Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Acta Neurologica Belgica 6/2020

01-12-2020 | Glioblastoma | Original article

Prognostic factors in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: focus on the pathologic variants

Authors: Ehsan Alimohammadi, Seyed Reza Bagheri, Alireza Sadeghsalehi, Parisa Rizevandi, Zahra Rezaie, Alireza Abdi

Published in: Acta Neurologica Belgica | Issue 6/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to offer predicting factors for survival in adult patients with glioblastoma multiforme. 153 consecutive patients with high-grade glioma (WHO grade IV) were studied in Imam Reza hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Science, Kermanshah, Iran, between April 2003 and April 2017. All patients treated with surgical resection and standard postoperative radiotherapy (54 Gy). Using the patients’ charts and electronic medical records system, the following data were obtained: gender, age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score on admission, primary vs. secondary type, extent of surgery, tumor location, tumor size, necrosis size, use of Temozolomide (TMZ), pathology subtype, and immunohistochemistry results. Patients were followed from the time of the surgery until the death occurred. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Survival time curves for various subgroups were compared by the log-rank test. The impact of the suggested prognostic factors on survival was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analyses. Age, gender, KPS, extent of surgery, tumor location, necrosis size, and reoperation in recurrence had not any statistically significant effect on survival. Univariate analysis revealed a significant impact on outcome for pathology subtype (PFS: P < 0.001, OS: P < 0.001), tumor type (primary vs. secondary) (PFS: P = P < 0.001, OS: P < 0.001), tumor size (PFS: P = 0.044, OS: P = 0.04), TMZ therapy (PFS: P < 0.001, OS: P < 0.001), P53 (PFS: P < 0.001, OS: P < 0.001), and Ki67 (PFS: P < 0.001, OS: P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, independent favorable prognostic factors for survival were pathology subtype (PFS: P < 0.001, OS: P < 0.001), type (PFS: P < 0.001, OS: 0.012), TMZ (PFS: P < 0.001, OS: P < 0.001), P53 (PFS: P < 0.001, OS: P < 0.001), and Ki67 (PFS: P < 0.001, OS: P < 0.001). The results suggest that pathology subtype, primary vs. secondary type, TMZ therapy, P53, and Ki 63 may play an important role in the survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme. There is no relationship detected between age, gender, KPS, tumor size and location, necrosis size, extent of surgery, reoperation in recurrence, and patient survival.
Literature
1.
go back to reference D’Alessio A, Proietti G, Sica G, Scicchitano BM (2019) Pathological and molecular features of glioblastoma and its peritumoral tissue. Cancers 11(4):2–19CrossRef D’Alessio A, Proietti G, Sica G, Scicchitano BM (2019) Pathological and molecular features of glioblastoma and its peritumoral tissue. Cancers 11(4):2–19CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Eriksson M, Kahari J, Vestman A, Hallmans M, Johansson M, Bergenheim AT et al (2019) Improved treatment of glioblastoma—changes in survival over two decades at a single regional Centre. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden). 58(3):334–341CrossRef Eriksson M, Kahari J, Vestman A, Hallmans M, Johansson M, Bergenheim AT et al (2019) Improved treatment of glioblastoma—changes in survival over two decades at a single regional Centre. Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden). 58(3):334–341CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Guden M, Ayata HB, Ceylan C, Kilic A, Engin K (2016) Prognostic factors effective on survival of patients with glioblastoma: Anadolu Medical Center experience. Indian J Cancer 53(3):382–386 Guden M, Ayata HB, Ceylan C, Kilic A, Engin K (2016) Prognostic factors effective on survival of patients with glioblastoma: Anadolu Medical Center experience. Indian J Cancer 53(3):382–386
4.
go back to reference Harat M, Blok M, Harat A, Soszynska K (2019) The impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on molecular prognostic markers in gliomas. OncoTargets Ther 12:2215–2224CrossRef Harat M, Blok M, Harat A, Soszynska K (2019) The impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on molecular prognostic markers in gliomas. OncoTargets Ther 12:2215–2224CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chaudhry NS, Shah AH, Ferraro N, Snelling BM, Bregy A, Madhavan K et al (2013) Predictors of long-term survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: advancements from the last quarter century. Cancer Invest 31(5):287–308CrossRef Chaudhry NS, Shah AH, Ferraro N, Snelling BM, Bregy A, Madhavan K et al (2013) Predictors of long-term survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: advancements from the last quarter century. Cancer Invest 31(5):287–308CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Myung JK, Cho HJ, Kim H, Park CK, Lee SH, Choi SH et al (2014) Prognosis of glioblastoma with oligodendroglioma component is associated with the IDH1 mutation and MGMT methylation status. Transl Oncol 7(6):712–719CrossRef Myung JK, Cho HJ, Kim H, Park CK, Lee SH, Choi SH et al (2014) Prognosis of glioblastoma with oligodendroglioma component is associated with the IDH1 mutation and MGMT methylation status. Transl Oncol 7(6):712–719CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rigamonti A, Imbesi F, Silvani A, Lamperti E, Agostoni E, Porcu L et al (2019) Prognostic nutritional index as a prognostic marker in glioblastoma: data from a cohort of 282 Italian patients. J Neurol Sci 400:175–179CrossRef Rigamonti A, Imbesi F, Silvani A, Lamperti E, Agostoni E, Porcu L et al (2019) Prognostic nutritional index as a prognostic marker in glioblastoma: data from a cohort of 282 Italian patients. J Neurol Sci 400:175–179CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Smoll NR, Schaller K, Gautschi OP (2013) Long-term survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). J Clin Neurosci 20(5):670–675CrossRef Smoll NR, Schaller K, Gautschi OP (2013) Long-term survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). J Clin Neurosci 20(5):670–675CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Piccolo SR, Frey LJ (2013) Clinical and molecular models of glioblastoma multiforme survival. Int J Data Min Bioinform 7(3):245–265CrossRef Piccolo SR, Frey LJ (2013) Clinical and molecular models of glioblastoma multiforme survival. Int J Data Min Bioinform 7(3):245–265CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Karsy M, Gelbman M, Shah P, Balumbu O, Moy F, Arslan E (2012) Established and emerging variants of glioblastoma multiforme: review of morphological and molecular features. Folia Neuropathol 50(4):301–321CrossRef Karsy M, Gelbman M, Shah P, Balumbu O, Moy F, Arslan E (2012) Established and emerging variants of glioblastoma multiforme: review of morphological and molecular features. Folia Neuropathol 50(4):301–321CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Woodworth GF, Garzon-Muvdi T, Ye X, Blakeley JO, Weingart JD, Burger PC (2013) Histopathological correlates with survival in reoperated glioblastomas. J Neurooncol 113(3):485–493CrossRef Woodworth GF, Garzon-Muvdi T, Ye X, Blakeley JO, Weingart JD, Burger PC (2013) Histopathological correlates with survival in reoperated glioblastomas. J Neurooncol 113(3):485–493CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Zhang LY, Ge HJ, Wang LM, Zhao LH, Liu L, Zhang DJ et al (2019) Prognostic implication of alterations in epidermal growth factor receptor and MGMT in glioblastoma. Zhonghua bing li xue za zhi Chinese J Pathol 48(3):186–191 Zhang LY, Ge HJ, Wang LM, Zhao LH, Liu L, Zhang DJ et al (2019) Prognostic implication of alterations in epidermal growth factor receptor and MGMT in glioblastoma. Zhonghua bing li xue za zhi Chinese J Pathol 48(3):186–191
14.
go back to reference Sales AHA, Bette S, Barz M, Huber T, Wiestler B, Ryang YM et al (2019) Role of postoperative tumor volume in patients with MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma. J Neuro-oncol 142(3):529–536CrossRef Sales AHA, Bette S, Barz M, Huber T, Wiestler B, Ryang YM et al (2019) Role of postoperative tumor volume in patients with MGMT-unmethylated glioblastoma. J Neuro-oncol 142(3):529–536CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Alexiou GA, Vartholomatos E, Tsamis KI, Peponi E, Markopoulos G, Papathanasopoulu VA et al (2019) Combination treatment for glioblastoma with temozolomide, DFMO and radiation. J BUON 24(1):397–404 Alexiou GA, Vartholomatos E, Tsamis KI, Peponi E, Markopoulos G, Papathanasopoulu VA et al (2019) Combination treatment for glioblastoma with temozolomide, DFMO and radiation. J BUON 24(1):397–404
16.
go back to reference Henker C, Kriesen T, Schneider B, Glass A, Scherer M, Langner S et al (2019) Correlation of Ki-67 index with volumetric segmentation and its value as a prognostic marker in glioblastoma. World Neurosurg 125:e1093–e1103CrossRef Henker C, Kriesen T, Schneider B, Glass A, Scherer M, Langner S et al (2019) Correlation of Ki-67 index with volumetric segmentation and its value as a prognostic marker in glioblastoma. World Neurosurg 125:e1093–e1103CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Syed M, Liermann J, Verma V, Bernhardt D, Bougatf N, Paul A et al (2018) Survival and recurrence patterns of multifocal glioblastoma after radiation therapy. Cancer Manag Res 10:4229–4235CrossRef Syed M, Liermann J, Verma V, Bernhardt D, Bougatf N, Paul A et al (2018) Survival and recurrence patterns of multifocal glioblastoma after radiation therapy. Cancer Manag Res 10:4229–4235CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wang X, Liu YH, Xie F, You C, Mao Q (2013) A clinical and molecular study of long-term survival glioblastomas. Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chin J Surg] 51(2):166–170 Wang X, Liu YH, Xie F, You C, Mao Q (2013) A clinical and molecular study of long-term survival glioblastomas. Zhonghua wai ke za zhi [Chin J Surg] 51(2):166–170
19.
go back to reference Li WB, Tang K, Chen Q, Li S, Qiu XG, Li SW et al (2012) MRI manifestions correlate with survival of glioblastoma multiforme patients. Cancer Biol Med 9(2):120–123 Li WB, Tang K, Chen Q, Li S, Qiu XG, Li SW et al (2012) MRI manifestions correlate with survival of glioblastoma multiforme patients. Cancer Biol Med 9(2):120–123
20.
go back to reference Delgado-Lopez PD, Corrales-Garcia EM (2016) Survival in glioblastoma: a review on the impact of treatment modalities. Clin Transl Oncol 18(11):1062–1071CrossRef Delgado-Lopez PD, Corrales-Garcia EM (2016) Survival in glioblastoma: a review on the impact of treatment modalities. Clin Transl Oncol 18(11):1062–1071CrossRef
21.
go back to reference De Barros A, Attal J, Roques M, Nicolau J, Sol JC, Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal E et al (2019) Impact on survival of early tumor growth between surgery and radiotherapy in patients with de novo glioblastoma. J Neuro-oncol 142(3):489–497CrossRef De Barros A, Attal J, Roques M, Nicolau J, Sol JC, Cohen-Jonathan-Moyal E et al (2019) Impact on survival of early tumor growth between surgery and radiotherapy in patients with de novo glioblastoma. J Neuro-oncol 142(3):489–497CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chaichana KL, Martinez-Gutierrez JC, De la Garza-Ramos R, Weingart JD, Olivi A, Gallia GL et al (2013) Factors associated with survival for patients with glioblastoma with poor pre-operative functional status. J Clin Neurosci 20(6):818–823CrossRef Chaichana KL, Martinez-Gutierrez JC, De la Garza-Ramos R, Weingart JD, Olivi A, Gallia GL et al (2013) Factors associated with survival for patients with glioblastoma with poor pre-operative functional status. J Clin Neurosci 20(6):818–823CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Byun J, Kim YH, Nam SJ, Park JE, Cho YH, Kim HS et al (2019) Comparison of survival outcomes between partial resection and biopsy for primary glioblastoma: a propensity score-matched study. World Neurosurg 121:e858–e866CrossRef Byun J, Kim YH, Nam SJ, Park JE, Cho YH, Kim HS et al (2019) Comparison of survival outcomes between partial resection and biopsy for primary glioblastoma: a propensity score-matched study. World Neurosurg 121:e858–e866CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Back M, Jayamanne D, Cove N, Wheeler H, Khasraw M, Guo L et al (2018) Optimising outcomes for glioblastoma through subspecialisation in a regional cancer centre. Brain Sci 8(10):186CrossRef Back M, Jayamanne D, Cove N, Wheeler H, Khasraw M, Guo L et al (2018) Optimising outcomes for glioblastoma through subspecialisation in a regional cancer centre. Brain Sci 8(10):186CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ahmadipour Y, Jabbarli R, Gembruch O, Pierscianek D, Darkwah Oppong M, Dammann P et al (2019) Impact of multifocality and molecular markers on survival of glioblastoma. World Neurosurg 122:e461–e466CrossRef Ahmadipour Y, Jabbarli R, Gembruch O, Pierscianek D, Darkwah Oppong M, Dammann P et al (2019) Impact of multifocality and molecular markers on survival of glioblastoma. World Neurosurg 122:e461–e466CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Palmer JD, Bhamidipati D, Shukla G, Sharma D, Glass J, Kim L et al (2019) Rapid early tumor progression is prognostic in glioblastoma patients. Am J Clin Oncol 42(5):481–486CrossRef Palmer JD, Bhamidipati D, Shukla G, Sharma D, Glass J, Kim L et al (2019) Rapid early tumor progression is prognostic in glioblastoma patients. Am J Clin Oncol 42(5):481–486CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prognostic factors in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: focus on the pathologic variants
Authors
Ehsan Alimohammadi
Seyed Reza Bagheri
Alireza Sadeghsalehi
Parisa Rizevandi
Zahra Rezaie
Alireza Abdi
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Acta Neurologica Belgica / Issue 6/2020
Print ISSN: 0300-9009
Electronic ISSN: 2240-2993
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-019-01171-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2020

Acta Neurologica Belgica 6/2020 Go to the issue