Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Glioblastoma | Research article

Secondary gliosarcoma: the clinicopathological features and the development of a patient-derived xenograft model of gliosarcoma

Authors: Karrie Mei-Yee Kiang, Andrian A. Chan, Gilberto Ka-Kit Leung

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Gliosarcoma (GSM) is a distinct and aggressive variant of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) with worse prognosis and few treatment options. It is often managed with the same treatment modalities with temozolomide (TMZ) as in GBM. However, the therapeutic benefits on GSM from such treatment regimen is largely unknown. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models have been used widely to model tumor progression, and subsequently to validate biomarkers and inform potential therapeutic regimens. Here, we report for the first time the successful development of a PDX model of secondary GSM.

Methods

Tissue obtained from a tumor resection revealed a secondary GSM arising from GBM. The clinical, radiological, and histopathological records of the patient were retrospectively reviewed. Samples obtained from surgery were cultured ex vivo and/or implanted subcutaneously in immunocompromised mice. Histopathological features between the primary GBM, secondary GSM, and GSM PDX are compared.

Results

In explant culture, the cells displayed a spindle-shaped morphology under phase contrast microscopy, consistent with the sarcomatous component. GSM samples were subcutaneously engrafted into immunocompromised mice after single-cell suspension. Xenografts of serial passages showed enhanced growth rate with increased in vivo passage. We did not observe any histopathological differences between the secondary GSM and its serial in vivo passages of PDX tumors.

Conclusions

Our PDX model for GSM retained the histopathological characteristics of the engrafted tumor from the patient. It may provide valuable information to facilitate molecular and histopathological modelling of GSM and be of significant implication in future research to establish precise cancer medicine for this highly malignant tumor.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Han SJ, Yang I, Tihan T, Chang SM, Parsa AT. Secondary gliosarcoma: a review of clinical features and pathological diagnosis. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(1):26–32.CrossRef Han SJ, Yang I, Tihan T, Chang SM, Parsa AT. Secondary gliosarcoma: a review of clinical features and pathological diagnosis. J Neurosurg. 2010;112(1):26–32.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Langlois A-M, Alarfaj AK, Sagga A, Findlay JM, Das S. Gliosarcoma in a young Filipino woman: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Case Rep. 2019;20:914–9.CrossRef Langlois A-M, Alarfaj AK, Sagga A, Findlay JM, Das S. Gliosarcoma in a young Filipino woman: a case report and review of the literature. Am J Case Rep. 2019;20:914–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cachia D, Kamiya-Matsuoka C, Mandel JJ, Olar A, Cykowski MD, Armstrong TS, et al. Primary and secondary gliosarcomas: clinical, molecular and survival characteristics. J Neuro-Oncol. 2015;125(2):401–10.CrossRef Cachia D, Kamiya-Matsuoka C, Mandel JJ, Olar A, Cykowski MD, Armstrong TS, et al. Primary and secondary gliosarcomas: clinical, molecular and survival characteristics. J Neuro-Oncol. 2015;125(2):401–10.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hidalgo M, Amant F, Biankin AV, Budinská E, Byrne AT, Caldas C, et al. Patient-derived Xenograft models: an emerging platform for translational Cancer research. Cancer Discov. 2014;4(9):998–1013.CrossRef Hidalgo M, Amant F, Biankin AV, Budinská E, Byrne AT, Caldas C, et al. Patient-derived Xenograft models: an emerging platform for translational Cancer research. Cancer Discov. 2014;4(9):998–1013.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Daniel VC, Marchionni L, Hierman JS, Rhodes JT, Devereux WL, Rudin CM, et al. A primary Xenograft model of small-cell lung Cancer reveals irreversible changes in gene expression imposed by culture in vitro. Cancer Res. 2009;69(8):3364–73.CrossRef Daniel VC, Marchionni L, Hierman JS, Rhodes JT, Devereux WL, Rudin CM, et al. A primary Xenograft model of small-cell lung Cancer reveals irreversible changes in gene expression imposed by culture in vitro. Cancer Res. 2009;69(8):3364–73.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Okada, Vaeteewoottacharn, Kariya. Application of Highly Immunocompromised Mice for the Establishment of Patient-Derived Xenograft (PDX) Models. Cells. 2019;8(8):889.CrossRef Okada, Vaeteewoottacharn, Kariya. Application of Highly Immunocompromised Mice for the Establishment of Patient-Derived Xenograft (PDX) Models. Cells. 2019;8(8):889.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tentler JJ, Tan AC, Weekes CD, Jimeno A, Leong S, Pitts TM, et al. Patient-derived tumour xenografts as models for oncology drug development. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9(6):338–50.CrossRef Tentler JJ, Tan AC, Weekes CD, Jimeno A, Leong S, Pitts TM, et al. Patient-derived tumour xenografts as models for oncology drug development. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9(6):338–50.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Linnebacher M, Maletzki C, Ostwald C, Klier U, Krohn M, Klar E, et al. Cryopreservation of human colorectal carcinomas prior to xenografting. BMC Cancer. 2010;10(1):362.CrossRef Linnebacher M, Maletzki C, Ostwald C, Klier U, Krohn M, Klar E, et al. Cryopreservation of human colorectal carcinomas prior to xenografting. BMC Cancer. 2010;10(1):362.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dangles-Marie V, Pocard M, Richon S, Weiswald L-B, Assayag F, Saulnier P, et al. Establishment of human Colon Cancer cell lines from fresh tumors versus Xenografts: comparison of success rate and cell line features. Cancer Res. 2007;67(1):398–407.CrossRef Dangles-Marie V, Pocard M, Richon S, Weiswald L-B, Assayag F, Saulnier P, et al. Establishment of human Colon Cancer cell lines from fresh tumors versus Xenografts: comparison of success rate and cell line features. Cancer Res. 2007;67(1):398–407.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fichtner I, Rolff J, Soong R, Hoffmann J, Hammer S, Sommer A, et al. Establishment of patient-derived non-small cell lung Cancer Xenografts as models for the identification of predictive biomarkers. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(20):6456–68.CrossRef Fichtner I, Rolff J, Soong R, Hoffmann J, Hammer S, Sommer A, et al. Establishment of patient-derived non-small cell lung Cancer Xenografts as models for the identification of predictive biomarkers. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(20):6456–68.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dong X, Guan J, English JC, Flint J, Yee J, Evans K, et al. Patient-derived first generation Xenografts of non-small cell lung cancers: promising tools for predicting drug responses for personalized chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(5):1442–51.CrossRef Dong X, Guan J, English JC, Flint J, Yee J, Evans K, et al. Patient-derived first generation Xenografts of non-small cell lung cancers: promising tools for predicting drug responses for personalized chemotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16(5):1442–51.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Grisanzio C, Seeley A, Chang M, Collins M, Di Napoli A, Cheng S-C, et al. Orthotopic xenografts of RCC retain histological, immunophenotypic and genetic features of tumours in patients. J Pathol. 2011;225(2):212–21.CrossRef Grisanzio C, Seeley A, Chang M, Collins M, Di Napoli A, Cheng S-C, et al. Orthotopic xenografts of RCC retain histological, immunophenotypic and genetic features of tumours in patients. J Pathol. 2011;225(2):212–21.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Derose YS, Wang G, Lin Y-C, Bernard PS, Buys SS, Ebbert MTW, et al. Tumor grafts derived from women with breast cancer authentically reflect tumor pathology, growth, metastasis and disease outcomes. Nat Med. 2011;17(11):1514–20.CrossRef Derose YS, Wang G, Lin Y-C, Bernard PS, Buys SS, Ebbert MTW, et al. Tumor grafts derived from women with breast cancer authentically reflect tumor pathology, growth, metastasis and disease outcomes. Nat Med. 2011;17(11):1514–20.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Wang J, Miletic H, Sakariassen PØ, Huszthy PC, Jacobsen H, Brekkå N, et al. A reproducible brain tumour model established from human glioblastoma biopsies. BMC Cancer. 2009;9(1):465.CrossRef Wang J, Miletic H, Sakariassen PØ, Huszthy PC, Jacobsen H, Brekkå N, et al. A reproducible brain tumour model established from human glioblastoma biopsies. BMC Cancer. 2009;9(1):465.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Beaumont TL, Kupsky WJ, Barger GR, Sloan AE. Gliosarcoma with multiple extracranial metastases: case report and review of the literature. J Neuro-Oncol. 2007;83(1):39–46.CrossRef Beaumont TL, Kupsky WJ, Barger GR, Sloan AE. Gliosarcoma with multiple extracranial metastases: case report and review of the literature. J Neuro-Oncol. 2007;83(1):39–46.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Vaubel RA, Tian S, Remonde D, Schroeder MA, Mladek AC, Kitange GJ, et al. Genomic and phenotypic characterization of a broad panel of patient-derived Xenografts reflects the diversity of Glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(5):1094–104.CrossRef Vaubel RA, Tian S, Remonde D, Schroeder MA, Mladek AC, Kitange GJ, et al. Genomic and phenotypic characterization of a broad panel of patient-derived Xenografts reflects the diversity of Glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(5):1094–104.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bailey ML, O'Neil NJ, van Pel DM, Solomon DA, Waldman T, Hieter P. Glioblastoma cells containing mutations in the cohesin component STAG2 are sensitive to PARP inhibition. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(3):724–32.CrossRef Bailey ML, O'Neil NJ, van Pel DM, Solomon DA, Waldman T, Hieter P. Glioblastoma cells containing mutations in the cohesin component STAG2 are sensitive to PARP inhibition. Mol Cancer Ther. 2014;13(3):724–32.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Evers L, Perez-Mancera PA, Lenkiewicz E, Tang N, Aust D, Knosel T, et al. STAG2 is a clinically relevant tumor suppressor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Genome Med. 2014;6(1):9.CrossRef Evers L, Perez-Mancera PA, Lenkiewicz E, Tang N, Aust D, Knosel T, et al. STAG2 is a clinically relevant tumor suppressor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Genome Med. 2014;6(1):9.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Pearson AT, Finkel KA, Warner KA, Nor F, Tice D, Martins MD, et al. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumors increase growth rate with time. Oncotarget. 2016;7(7):7993–8005.CrossRef Pearson AT, Finkel KA, Warner KA, Nor F, Tice D, Martins MD, et al. Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) tumors increase growth rate with time. Oncotarget. 2016;7(7):7993–8005.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Voskoglou-Nomikos T, Pater JL, Seymour L. Clinical predictive value of the in vitro cell line, human xenograft, and mouse allograft preclinical cancer models. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(11):4227–39.PubMed Voskoglou-Nomikos T, Pater JL, Seymour L. Clinical predictive value of the in vitro cell line, human xenograft, and mouse allograft preclinical cancer models. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9(11):4227–39.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Secondary gliosarcoma: the clinicopathological features and the development of a patient-derived xenograft model of gliosarcoma
Authors
Karrie Mei-Yee Kiang
Andrian A. Chan
Gilberto Ka-Kit Leung
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08008-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Cancer 1/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine