Skip to main content
Top
Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 3/2011

01-06-2011 | Letter to the Editor

Further Data About Upper Extremity Ports

Authors: Pierre-Yves Marcy, Andrea Figl, Nicolas Amoretti, Juliet Thariat

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Excerpt

We would like to reply to the questions raised by article published in the April 2010 issue by Goltz et al. [1], “Peripherally Placed Totally Implantable Venous Access Port Systems of the Forearm: Clinical Experience in 763 Consecutive Patients.” The authors report on one of the largest series of percutaneous ultrasound-guided arm vein access with concomitant port chamber placement in the forearm. The authors state—and we fully agree—that percutaneous access via radiological guidance increases the technical success rate and greatly decreases the procedure-related complication rate in comparison to the surgical techniques. With ultrasound real-time guidance, the technical success vein access rate reaches up to 99–100% vs. 94% by venography guidance [24]. To our opinion, the latter should only be indicated in obese patients, in whom ultrasound scan is often of poor quality, and in patients with previous ipsilateral catheter [5]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Goltz JP, Scholl A, Ritter CO, Wittenberg G, Hahn D, Kickuth R (2010) Peripherally placed totally implantable venous-access port systems of the forearm: clinical experience in 763 consecutive patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol [Epub ahead of print] Goltz JP, Scholl A, Ritter CO, Wittenberg G, Hahn D, Kickuth R (2010) Peripherally placed totally implantable venous-access port systems of the forearm: clinical experience in 763 consecutive patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol [Epub ahead of print]
2.
go back to reference Lyon RD, Griggs KA, Johnson AM et al (1999) Long-term follow-up of upper extremity implanted venous access devices in oncology patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10:463–471PubMedCrossRef Lyon RD, Griggs KA, Johnson AM et al (1999) Long-term follow-up of upper extremity implanted venous access devices in oncology patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol 10:463–471PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bodner LJ, Nosher JL, Patel KM et al (2000) Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 23:187–193PubMedCrossRef Bodner LJ, Nosher JL, Patel KM et al (2000) Peripheral venous access ports: outcomes analysis in 109 patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 23:187–193PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Marcy PY, Magné N, Castadot P et al (2007) Is radiologic placement of an arm port mandatory in oncology patients? Analysis of a large bi-institutional experience. Cancer 110:2331–2338PubMedCrossRef Marcy PY, Magné N, Castadot P et al (2007) Is radiologic placement of an arm port mandatory in oncology patients? Analysis of a large bi-institutional experience. Cancer 110:2331–2338PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gonsalves CF, Eschelman DJ, Sullivan KL et al (2003) Incidence of central vein stenosis and occlusion following upper extremity PICC and port placement. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26:123–127PubMedCrossRef Gonsalves CF, Eschelman DJ, Sullivan KL et al (2003) Incidence of central vein stenosis and occlusion following upper extremity PICC and port placement. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 26:123–127PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Marcy PY, Chamorey E, Figl A et al (2010) Venous thrombosis associated with central venous catheter in cancer patients with surgical chest port (S) or venography-guided arm port insertion (R): a randomized controlled study (abstract 9158). J Clin Oncol 28(suppl):15s Marcy PY, Chamorey E, Figl A et al (2010) Venous thrombosis associated with central venous catheter in cancer patients with surgical chest port (S) or venography-guided arm port insertion (R): a randomized controlled study (abstract 9158). J Clin Oncol 28(suppl):15s
7.
go back to reference Kuriakose P, Colon-Otero G, Paz-Fumagalli R (2002) Risk of deep venous thrombosis associated with chest versus arm central venous subcutaneous port catheters: a 5-year single-institution retrospective study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13(2 pt 1):179–184PubMedCrossRef Kuriakose P, Colon-Otero G, Paz-Fumagalli R (2002) Risk of deep venous thrombosis associated with chest versus arm central venous subcutaneous port catheters: a 5-year single-institution retrospective study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13(2 pt 1):179–184PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Polak JF, Anderson D, Hagspiel K et al (1998) Peripherally inserted central venous catheters: factors affecting patient satisfaction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1609–1611PubMed Polak JF, Anderson D, Hagspiel K et al (1998) Peripherally inserted central venous catheters: factors affecting patient satisfaction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:1609–1611PubMed
Metadata
Title
Further Data About Upper Extremity Ports
Authors
Pierre-Yves Marcy
Andrea Figl
Nicolas Amoretti
Juliet Thariat
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-010-9963-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology 3/2011 Go to the issue