Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics 12/2008

01-12-2008 | Original Research Article

Glycopeptide Bone Penetration in Patients with Septic Pseudoarthrosis of the Tibia

Authors: Dr Silvia Garazzino, Alessandro Aprato, Lorena Baietto, Antonio D’Avolio, Agostino Maiello, Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa, Domenico Aloj, Marco Siccardi, Antonio Biasibetti, Alessandro Massè, Giovanni Di Perri

Published in: Clinical Pharmacokinetics | Issue 12/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and objective: In the treatment of bone infections, a major determinant of the clinical response is the active drug concentration at the infected site. Because of the high prevalence of meticillin (methicillin)-resistant staphylococci and enterococci, glycopeptides are widely used for the treatment of bone and joint infections, but data on their penetration into human bone are lacking. The aim of our study was to measure vancomycin and teicoplanin concentrations in infected human bone under steady-state conditions and verify their relationship with inflammatory markers, patient demographic characteristics and pharmacodynamic microbiological markers.
Methods and patients: Twenty-seven adult orthopaedic patients undergoing surgical debridement for septic pseudoarthrosis of the tibia and receiving either intravenous vancomycin (Vancocina® 1 g twice daily) or teicoplanin (Targosid® 10 mg/kg/day) were studied from January 2004 to January 2008. Plasma and bone specimens were simultaneously collected during surgery for pharmacokinetic and microbiological assays at a variable interval after antimicrobial administration. Bone samples were dissected into cortical and cancellous bone, cleaned of soft tissues, crushed and eluted into phosphate buffer. Necrotic samples and sequestra were not analysed.
Plasma and bone antimicrobial concentrations were measured by a validated method of high-performance liquid chromatography with UV detection, and bone/plasma concentration ratios were calculated. Cortical and cancellous bone area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over 24 hours (AUC24) values were measured by the linear-log trapezoidal rule, using WinNonlin® software, and were compared with the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the infecting agents.
Results: For vancomycin, the mean ± SD concentrations were 2.66 ± 1.2 mg/L in cortical bone and 11.53 ± 7.8 mg/L in cancellous bone (corresponding to 20.67% and 89.39% of intraoperative plasma concentrations), and the mean ± SD tissue AUC24 values were 55.15 ± 25.26 h · mg/L for cortical bone and 299.16 ± 299.54 h · mg/L for cancellous bone. For teicoplanin, the mean ± SD concentrations were 2.01 ± 1.7 and 7.51 ± 7.0 mg/L in cortical and cancellous bone, respectively (12.35% and 48.6% of intraoperative plasma concentrations), and the mean ± SD teicoplanin tissue AUC24 values were 34.08 ± 23.6 h · mg/L and 155.17 ± 132.8 h · mg/L for cortical bone and cancellous bone, respectively. The mean vancomycin AUC24/MIC ratios were 215.02 for plasma, 47.14 for cortical bone and 268.95 for cancellous bone. The mean teicoplanin AUC24/MIC ratios were 336.48, 36.27 and 197.21 for plasma, cortical bone and cancellous bone, respectively.
Conclusions: Bone penetration of both glycopeptides ranged from poor (<15%) to satisfactory (15–30%) in the cortical compartment, while it was far higher into the highly vascularized cancellous tissue. Vancomycin bone penetration was slightly higher than with teicoplanin, but the difference was not statistically significant. Higher bone concentrations were observed with higher inflammatory markers, possibly as a result of increased vascularization and vascular permeability under inflammatory conditions. Bone concentrations over the MIC and AUC/MIC ratios suggested that both glycopeptides achieve a satisfactory pharmacokinetic exposure in the cancellous bone, as far as Gram-positive pathogens are concerned. On the other hand, cortical bone exposure was suboptimal in most patients. Furthermore, as antimicrobial penetration may be affected by impaired blood supply, the role of radical surgical removal of purulent and necrotic tissues appears to be essential in order to shorten treatment duration and to reduce the risk of treatment failure.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Footnotes
1
The use of trade names is for product identification purposes only and does not imply endorsement.
 
Literature
1.
go back to reference Norden CW. Osteomyelitis. In: Mandell GL, Douglas RG, Bennett JE, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases, 3rd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1990: 922–30 Norden CW. Osteomyelitis. In: Mandell GL, Douglas RG, Bennett JE, editors. Principles and practice of infectious diseases, 3rd ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1990: 922–30
2.
go back to reference Cierny G, Mader JT, Penninck JJ. A clinical staging system for adult osteomyelitis. Contemp Orthop 1985; 10: 17–37 Cierny G, Mader JT, Penninck JJ. A clinical staging system for adult osteomyelitis. Contemp Orthop 1985; 10: 17–37
3.
go back to reference Lieberman JR, Callaway GH, Salvati EA, et al. Treatment of the infected total hip arthroplasty with a two stage reimplantation protocol. Clin Orthopaed Related Res 1994; 301: 205–12 Lieberman JR, Callaway GH, Salvati EA, et al. Treatment of the infected total hip arthroplasty with a two stage reimplantation protocol. Clin Orthopaed Related Res 1994; 301: 205–12
4.
go back to reference Redington J, Ebert SC, Craig WA. Role of antimicrobial pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in surgical prophylaxis. Rev Infect Dis 1991; 13 Suppl. 10: 790–9CrossRef Redington J, Ebert SC, Craig WA. Role of antimicrobial pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in surgical prophylaxis. Rev Infect Dis 1991; 13 Suppl. 10: 790–9CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tsukayama DT, Guay DRR, Peterson PK. Antibiotic therapy of chronic osteomyelitis. In: Gustilo RB, Gruninger RP, Tsukayama DT, editors. Orthopaedic infection: diagnosis and treatment. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders, 1989: 166–74 Tsukayama DT, Guay DRR, Peterson PK. Antibiotic therapy of chronic osteomyelitis. In: Gustilo RB, Gruninger RP, Tsukayama DT, editors. Orthopaedic infection: diagnosis and treatment. Philadelphia (PA): Saunders, 1989: 166–74
6.
go back to reference Darley ESR, MacGowan AP. Antibiotic treatment of Gram-positive bone and joint infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004; 53: 928–35PubMedCrossRef Darley ESR, MacGowan AP. Antibiotic treatment of Gram-positive bone and joint infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004; 53: 928–35PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Djabarouti S, Boselli E, Allaouchiche B, et al. Determination of levofloxacin in plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage and bone tissues by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection using a fully automated extraction method. J Chromatogr B 2004; 799: 165–72CrossRef Djabarouti S, Boselli E, Allaouchiche B, et al. Determination of levofloxacin in plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage and bone tissues by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection using a fully automated extraction method. J Chromatogr B 2004; 799: 165–72CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Roncoroni AJ, Manuel C, Nedjar C, et al. Cefamandole bone diffusion in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Chemotherapy 1981; 27(3): 166–72PubMedCrossRef Roncoroni AJ, Manuel C, Nedjar C, et al. Cefamandole bone diffusion in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Chemotherapy 1981; 27(3): 166–72PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Cristofolini L, Viceconti M, Cappello A, et al. Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. J Biomechanics 1996; 29: 525–35CrossRef Cristofolini L, Viceconti M, Cappello A, et al. Mechanical validation of whole bone composite femur models. J Biomechanics 1996; 29: 525–35CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Martin C, Alaya M, Mallet MN, et al. Penetration of vancomycin into mediastinal and cardiac tissues in humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38(2): 396–9PubMedCrossRef Martin C, Alaya M, Mallet MN, et al. Penetration of vancomycin into mediastinal and cardiac tissues in humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994; 38(2): 396–9PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Vuorisalo S, Pokela R, Satta J, et al. Internal mammary artery harvesting and antibiotic concentrations in sternal bone during coronary artery bypass. Int J Angiol 2000; 9(2): 78–81PubMedCrossRef Vuorisalo S, Pokela R, Satta J, et al. Internal mammary artery harvesting and antibiotic concentrations in sternal bone during coronary artery bypass. Int J Angiol 2000; 9(2): 78–81PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kitzes-Cohen R, Farin D, Piva G, et al. Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin administered as prophylaxis before cardiac surgery. Ther Drug Monit 2000; 22(6): 661–7PubMedCrossRef Kitzes-Cohen R, Farin D, Piva G, et al. Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin administered as prophylaxis before cardiac surgery. Ther Drug Monit 2000; 22(6): 661–7PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Borner K, Hahn F, Koeppe P. Concentrations of vancomycin in human bone. J Chemother 1989; 1 (4 Suppl.): 588–9PubMed Borner K, Hahn F, Koeppe P. Concentrations of vancomycin in human bone. J Chemother 1989; 1 (4 Suppl.): 588–9PubMed
14.
