Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Primary Care
Published in: BMC Primary Care 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

General practitioners and sickness certification for injury in Australia

Authors: Danielle Mazza, Bianca Brijnath, Nabita Singh, Agnieszka Kosny, Rasa Ruseckaite, Alex Collie

Published in: BMC Primary Care | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Strong evidence supports an early return to work after injury as a way to improve recovery. In Australia, General Practitioners (GPs) see about 96 % of injured workers, making them the main gatekeepers to workers’ entitlements. Most people with compensable injuries in Australia are certified as “unfit to work” by their GP, with a minority of patients certified for modified work duties. The reasons for this apparent dissonance between evidence and practice remain unexplored. Little is known about the factors that influence GP sickness certification behaviour in Australia. The aim of this study is to describe the factors influencing Australian GPs certification practice through qualitative interviews with four key stakeholders.

Methods

From September to December 2012, 93 semi-structured interviews were undertaken in Melbourne, Australia. Participants included GPs, injured workers, employers and compensation agents. Data were thematically analysed.

Results

Five themes describing factors influencing GP certification were identified: 1. Divergent stakeholder views about the GP’s role in facilitating return to work; 2. Communication between the four stakeholder groups; 3. Conflict between the stakeholder groups; 4. Allegations of GPs and injured workers misusing the compensation system and 5. The layout and content of the sickness certificate itself.

Conclusion

By exploring GP certification practice from the perspectives of four key stakeholders, this study suggests that certification is an administrative and clinical task underpinned by a host of social and systemic factors. The findings highlight opportunities such as practice guideline development and improvements to the sickness certificate itself that may be targeted to improve GP sickness certification behaviour and return to work outcomes in an Australian context.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Dembe AE, Mastroberti MA, Fox SE, Bigelow C, Banks SM. Inpatient hospital care for work-related injuries and illnesses. Am J Ind Med. 2003;44(4):331–42.CrossRefPubMed
2.
The Australasian Faculty of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Australian and New Zealand Consensus statement on the health benefits of work. Sydney: The Royal Australian College of Physicians; 2011.
3.
4.
Bültmann U, Franche R-L, Hogg-Johnson S, Côté P, Lee H, Severin C, et al. Health status, work limitations, and return-to-work trajectories in injured workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Qual Life Res. 2007;16(7):1167–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Brijnath B, Mazza D, Singh N, Kosny A, Ruseckaite R, Collie A. Mental Health Claims Management and Return to Work: Qualitative Insights from Melbourne, Australia. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24:766–76.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Wilkinson R, Marmot M. The social determinants of health: The solid facts. 2nd ed. Denmark: World Health Organization; 2003.
7.
Black C. Working for a Healthier Tomorrow: Review of the Health of Britain’s Working Age Population. London: TSO; 2008.
8.
Waddell G, Burton A. Is Work Good for Heath and Well Being? London: TSO; 2006.
9.
Collie A, Britt H, Henderson J, Ying-Pan H. Coverage of work-related injury and disease in Australian general practice. Int J Soc Secur Worker's Compens. 2012;3(1):1–15.
10.
Zhang C, Pan Y, Britt H. Work related encounters in general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 2013;42(4):171.PubMed
11.
Collie A, Ruseckaite R, Brijnath B, Kosny AA, Mazza D. Sickness certification of workers compensation claimants by general practitioners in Victoria, 2003–2010. Med J Aust. 2013;199(7):480–3.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Ruseckaite R, Collie A, Bohensky M, Brijnath B, Kosny A, Mazza D. Trends in sickness certification of injured workers by General Practitioners in Victoria, Australia. J Occup Rehabil. In press, accepted 4 November 2013.
13.
Wynne-Jones G, Mallen CD, Mottram S, Main CJ, Dunn KM. Identification of UK sickness certification rates, standardised for age and sex. Br J Gen Pract. 2009; 59(564):510-514+515-516.
14.
Clayton M, Verow P. Advice given to patients about return to work and driving following surgery. Occup Med. 2007;57(7):488–91.CrossRef
15.
Roope R, Parker G, Turner S. General practitioners' use of sickness certificates. Occup Med. 2009;59(8):580–5.CrossRef
16.
Meershoek A, Krumeich A, Vos R. Judging without criteria? Sickness certification in Dutch disability schemes. Sociol Health Illn. 2007;29(4):497–514.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Bollag U, Rajeswaran A, Ruffieux C, Burnand B. Sickness certification in primary care - the physician's role. Swiss Med Wkly. 2007;137(23–24):341–6.PubMed
18.
Krohne K, Brage S. New rules meet established sickness certification practice: a focus-group study on the introduction of functional assessments in Norwegian primary care. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007;25(3):172–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Engblom M, Nilsson G, Arrelöv B, Löfgren A, Skånér Y, Lindholm C, et al. Frequency and severity of problems that general practitioners experience regarding sickness certification. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011;29(4):227–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Lofgren A, Hagberg J, Arrelov B, Ponzer S, Alexanderson K. Frequency and nature of problems associated with sickness certification tasks: A cross-sectional questionnaire study of 5455 physicians. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007;25(3):178–85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
von Knorring M, Sundberg L, Lofgren A, Alexanderson K. Problems in sickness certification of patients: a qualitative study on views of 26 physicians in Sweden. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(1):22–8.CrossRef
22.
Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. The Sage handbook of qualitative research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2011.
23.
24.
25.
26.
Ryan GW, Bernard HR. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods. 2003;15(1):85–109.CrossRef
27.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.CrossRef
28.
Kosny A, Brijnath B, Singh N, Allen A, Collie A, Ruseckaite R, & Mazza D. Uncomfortable bedfellows: Employer perspectives on general practitioners’ role in the return to work process. Policy and Practice in Health & Safety, 2015;13(1):65-76.
29.
Hussey S, Hoddinott P, Wilson P, Dowell J, Barbour R. Sickness certification system in the United Kingdom: qualitative study of views of general practitioners in Scotland. BMJ. 2004;328(7431):88.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
MacDonald S, Maxwell M, Wilson P, Smith M, Whittaker W, Sutton M, et al. A powerful intervention: General practitioners'; Use of sickness certification in depression. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
31.
Nilsing E, Söderberg E, Berterö C, Öberg B. Primary healthcare professionals' experiences of the sick leave process: A focus group study in Sweden. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(3):450–61.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Swartling MS, Alexanderson KA, Wahlstrom RA. Barriers to good sickness certification - An interview study with Swedish general practitioners. Scand J Public Health. 2008;36(4):408–14.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Hann M, Sibbald B. General practitioners’ attitudes towards patients’ health and work. Final Report for Health Work and Well-being Delivery Unit. London: Department for Work and Pensions; 2011.
34.
Hiscock J, Ritchie J. The Role of GPs in Sickness Certification. London: Department for Work and Pensions; 2001.
35.
Wynne-Jones G, Mallen C, Main C, Dunn K. What do GPs feel about sickness certification? A systematic search and narrative review. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010;28(2):67–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Welsh VK, Mallen CD, Wynne-Jones G, Jinks C. Exploration of GPs' views and use of the fit note: a qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2012;62(598):e363–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Wainwright E, Wainwright D, Keogh E, Eccleston C. Fit for purpose? Using the fit note with patients with chronic pain: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(593):e794–800.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
38.
39.
40.
Coole C, Watson PJ, Thomson L, Hampton R. How do GPs complete fit note comments? Occup Med (Lond). 2013;63(8):575–8.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
General practitioners and sickness certification for injury in Australia
Authors
Danielle Mazza
Bianca Brijnath
Nabita Singh
Agnieszka Kosny
Rasa Ruseckaite
Alex Collie
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Primary Care / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 2731-4553
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0307-9

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Primary Care 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Practice nurse chlamydia testing in Australian general practice: a qualitative study of benefits, barriers and facilitators

Study protocol

Point of care susceptibility testing in primary care - does it lead to a more appropriate prescription of antibiotics in patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections? Protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Research article

Improving treatment adherence for blood pressure lowering via mobile phone SMS-messages in South Africa: a qualitative evaluation of the SMS-text Adherence SuppoRt (StAR) trial

Research article

Establishing chronic condition concordance and discordance with diabetes: a Delphi study

Research article

Chest pain syndromes are associated with high rates of recidivism and costs in young United States Veterans

Research article

Development of a questionnaire to measure primary care physicians’ scope of practice