Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2020

Open Access 01-12-2020 | Research article

Gingival phenotypes and their relation to age, gender and other risk factors

Author: Wadhah Abdulnasser Alhajj

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2020

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Careful consideration and assessment of the type of phenotype has gained a fundamental importance in the treatment planning for any patient. We evaluated the prevalence of gingival phenotypes in a sample of Yemeni population and to explore its relationships to gender, age and other risk factors.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was performed among 456 patients. All maxillary anterior teeth were included for all parameters and 1st molars were included for gingival thickness measurements. All patients included in this study were systemically healthy and presented no dental crowding. Four clinical parameters were systematically recorded: Gingival thickness (GT), Width of keratinized gingiva (WKG), Crown width/ crown length (CW/CL) ratio and Papilla height (PH). Scores obtained from different parameters measurements were recorded and analyzed using non-parametric tests where P-value < 0.05 was considered significant. One examiner performed all measurements.

Results

The mean age was 29.9 ± 8.26 years. Of 456 recruited subjects, 83 (18.2%) subjects had thin, 69 (15.1%) had thick GT and 304 (66.7%) were placed in non-categorized (1.5–2 mm) GT. Square crown shape was found in 210 (44.1%) patients and 245 patients (55.9%) showed rectangular shape. Regarding WKG, 114 (25%) patients had width < 4 mm, 319 (70%) had width 4.1–8 mm and 23 (5%) patients had width >  8 mm. There was no significant difference between males and females for GT measurements. Regarding WKG, results showed that the prevalence of WKG 4.1–8 mm was more among females while males had more prevalence of ≤4 mm with significance difference. PH showed no significant differences between males and females. Regarding age, there was no significant differences between patients ≤25 years and >  25 years for all gingival parameters measurements. The relationship of smoking with different gingival parameters also showed no significant differences between smokers and non-smokers. Similarly, relationship of khat chewing with different gingival parameters showed no significant difference. Regarding inter-relationship between parameters, thin GT was associated with rectangular tooth form while square and quadrate forms are more associated with “1.5–2 mm” GT. WKG of ≤4 mm was associated with rectangular tooth form while WKG >  8 was more associated with square and quadrate forms with no significant difference. Results showed significant association between thin GT with 4.1–8 mm WKG.

Conclusion

Yemeni population had more prevalence of “1.5–2 mm” GT, rectangular crown shape and WKG from 4.1–8 mm. Regarding interrelationship between gingival parameters, GT showed obvious relationship with WKG, CW/CL ratio and PH. WKG with CW/CL also showed significant relationship while no relationship was shown between other gingival phenotype parameters.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ochsenbein C, Ross S. A reevaluation of osseous surgery. Dent Clin N Am. 1969;13(1):87.PubMed Ochsenbein C, Ross S. A reevaluation of osseous surgery. Dent Clin N Am. 1969;13(1):87.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Seibert J, Lindhe J. Esthetics and periodontal therapy. Textbook of Clinical Periodontology. 2nd ed. Copenhangen: Munksgaard; 1989. p. 477–514. Seibert J, Lindhe J. Esthetics and periodontal therapy. Textbook of Clinical Periodontology. 2nd ed. Copenhangen: Munksgaard; 1989. p. 477–514.
3.
go back to reference Claffey N, Shanley D. Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 1986;13(7):654–7.CrossRef Claffey N, Shanley D. Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 1986;13(7):654–7.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM, Bissada NF, Bouchard P, Cortellini P, et al. Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and Peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45:S219–S29.CrossRef Jepsen S, Caton JG, Albandar JM, Bissada NF, Bouchard P, Cortellini P, et al. Periodontal manifestations of systemic diseases and developmental and acquired conditions: consensus report of workgroup 3 of the 2017 world workshop on the classification of periodontal and Peri-implant diseases and conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45:S219–S29.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(5):428–33.CrossRef De Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(5):428–33.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Sammut E. Soft tissue biotype and its implications-Dental Clinical Articles-PPD. Sammut E. Soft tissue biotype and its implications-Dental Clinical Articles-PPD.
7.
go back to reference Greenberg J, Laster L, Listgarten M. Transgingival probing as a potential estimator of alveolar bone level. J Periodontol. 1976;47(9):514–7.CrossRef Greenberg J, Laster L, Listgarten M. Transgingival probing as a potential estimator of alveolar bone level. J Periodontol. 1976;47(9):514–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Müller HP, Heinecke A, Schaller N, Eger T. Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. J Clin Periodontol. 2000;27(9):621–6.CrossRef Müller HP, Heinecke A, Schaller N, Eger T. Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. J Clin Periodontol. 2000;27(9):621–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bhatia G, Kumar A, Khatri M, Bansal M, Saxena S. Assessment of the width of attached gingiva using different methods in various age groups: a clinical study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015;19(2):199.CrossRef Bhatia G, Kumar A, Khatri M, Bansal M, Saxena S. Assessment of the width of attached gingiva using different methods in various age groups: a clinical study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015;19(2):199.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Shah R, Sowmya N, Mehta D. Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to clinical parameters. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6(Suppl 1):S167.CrossRef Shah R, Sowmya N, Mehta D. Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to clinical parameters. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6(Suppl 1):S167.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Miller P Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 1985;5:9. Miller P Jr. A classification of marginal tissue recession. Int J Periodont Rest Dent. 1985;5:9.
12.
go back to reference Eghbali A, De Rouck T, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype assessed by experienced and inexperienced clinicians. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(11):958–63.CrossRef Eghbali A, De Rouck T, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype assessed by experienced and inexperienced clinicians. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36(11):958–63.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Medina Coeli Egreja A, Kahn S, Barceleiro M, Bittencourt S. Relationship between the width of the zone of keratinized tissue and thickness of gingival tissue in the anterior maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012;32(5):573–9. Medina Coeli Egreja A, Kahn S, Barceleiro M, Bittencourt S. Relationship between the width of the zone of keratinized tissue and thickness of gingival tissue in the anterior maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012;32(5):573–9.
14.
go back to reference Agarwal V, Mehrotra N, Vijay V. Gingival biotype assessment: variations in gingival thickness with regard to age, gender, and arch location. Indian J Dental Sci. 2017;9(1):12.CrossRef Agarwal V, Mehrotra N, Vijay V. Gingival biotype assessment: variations in gingival thickness with regard to age, gender, and arch location. Indian J Dental Sci. 2017;9(1):12.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Fischer KR, Grill E, Jockel-Schneider Y, Bechtold M, Schlagenhauf U, Fickl S. On the relationship between gingival biotypes and supracrestal gingival height, crown form and papilla height. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(8):894–8.CrossRef Fischer KR, Grill E, Jockel-Schneider Y, Bechtold M, Schlagenhauf U, Fickl S. On the relationship between gingival biotypes and supracrestal gingival height, crown form and papilla height. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014;25(8):894–8.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Olssoin M, Lindhe J, Marinello C. On the relationship between crown form and clinical features of the gingiva in adolescents. J Clin Periodontol. 1993;20(8):570–7.CrossRef Olssoin M, Lindhe J, Marinello C. On the relationship between crown form and clinical features of the gingiva in adolescents. J Clin Periodontol. 1993;20(8):570–7.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Marinello CP, Meyenberg KH, Zitzmann N, Lothy H, Soom U, Imoberdorf M. Single-tooth replacement: some clinical aspects. J Esthet Restor Dent. 1997;9(4):169–78.CrossRef Marinello CP, Meyenberg KH, Zitzmann N, Lothy H, Soom U, Imoberdorf M. Single-tooth replacement: some clinical aspects. J Esthet Restor Dent. 1997;9(4):169–78.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Zawawi KH, Al-Harthi SM, Al-Zahrani MS. Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to dental malocclusion. Saudi Med J. 2012;33(6):671–5.PubMed Zawawi KH, Al-Harthi SM, Al-Zahrani MS. Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to dental malocclusion. Saudi Med J. 2012;33(6):671–5.PubMed
19.
go back to reference Kydd W. The thickness measurement of masticatory mucosa in vivo. Int Dent J. 1971;21:430–41.PubMed Kydd W. The thickness measurement of masticatory mucosa in vivo. Int Dent J. 1971;21:430–41.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Wara-aswapati N, Pitiphat W, Chandrapho N, Rattanayatikul C, Karimbux N. Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa associated with age. J Periodontol. 2001;72(10):1407–12.CrossRef Wara-aswapati N, Pitiphat W, Chandrapho N, Rattanayatikul C, Karimbux N. Thickness of palatal masticatory mucosa associated with age. J Periodontol. 2001;72(10):1407–12.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Vandana K, Savitha B. Thickness of gingiva in association with age, gender and dental arch location. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(7):828–30.CrossRef Vandana K, Savitha B. Thickness of gingiva in association with age, gender and dental arch location. J Clin Periodontol. 2005;32(7):828–30.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Geron S, Atalia W. Influence of sex on the perception of oral and smile esthetics with different gingival display and incisal plane inclination. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(5):778–84.PubMed Geron S, Atalia W. Influence of sex on the perception of oral and smile esthetics with different gingival display and incisal plane inclination. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(5):778–84.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Ainamo A, Ainamo J, Poikkeus R. Continuous widening of the band of attached gingiva from 23 to 65 years of age. J Periodontal Res. 1981;16(6):595–9.CrossRef Ainamo A, Ainamo J, Poikkeus R. Continuous widening of the band of attached gingiva from 23 to 65 years of age. J Periodontal Res. 1981;16(6):595–9.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Chang L-C. The central papilla height in association with age and gender-assessed with a new method. Chinese J Periodontol. 2006;11(3):272–9. Chang L-C. The central papilla height in association with age and gender-assessed with a new method. Chinese J Periodontol. 2006;11(3):272–9.
25.
go back to reference Chang LC. The association between embrasure morphology and central papilla recession. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34(5):432–6.CrossRef Chang LC. The association between embrasure morphology and central papilla recession. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34(5):432–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Chen M-C, Chan C-P, Tu Y-K, Liao Y-F, Ku Y-C, Kwong L-K, et al. Factors influencing the length of the interproximal dental papilla between maxillary anterior teeth. J Dental Sci. 2009;4(3):103–9.CrossRef Chen M-C, Chan C-P, Tu Y-K, Liao Y-F, Ku Y-C, Kwong L-K, et al. Factors influencing the length of the interproximal dental papilla between maxillary anterior teeth. J Dental Sci. 2009;4(3):103–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois JC. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol. 2003;74(4):557–62.CrossRef Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois JC. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol. 2003;74(4):557–62.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Chow YC, Eber RM, Tsao YP, Shotwell JL, Wang HL. Factors associated with the appearance of gingival papillae. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37(8):719–27.PubMed Chow YC, Eber RM, Tsao YP, Shotwell JL, Wang HL. Factors associated with the appearance of gingival papillae. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37(8):719–27.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Gingival phenotypes and their relation to age, gender and other risk factors
Author
Wadhah Abdulnasser Alhajj
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2020
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-020-01073-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2020

BMC Oral Health 1/2020 Go to the issue