go back to reference Graziani AL, Lawson LA, Gibson GA, et al. Vancomycin in infected and non-infected human bone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1988; 32: 1320–2PubMedCrossRef Graziani AL, Lawson LA, Gibson GA, et al. Vancomycin in infected and non-infected human bone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1988; 32: 1320–2PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Massias L, Dubois C, De Lentdecker P, et al. Penetration of vancomycin in uninfected sternal bone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1992; 36: 2539–41PubMedCrossRef Massias L, Dubois C, De Lentdecker P, et al. Penetration of vancomycin in uninfected sternal bone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1992; 36: 2539–41PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Desplaces N, Mamoudy P, Ducroquet F, et al. Vancomycine en perfusion continue et infections ostéo-articulaires à staphylocoques multirésistants. Med Mal Infect 1997; 27: 969–74CrossRef Desplaces N, Mamoudy P, Ducroquet F, et al. Vancomycine en perfusion continue et infections ostéo-articulaires à staphylocoques multirésistants. Med Mal Infect 1997; 27: 969–74CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Garcia-Zabarte A, Penalver D, Aguilera A, et al. Serum and bone levels of teicoplanin in total hip replacement [abstract no. 0445]. 34th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 1994 Oct 4–7; Orlando (FL) Garcia-Zabarte A, Penalver D, Aguilera A, et al. Serum and bone levels of teicoplanin in total hip replacement [abstract no. 0445]. 34th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy; 1994 Oct 4–7; Orlando (FL)
18.
go back to reference Rosina R, Avai A, Suter F, et al. Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in human bone [abstract no. 249]. 16th International Congress of Chemotherapy; 1989 Jun 18–20; Jerusalem Rosina R, Avai A, Suter F, et al. Pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin in human bone [abstract no. 249]. 16th International Congress of Chemotherapy; 1989 Jun 18–20; Jerusalem
19.
go back to reference Sirot J, Dumont C, Delisle JJ, et al. Pénétration de la teicoplanine dans l’os [abstract no. 221]. Réunion Interdisciplinaire de Chimiothérapie Anti-Infectieuse; 1986; Paris Sirot J, Dumont C, Delisle JJ, et al. Pénétration de la teicoplanine dans l’os [abstract no. 221]. Réunion Interdisciplinaire de Chimiothérapie Anti-Infectieuse; 1986; Paris
20.
go back to reference Wilson AP, Taylor B, Treasure T, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery: serum and tissue levels of teicoplanin, flucloxacillin and tobramycin. J Antimicrob Chemother 1988; 21(2): 201–12PubMedCrossRef Wilson AP, Taylor B, Treasure T, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis in cardiac surgery: serum and tissue levels of teicoplanin, flucloxacillin and tobramycin. J Antimicrob Chemother 1988; 21(2): 201–12PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Martin C, Bourget P, Alaya M, et al. Teicoplanin in cardiac surgery: intraoperative pharmacokinetics and concentrations in cardiac and mediastinal tissues. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997; 41(5): 1150–5PubMed Martin C, Bourget P, Alaya M, et al. Teicoplanin in cardiac surgery: intraoperative pharmacokinetics and concentrations in cardiac and mediastinal tissues. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997; 41(5): 1150–5PubMed
22.
go back to reference De Lalla F, Novelli A, Pellizzer G, et al. Regional and systemic prophylaxis with teicoplanin in monolateral and bilateral total knee replacement procedures: study of pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993; 37(12): 2693–8PubMedCrossRef De Lalla F, Novelli A, Pellizzer G, et al. Regional and systemic prophylaxis with teicoplanin in monolateral and bilateral total knee replacement procedures: study of pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993; 37(12): 2693–8PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lazzarini L, Novelli A, Marzano N, et al. Regional and systemic prophylaxis with teicoplanin in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 342–6PubMedCrossRef Lazzarini L, Novelli A, Marzano N, et al. Regional and systemic prophylaxis with teicoplanin in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2003; 18: 342–6PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Nehrer S, Thalhammer F, Schwameis E, et al. Teicoplanin in the prevention of infection in total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998; 118: 32–6PubMedCrossRef Nehrer S, Thalhammer F, Schwameis E, et al. Teicoplanin in the prevention of infection in total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998; 118: 32–6PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mouton JW, Theuretzbacher U, Craig WA, et al. Tissue concentrations: do we ever learn? J Antimicrob Chemother 2008; 61: 235–7PubMedCrossRef Mouton JW, Theuretzbacher U, Craig WA, et al. Tissue concentrations: do we ever learn? J Antimicrob Chemother 2008; 61: 235–7PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Boselli E, Allaouchiche B. Diffusion osseuse des antibiotiques. Presse Med 1999; 28: 2265–76PubMed Boselli E, Allaouchiche B. Diffusion osseuse des antibiotiques. Presse Med 1999; 28: 2265–76PubMed
27.
