Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Drugs - Real World Outcomes 1/2022

Open Access 01-03-2022 | Glaucoma | Original Research Article

Pregnancy Loss Signal from Prostaglandin Eye Drop Use in Pregnancy: A Disproportionality Analysis Using Japanese and US Spontaneous Reporting Databases

Authors: Takamasa Sakai, Chiyo Mori, Honoka Koshiba, Ryuta Yuminaga, Kouichi Tanabe, Fumiko Ohtsu

Published in: Drugs - Real World Outcomes | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There is limited research regarding the use of glaucoma medicines during pregnancy. Prostaglandins contract uterine smooth muscle; however, it is not clear whether prostaglandin eye drops are associated with pregnancy loss in pregnant women.

Objectives

We conducted a pharmacovigilance study using spontaneous report databases from Japan and the USA to evaluate the association between pregnancy loss and the use of prostaglandin eye drops during pregnancy.

Methods

The Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database and the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System were used for analysis. Disproportionality analyses and a review of individual case safety reports were conducted.

Results

As for prostaglandin eye drops in pregnancy-related reports, there were eight reports involving latanoprost in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database and no reports of pregnant women using other prostaglandin eye drops. In the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System, there were 25 reports involving latanoprost, 23 involving bimatoprost, 13 involving travoprost, and three involving tafluprost. The drug safety signal was detected during latanoprost usage and pregnancy loss. In the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database, there were five reports of pregnancy loss related to latanoprost, with a reporting odds ratio of 12.84 (95% confidence interval 3.06–53.86), and in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System, pregnancy loss was reported in 12 cases of latanoprost usage with a reporting odds ratio of 4.35 (95% confidence interval 1.98–9.54). Uterine contractions were observed as concomitant adverse events in one case.

Conclusions

Although a disproportionality analysis cannot determine causality, we need to keep an eye on the signal detected in this study. This signal should be validated using a causal design study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kant A, de Vries L, Rolfes L. Surveillance of drug safety during pregnancy: insight in current international activities, future intentions and need for support of national Pharmacovigilance Centres. Drug Saf. 2019;42(1):35–43.CrossRef Kant A, de Vries L, Rolfes L. Surveillance of drug safety during pregnancy: insight in current international activities, future intentions and need for support of national Pharmacovigilance Centres. Drug Saf. 2019;42(1):35–43.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference van De Ven NS, Pozniak AL, Levi JA, Clayden P, Garratt A, Redd C, et al. Analysis of pharmacovigilance databases for dolutegravir safety in pregnancy. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;70(12):2599–606.CrossRef van De Ven NS, Pozniak AL, Levi JA, Clayden P, Garratt A, Redd C, et al. Analysis of pharmacovigilance databases for dolutegravir safety in pregnancy. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;70(12):2599–606.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sakai T, Ohtsu F, Mori C, Tanabe K, Goto N. Signal of miscarriage with aripiprazole: a disproportionality analysis of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database. Drug Saf. 2017;40(11):1141–6.CrossRef Sakai T, Ohtsu F, Mori C, Tanabe K, Goto N. Signal of miscarriage with aripiprazole: a disproportionality analysis of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database. Drug Saf. 2017;40(11):1141–6.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Deepak P, Stobaugh DJ. Maternal and foetal adverse events with tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;40(9):1035–43.CrossRef Deepak P, Stobaugh DJ. Maternal and foetal adverse events with tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors in inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;40(9):1035–43.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sessa M, Mascolo A, Callréus T, Capuano A, Rossi F, Andersen M. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in pregnancy: new insight from VigiBase®. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):7236.CrossRef Sessa M, Mascolo A, Callréus T, Capuano A, Rossi F, Andersen M. Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in pregnancy: new insight from VigiBase®. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):7236.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Noseda R, Bedussi F, Gobbi C, Zecca C, Ceschi A. Safety profile of erenumab, galcanezumab and fremanezumab in pregnancy and lactation: analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance database. Cephalalgia. 2021;41(7):789–98.CrossRef Noseda R, Bedussi F, Gobbi C, Zecca C, Ceschi A. Safety profile of erenumab, galcanezumab and fremanezumab in pregnancy and lactation: analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance database. Cephalalgia. 2021;41(7):789–98.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Razeghinejad MR, Tania Tai TY, Fudemberg SJ, Katz LJ. Pregnancy and glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 2011;56(4):324–35.CrossRef Razeghinejad MR, Tania Tai TY, Fudemberg SJ, Katz LJ. Pregnancy and glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 2011;56(4):324–35.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yoshida M, Okada E, Mizuki N, Kokaze A, Sekine Y, Onari K, et al. Age-specific prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and its relationship to refraction among more than 60,000 asymptomatic Japanese subjects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(11):1151–8.CrossRef Yoshida M, Okada E, Mizuki N, Kokaze A, Sekine Y, Onari K, et al. Age-specific prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and its relationship to refraction among more than 60,000 asymptomatic Japanese subjects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54(11):1151–8.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Razeghinejad MR. Glaucoma medications in pregnancy. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(3):195–9.CrossRef Razeghinejad MR. Glaucoma medications in pregnancy. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2018;11(3):195–9.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Sethi HS, Naik M, Gupta VS. Management of glaucoma in pregnancy: risks or choices, a dilemma? Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(11):1684–90.PubMedPubMedCentral Sethi HS, Naik M, Gupta VS. Management of glaucoma in pregnancy: risks or choices, a dilemma? Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(11):1684–90.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Li T, Lindsley K, Rouse B, Hong H, Shi Q, Friedman DS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of first-line medications for primary open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(1):129–40.CrossRef Li T, Lindsley K, Rouse B, Hong H, Shi Q, Friedman DS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of first-line medications for primary open-angle glaucoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(1):129–40.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Vaideanu D, Fraser S. Glaucoma management in pregnancy: a questionnaire survey. Eye (Lond). 2007;21(3):341–3.CrossRef Vaideanu D, Fraser S. Glaucoma management in pregnancy: a questionnaire survey. Eye (Lond). 2007;21(3):341–3.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sharif NA. Synthetic FP-prostaglandin-induced contraction of rat uterus smooth muscle in vitro. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2008;78(3):199–207.CrossRef Sharif NA. Synthetic FP-prostaglandin-induced contraction of rat uterus smooth muscle in vitro. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids. 2008;78(3):199–207.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wagenvoort AM, van Vugt JM, Sobotka M, van Geijn HP. Topical timolol therapy in pregnancy: is it safe for the fetus? Teratology. 1998;58(6):258–62.CrossRef Wagenvoort AM, van Vugt JM, Sobotka M, van Geijn HP. Topical timolol therapy in pregnancy: is it safe for the fetus? Teratology. 1998;58(6):258–62.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Beyer-Westendorf J, Tittl L, Bistervels I, Middeldorp S, Schaefer C, Paulus W, et al. Safety of direct oral anticoagulant exposure during pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7(12):e884–91.CrossRef Beyer-Westendorf J, Tittl L, Bistervels I, Middeldorp S, Schaefer C, Paulus W, et al. Safety of direct oral anticoagulant exposure during pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7(12):e884–91.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Sakai T, Ohtsu F, Sekiya Y, Mori C, Sakata H, Goto N. Methodology for estimating the risk of adverse drug reactions in pregnant women: analysis of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2016;136(3):499–505.CrossRef Sakai T, Ohtsu F, Sekiya Y, Mori C, Sakata H, Goto N. Methodology for estimating the risk of adverse drug reactions in pregnant women: analysis of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2016;136(3):499–505.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rzeszotarska A, Szczapa-Jagustyn J, Kociecki J. Ophthalmological problems in pregnancy: a review. Ginekol Pol. 2020;91(8):473–7.CrossRef Rzeszotarska A, Szczapa-Jagustyn J, Kociecki J. Ophthalmological problems in pregnancy: a review. Ginekol Pol. 2020;91(8):473–7.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wisniewski AF, Bate A, Bousquet C, Brueckner A, Candore G, Juhlin K, et al. Good signal detection practices: evidence from IMI PROTECT. Drug Saf. 2016;39(6):469–90.CrossRef Wisniewski AF, Bate A, Bousquet C, Brueckner A, Candore G, Juhlin K, et al. Good signal detection practices: evidence from IMI PROTECT. Drug Saf. 2016;39(6):469–90.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference De Santis M, Lucchese A, Carducci B, Cavaliere AF, De Santis L, Merola A, et al. Latanoprost exposure in pregnancy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(2):305–6.CrossRef De Santis M, Lucchese A, Carducci B, Cavaliere AF, De Santis L, Merola A, et al. Latanoprost exposure in pregnancy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;138(2):305–6.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Fiscella RG, Jensen MK. Precautions in use and handling of travoprost. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003;60(5):484–5 (author reply 485).CrossRef Fiscella RG, Jensen MK. Precautions in use and handling of travoprost. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003;60(5):484–5 (author reply 485).CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Tsuchiya M, Obara T, Sakai T, Nomura K, Takamura C, Mano N. Quality evaluation of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020;29(2):173–81.CrossRef Tsuchiya M, Obara T, Sakai T, Nomura K, Takamura C, Mano N. Quality evaluation of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database (JADER). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020;29(2):173–81.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Pregnancy Loss Signal from Prostaglandin Eye Drop Use in Pregnancy: A Disproportionality Analysis Using Japanese and US Spontaneous Reporting Databases
Authors
Takamasa Sakai
Chiyo Mori
Honoka Koshiba
Ryuta Yuminaga
Kouichi Tanabe
Fumiko Ohtsu
Publication date
01-03-2022
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Drugs - Real World Outcomes / Issue 1/2022
Print ISSN: 2199-1154
Electronic ISSN: 2198-9788
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40801-021-00287-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

Drugs - Real World Outcomes 1/2022 Go to the issue