Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Cancer 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Gastric Cancer | Research

Log odds of positive lymph nodes as a novel prognostic predictor for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Yiding Li, Guiling Wu, Jinqiang Liu, Yujie Zhang, Wanli Yang, Xiaoqian Wang, Lili Duan, Liaoran Niu, Junfeng Chen, Wei Zhou, Weili Han, Jing Wang, Helun Zhong, Gang Ji, Daiming Fan, Liu Hong

Published in: BMC Cancer | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the predictive and prognostic ability of the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) staging system and compare it with pathological N (pN) classification and the ratio-based lymph node system (rN) for the overall survival (OS) of gastric cancer (GC).

Methods

Through a systematic review till March 7, 2022, we identified population-based studies that reported the prognostic effects of LODDS in patients with GC. We compare the predictive effectiveness of the LODDS staging system with that of the rN and pN classification systems for the OS of GC.

Results

Twelve studies comprising 20,312 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The results showed that LODDS1, LODDS2, LODDS3, and LODDS4 in GC patients were correlated with poor OS compared with LODDS0 (LODDS1 vs. LODDS0: HR = 1.62, 95% CI (1.42, 1.85); LODDS2 vs. LODDS0: HR = 2.47, 95% CI (2.02, 3.03); LODDS3 vs. LODDS0: HR = 3.15, 95% CI (2.50, 3.97); LODDS4 vs. LODDS0: HR = 4.55, 95% CI (3.29, 6.29)). Additionally, significant differences in survival were observed among patients with different LODDS classifications (all P-values were < 0.001) with the same rN and pN classifications. Meanwhile, for patients with different pN or rN classifications with the same LODDS classification, prognosis was highly similar.