go back to reference Goldstein FW, Mainardi JL. Sensibilité et résistance des souches: quotients inhibiteurs. In: Mainardi JL, editor. Précis d’antibiothérapie pratique. Paris: Phase 5 Éditions Médicales, 1995: 81–147 Goldstein FW, Mainardi JL. Sensibilité et résistance des souches: quotients inhibiteurs. In: Mainardi JL, editor. Précis d’antibiothérapie pratique. Paris: Phase 5 Éditions Médicales, 1995: 81–147
28.
go back to reference Larsson AJ, Walker KJ, Raddaz JK, et al. The concentration-independent effect of monoexponential and biexponential decay in vancomycin concentrations on the killing of Staphylococcus aureus under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. J Antimicrob Chemother 1996; 38: 589–97PubMedCrossRef Larsson AJ, Walker KJ, Raddaz JK, et al. The concentration-independent effect of monoexponential and biexponential decay in vancomycin concentrations on the killing of Staphylococcus aureus under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. J Antimicrob Chemother 1996; 38: 589–97PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ahmed A, Jafri H, Lutsar I, et al. Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin for the treatment of experimental penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 43: 876–81PubMed Ahmed A, Jafri H, Lutsar I, et al. Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin for the treatment of experimental penicillin- and cephalosporin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 43: 876–81PubMed
30.
go back to reference Peetermans WE, Hoogeterp JJ, Hazekamp-van Dokkum AM, et al. Antistaphylococcal activities of teicoplanin and vancomycin in vitro and in experimental infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990; 34: 1869–74PubMedCrossRef Peetermans WE, Hoogeterp JJ, Hazekamp-van Dokkum AM, et al. Antistaphylococcal activities of teicoplanin and vancomycin in vitro and in experimental infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990; 34: 1869–74PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Ambrose PG, Bhavnani SM, Rubino CM, et al. Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial therapy: it’s not just for mice anymore. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 79–86PubMedCrossRef Ambrose PG, Bhavnani SM, Rubino CM, et al. Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial therapy: it’s not just for mice anymore. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44: 79–86PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Hyatt JM, McKinnon PS, Zimmer GS, et al. The importance of pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic surrogate markers to outcome: focus on antibacterial agents. Clin Pharmacokinet 1995; 28(2): 143–60PubMedCrossRef Hyatt JM, McKinnon PS, Zimmer GS, et al. The importance of pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic surrogate markers to outcome: focus on antibacterial agents. Clin Pharmacokinet 1995; 28(2): 143–60PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Moise-Broder PA, Forrest A, Birmingham MC, et al. Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicrobials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections. Clin Pharmacokinet 2004; 43: 925–42PubMedCrossRef Moise-Broder PA, Forrest A, Birmingham MC, et al. Pharmacodynamics of vancomycin and other antimicrobials in patients with Staphylococcus aureus lower respiratory tract infections. Clin Pharmacokinet 2004; 43: 925–42PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference MacGowan AP, Bowker KE. Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial agents and rationale for their dosing. J Chemother 1997; 9 Suppl. 1: S64–73 MacGowan AP, Bowker KE. Pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial agents and rationale for their dosing. J Chemother 1997; 9 Suppl. 1: S64–73
35.
go back to reference MacGowan A, White L, Reeves D, et al. Retrospective review of serum teicoplanin concentrations in clinical trials and their relationship to clinical outcome. J Infect Chemother 1996; 2: 197–208CrossRef MacGowan A, White L, Reeves D, et al. Retrospective review of serum teicoplanin concentrations in clinical trials and their relationship to clinical outcome. J Infect Chemother 1996; 2: 197–208CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Vuagnat A, Stern R, Lotthe A, et al. High dose vancomycin for osteomyelitis: continuous vs intermittent infusion. J Clin Pharm Therap 2004; 29: 351–7CrossRef Vuagnat A, Stern R, Lotthe A, et al. High dose vancomycin for osteomyelitis: continuous vs intermittent infusion. J Clin Pharm Therap 2004; 29: 351–7CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Glycopeptide Bone Penetration in Patients with Septic Pseudoarthrosis of the Tibia
Authors
Dr Silvia Garazzino
Alessandro Aprato
Lorena Baietto
Antonio D’Avolio
Agostino Maiello
Francesco Giuseppe De Rosa
Domenico Aloj
Marco Siccardi
Antonio Biasibetti
Alessandro Massè
Giovanni Di Perri
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics / Issue 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0312-5963
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1926
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2165/0003088-200847120-00004

Other articles of this Issue 12/2008

Clinical Pharmacokinetics 12/2008 Go to the issue

Acknowledgement

Acknowledgement