Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 7/2003

01-07-2003 | Original Article

Gender differences in volumetric bone density: a study of opposite-sex twins

Authors: Vasi Naganathan, Philip Sambrook

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 7/2003

Login to get access

Abstract

Gender difference in bone size is a potential confounder when comparing bone density between males and females. A comparison of volumetric BMD (vBMD) between men and women, which is a measure of bone mass relative to three-dimensional bone volume (g/cm3) as opposed to areal bone density (g/cm2), may be a more accurate reflection of gender differences in bone density. The aims of this study were to examine gender differences in bone mass (BMC), areal BMD (aBMD), volumetric BMD (vBMD) by comparing twins of opposite sex in whom the effects of age, genes and environment are partially controlled for. DEXA derived BMC, aBMD, vBMD at the third lumbar vertebra (L3), femoral neck (FN) and forearm (1/3 radius) were compared between 82 opposite sex pairs aged 18–80. BMC was significantly higher in males at all three sites (26–45.5%). For aBMD the gender differences remained significant at all sites except the spine. The average differences in aBMD were not as great as the differences in BMC (2.2–20.5%). The differences in vBMD, however, followed a different pattern. FN and L3 vBMD were significantly higher in females (4.8 and 0.6%, respectively), while radial BMD was not significantly different between the sexes. Comparing aBMD values between males and females, when females in general have a smaller skeleton than males may not be a true indication of gender differences in bone density. A comparison of vBMD between men and women shows only small differences in bone density between the sexes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lips P (1997) Epidemiology and predictors of fractures associated with osteoporosis. Am J Med 103:3S–8S Lips P (1997) Epidemiology and predictors of fractures associated with osteoporosis. Am J Med 103:3S–8S
2.
go back to reference Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL et al. (1995) Proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 5:389–409PubMed Looker AC, Wahner HW, Dunn WL et al. (1995) Proximal femur bone mineral levels of US adults. Osteoporos Int 5:389–409PubMed
3.
go back to reference Berntsen GK, Fonnebo V, Tollan A et al. (2001) Forearm bone mineral density by age in 7,620 men and women: the Tromso study, a population-based study. Am J Epidemiol 153:465–473CrossRefPubMed Berntsen GK, Fonnebo V, Tollan A et al. (2001) Forearm bone mineral density by age in 7,620 men and women: the Tromso study, a population-based study. Am J Epidemiol 153:465–473CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Burger H, De LC, van Daile PL et al. (1998) Risk factors for increased bone loss in an elderly population: the Rotterdam Study. Am J Epidemiol 147:871–879PubMed Burger H, De LC, van Daile PL et al. (1998) Risk factors for increased bone loss in an elderly population: the Rotterdam Study. Am J Epidemiol 147:871–879PubMed
5.
go back to reference Dennison E, Eastell R, Fall CH et al. (1999) Determinants of bone loss in elderly men and women: a prospective population-based study. Osteoporos Int 10:384–391CrossRefPubMed Dennison E, Eastell R, Fall CH et al. (1999) Determinants of bone loss in elderly men and women: a prospective population-based study. Osteoporos Int 10:384–391CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Naganathan V, MacGregor AJ, Snider H et al. (2002) Gender differences in the genetic factors responsible for variation in bone density and ultrasound. J Bone Miner Res 17:725–733PubMed Naganathan V, MacGregor AJ, Snider H et al. (2002) Gender differences in the genetic factors responsible for variation in bone density and ultrasound. J Bone Miner Res 17:725–733PubMed
7.
go back to reference Faulkner RA, McCulloch RG, Fyke SL et al. (1995) Comparison of areal and estimated volumetric bone mineral density values between older men and women. Osteoporos Int 5:271–275PubMed Faulkner RA, McCulloch RG, Fyke SL et al. (1995) Comparison of areal and estimated volumetric bone mineral density values between older men and women. Osteoporos Int 5:271–275PubMed
8.
go back to reference Seeman E, Duan Y, Fong C et al. (2001) Fracture site-specific deficits in bone size and volumetric density in men with spine or hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res 16:120–127PubMed Seeman E, Duan Y, Fong C et al. (2001) Fracture site-specific deficits in bone size and volumetric density in men with spine or hip fractures. J Bone Miner Res 16:120–127PubMed
9.
go back to reference Faulkner RA, McCulloch RG, Fyke SL et al. (1995) Comparison of areal and estimated volumetric bone mineral density values between older men and women. Osteoporos Int 5:271–275PubMed Faulkner RA, McCulloch RG, Fyke SL et al. (1995) Comparison of areal and estimated volumetric bone mineral density values between older men and women. Osteoporos Int 5:271–275PubMed
10.
go back to reference Melton LJ, Khosla S, Achenbach SJ et al. (2000) Effects of body size and skeletal site on the estimated prevalence of osteoporosis in women and men. Osteoporos Int 11:977–983PubMed Melton LJ, Khosla S, Achenbach SJ et al. (2000) Effects of body size and skeletal site on the estimated prevalence of osteoporosis in women and men. Osteoporos Int 11:977–983PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kelly PJ, Twomey L, Sambrook PN et al. (1990) Sex differences in peak adult bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 5:1169–1175PubMed Kelly PJ, Twomey L, Sambrook PN et al. (1990) Sex differences in peak adult bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 5:1169–1175PubMed
12.
go back to reference Karantanas AH, Kalef-Ezra JA, Glaros DC (1991) Quantitative computed tomography for bone mineral measurement: technical aspects, dosimetry, normal data and clinical applications. Br J Radiol 64:298–304PubMed Karantanas AH, Kalef-Ezra JA, Glaros DC (1991) Quantitative computed tomography for bone mineral measurement: technical aspects, dosimetry, normal data and clinical applications. Br J Radiol 64:298–304PubMed
13.
go back to reference Gilsanz V, Boechat MI, Roe TF et al. (1994) Gender differences in vertebral body sizes in children and adolescents. Radiology 190:673–677PubMed Gilsanz V, Boechat MI, Roe TF et al. (1994) Gender differences in vertebral body sizes in children and adolescents. Radiology 190:673–677PubMed
14.
go back to reference Gilsanz V, Boechat MI, Gilsanz R et al. (1994) Gender differences in vertebral sizes in adults: biomechanical implications. Radiology 190:678–682PubMed Gilsanz V, Boechat MI, Gilsanz R et al. (1994) Gender differences in vertebral sizes in adults: biomechanical implications. Radiology 190:678–682PubMed
15.
go back to reference Neu CM, Manz F, Rauch F et al. (2001) Bone densities and bone size at the distal radius in healthy children and adolescents: a study using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone 28:227–232 Neu CM, Manz F, Rauch F et al. (2001) Bone densities and bone size at the distal radius in healthy children and adolescents: a study using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone 28:227–232
16.
go back to reference Ebbesen EN, Thomsen JS, Beck-Nielsen H et al. (1999) Age- and gender-related differences in vertebral bone mass, density, and strength. J Bone Miner Res 14:1394–1403PubMed Ebbesen EN, Thomsen JS, Beck-Nielsen H et al. (1999) Age- and gender-related differences in vertebral bone mass, density, and strength. J Bone Miner Res 14:1394–1403PubMed
17.
go back to reference Ebbesen EN, Thomsen JS, Mosekilde L (1997) Nondestructive determination of iliac crest cancellous bone strength by pQCT. Bone 21:535–540CrossRefPubMed Ebbesen EN, Thomsen JS, Mosekilde L (1997) Nondestructive determination of iliac crest cancellous bone strength by pQCT. Bone 21:535–540CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mosekilde L (1990) Sex differences in age-related changes in vertebral body size, density and biomechanical competence in normal individuals. Bone 11:67–73PubMed Mosekilde L (1990) Sex differences in age-related changes in vertebral body size, density and biomechanical competence in normal individuals. Bone 11:67–73PubMed
19.
go back to reference Duan Y, Parfitt A, Seeman E (1999) Vertebral bone mass, size, and volumetric density in women with spinal fractures. J Bone Miner Res 14:1796–1802PubMed Duan Y, Parfitt A, Seeman E (1999) Vertebral bone mass, size, and volumetric density in women with spinal fractures. J Bone Miner Res 14:1796–1802PubMed
20.
go back to reference Genant HK, Gluer CC, Lotz JC (1994) Gender differences in bone density, skeletal geometry, and fracture biomechanics. Radiology 190:636–640PubMed Genant HK, Gluer CC, Lotz JC (1994) Gender differences in bone density, skeletal geometry, and fracture biomechanics. Radiology 190:636–640PubMed
21.
go back to reference Seeman E (1998) Growth in bone mass and size--are racial and gender differences in bone mineral density more apparent than real? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:1414–1419 Seeman E (1998) Growth in bone mass and size--are racial and gender differences in bone mineral density more apparent than real? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 83:1414–1419
22.
go back to reference Schreuder MF, van DA, Van LA et al. (1998) Volumetric measurements of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine: comparison of three geometrical approximations using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Nucl Med Commun 19:727–733PubMed Schreuder MF, van DA, Van LA et al. (1998) Volumetric measurements of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine: comparison of three geometrical approximations using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Nucl Med Commun 19:727–733PubMed
23.
go back to reference Sabin MA, Blake GM, MacLaughlin-Black SM et al. (1995) The accuracy of volumetric bone density measurements in dual X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 56:210–214PubMed Sabin MA, Blake GM, MacLaughlin-Black SM et al. (1995) The accuracy of volumetric bone density measurements in dual X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 56:210–214PubMed
24.
go back to reference Griffiths MR, Noakes KA, Pocock NA (1997) Correcting the magnification error of fan beam densitometers. J Bone Miner Res 12:119–123PubMed Griffiths MR, Noakes KA, Pocock NA (1997) Correcting the magnification error of fan beam densitometers. J Bone Miner Res 12:119–123PubMed
25.
go back to reference Tothill P, Hannan WJ, Wilkinson S (2001) Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total bone and soft tissue. Br J Radiol 74:166–176PubMed Tothill P, Hannan WJ, Wilkinson S (2001) Comparisons between a pencil beam and two fan beam dual energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring total bone and soft tissue. Br J Radiol 74:166–176PubMed
Metadata
Title
Gender differences in volumetric bone density: a study of opposite-sex twins
Authors
Vasi Naganathan
Philip Sambrook
Publication date
01-07-2003
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 7/2003
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1422-3

Other articles of this Issue 7/2003

Osteoporosis International 7/2003 Go to the issue