Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4/2008

01-12-2008

Futility by Any Other Name. The Texas 10 Day Rule

Author: Geoffrey Miller

Published in: Journal of Bioethical Inquiry | Issue 4/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

This commentary examines the ethics and law in the United States as they relate to the foregoing of life sustaining treatment when such treatment is deemed medically inappropriate. In particular the article highlights the procedural approach when there is disagreement between physicians and surrogates or patients as exemplified in Texas Law. This approach, although worthy in concept, may in practice invite opposition and dissatisfaction as it may be perceived as coercive and pitting the weak against powerful adversaries and interests, in addition to discouraging the exercise of professional virtues. Too inflexible an approach erodes trust, and furthermore the Texas law allows hospital ethics committees to move from an advisory non judgmental role to a quasi legal court with real legal power but no credentialing or oversight.
Literature
go back to reference Ackerman, Todd. 2005. Burial set for man at center of debate over life support. Houston Chronicle. June 3. Ackerman, Todd. 2005. Burial set for man at center of debate over life support. Houston Chronicle. June 3.
go back to reference Ackerman, Todd. 2006. Families urge change to state futile-care law. Houston Chronicle. August 10. Ackerman, Todd. 2006. Families urge change to state futile-care law. Houston Chronicle. August 10.
go back to reference Brody, H. 1994. The physician’s role in determining futility. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 42: 875–878.PubMed Brody, H. 1994. The physician’s role in determining futility. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 42: 875–878.PubMed
go back to reference Buggs, Simon. 2005. Preparing for life’s end relevant now. Houston Chronicle. March 28. Buggs, Simon. 2005. Preparing for life’s end relevant now. Houston Chronicle. March 28.
go back to reference Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 US 261, 110 SCt 2841 (1990). Cruzan v Director, Missouri Department of Health, 497 US 261, 110 SCt 2841 (1990).
go back to reference Fine, Robert L., and Thomas W. Mayo. 2003. Resolution of futility by due process: early experience with the Texas Advanced Directives Act. Annals of Internal Medicine 138: 743–746.PubMed Fine, Robert L., and Thomas W. Mayo. 2003. Resolution of futility by due process: early experience with the Texas Advanced Directives Act. Annals of Internal Medicine 138: 743–746.PubMed
go back to reference Frank, R.H. 2006. Weighing the true costs and benefits in a matter of life and death. New York Times, January 19. Frank, R.H. 2006. Weighing the true costs and benefits in a matter of life and death. New York Times, January 19.
go back to reference Gilgunn v Massachusetts General Hospital No 92 -420 Mass Super Ct Civ Action Suffolk So April 22 1995. Gilgunn v Massachusetts General Hospital No 92 -420 Mass Super Ct Civ Action Suffolk So April 22 1995.
go back to reference Halevy, A., and A.L. McGuire 2006. The history and controversies of the Texas “futility” policy. Houston Lawyer, (May/June), 38–43. Halevy, A., and A.L. McGuire 2006. The history and controversies of the Texas “futility” policy. Houston Lawyer, (May/June), 38–43.
go back to reference Horrtor, B.J. 1998. A survey of living will and advanced health care directives. North Dakota Law Review 74: 233–293. Horrtor, B.J. 1998. A survey of living will and advanced health care directives. North Dakota Law Review 74: 233–293.
go back to reference In Re: Conservatorship of Wanglie: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order. Minnesota District Court, Probate Court Division, Fourth Judicial District, Hennepin County, 1991 June 28. File PX – 91 – 283. In Re: Conservatorship of Wanglie: Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order. Minnesota District Court, Probate Court Division, Fourth Judicial District, Hennepin County, 1991 June 28. File PX – 91 – 283.
go back to reference In the matter of Baby K, 16 F3d 590 (4th Cir 1994). In the matter of Baby K, 16 F3d 590 (4th Cir 1994).
go back to reference Luce, J.L., and A. Alpers. 2000. Legal aspects of withholding and withdrawing life support from critically ill patients in the United States and providing palliative care to them. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 162: 2029–2032.PubMed Luce, J.L., and A. Alpers. 2000. Legal aspects of withholding and withdrawing life support from critically ill patients in the United States and providing palliative care to them. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 162: 2029–2032.PubMed
go back to reference Nikolouzos v St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital, 162 SW 3d 678 (Tex App Houston [14th Dist} 2005) Nikolouzos v St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital, 162 SW 3d 678 (Tex App Houston [14th Dist} 2005)
go back to reference Pellegrino, Edmund, D. 2005. Futility in medical decisions: the word and the concept. HEC Forum 17: 308–318.PubMedCrossRef Pellegrino, Edmund, D. 2005. Futility in medical decisions: the word and the concept. HEC Forum 17: 308–318.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tenerowicz, Lynn. 2001. Navigating the waters of uncertainty: surrogate decision making at the end of life. Clinical Intensive Care 12: 101–104.CrossRef Tenerowicz, Lynn. 2001. Navigating the waters of uncertainty: surrogate decision making at the end of life. Clinical Intensive Care 12: 101–104.CrossRef
go back to reference Texas Health and Safety Code 166.046(a) Vernon Supp 2002. Texas Health and Safety Code 166.046(a) Vernon Supp 2002.
go back to reference Truog, Robert D., Allan S. Brett, and Joel Frader. 1992. The problem with futility. New England Journal of Medicine 326: 1560–1564.PubMed Truog, Robert D., Allan S. Brett, and Joel Frader. 1992. The problem with futility. New England Journal of Medicine 326: 1560–1564.PubMed
go back to reference Truog, Robert D., and Christine Mitchell. 2006. Futility—from hospital policies to State laws. American Journal of Bioethics 6: 19–21.PubMed Truog, Robert D., and Christine Mitchell. 2006. Futility—from hospital policies to State laws. American Journal of Bioethics 6: 19–21.PubMed
go back to reference Wojtasiewicz, Mary, E. 2006. Damage compounded: disparities, distrust, and disparate impact in end -of-life conflict resolution policies. American Journal of Bioethics 6: 8–12.PubMed Wojtasiewicz, Mary, E. 2006. Damage compounded: disparities, distrust, and disparate impact in end -of-life conflict resolution policies. American Journal of Bioethics 6: 8–12.PubMed
go back to reference Wreen Michael, J. 2004. Medical futility and physician discretion. Journal of Medical Ethics 30: 275–278.CrossRef Wreen Michael, J. 2004. Medical futility and physician discretion. Journal of Medical Ethics 30: 275–278.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Futility by Any Other Name. The Texas 10 Day Rule
Author
Geoffrey Miller
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry / Issue 4/2008
Print ISSN: 1176-7529
Electronic ISSN: 1872-4353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-008-9114-5

Other articles of this Issue 4/2008

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4/2008 Go to the issue

OriginalPaper

Recent Developments

OriginalPaper

Response

OriginalPaper

In That Case