Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgery 6/2021

01-06-2021 | Gastrectomy | Original Scientific Report

Surgical Outcome of Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients with a History of Roux-en-Y Reconstruction after Tumor Removal

Authors: Daiki Marukawa, Yoshito Tomimaru, Shogo Kobayashi, Yoshifumi Iwagami, Daisaku Yamada, Hirofumi Akita, Takehiro Noda, Kunihito Gotoh, Yuichiro Doki, Hidetoshi Eguchi

Published in: World Journal of Surgery | Issue 6/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The need for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) after Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction after tumor removal is expected to increase in future, but current studies on outcome are sparse. This surgery is challenging, due to intraabdominal adhesions and/or anatomical changes introduced by the previous abdominal surgery. Here, we investigated the surgical outcomes of PD after RY reconstruction following tumor removal.

Methods

We enrolled 283 patients that underwent PD. Surgical outcomes for PD were compared between patients with or without a history of RY reconstruction after tumor removal. Outcomes were also compared between two different surgical procedures for the post-PD reconstruction.

Results

Among 283 patients, 11 had a history of RY reconstruction after tumor removal (3.9%). Among these, RY reconstructions had been performed where the small intestine was anastomosed to a remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy (n = 2), to remnant stomach after proximal gastrectomy (n = 1), to the esophagus after total gastrectomy (n = 6), or to the hepatic duct after extrahepatic bile duct resection (n = 2). Surgical outcomes were not significantly different between cases with and without RY reconstructions. We identified two different reconstruction procedures after removing the periampullary tumor during PD. The surgical outcomes were not significantly different between these two reconstruction groups.

Conclusions

The surgical outcome of PD was not significantly affected by a history of RY reconstruction. Similarly, the type of reconstruction performed during PD did not significantly affect the outcome. These results could be useful when planning PD in patients with a history of RY reconstruction after tumor removal.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kojima K, Yamada H, Inokuchi M et al (2008) A comparison of Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg 247(6):962–967CrossRef Kojima K, Yamada H, Inokuchi M et al (2008) A comparison of Roux-en-Y and Billroth-I reconstruction after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg 247(6):962–967CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Stefanini P, Carboni M, Patrassi N et al (1975) Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy: a reappraisal of its indications and results. Ann Surg 181(2):213–219CrossRef Stefanini P, Carboni M, Patrassi N et al (1975) Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy: a reappraisal of its indications and results. Ann Surg 181(2):213–219CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Morano WF, Shaikh NF, Gleeson EM et al (2018) Reconstruction options following pancreaticoduodenectomy after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review. World J Surg Oncol 16(1):168CrossRef Morano WF, Shaikh NF, Gleeson EM et al (2018) Reconstruction options following pancreaticoduodenectomy after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review. World J Surg Oncol 16(1):168CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Peng JS, Corcelles R, Choong K et al (2018) Pancreatoduodenectomy after roux-en-Y gastric bypass: technical considerations and outcomes. HPB (Oxford) 20(1):34–40CrossRef Peng JS, Corcelles R, Choong K et al (2018) Pancreatoduodenectomy after roux-en-Y gastric bypass: technical considerations and outcomes. HPB (Oxford) 20(1):34–40CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR (1935) Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of vater. Ann Surg 102(4):763–779CrossRef Whipple AO, Parsons WB, Mullins CR (1935) Treatment of carcinoma of the ampulla of vater. Ann Surg 102(4):763–779CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Warshaw AL, Thayer SP (2004) Pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 8(6):733–741CrossRef Warshaw AL, Thayer SP (2004) Pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 8(6):733–741CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kakeji Y, Takahashi A, Hasegawa H et al (2020) Surgical outcomes in gastroenterological surgery in Japan. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 4(3):250–274CrossRef Kakeji Y, Takahashi A, Hasegawa H et al (2020) Surgical outcomes in gastroenterological surgery in Japan. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 4(3):250–274CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Aoki S, Miyata H, Konno H et al (2017) Risk factors of serious postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy and risk calculators for predicting postoperative complications: a nationwide study of 17,564 patients in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24:243–251CrossRef Aoki S, Miyata H, Konno H et al (2017) Risk factors of serious postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy and risk calculators for predicting postoperative complications: a nationwide study of 17,564 patients in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 24:243–251CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vin Y, Sima CS, Getrajdman GI et al (2008) Management and outcomes of postpancreatectomy fistula, leak, and abscess: results of 908 patients resected at a single institution between 2000 and 2005. J Am Coll Surg 207:490–498CrossRef Vin Y, Sima CS, Getrajdman GI et al (2008) Management and outcomes of postpancreatectomy fistula, leak, and abscess: results of 908 patients resected at a single institution between 2000 and 2005. J Am Coll Surg 207:490–498CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Trudeau MT, Maggino L, Ecker BL et al (2020) Pancreatic head resection following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: operative considerations and outcomes. J Gastointest Surg 24(1):76–87CrossRef Trudeau MT, Maggino L, Ecker BL et al (2020) Pancreatic head resection following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: operative considerations and outcomes. J Gastointest Surg 24(1):76–87CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of Surgical Complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of Surgical Complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Yokoyama S, Sekioka A, Ueno K et al (2014) Pancreaticoduodenectomy following total gastrectomy: a case report and liteerature review. World J Gastroenterol 20(10):2721–2724CrossRef Yokoyama S, Sekioka A, Ueno K et al (2014) Pancreaticoduodenectomy following total gastrectomy: a case report and liteerature review. World J Gastroenterol 20(10):2721–2724CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kawamoto Y, Ome Y, Kouda Y et al (2017) Pancreaticoduodenectomy following gastrectomy reconstructed with Billroth II or Roux-en Y method: Case series and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep 35:106–109CrossRef Kawamoto Y, Ome Y, Kouda Y et al (2017) Pancreaticoduodenectomy following gastrectomy reconstructed with Billroth II or Roux-en Y method: Case series and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep 35:106–109CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Doi R, Fujimoto K, Imamura M (2004) Effects preceding gastrectomy on the outcome of pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 8(5):575–579CrossRef Doi R, Fujimoto K, Imamura M (2004) Effects preceding gastrectomy on the outcome of pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 8(5):575–579CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Surgical Outcome of Pancreaticoduodenectomy in Patients with a History of Roux-en-Y Reconstruction after Tumor Removal
Authors
Daiki Marukawa
Yoshito Tomimaru
Shogo Kobayashi
Yoshifumi Iwagami
Daisaku Yamada
Hirofumi Akita
Takehiro Noda
Kunihito Gotoh
Yuichiro Doki
Hidetoshi Eguchi
Publication date
01-06-2021
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
World Journal of Surgery / Issue 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-05998-5

Other articles of this Issue 6/2021

World Journal of Surgery 6/2021 Go to the issue