Conclusion

The findings show that LODDS is correlated with the prognosis of GC patients and is superior to the pN and rN classifications for prognostic assessment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRefPubMed Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Siewert J, Böttcher K, Stein H, et al. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg. 1998;228(4):449–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Siewert J, Böttcher K, Stein H, et al. Relevant prognostic factors in gastric cancer: ten-year results of the German Gastric Cancer Study. Ann Surg. 1998;228(4):449–61.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Wu C, Hsieh M, Lo S, et al. Relation of number of positive lymph nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma. Gut. 1996;38(4):525–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wu C, Hsieh M, Lo S, et al. Relation of number of positive lymph nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma. Gut. 1996;38(4):525–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Sano T, Coit D, Kim H, et al. Proposal of a new stage grouping of gastric cancer for TNM classification: International Gastric Cancer Association staging project. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20(2):217–25.PubMedCrossRef Sano T, Coit D, Kim H, et al. Proposal of a new stage grouping of gastric cancer for TNM classification: International Gastric Cancer Association staging project. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20(2):217–25.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Coburn N, Swallow C, Kiss A, et al. Significant regional variation in adequacy of lymph node assessment and survival in gastric cancer. Cancer. 2006;107(9):2143–51.PubMedCrossRef Coburn N, Swallow C, Kiss A, et al. Significant regional variation in adequacy of lymph node assessment and survival in gastric cancer. Cancer. 2006;107(9):2143–51.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Schwarz R, Smith D. Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable gastric cancer of advanced stage. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(2):317–28.PubMedCrossRef Schwarz R, Smith D. Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable gastric cancer of advanced stage. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14(2):317–28.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Smith D, Schwarz R, Schwarz R. Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(28):7114–24.PubMedCrossRef Smith D, Schwarz R, Schwarz R. Impact of total lymph node count on staging and survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: data from a large US-population database. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(28):7114–24.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Deng J, Liu J, Wang W, et al. Validation of clinical significance of examined lymph node count for accurate prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer for the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system. Chin J Cancer Res. 2018;30(5):477–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Deng J, Liu J, Wang W, et al. Validation of clinical significance of examined lymph node count for accurate prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer for the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system. Chin J Cancer Res. 2018;30(5):477–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kim CY, Yang DH. Adjustment of N stages of gastric cancer by the ratio between the metastatic and examined lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(7):1868–74.PubMedCrossRef Kim CY, Yang DH. Adjustment of N stages of gastric cancer by the ratio between the metastatic and examined lymph nodes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(7):1868–74.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Coimbra F, Costa W, Montagnini A, et al. The interaction between N-category and N-ratio as a new tool to improve lymph node metastasis staging in gastric cancer: results of a single cancer center in Brazil. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(1):47–54.PubMedCrossRef Coimbra F, Costa W, Montagnini A, et al. The interaction between N-category and N-ratio as a new tool to improve lymph node metastasis staging in gastric cancer: results of a single cancer center in Brazil. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2011;37(1):47–54.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gu P, Deng J, Sun Z, et al. Superiority of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) for prognostic prediction after gastric cancer surgery: a multi-institutional analysis of 7620 patients in China. Surg Today. 2021;51(1):101–10.PubMedCrossRef Gu P, Deng J, Sun Z, et al. Superiority of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) for prognostic prediction after gastric cancer surgery: a multi-institutional analysis of 7620 patients in China. Surg Today. 2021;51(1):101–10.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Xu J, Bian YH, Jin X, et al. Prognostic assessment of different metastatic lymph node staging methods for gastric cancer after D2 resection. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(12):1975–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Xu J, Bian YH, Jin X, et al. Prognostic assessment of different metastatic lymph node staging methods for gastric cancer after D2 resection. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(12):1975–83.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Wang J, Dang P, Raut C, et al. Comparison of a lymph node ratio-based staging system with the 7th AJCC system for gastric cancer: analysis of 18,043 patients from the SEER database. Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):478–85.PubMedCrossRef Wang J, Dang P, Raut C, et al. Comparison of a lymph node ratio-based staging system with the 7th AJCC system for gastric cancer: analysis of 18,043 patients from the SEER database. Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):478–85.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Sun Z, Xu Y, Li DM, et al. Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection. Cancer. 2010;116(11):2571–80.PubMedCrossRef Sun Z, Xu Y, Li DM, et al. Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection. Cancer. 2010;116(11):2571–80.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Kim Y, et al. Prognostic performance of different lymph node staging systems after curative intent resection for gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2015;262(6):991–8.PubMedCrossRef Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Kim Y, et al. Prognostic performance of different lymph node staging systems after curative intent resection for gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2015;262(6):991–8.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Shi Z, Xiao ZQ, Li LJ, et al. Application of nomogram containing log odds of metastatic lymph node in gallbladder cancer patients. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(10):655.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Shi Z, Xiao ZQ, Li LJ, et al. Application of nomogram containing log odds of metastatic lymph node in gallbladder cancer patients. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(10):655.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Modi KB, Sekhon R, Rawal S, et al. Analysis of role of lymph node density, negative lymph node and lodds on survival in cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143:426–7. Modi KB, Sekhon R, Rawal S, et al. Analysis of role of lymph node density, negative lymph node and lodds on survival in cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143:426–7.
19.
go back to reference Dziedzic D, Rudzinski P, Orlowski T, et al. Log odds as a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and ratio-based category for non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(1):S731.CrossRef Dziedzic D, Rudzinski P, Orlowski T, et al. Log odds as a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and ratio-based category for non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(1):S731.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lin P. Prognostic performance of different lymph node staging systems for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29:157A. Lin P. Prognostic performance of different lymph node staging systems for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Dis Esophagus. 2016;29:157A.
21.
go back to reference Smith DD, Nelson RA, Schwarz RE. A comparison of competing lymph node staging schemes in resectable gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:S64. Smith DD, Nelson RA, Schwarz RE. A comparison of competing lymph node staging schemes in resectable gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:S64.
22.
go back to reference Zhang QW, Zhang CH, Li XB, et al. Comparison of three lymph node staging schemes for predicting survival in patients with colorectal cancer: a large population database and Chinese multicenter validation. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018;6(8):A277. Zhang QW, Zhang CH, Li XB, et al. Comparison of three lymph node staging schemes for predicting survival in patients with colorectal cancer: a large population database and Chinese multicenter validation. United European Gastroenterol J. 2018;6(8):A277.
23.
go back to reference Pan SW, Wang PL, Xing YN, et al. Retrieved lymph nodes from different anatomic groups in gastric cancer: a proposed optimal number, comparison with other nodal classification strategies and its impact on prognosis. Cancer Commun. 2019;39(1):49.CrossRef Pan SW, Wang PL, Xing YN, et al. Retrieved lymph nodes from different anatomic groups in gastric cancer: a proposed optimal number, comparison with other nodal classification strategies and its impact on prognosis. Cancer Commun. 2019;39(1):49.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Cao HH, Tang ZQ, Yu Z, et al. Comparison of the 8th union for international cancer control lymph node staging system for gastric cancer with two other lymph node staging systems. Oncol Lett. 2019;17(1):1299–305.PubMed Cao HH, Tang ZQ, Yu Z, et al. Comparison of the 8th union for international cancer control lymph node staging system for gastric cancer with two other lymph node staging systems. Oncol Lett. 2019;17(1):1299–305.PubMed
25.
go back to reference Tóth D, Bíró A, Varga Z, et al. Comparison of different lymph node staging systems in prognosis of gastric cancer: a bi-institutional study from Hungary. Chin J Cancer Res. 2017;29(4):323–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tóth D, Bíró A, Varga Z, et al. Comparison of different lymph node staging systems in prognosis of gastric cancer: a bi-institutional study from Hungary. Chin J Cancer Res. 2017;29(4):323–32.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603–5.PubMedCrossRef Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(9):603–5.PubMedCrossRef
28.
29.
go back to reference Higgins J, Thompson S, Deeks J, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2003;327(7414):557–60.PubMedCrossRef Higgins J, Thompson S, Deeks J, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2003;327(7414):557–60.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Guyatt G, Oxman A, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294–302.PubMedCrossRef Guyatt G, Oxman A, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence–inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294–302.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455–63.PubMedCrossRef Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56(2):455–63.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Galbraith R. A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials. Stat Med. 1988;7(8):889–94.PubMedCrossRef Galbraith R. A note on graphical presentation of estimated odds ratios from several clinical trials. Stat Med. 1988;7(8):889–94.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1997;315(7109):629–34.PubMedCrossRef Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1997;315(7109):629–34.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lee JW, Ali B, Park CH, et al. Different lymph node staging systems in patients with gastric cancer from Korean. Medicine (United States). 2016;95(25):e3860. Lee JW, Ali B, Park CH, et al. Different lymph node staging systems in patients with gastric cancer from Korean. Medicine (United States). 2016;95(25):e3860.
35.
go back to reference Jian-Hui C, Shi-Rong C, Hui W, et al. Prognostic value of three different lymph node staging systems in the survival of patients with gastric cancer following D2 lymphadenectomy. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(8):11105–13.PubMedCrossRef Jian-Hui C, Shi-Rong C, Hui W, et al. Prognostic value of three different lymph node staging systems in the survival of patients with gastric cancer following D2 lymphadenectomy. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(8):11105–13.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Aurello P, Petrucciani N, Nigri GR, et al. Log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS): what are their role in the prognostic assessment of gastric adenocarcinoma? J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(7):1254–60.PubMedCrossRef Aurello P, Petrucciani N, Nigri GR, et al. Log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS): what are their role in the prognostic assessment of gastric adenocarcinoma? J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(7):1254–60.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Liu H, Deng J, Zhang R, et al. The RML of lymph node metastasis was superior to the LODDS forevaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer. Int J Surg. 2013;11(5):419–24.PubMedCrossRef Liu H, Deng J, Zhang R, et al. The RML of lymph node metastasis was superior to the LODDS forevaluating the prognosis of gastric cancer. Int J Surg. 2013;11(5):419–24.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Qiu MZ, Qiu HJ, Wang ZQ, et al. The tumor-log odds of positive lymph nodes-metastasis staging system, a promising new staging system for gastric cancer after D2 resection in China. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31736.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Qiu MZ, Qiu HJ, Wang ZQ, et al. The tumor-log odds of positive lymph nodes-metastasis staging system, a promising new staging system for gastric cancer after D2 resection in China. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31736.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Gong Y, Pan S, Wang X, et al. A novel lymph node staging system for gastric cancer including modified Union for cancer Control/American Joint Committee on cancer and Japanese Gastric Cancer Association criteria. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46:e27–32.PubMedCrossRef Gong Y, Pan S, Wang X, et al. A novel lymph node staging system for gastric cancer including modified Union for cancer Control/American Joint Committee on cancer and Japanese Gastric Cancer Association criteria. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46:e27–32.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Che K, Wang Y, Wu N, et al. Prognostic nomograms based on three lymph node classification systems for resected gastric adenocarcinoma: a large population-based cohort study and external validation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:8937–49.PubMedCrossRef Che K, Wang Y, Wu N, et al. Prognostic nomograms based on three lymph node classification systems for resected gastric adenocarcinoma: a large population-based cohort study and external validation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:8937–49.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Daw NC, Chi YY, Kalapurakal JA, et al. Activity of vincristine and irinotecan in diffuse anaplastic Wilms tumor and therapy outcomes of stage II to IV disease: results of the Children’s Oncology Group AREN0321 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(14):1558–68.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Daw NC, Chi YY, Kalapurakal JA, et al. Activity of vincristine and irinotecan in diffuse anaplastic Wilms tumor and therapy outcomes of stage II to IV disease: results of the Children’s Oncology Group AREN0321 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(14):1558–68.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Shen J, Kim S, Cheong J, et al. The impact of total retrieved lymph nodes on staging and survival of patients with pT3 gastric cancer. Cancer. 2007;110(4):745–51.PubMedCrossRef Shen J, Kim S, Cheong J, et al. The impact of total retrieved lymph nodes on staging and survival of patients with pT3 gastric cancer. Cancer. 2007;110(4):745–51.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Bouvier A, Haas O, Piard F, et al. How many nodes must be examined to accurately stage gastric carcinomas? Results from a population based study. Cancer. 2002;94(11):2862–6.PubMedCrossRef Bouvier A, Haas O, Piard F, et al. How many nodes must be examined to accurately stage gastric carcinomas? Results from a population based study. Cancer. 2002;94(11):2862–6.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Lee H, Yang H, Kim W, et al. Influence of the number of lymph nodes examined on staging of gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2001;88(10):1408–12.PubMedCrossRef Lee H, Yang H, Kim W, et al. Influence of the number of lymph nodes examined on staging of gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2001;88(10):1408–12.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Hsieh M, Wang S, Wei C, et al. S1 versus Doublet Regimens as Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer after Radical Surgery with D2 Dissection-A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(9):2384.PubMedCrossRef Hsieh M, Wang S, Wei C, et al. S1 versus Doublet Regimens as Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer after Radical Surgery with D2 Dissection-A Propensity Score Matching Analysis. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(9):2384.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Li J, Lin Y, Wang Y, et al. Prognostic nomogram based on the metastatic lymph node ratio for gastric neuroendocrine tumour: SEER database analysis. ESMO Open. 2020;5(2):e000632.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Li J, Lin Y, Wang Y, et al. Prognostic nomogram based on the metastatic lymph node ratio for gastric neuroendocrine tumour: SEER database analysis. ESMO Open. 2020;5(2):e000632.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Rawicz-Pruszyński K, Ciseł B, Mlak R, et al. The role of the lymph node ratio in advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancers. 2019;11(12):1914.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Rawicz-Pruszyński K, Ciseł B, Mlak R, et al. The role of the lymph node ratio in advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancers. 2019;11(12):1914.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Shin J, Kim H, Lee W, et al. The Stage Migration Should be Reconsidered in Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer: Based on Propensity Score Analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2021;20(4):e273–8.PubMedCrossRef Shin J, Kim H, Lee W, et al. The Stage Migration Should be Reconsidered in Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer: Based on Propensity Score Analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2021;20(4):e273–8.PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Li MM, Zhao S, Eskander A, et al. Stage Migration and Survival Trends in Laryngeal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(12):7300-9. Li MM, Zhao S, Eskander A, et al. Stage Migration and Survival Trends in Laryngeal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(12):7300-9.
50.
go back to reference Wang X, Bao M, Zhang C. Prognostic value of different lymph node staging methods for node-positive cardia gastric cancer: a register-based retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(8):e050378.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wang X, Bao M, Zhang C. Prognostic value of different lymph node staging methods for node-positive cardia gastric cancer: a register-based retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(8):e050378.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Deng W, Xu T, Wang Y, et al. Log odds of positive lymph nodes may predict survival benefit in patients with node-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2018;122:60–6.PubMedCrossRef Deng W, Xu T, Wang Y, et al. Log odds of positive lymph nodes may predict survival benefit in patients with node-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2018;122:60–6.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Occhionorelli S, Andreotti D, Vallese P, et al. Evaluation on prognostic efficacy of lymph nodes ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in complicated colon cancer: the first study in emergency surgery. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16(1):186.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Occhionorelli S, Andreotti D, Vallese P, et al. Evaluation on prognostic efficacy of lymph nodes ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in complicated colon cancer: the first study in emergency surgery. World J Surg Oncol. 2018;16(1):186.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Wang J, Li J, Chen R, et al. Survival effect of different lymph node staging methods on ovarian cancer: an analysis of 10 878 patients. Cancer Med. 2018;7(9):4315–29.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wang J, Li J, Chen R, et al. Survival effect of different lymph node staging methods on ovarian cancer: an analysis of 10 878 patients. Cancer Med. 2018;7(9):4315–29.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Log odds of positive lymph nodes as a novel prognostic predictor for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Yiding Li
Guiling Wu
Jinqiang Liu
Yujie Zhang
Wanli Yang
Xiaoqian Wang
Lili Duan
Liaoran Niu
Junfeng Chen
Wei Zhou
Weili Han
Jing Wang
Helun Zhong
Gang Ji
Daiming Fan
Liu Hong
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cancer / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2407
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10805-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Cancer 1/2023 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine