Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2014

01-10-2014 | Otology

Gentamicin conditioning confers auditory protection against noise trauma

Authors: Alex Strose, Gleice Cristina Colombari, Maria Rossato, Miguel Ângelo Hyppolito, José Antônio Aparecido de Oliveira

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 10/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Auditory conditioning consists of the pre-exposure to low levels of a potential harmful agent to protect against a subsequent harmful presentation. The agent that was first tested was noise. This paradigm was more recently successfully tested with other agents. Nonetheless, the vast majority of the studies utilize the same agent to condition and to cause the trauma. The aim of this study was to verify whether conditioning with an agent different from the agent used to cause the trauma can also be effective. Thus, the following groups were organized: group Cont, which is the noise trauma control group, was exposed to 110-dB broadband noise centered at 4 kHz for 72 h; group Gent, which is the gentamicin conditioning control group, was administered 30 mg/kg of gentamicin daily for 30 consecutive days; and group Expt was conditioned with gentamicin similarly to group Gent and then subjected to a noise trauma similarly to group Cont. The animals were functionally and morphologically evaluated through the measurement of the auditory brainstem response and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. The following variables were investigated: outer hair cell injury and auditory threshold shift. The group that was conditioned with the drug exhibited significantly less outer hair cell damage, 10.8 and 22.9 %, respectively (p = 0.0146), although did not maintain the proper functioning of the auditory system. We, therefore, conclude that conditioning with a different agent from that used to cause the trauma is effective, which suggests that both agents that were used promote similar mechanisms of self-protection.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Canlon B, Borg E, Flock A (1988) Protection against noise trauma by pre-exposure to a low level acoustic stimulus. Hear Res 34:197–200PubMedCrossRef Canlon B, Borg E, Flock A (1988) Protection against noise trauma by pre-exposure to a low level acoustic stimulus. Hear Res 34:197–200PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Canlon B, Frasson A (1995) Morphological and functional preservation of the outer hair cells from noise trauma by sound conditioning. Hear Res 84:112–124PubMedCrossRef Canlon B, Frasson A (1995) Morphological and functional preservation of the outer hair cells from noise trauma by sound conditioning. Hear Res 84:112–124PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Campo P, Subramaniam M, Henderson D (1991) The effect of ‘conditioning’ exposures on hearing loss from traumatic exposure. Hear Res 55:195–200PubMedCrossRef Campo P, Subramaniam M, Henderson D (1991) The effect of ‘conditioning’ exposures on hearing loss from traumatic exposure. Hear Res 55:195–200PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ryan AF, Bennett TM, Woolf NK, Axelsson A (1994) Protection from noise-induced hearing loss by prior exposure to a nontrau- matic stimulus: role of the middle ear muscles. Hear Res 72:23–28PubMedCrossRef Ryan AF, Bennett TM, Woolf NK, Axelsson A (1994) Protection from noise-induced hearing loss by prior exposure to a nontrau- matic stimulus: role of the middle ear muscles. Hear Res 72:23–28PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Miyakita T, Hellström P, Frimanson E, Axelsson A (1992) Effect of low level acoustic stimulation on temporary threshold shift in Young humans. Hear Res 60:149–155PubMedCrossRef Miyakita T, Hellström P, Frimanson E, Axelsson A (1992) Effect of low level acoustic stimulation on temporary threshold shift in Young humans. Hear Res 60:149–155PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference White DR, Boettcher FA, Miles LR, Grantton MA (1997) Effectiveness of intermittent and continuous acoustic stimulation in preventing noise-induced hearing and hair cell loss. J Acoust Soc Am 103:1566–1572CrossRef White DR, Boettcher FA, Miles LR, Grantton MA (1997) Effectiveness of intermittent and continuous acoustic stimulation in preventing noise-induced hearing and hair cell loss. J Acoust Soc Am 103:1566–1572CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Oliveira JAA, Canedo DM, Rossato M (2002) Otoprotection of auditory hair cells against amikacin ototoxicity. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 68:7–13CrossRef Oliveira JAA, Canedo DM, Rossato M (2002) Otoprotection of auditory hair cells against amikacin ototoxicity. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol 68:7–13CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Maudonnet EN, Oliveira JAA, Rossato M, Hyppolito MA (2008) Gentamicin attenuates gentamicin-induced ototoxicity—self-protection. Drug Chem Toxicol 31:11–25PubMedCrossRef Maudonnet EN, Oliveira JAA, Rossato M, Hyppolito MA (2008) Gentamicin attenuates gentamicin-induced ototoxicity—self-protection. Drug Chem Toxicol 31:11–25PubMedCrossRef
9.
10.
go back to reference Theneshkumar S, Lorito G, Giordano P, Petruccelli J, Martini A, Hatzopoulos S (2009) Effect of noise conditioning on cisplatin-induced ototoxicity: a pilot study. Med Sci Monit 15:173–177 Theneshkumar S, Lorito G, Giordano P, Petruccelli J, Martini A, Hatzopoulos S (2009) Effect of noise conditioning on cisplatin-induced ototoxicity: a pilot study. Med Sci Monit 15:173–177
11.
go back to reference Fernandez EA, Ohlemiller KK, Gagnon PM, Clark WW (2010) Protection against noise-induced hearing loss in young CBA/J mice by low-dose kanamycin. JARO 11:235–244PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Fernandez EA, Ohlemiller KK, Gagnon PM, Clark WW (2010) Protection against noise-induced hearing loss in young CBA/J mice by low-dose kanamycin. JARO 11:235–244PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mathews A, Bailie GR (1987) Clinical pharmacokinetics, toxicity and cost effectiveness analysis of aminoglycosides and aminoglycoside dosing services. J Clin Pharm Ther 5:273–291CrossRef Mathews A, Bailie GR (1987) Clinical pharmacokinetics, toxicity and cost effectiveness analysis of aminoglycosides and aminoglycoside dosing services. J Clin Pharm Ther 5:273–291CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Colombari GC, Rossato M, Feres O, Hyppolito MA (2011) Effects of hyperbaric oxygen treatment on auditory hair cells after acute noise damage. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:49–56PubMedCrossRef Colombari GC, Rossato M, Feres O, Hyppolito MA (2011) Effects of hyperbaric oxygen treatment on auditory hair cells after acute noise damage. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 268:49–56PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Smith DI, Mills JH (1989) Anesthesia effects: auditory brain-stem response. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 72:422–428PubMedCrossRef Smith DI, Mills JH (1989) Anesthesia effects: auditory brain-stem response. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 72:422–428PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sha SH, Schacht J (1999) Salicylate atteenuates Gentamicin induced ototoxicity. Lab Invest 79:807–813PubMed Sha SH, Schacht J (1999) Salicylate atteenuates Gentamicin induced ototoxicity. Lab Invest 79:807–813PubMed
16.
go back to reference Hyppolito MA, Oliveira JAA, Rossato M (2006) Cisplatin ototoxicity and otoprotecton with sodium salicylate. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263:798–803PubMedCrossRef Hyppolito MA, Oliveira JAA, Rossato M (2006) Cisplatin ototoxicity and otoprotecton with sodium salicylate. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 263:798–803PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Normand AS, Bohne BA, Harding GW (2000) Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift. Hear Res 139:13–30CrossRef Normand AS, Bohne BA, Harding GW (2000) Histopathological differences between temporary and permanent threshold shift. Hear Res 139:13–30CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Jacono AA, Hu B, Kopke RD, Henderson D, Van De Water TR, Steinman HM (1998) Changes in cochlear antioxidant enzyme activity after sound conditioning and noise exposure in the chinchilla. Hear Res 117:31–38 Jacono AA, Hu B, Kopke RD, Henderson D, Van De Water TR, Steinman HM (1998) Changes in cochlear antioxidant enzyme activity after sound conditioning and noise exposure in the chinchilla. Hear Res 117:31–38
19.
go back to reference Miller JD, Watson CS, Covell WP (1967) Deafening effects of noise on the cat. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 176:1–91 Miller JD, Watson CS, Covell WP (1967) Deafening effects of noise on the cat. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 176:1–91
20.
go back to reference Boettcher FA, Spongr VP, Salvi RJ (1992) Physiological and histological changes associated with the reduction in the threshold shift during interrupted noise exposure. Hear Res 62:217–236PubMedCrossRef Boettcher FA, Spongr VP, Salvi RJ (1992) Physiological and histological changes associated with the reduction in the threshold shift during interrupted noise exposure. Hear Res 62:217–236PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Chen YS, Liu TC, Cheng CH, Yeh TH, Lee SY, Hsu CJ (2003) Changes of hair cell stereocilia and threshold shift after acoustic trauma in guinea pigs: comparison between Inner and outer hair cells. ORL 65:266–274PubMedCrossRef Chen YS, Liu TC, Cheng CH, Yeh TH, Lee SY, Hsu CJ (2003) Changes of hair cell stereocilia and threshold shift after acoustic trauma in guinea pigs: comparison between Inner and outer hair cells. ORL 65:266–274PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Brown JJ, Brummett RE, Meikle MB, Vernon J (1978) Combined effects of noise and neomycin Cochlear changes in the guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 86:394–400 Brown JJ, Brummett RE, Meikle MB, Vernon J (1978) Combined effects of noise and neomycin Cochlear changes in the guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 86:394–400
23.
go back to reference Collins PW (1988) Synergistic interactions of gentamicin and pure tones causing cochlear hair cell loss in pigmented guinea pigs. Hear Res 36:249–259PubMedCrossRef Collins PW (1988) Synergistic interactions of gentamicin and pure tones causing cochlear hair cell loss in pigmented guinea pigs. Hear Res 36:249–259PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Subramaniam M, Campo P, Henderson D (1991) The effect of exposure level on the development of progressive resistance to noise. Hear Res 52:181–188PubMedCrossRef Subramaniam M, Campo P, Henderson D (1991) The effect of exposure level on the development of progressive resistance to noise. Hear Res 52:181–188PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Pourbakht A, Imani A (2012) The protective effect of conditioning on noise induced hearing loss is frequency-dependent. Acta Med Iran 50:664–669PubMed Pourbakht A, Imani A (2012) The protective effect of conditioning on noise induced hearing loss is frequency-dependent. Acta Med Iran 50:664–669PubMed
27.
go back to reference Clark WW, Bohne BA (1987) Effect of periodic rest on hearing loss and cochlear damage following exposure to noise. J Acoust Soc Am 82:1253–1264PubMedCrossRef Clark WW, Bohne BA (1987) Effect of periodic rest on hearing loss and cochlear damage following exposure to noise. J Acoust Soc Am 82:1253–1264PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference McFadden LS, Henderson D, ShenHEN YH (1997) Low-frequency ‘conditioning’ provides long-term protection from noise-induced threshold shifts in chinchillas. Hear Res 103:142–150PubMedCrossRef McFadden LS, Henderson D, ShenHEN YH (1997) Low-frequency ‘conditioning’ provides long-term protection from noise-induced threshold shifts in chinchillas. Hear Res 103:142–150PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Hamernik RP, Patterson JH, Turrentine GA, Ahroon WA (1989) The quantitative relation between sensory cell loss and hearing threshold. Hear Res 38:199–212PubMedCrossRef Hamernik RP, Patterson JH, Turrentine GA, Ahroon WA (1989) The quantitative relation between sensory cell loss and hearing threshold. Hear Res 38:199–212PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Saunders JC, Cohen YE, Szymko YM (1991) The structural and functional consequences of acoustic injury in the cochlea and peripheral auditory system: a five year update. J Acoust Soc Am 90:136–146PubMedCrossRef Saunders JC, Cohen YE, Szymko YM (1991) The structural and functional consequences of acoustic injury in the cochlea and peripheral auditory system: a five year update. J Acoust Soc Am 90:136–146PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Gentamicin conditioning confers auditory protection against noise trauma
Authors
Alex Strose
Gleice Cristina Colombari
Maria Rossato
Miguel Ângelo Hyppolito
José Antônio Aparecido de Oliveira
Publication date
01-10-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 10/2014
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-013-2707-6

Other articles of this Issue 10/2014

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 10/2014 Go to the issue