Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Commentary

Getting evidence to travel inside public systems: what organisational brokering capacities exist for evidence-based policy?

Authors: Pernelle Smits, Jean-Louis Denis, Johanne Préval, Evert Lindquist, Miguel Aguirre

Published in: Health Research Policy and Systems | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Implementing research findings into healthcare policy is an enduring challenge made even more difficult when policies must be developed and implemented with the help and support of multiple ideas, agendas and actors taking part in determinants of health. Only looking at mechanisms to feed policy-makers with evidence or to interest researchers in the policy process will simply bring partial clues; implementing evidence-based policy also requires organisations to lead and to partner in the production and intake of scientific evidence from academics and practical evidence from one another.

Main body

This Commentary argues for the need to better understand the capacities required by organisations to foster evidence-based policy in a dispersed environment. It proposes a framework of 11 brokering capacities for organisations involved in evidence-based policy. Eight of these capacities are informed by streams of research related to the roles of knowledge broker, innovation broker and policy broker. Three complementary brokering capacities are informed by our experience studying real-life evidence-based policies; these are capturing boundary knowledge, trending know-how on scientific and practical evidence-based policy, and conveying evidence outward.

Conclusions

Previous guidelines on brokering capacities focused on the individual level more than on the organisational level. Beyond the individual capacities of managers, designers and implementers of new policies, there is a need to identify and assess the brokering capacities of organisations involved in evidence-based policy. The three specific organisational brokering capacities for evidence-based policy that we present offer a means for policy-makers and policy designers to reflect upon favourable environments for evidence-based policy. These capacities could also help administrators and implementation scholars to think about and develop measurements to assess the quality and readiness of organisations involved in evidence-based policy design.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Head BW. Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges. Polic Soc. 2010;29(2):77–94.CrossRef Head BW. Reconsidering evidence-based policy: Key issues and challenges. Polic Soc. 2010;29(2):77–94.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Overseas Development Institute. Helping Researchers become Policy Entrepreneurs. How to Develop Engagement Strategies for Evidence-based Policy-making. London: ODI; 2009. Overseas Development Institute. Helping Researchers become Policy Entrepreneurs. How to Develop Engagement Strategies for Evidence-based Policy-making. London: ODI; 2009.
3.
go back to reference Gleeson DH, Legge DG, O'Neill D. Evaluating health policy capacity: Learning from international and Australian experience. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2009;6(1):3.CrossRef Gleeson DH, Legge DG, O'Neill D. Evaluating health policy capacity: Learning from international and Australian experience. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2009;6(1):3.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Meyer M. The rise of the knowledge broker. Sci Commun. 2010;32(1):118–27.CrossRef Meyer M. The rise of the knowledge broker. Sci Commun. 2010;32(1):118–27.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Winch GM, Courtney RJ. The Organization of Innovation Brokers: An International Review. Technol Anal Strategic Manage. 2007;19(6):747–63.CrossRef Winch GM, Courtney RJ. The Organization of Innovation Brokers: An International Review. Technol Anal Strategic Manage. 2007;19(6):747–63.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Howells J. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Res Policy. 2006;35(5):715–28.CrossRef Howells J. Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation. Res Policy. 2006;35(5):715–28.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kingdon J. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.; 2003. Kingdon J. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. 2nd ed. New York: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.; 2003.
8.
go back to reference Mintrom M. Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. Am J Polit Sci. 1997;41(3):738–70.CrossRef Mintrom M. Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. Am J Polit Sci. 1997;41(3):738–70.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Maybin J. Policy analysis and policy know-how: a case study of civil servants in England’s Department of Health. J Compar Policy Anal Res Pract. 2015;17(3):286–304.CrossRef Maybin J. Policy analysis and policy know-how: a case study of civil servants in England’s Department of Health. J Compar Policy Anal Res Pract. 2015;17(3):286–304.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Oliver K, Lorenc T, Innvaer S. New directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literature. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12:34.CrossRef Oliver K, Lorenc T, Innvaer S. New directions in evidence-based policy research: a critical analysis of the literature. Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12:34.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Getting evidence to travel inside public systems: what organisational brokering capacities exist for evidence-based policy?
Authors
Pernelle Smits
Jean-Louis Denis
Johanne Préval
Evert Lindquist
Miguel Aguirre
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1478-4505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0393-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Health Research Policy and Systems 1/2018 Go to the issue