Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Molecular Cancer 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Gastric Cancer | Research

Clinically conserved genomic subtypes of gastric adenocarcinoma

Authors: Yun Seong Jeong, Young-Gyu Eun, Sung Hwan Lee, Sang-Hee Kang, Sun Young Yim, Eui Hyun Kim, Joo Kyung Noh, Bo Hwa Sohn, Seon Rang Woo, Moonkyoo Kong, Deok Hwa Nam, Hee-Jin Jang, Hyun-Sung Lee, Shumei Song, Sang Cheul Oh, Jeeyun Lee, Jaffer A. Ajani, Ju-Seog Lee

Published in: Molecular Cancer | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is a lethal disease characterized by genomic and clinical heterogeneity. By integrating 8 previously established genomic signatures for GAC subtypes, we identified 6 clinically and molecularly distinct genomic consensus subtypes (CGSs). CGS1 have the poorest prognosis, very high stem cell characteristics, and high IGF1 expression, but low genomic alterations. CGS2 is enriched with canonical epithelial gene expression. CGS3 and CGS4 have high copy number alterations and low immune reactivity. However, CGS3 and CGS4 differ in that CGS3 has high HER2 activation, while CGS4 has high SALL4 and KRAS activation. CGS5 has the high mutation burden and moderately high immune reactivity that are characteristic of microsatellite instable tumors. Most CGS6 tumors are positive for Epstein Barr virus and show extremely high levels of methylation and high immune reactivity. In a systematic analysis of genomic and proteomic data, we estimated the potential response rate of each consensus subtype to standard and experimental treatments such as radiation therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Interestingly, CGS3 was significantly associated with a benefit from chemoradiation therapy owing to its high basal level of ferroptosis. In addition, we also identified potential therapeutic targets for each consensus subtype. Thus, the consensus subtypes produced a robust classification and provide for additional characterizations for subtype-based customized interventions.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sung H, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49. Sung H, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.
2.
go back to reference Ajani JA, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma Nature reviews Disease primers. 2017;3:17036.PubMed Ajani JA, et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma Nature reviews Disease primers. 2017;3:17036.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Nagaraja AK, Kikuchi O, Bass AJ. Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2019;9:1656–72.PubMedPubMedCentral Nagaraja AK, Kikuchi O, Bass AJ. Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma. Cancer Discov. 2019;9:1656–72.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Joshi SS, Badgwell BD. Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:264–79. Joshi SS, Badgwell BD. Current treatment and recent progress in gastric cancer. CA  Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:264–79.
5.
6.
go back to reference TCGA Consortium. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2014;513:202–9. TCGA Consortium. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2014;513:202–9.
7.
8.
go back to reference Cheong JH, et al. Predictive test for chemotherapy response in resectable gastric cancer: a multi-cohort, retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:629–38.PubMed Cheong JH, et al. Predictive test for chemotherapy response in resectable gastric cancer: a multi-cohort, retrospective analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:629–38.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Cristescu R, et al. Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies subtypes associated with distinct clinical outcomes. Nat Med. 2015;21:449–56.PubMed Cristescu R, et al. Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies subtypes associated with distinct clinical outcomes. Nat Med. 2015;21:449–56.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Cho JY, et al. Gene expression signature-based prognostic risk score in gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:1850–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Cho JY, et al. Gene expression signature-based prognostic risk score in gastric cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:1850–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Sohn BH, et al. Clinical Significance of Four Molecular Subtypes of Gastric Cancer Identified by The Cancer Genome Atlas Project. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:4441–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Sohn BH, et al. Clinical Significance of Four Molecular Subtypes of Gastric Cancer Identified by The Cancer Genome Atlas Project. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23:4441–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Lee J, et al. Nanostring-based multigene assay to predict recurrence for gastric cancer patients after surgery. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e90133.PubMedPubMedCentral Lee J, et al. Nanostring-based multigene assay to predict recurrence for gastric cancer patients after surgery. PLoS ONE. 2014;9: e90133.PubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Wang G, et al. Comparison of global gene expression of gastric cardia and noncardia cancers from a high-risk population in China. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e63826.PubMedPubMedCentral Wang G, et al. Comparison of global gene expression of gastric cardia and noncardia cancers from a high-risk population in China. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e63826.PubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Holbrook JD, et al. Deep sequencing of gastric carcinoma reveals somatic mutations relevant to personalized medicine. J Transl Med. 2011;9:119.PubMedPubMedCentral Holbrook JD, et al. Deep sequencing of gastric carcinoma reveals somatic mutations relevant to personalized medicine. J Transl Med. 2011;9:119.PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Ooi CH, et al. Oncogenic pathway combinations predict clinical prognosis in gastric cancer. PLoS Genet. 2009;5: e1000676.PubMedPubMedCentral Ooi CH, et al. Oncogenic pathway combinations predict clinical prognosis in gastric cancer. PLoS Genet. 2009;5: e1000676.PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Kim HK, et al. A gene expression signature of acquired chemoresistance to cisplatin and fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e16694.PubMedPubMedCentral Kim HK, et al. A gene expression signature of acquired chemoresistance to cisplatin and fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients. PLoS ONE. 2011;6: e16694.PubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Tan IB, et al. Intrinsic subtypes of gastric cancer, based on gene expression pattern, predict survival and respond differently to chemotherapy. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:476–85.PubMed Tan IB, et al. Intrinsic subtypes of gastric cancer, based on gene expression pattern, predict survival and respond differently to chemotherapy. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:476–85.PubMed
18.
go back to reference Lee KW, et al. Development and Validation of a Six-Gene Recurrence Risk Score Assay for Gastric Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:6228–35.PubMedPubMedCentral Lee KW, et al. Development and Validation of a Six-Gene Recurrence Risk Score Assay for Gastric Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:6228–35.PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Shin MK, et al. Long non-coding RNAs are significantly associated with prognosis and response to therapies in gastric cancer. Clin Transl Med. 2021;11: e421.PubMedPubMedCentral Shin MK, et al. Long non-coding RNAs are significantly associated with prognosis and response to therapies in gastric cancer. Clin Transl Med. 2021;11: e421.PubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:14863–8.PubMedPubMedCentral Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:14863–8.PubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Lee JS, et al. Application of comparative functional genomics to identify best-fit mouse models to study human cancer. Nat Genet. 2004;36:1306–11.PubMed Lee JS, et al. Application of comparative functional genomics to identify best-fit mouse models to study human cancer. Nat Genet. 2004;36:1306–11.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Kaposi-Novak P, et al. Met-regulated expression signature defines a subset of human hepatocellular carcinomas with poor prognosis and aggressive phenotype. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:1582–95.PubMedPubMedCentral Kaposi-Novak P, et al. Met-regulated expression signature defines a subset of human hepatocellular carcinomas with poor prognosis and aggressive phenotype. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:1582–95.PubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Hoadley KA, et al. Multiplatform analysis of 12 cancer types reveals molecular classification within and across tissues of origin. Cell. 2014;158:929–44.PubMedPubMedCentral Hoadley KA, et al. Multiplatform analysis of 12 cancer types reveals molecular classification within and across tissues of origin. Cell. 2014;158:929–44.PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Kandoth C Fau - Schultz N, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013;497:67–73. Kandoth C Fau - Schultz N, et al. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature. 2013;497:67–73.
26.
go back to reference TCGA. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490:61–70. TCGA. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490:61–70.
27.
go back to reference Hoadley KA, et al. Cell-of-Origin Patterns Dominate the Molecular Classification of 10,000 Tumors. Cell. 2018;173:291–304.PubMedPubMedCentral Hoadley KA, et al. Cell-of-Origin Patterns Dominate the Molecular Classification of 10,000 Tumors. Cell. 2018;173:291–304.PubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Wilkerson MD, Hayes DN. ConsensusClusterPlus: a class discovery tool with confidence assessments and item tracking. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2010;26:1572–3.PubMed Wilkerson MD, Hayes DN. ConsensusClusterPlus: a class discovery tool with confidence assessments and item tracking. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England). 2010;26:1572–3.PubMed
29.
30.
go back to reference Tan SH, et al. AQP5 enriches for stem cells and cancer origins in the distal stomach. Nature. 2020;578:437–43.PubMed Tan SH, et al. AQP5 enriches for stem cells and cancer origins in the distal stomach. Nature. 2020;578:437–43.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Barker N, et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature. 2007;449:1003–7.PubMed Barker N, et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature. 2007;449:1003–7.PubMed
32.
go back to reference Tian H, et al. A reserve stem cell population in small intestine renders Lgr5-positive cells dispensable. Nature. 2011;478:255–9.PubMedPubMedCentral Tian H, et al. A reserve stem cell population in small intestine renders Lgr5-positive cells dispensable. Nature. 2011;478:255–9.PubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Lee JS, et al. Classification and prediction of survival in hepatocellular carcinoma by gene expression profiling. Hepatology. 2004;40:667–76.PubMed Lee JS, et al. Classification and prediction of survival in hepatocellular carcinoma by gene expression profiling. Hepatology. 2004;40:667–76.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Lee JS, et al. A novel prognostic subtype of human hepatocellular carcinoma derived from hepatic progenitor cells. Nat Med. 2006;12:410–6.PubMed Lee JS, et al. A novel prognostic subtype of human hepatocellular carcinoma derived from hepatic progenitor cells. Nat Med. 2006;12:410–6.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Kim JH, et al. Genomic predictors for recurrence patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma: model derivation and validation. PLoS Med. 2014;11: e1001770.PubMedPubMedCentral Kim JH, et al. Genomic predictors for recurrence patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma: model derivation and validation. PLoS Med. 2014;11: e1001770.PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Nagaoka K, et al. Deep immunophenotyping at the single-cell level identifies a combination of anti-IL-17 and checkpoint blockade as an effective treatment in a preclinical model of data-guided personalized immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8: e001358.PubMedPubMedCentral Nagaoka K, et al. Deep immunophenotyping at the single-cell level identifies a combination of anti-IL-17 and checkpoint blockade as an effective treatment in a preclinical model of data-guided personalized immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2020;8: e001358.PubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference van den Ende T, et al. Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Combined with Atezolizumab for Resectable Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Single Arm Phase II Feasibility Trial (PERFECT). Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:3351–9.PubMed van den Ende T, et al. Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Combined with Atezolizumab for Resectable Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Single Arm Phase II Feasibility Trial (PERFECT). Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:3351–9.PubMed
38.
go back to reference Park SH, et al. Phase III Trial to Compare Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Capecitabine and Cisplatin Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Gastric Cancer: Final Report of the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors Trial, Including Survival and Subset Analyses. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2015;33:3130–6.PubMed Park SH, et al. Phase III Trial to Compare Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Capecitabine and Cisplatin Versus Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Gastric Cancer: Final Report of the Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Stomach Tumors Trial, Including Survival and Subset Analyses. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2015;33:3130–6.PubMed
39.
go back to reference Lee J, et al. Phase III trial comparing capecitabine plus cisplatin versus capecitabine plus cisplatin with concurrent capecitabine radiotherapy in completely resected gastric cancer with D2 lymph node dissection: the ARTIST trial. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2012;30:268–73.PubMed Lee J, et al. Phase III trial comparing capecitabine plus cisplatin versus capecitabine plus cisplatin with concurrent capecitabine radiotherapy in completely resected gastric cancer with D2 lymph node dissection: the ARTIST trial. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2012;30:268–73.PubMed
40.
go back to reference Guo S, et al. Molecular Pathology of Patient Tumors, Patient-Derived Xenografts, and Cancer Cell Lines. Cancer Res. 2016;76:4619–26.PubMed Guo S, et al. Molecular Pathology of Patient Tumors, Patient-Derived Xenografts, and Cancer Cell Lines. Cancer Res. 2016;76:4619–26.PubMed
41.
go back to reference Bladt F, Friese-Hamim M, Ihling C, Wilm C, Blaukat A. The c-Met Inhibitor MSC2156119J Effectively Inhibits Tumor Growth in Liver Cancer Models. Cancers. 2014;6:1736–52.PubMedPubMedCentral Bladt F, Friese-Hamim M, Ihling C, Wilm C, Blaukat A. The c-Met Inhibitor MSC2156119J Effectively Inhibits Tumor Growth in Liver Cancer Models. Cancers. 2014;6:1736–52.PubMedPubMedCentral
42.
go back to reference Tibshirani R, Hastie T, Narasimhan B, Chu G. Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:6567–72.PubMedPubMedCentral Tibshirani R, Hastie T, Narasimhan B, Chu G. Diagnosis of multiple cancer types by shrunken centroids of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:6567–72.PubMedPubMedCentral
43.
go back to reference Parker JS, et al. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2009;27:1160–7.PubMed Parker JS, et al. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2009;27:1160–7.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Nagafuchi A, Shirayoshi Y, Okazaki K, Yasuda K, Takeichi M. Transformation of cell adhesion properties by exogenously introduced E-cadherin cDNA. Nature. 1987;329:341–3.PubMed Nagafuchi A, Shirayoshi Y, Okazaki K, Yasuda K, Takeichi M. Transformation of cell adhesion properties by exogenously introduced E-cadherin cDNA. Nature. 1987;329:341–3.PubMed
45.
go back to reference Yoshihara K, et al. Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2612.PubMed Yoshihara K, et al. Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2612.PubMed
46.
go back to reference Kang YK, et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390:2461–71.PubMed Kang YK, et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390:2461–71.PubMed
47.
go back to reference Janjigian YY, et al. First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;398:27–40.PubMedPubMedCentral Janjigian YY, et al. First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastro-oesophageal junction, and oesophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;398:27–40.PubMedPubMedCentral
48.
go back to reference Kelly RJ, et al. Adjuvant Nivolumab in Resected Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1191–203.PubMed Kelly RJ, et al. Adjuvant Nivolumab in Resected Esophageal or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1191–203.PubMed
49.
go back to reference Kim ST, et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of clinical responses to PD-1 inhibition in metastatic gastric cancer. Nat Med. 2018;24:1449–58.PubMed Kim ST, et al. Comprehensive molecular characterization of clinical responses to PD-1 inhibition in metastatic gastric cancer. Nat Med. 2018;24:1449–58.PubMed
50.
go back to reference Kwon M, et al. Determinants of Response and Intrinsic Resistance to PD-1 Blockade in Microsatellite Instability-High Gastric Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2021;11:2168–85.PubMed Kwon M, et al. Determinants of Response and Intrinsic Resistance to PD-1 Blockade in Microsatellite Instability-High Gastric Cancer. Cancer Discov. 2021;11:2168–85.PubMed
51.
go back to reference Bang YJ, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:315–21.PubMed Bang YJ, et al. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:315–21.PubMed
52.
go back to reference Cats A, et al. Chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy after surgery and preoperative chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer (CRITICS): an international, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:616–28.PubMed Cats A, et al. Chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy after surgery and preoperative chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer (CRITICS): an international, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:616–28.PubMed
53.
go back to reference Bang YJ, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:687–97.PubMed Bang YJ, et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;376:687–97.PubMed
54.
go back to reference Wong GS, et al. Targeting wild-type KRAS-amplified gastroesophageal cancer through combined MEK. Nat Med. 2018;24:968–77.PubMedPubMedCentral Wong GS, et al. Targeting wild-type KRAS-amplified gastroesophageal cancer through combined MEK. Nat Med. 2018;24:968–77.PubMedPubMedCentral
55.
go back to reference Pollak M. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor signalling in neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:915–28.PubMed Pollak M. Insulin and insulin-like growth factor signalling in neoplasia. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:915–28.PubMed
56.
go back to reference Pollak M. The insulin and insulin-like growth factor receptor family in neoplasia: an update. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:159–69.PubMed Pollak M. The insulin and insulin-like growth factor receptor family in neoplasia: an update. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12:159–69.PubMed
57.
58.
go back to reference Viswanathan VS, et al. Dependency of a therapy-resistant state of cancer cells on a lipid peroxidase pathway. Nature. 2017;547:453–7.PubMedPubMedCentral Viswanathan VS, et al. Dependency of a therapy-resistant state of cancer cells on a lipid peroxidase pathway. Nature. 2017;547:453–7.PubMedPubMedCentral
59.
go back to reference Zhang Q, et al. Atorvastatin Induces Mitochondria-Dependent Ferroptosis via the Modulation of Nrf2-xCT/GPx4 Axis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10: 806081.PubMedPubMedCentral Zhang Q, et al. Atorvastatin Induces Mitochondria-Dependent Ferroptosis via the Modulation of Nrf2-xCT/GPx4 Axis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10: 806081.PubMedPubMedCentral
60.
go back to reference Kim BM, Buchner G, Miletich I, Sharpe PT, Shivdasani RA. The stomach mesenchymal transcription factor Barx1 specifies gastric epithelial identity through inhibition of transient Wnt signaling. Dev Cell. 2005;8:611–22.PubMed Kim BM, Buchner G, Miletich I, Sharpe PT, Shivdasani RA. The stomach mesenchymal transcription factor Barx1 specifies gastric epithelial identity through inhibition of transient Wnt signaling. Dev Cell. 2005;8:611–22.PubMed
61.
go back to reference Perou CM, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–52.PubMed Perou CM, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2000;406:747–52.PubMed
62.
go back to reference Davoli T, Uno H, Wooten EC, Elledge SJ. Tumor aneuploidy correlates with markers of immune evasion and with reduced response to immunotherapy. Science. 2017;355:eaaf8399. Davoli T, Uno H, Wooten EC, Elledge SJ. Tumor aneuploidy correlates with markers of immune evasion and with reduced response to immunotherapy. Science. 2017;355:eaaf8399.
63.
go back to reference Ock CY, et al. Genomic landscape associated with potential response to anti-CTLA-4 treatment in. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1050.PubMedPubMedCentral Ock CY, et al. Genomic landscape associated with potential response to anti-CTLA-4 treatment in. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1050.PubMedPubMedCentral
64.
65.
go back to reference Donovan KA, et al. Thalidomide promotes degradation of SALL4, a transcription factor implicated in Duane Radial Ray syndrome. Elife. 2018;7: e38430.PubMedPubMedCentral Donovan KA, et al. Thalidomide promotes degradation of SALL4, a transcription factor implicated in Duane Radial Ray syndrome. Elife. 2018;7: e38430.PubMedPubMedCentral
66.
go back to reference Matyskiela ME, et al. SALL4 mediates teratogenicity as a thalidomide-dependent cereblon substrate. Nat Chem Biol. 2018;14:981–7.PubMed Matyskiela ME, et al. SALL4 mediates teratogenicity as a thalidomide-dependent cereblon substrate. Nat Chem Biol. 2018;14:981–7.PubMed
67.
go back to reference Fan C, et al. Cancer/testis antigens: from serology to mRNA cancer vaccine. Semin Cancer Biol. 2021;76:218–31.PubMed Fan C, et al. Cancer/testis antigens: from serology to mRNA cancer vaccine. Semin Cancer Biol. 2021;76:218–31.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinically conserved genomic subtypes of gastric adenocarcinoma
Authors
Yun Seong Jeong
Young-Gyu Eun
Sung Hwan Lee
Sang-Hee Kang
Sun Young Yim
Eui Hyun Kim
Joo Kyung Noh
Bo Hwa Sohn
Seon Rang Woo
Moonkyoo Kong
Deok Hwa Nam
Hee-Jin Jang
Hyun-Sung Lee
Shumei Song
Sang Cheul Oh
Jeeyun Lee
Jaffer A. Ajani
Ju-Seog Lee
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Molecular Cancer / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1476-4598
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-023-01796-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

Molecular Cancer 1/2023 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine