Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 4/2022

Open Access 01-04-2022 | Gastric Cancer | Original Article

Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel and ramucirumab versus paclitaxel and ramucirumab as second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer: a multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis (CROSS SELL study)

Authors: Akio Nakasya, Yuya Hagiwara, Tatsuki Ikoma, Yusuke Kurioka, Toshihiko Matsumoto, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Takao Tsuduki, Takeshi Kajiwara, Toshikazu Moriwaki, Tomohiro Nishina, Natsumi Yamashita, Ichinosuke Hyodo

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 4/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Paclitaxel plus ramucirumab (PTX + RAM) is the standard second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (AGC). Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) is an improved, more convenient form of PTX and is non-inferior to PTX. Although some retrospective and single-arm phase II studies regarding nab-PTX + RAM have been reported, comparative studies are lacking. Here, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of nab-PTX + RAM and PTX + RAM using propensity score matching.

Methods

Clinical data of 265 patients treated for AGC with nab-PTX + RAM or PTX + RAM were retrospectively collected. Nab-PTX was administered at dosages of 100 mg/m2, replacing PTX in the standard PTX + RAM regimen. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were compared using 1:1 propensity score matching.

Results

In total, 190 (72%) patients were matched. The median PFS was 5.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.4–6.3] and 4.7 (95% CI 3.2–5.3) months in the nab-PTX + RAM and PTX + RAM groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.76, 95% CI 0.56–1.03, p = 0.07]. The median OS was 11.5 (95% CI 9.2–15.0) and 9.9 (95% CI 8.0–12.7) months, respectively (HR = 0.78, 95% CI 0.56–1.07, p = 0.12). Grade 3 and 4 neutropenia was observed more frequently in the nab-PTX + RAM group (72% vs. 56%, p = 0.03). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

Conclusions

Nab-PTX + RAM exhibited more favorable trends in terms of PFS and OS but was more myelosuppressive than PTX + RAM. As neutropenia is commonly manageable toxicity, nab-PTX + RAM presents a treatment alternative for AGC. Further studies including randomized, controlled studies are warranted.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Association JGC, Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines (2018) 5th ed. Gastric Cancer 2021(24):1–21 Association JGC, Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines (2018) 5th ed. Gastric Cancer 2021(24):1–21
2.
go back to reference National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2020) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology gastric cancer version 1 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2020) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology gastric cancer version 1
3.
go back to reference Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W et al (2016) Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Ann Oncol 27:v38-49CrossRef Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W et al (2016) Gastric cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Ann Oncol 27:v38-49CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E et al (2014) Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1224–1235CrossRef Wilke H, Muro K, Van Cutsem E et al (2014) Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1224–1235CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Shitara K, Takashima A, Fujitani K et al (2017) Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer (ABSOLUTE): an open-label, randomized, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:277–287CrossRef Shitara K, Takashima A, Fujitani K et al (2017) Nab-paclitaxel versus solvent-based paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer (ABSOLUTE): an open-label, randomized, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:277–287CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bando H, Shimodaira H, Fujitani K et al (2018) A phase II study of nab-paclitaxel in combination with ramucirumab in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 91:86–91CrossRef Bando H, Shimodaira H, Fujitani K et al (2018) A phase II study of nab-paclitaxel in combination with ramucirumab in patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer 91:86–91CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ishikawa M, Iwasa S, Nagashima K et al (2020) Retrospective comparison of nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab and paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer focusing on peritoneal metastasis. Investig New Drugs 38:533–540CrossRef Ishikawa M, Iwasa S, Nagashima K et al (2020) Retrospective comparison of nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab and paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer focusing on peritoneal metastasis. Investig New Drugs 38:533–540CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Okunaka M, Kotani D, Demachi K et al (2020) Retrospective cohort study of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel plus ramucirumab versus paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer. BMC Cancer 20:1111CrossRef Okunaka M, Kotani D, Demachi K et al (2020) Retrospective cohort study of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel plus ramucirumab versus paclitaxel plus ramucirumab as second-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer. BMC Cancer 20:1111CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRef Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228–247CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chau I, Norman AR, Cunningham D et al (2004) Multivariate prognostic factor analysis in locally advanced and metastatic esophago-gastric cancer-pooled analysis from three multicenter, randomized, controlled trials using individual patient data. J Clin Oncol 22(12):2395–2403CrossRef Chau I, Norman AR, Cunningham D et al (2004) Multivariate prognostic factor analysis in locally advanced and metastatic esophago-gastric cancer-pooled analysis from three multicenter, randomized, controlled trials using individual patient data. J Clin Oncol 22(12):2395–2403CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Takahari D, Boku N, Mizusawa J et al (2014) Determination of prognostic factors in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer using the data from a randomized controlled trial, Japan clinical oncology group 9912. Oncologist 19(4):358–366CrossRef Takahari D, Boku N, Mizusawa J et al (2014) Determination of prognostic factors in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer using the data from a randomized controlled trial, Japan clinical oncology group 9912. Oncologist 19(4):358–366CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Fuchs CS, Muro K, Tomasek J et al (2017) Prognostic factor analysis of overall survival in gastric cancer from two Phase III studies of second-line ramucirumab (REGARD and RAINBOW) using pooled patient data. J Gastric Cancer 17:132–144CrossRef Fuchs CS, Muro K, Tomasek J et al (2017) Prognostic factor analysis of overall survival in gastric cancer from two Phase III studies of second-line ramucirumab (REGARD and RAINBOW) using pooled patient data. J Gastric Cancer 17:132–144CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Austin PC (2009) Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med 28(25):3083–3107CrossRef Austin PC (2009) Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity-score matched samples. Stat Med 28(25):3083–3107CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Takashima A, Shitara K, Fujitani K et al (2019) Peritoneal metastasis as a predictive factor for nab-paclitaxel in patients with pretreated advanced gastric cancer: an exploratory analysis of the phase III ABSOLUTE trial. Gastric Cancer 22:155–163CrossRef Takashima A, Shitara K, Fujitani K et al (2019) Peritoneal metastasis as a predictive factor for nab-paclitaxel in patients with pretreated advanced gastric cancer: an exploratory analysis of the phase III ABSOLUTE trial. Gastric Cancer 22:155–163CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Hirata K, Hamamoto Y, Ando M et al (2020) Weekly paclitaxel plus ramucirumab versus weekly nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination refractory to first-line therapy—the P-select trial (WJOG10617G)—a randomized phase II trial by the West Japan Oncology Group. BMC Cancer 20(1):548CrossRef Hirata K, Hamamoto Y, Ando M et al (2020) Weekly paclitaxel plus ramucirumab versus weekly nab-paclitaxel plus ramucirumab for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination refractory to first-line therapy—the P-select trial (WJOG10617G)—a randomized phase II trial by the West Japan Oncology Group. BMC Cancer 20(1):548CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Shitara K, Matsuo K, Takahari D et al (2010) Neutropenia as a prognostic factor in advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing second-line chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel. Ann Oncol 21:2403–2409CrossRef Shitara K, Matsuo K, Takahari D et al (2010) Neutropenia as a prognostic factor in advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing second-line chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel. Ann Oncol 21:2403–2409CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shitara K, Yuki S, Takahari D et al (2014) Randomised phase II study comparing dose-escalated weekly paclitaxel vs standard-dose weekly paclitaxel for patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 110:271–277CrossRef Shitara K, Yuki S, Takahari D et al (2014) Randomised phase II study comparing dose-escalated weekly paclitaxel vs standard-dose weekly paclitaxel for patients with previously treated advanced gastric cancer. Br J Cancer 110:271–277CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel and ramucirumab versus paclitaxel and ramucirumab as second-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer: a multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis (CROSS SELL study)
Authors
Akio Nakasya
Yuya Hagiwara
Tatsuki Ikoma
Yusuke Kurioka
Toshihiko Matsumoto
Yoshiyuki Yamamoto
Takao Tsuduki
Takeshi Kajiwara
Toshikazu Moriwaki
Tomohiro Nishina
Natsumi Yamashita
Ichinosuke Hyodo
Publication date
01-04-2022
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-022-02114-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 4/2022 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine