Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The ONWARDS insulin icodec trials

A round-up of the ONWARDS phase 3 clinical trials evaluating the novel weekly insulin icodec in people with diabetes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research article

Gender differences in load carriage injuries of Australian army soldiers

Authors: Robin Marc Orr, Rodney Pope

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

With the removal of gender restrictions and the changing nature of warfare potentially increasing female soldier exposure to heavy military load carriage, the aim of this research was to determine relative risks and patterns of load carriage related injuries in female compared to male soldiers.

Methods

The Australian Defence Force Occupational Health, Safety and Compensation Analysis and Reporting workplace injury database was searched to identify all reported load carriage injuries. Using key search terms, the narrative description fields were used as the search medium to identify records of interest. Population estimates of the female: male incident rate ratio (IRR) were calculated with ninety-five percent confidence interval (95% CI) around the population estimate of each IRR determined.

Results

Female soldiers sustained 10% (n = 40) of the 401 reported injuries, with a female to male IRR of 1.02 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.41). The most common site of injury for both genders was the back (F: n = 11, 27%; M: n = 80, 22%), followed by the foot in female soldiers (n = 8, 20%) and the ankle (n = 60, 17%) in male soldiers. Fifteen percent (n = 6) of injuries in female soldiers and 6% (n = 23) of injuries in males were classified as Serious Personal Injuries (SPI) with the lower back the leading site for both genders (F: n = 3, 43%: M: n = 8, 29%). The injury risk ratio of SPI for female compared to male soldiers was 2.40 (95% CI 0.98 to 5.88).

Conclusions

While both genders similarly have the lower back as the leading site of injury while carrying load, female soldiers have more injuries to the foot as the second leading site of injury, as opposed to ankle injuries in males. The typically smaller statures of female soldiers may have predisposed them to their observed higher risk of suffering SPI while carrying loads.
Literature
1.
Orr R, Pope R, Johnston V, Coyle J. Load carriage and its force impact. Aust Def Force J. 2011;185:52–63.
2.
Orr RM, Johnston V, Coyle J, Pope R. Reported Load Carriage Injuries of the Australian Army Soldier. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;25(316):9540–7.
3.
Knapik JJ, Reynolds KL, Staab J, Vogel JA, Jones B. Injuries associated with strenuous road marching. Mil Med. 1992;157(2):64–7.PubMed
4.
Birrell SA, Hooper RH. Initial subjective load carriage injury data collected with interviews and questionnaires. Mil Med. 2007;172(3):306–11.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Orr RM, Pope R, Coyle J, Johnston V. Occupational Loads Carried by Australian Soldiers on Military Operations. J Health Saf Environ. 2015;31(1):451–67.
6.
Orr R. The history of the Soldier’s load. Aust Army J. 2010;VII(2):67–88.
7.
Knapik JJ, Reynolds K, Santee WR, Friedl KE. Load carriage in military operations: a review of historical, physiological, biomechanical and medical aspects. Military Quantitative Physiology: Problems and Concepts in Military Operational Medicine Office of the Surgeon General and the Borden Institute, Ft Detrick, MD; 2012. p. 303–37.
8.
Smith S. Minister for defence – removal of restrictions on combat roles for women. Ministerial media release of 10 May 2011. Canberra: Australian Government; 2011.
9.
Holewijn M, Heus R, Wammes LJA. Physiological strain due to load carrying in heavy footwear. Eur J Appl Physiol. 1992;65:129–34.CrossRef
10.
Harper WH, Knapik JJ, de Pontbriand R. Female Load-Carrying Performance. Human Research & Engineering Directorate, Army Research Laboratory ARL-TR-1176. 1997. p. 124.
11.
Bhambhani Y, Maikala R. Gender differences during treadmill walking with graded loads: biomechanical and physiological comparisons. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;81(1–2):75–83.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Allison KF, Keenan KA, Sell TC, Abt JP, Nagai T, Deluzio J, McGrail M, Lephart SM. Musculoskeletal, biomechanical, and physiological gender differences in the US military. US Army Medical Department Journal 2015, April - June 2015:12–22.
13.
Myles W, Eclache J, Beaury J. Self-pacing during sustained, repetitive exercise. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1979;50(9):921–4.PubMed
14.
Knapik JJ, Reynolds KL, Harman E. Soldier load carriage: historical, physiological, biomechanical, and medical aspects. Mil Med. 2004;169(1):45–56.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Martin PE, Nelson RC. The effect of carried loads on the walking patterns of men and women. Ergonomics. 1986;29(10):1191–202.CrossRefPubMed
16.
17.
Kirtley C. Clinical gait analysis. New York: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.
18.
19.
Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC press; 1990.
20.
Department of Defence. The defence annual report 2009–10, vol. 1. Canberra: Department of Defence; 2010.
21.
O’Connor F. Injuries during Marine Corps officer basic training. Mil Med. 2000;165(7):515–20.PubMed
22.
Strowbridge N. Musculoskeletal injuries in female soldiers: analysis of cause and type of injury. J R Army Med Corps. 2002;148(3):256–8.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Scott PA, Ramabhai L. Comparison of male and female responses to carrying absolute and relative loads while on a three hour military march. In: Proceedings of the IEA 2000/HFES 2000 Congress: 2000; 2000: 3–161 - 164.
24.
Ricciardi R, Deuster P, Talbot LA. Effects of gender and body adiposity on physiological responses to physical work while wearing body armor. Mil Med. 2007;172(7):743–8.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Lyons J, Allsopp A, Bilzon J. Influences of body composition upon the relative metabolic and cardiovascular demands of load-carriage. Occup Med. 2005;55(5):380–4.CrossRef
26.
Pope R, Herbert R, Kirwan JD, Graham BJ. Predicting attrition in basic military training. Mil Med. 1999;164(10):710–4.PubMed
27.
Reynolds KL, White J, Knapik JJ, Witt C, Amoroso P. Injuries and risk factors in a 100-mile (161-km) infantry road march. Prev Med. 1999;28(2):167–73.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Havenetidis K, Kardaris D, Paxinos T. Profiles of musculoskeletal injuries among Greek Army officer cadets during basic combat training. Mil Med. 2011;176(3):297–303.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Kaufman KR, Brodine S, Shaffer R. Military training-related injuries: surveillance, research, and prevention. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(3):54–63.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Knapik JJ, Canham-Chervak M, Hauret K, Hoedebecke E, Laurin MJ, Cuthie J. Discharges during US Army basic training: injury rates and risk factors. Mil Med. 2001;166(7):641–7.PubMed
31.
Roy TC, Knapik JJ, Ritland BM, Murphy N, Sharp MA. Risk factors for musculoskeletal injuries for soldiers deployed to Afghanistan. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2012;83(11):1060–6.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Cohen SP, Griffith S, Larkin TM, Villena F, Larkin R. Presentation, diagnoses, mechanisms of injury, and treatment of soldiers injured in Operation Iraqi Freedom: an epidemiological study conducted at two military pain management centers. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(4):1098–103.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Ricciardi R, Deuster P, Talbot LA. Metabolic demands of Body Armor on physical performance in simulated conditions. Mil Med. 2008;173(9):817–24.CrossRefPubMed
34.
Roy TC, Lopez HP. A comparison of deployed occupational tasks performed by different types of military battalions and resulting Low back pain. Mil Med. 2013;178(8):e937–43.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Orloff HA, Rapp CM. The effects of load carriage on spinal curvature and posture. Spine. 2004;29(12):1325–9.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Meakin JR, Smith FW, Gilbert FJ, Aspden RM. The effect of axial load on the sagittal plane curvature of the upright human spine in vivo. J Biomech. 2008;41(13):2850–4.CrossRefPubMed
37.
Knapik JJ. Injuries and injury prevention during foot marching. J Spec Oper Med. 2013;14(4):131–5.
38.
Bergman BP, Miller SSJ. Equal opportunities, equal risks? Overuse injuries in female military recruits. J Public Health. 2001;23(1):35–9.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Gender differences in load carriage injuries of Australian army soldiers
Authors
Robin Marc Orr
Rodney Pope
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1340-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 1/2016 Go to the issue

Technical advance

A modified and enhanced test setup for biomechanical investigations of the hindfoot, for example in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis

Research article

Workers’ characteristics associated with the type of healthcare provider first seen for occupational back pain

Study protocol

Study protocol for Norwegian Psychomotor Physiotherapy versus Cognitive Patient Education in combination with active individualized physiotherapy in patients with long-lasting musculoskeletal pain – a randomized controlled trial

Erratum

Erratum to: Smoking, Porphyromonas gingivalis and the immune response to citrullinated autoantigens before the clinical onset of rheumatoid arthritis in a Southern European nested case–control study

Research article

National Rugby League athletes and tendon tap reflex assessment: a matched cohort clinical study

Research article

Characterization of nano-structural and nano-mechanical properties of osteoarthritic subchondral bone