Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2020

01-12-2020 | Gastrectomy | ASO Author Reflections

ASO Author Reflections: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric Cancer—Has the Future Arrived?

Authors: Jun Lu, MD, PhD, Sam S. Yoon, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Special Issue 3/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

Gastric cancer (GC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide.1 Surgical resection currently is the dominant treatment option for GC patients. Since the introduction of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) for GC in 1994, LG has been widely applied clinically worldwide for more than 2 decades. Until recently, most clinical trials focused on minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for stage 1 GC.24 The oncologic effectiveness of LG in terms of 5-year overall survival also has been demonstrated in Asian patients with stage 1 GC.4,5 In fact, LG is considered a stipulated option for stage 1 distal GC according to the latest Japanese guideline published in 2014.6 The more rapid adoption of MIS for GC in the countries of Japan and Korea is largely due to the high incidence of GC overall and to early-stage GC in particular. In contrast, Western countries have been slower than Eastern countries to adopt a minimally invasive approach. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.CrossRef Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:699–708.CrossRef Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:699–708.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, et al. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg. 2016;263:28–35.CrossRef Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, et al. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg. 2016;263:28–35.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, et al. Effect of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy vs open distal gastrectomy on long-term survival among patients with stage I gastric cancer: the KLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:506–13.CrossRef Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, et al. Effect of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy vs open distal gastrectomy on long-term survival among patients with stage I gastric cancer: the KLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:506–13.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Honda M, Hiki N, Kinoshita T, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for clinical stage I gastric cancer: the LOC-1 study. Ann Surg. 2016;264:214–22.CrossRef Honda M, Hiki N, Kinoshita T, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for clinical stage I gastric cancer: the LOC-1 study. Ann Surg. 2016;264:214–22.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver.4). Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:1–19.CrossRef Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver.4). Gastric Cancer. 2017;20:1–19.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lee HJ, Hyung WJ, Yang HK, et al. Short-term outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy to open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). Ann Surg. 2019;270:983–91.CrossRef Lee HJ, Hyung WJ, Yang HK, et al. Short-term outcomes of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy to open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). Ann Surg. 2019;270:983–91.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, et al. Effect of laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy on 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: the CLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321:1983–92.CrossRef Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, et al. Effect of laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy on 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: the CLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321:1983–92.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Kinoshita T, Uyama I, Terashima M, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for clinical stage II/III gastric cancer: a multicenter cohort study in Japan (LOC-A study). Ann Surg. 2019;269:887–94.CrossRef Kinoshita T, Uyama I, Terashima M, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for clinical stage II/III gastric cancer: a multicenter cohort study in Japan (LOC-A study). Ann Surg. 2019;269:887–94.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference van Boxel GI, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R, et al. Robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a European perspective. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22:909–19.CrossRef van Boxel GI, Ruurda JP, van Hillegersberg R, et al. Robotic-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a European perspective. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22:909–19.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yang SY, Roh KH, Kim YN, et al. Surgical outcomes after open, laparoscopic, and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1770–7.CrossRef Yang SY, Roh KH, Kim YN, et al. Surgical outcomes after open, laparoscopic, and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1770–7.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Chang KK, Park DJ, Yoon SS. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma: innovation continues to challenge tradition. Ann Surg. 2016;264:223–5.CrossRef Chang KK, Park DJ, Yoon SS. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for gastric adenocarcinoma: innovation continues to challenge tradition. Ann Surg. 2016;264:223–5.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
ASO Author Reflections: Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric Cancer—Has the Future Arrived?
Authors
Jun Lu, MD, PhD
Sam S. Yoon, MD
Publication date
01-12-2020
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue Special Issue 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08297-w

Other articles of this Special Issue 3/2020

Annals of Surgical Oncology 3/2020 Go to the issue