Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 12/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Glioblastoma | Original Article

Circulating PD-L1 levels change during bevacizumab-based treatment in recurrent glioma

Authors: Maximilian J. Mair, Ayseguel Ilhan-Mutlu, Sahra Pajenda, Barbara Kiesel, Adelheid Wöhrer, Georg Widhalm, Karin Dieckmann, Christine Marosi, Ludwig Wagner, Matthias Preusser, Anna S. Berghoff

Published in: Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy | Issue 12/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In primary brain tumors, the efficacy of immune-modulating therapies is still under investigation as inflammatory responses are restricted by tight immunoregulatory mechanisms in the central nervous system. Here, we measured soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) in the plasma of patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) and recurrent WHO grade II–III glioma treated with bevacizumab-based salvage therapy.

Methods

Thirty patients with recurrent GBM and 10 patients with recurrent WHO grade II–III glioma were treated with bevacizumab-based salvage therapy at the Medical University of Vienna. Prior to each treatment cycle, EDTA plasma was drawn and sPD-L1 was measured applying a sandwich ELISA with a lower detection limit of 0.050 ng/ml. Leukocyte counts and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured according to institutional practice.

Results

Median number of sPD-L1 measurements was 6 per patient (range: 2–24). At baseline, no significant difference in sPD-L1 concentrations was observed between WHO grade II–III glioma and GBM. Intra-patient variability of sPD-L1 concentrations was significantly higher in WHO grade II–III glioma than in GBM (p = 0.014) and tendentially higher in IDH-mutant than in IDH-wildtype glioma (p = 0.149) In WHO grade II–III glioma, sPD-L1 levels were significantly lower after one administration of bevacizumab than at baseline (median: 0.039 ng/ml vs. 0.4855 ng/ml, p = 0.036). In contrast, no significant change could be observed in patients with GBM.

Conclusions

Changes in systemic inflammation markers including sPD-L1 are observable in patients with recurrent glioma under bevacizumab-based treatment and differ between WHO grade II–III glioma and GBM.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
4.
go back to reference Reardon DA, Omuro A, Brandes AA et al (2017) OS10.3 randomized phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of nivolumab vs bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: checkmate 143. Neuro Oncol 19:III21–III21CrossRef Reardon DA, Omuro A, Brandes AA et al (2017) OS10.3 randomized phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of nivolumab vs bevacizumab in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: checkmate 143. Neuro Oncol 19:III21–III21CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Strojnik T, Šmigoc T, Lah TT (2014) Prognostic value of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein in the blood of patients with glioma. Anticancer Res 34:339–347PubMed Strojnik T, Šmigoc T, Lah TT (2014) Prognostic value of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein in the blood of patients with glioma. Anticancer Res 34:339–347PubMed
Metadata
Title
Circulating PD-L1 levels change during bevacizumab-based treatment in recurrent glioma
Authors
Maximilian J. Mair
Ayseguel Ilhan-Mutlu
Sahra Pajenda
Barbara Kiesel
Adelheid Wöhrer
Georg Widhalm
Karin Dieckmann
Christine Marosi
Ludwig Wagner
Matthias Preusser
Anna S. Berghoff
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy / Issue 12/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-7004
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0851
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-021-02951-2

Other articles of this Issue 12/2021

Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 12/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine