Top

Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Functional treatment for fractures to the base of the 5th metatarsal - influence of fracture location and fracture characteristics

Authors: Sebastian Felix Baumbach, Wolf Christian Prall, Michael Kramer, Mareen Braunstein, Wolfgang Böcker, Hans Polzer

Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders | Issue 1/2017

Abstract

Background

Fractures to the base of the fifth metatarsal are common, but their treatment remains controversial. Especially for Lawrence and Botte (L&B) type II fractures, there is conflicting evidence and consequently no consensus. Further, many authors consider displacement, articular involvement, and number of fragments an indication for surgery, although evidence is missing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of functional treatment for all L&B type I and II fractures. Of special interest were the influence of (1) the fracture location (L&B type I vs. II) and (2) the fracture characteristics (displacement, intra-articular involvement, communition) on the subjective outcome.

Methods

Retrospective registry study with a prospective follow-up. Patients with an acute, isolated, epi-metaphyseal fracture to the fifth metatarsal bone (L&B type I and II) treated by full weightbearing with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were included. Fracture location (L&B type I and II) and characteristics (displacement <2 mm or >2 mm, intra-articular involvement, and number of fragments) were assessed. Outcome parameters were return to work, return to sports, VAS-FA, and SF-12. The influence of the fracture (1) location and (2) -characteristics on these parameters was tested.

Results

Thirty-nine patients (40 ± 15 years, 56% female) were enrolled with a mean follow-up of 22 ± 10 months. L&B type I fractures occurred in 59%, type II in 41%. Thirty-one percent of all fractures were dislocated, 74% intra-articular, and 41% multi-fragmentary. Patients returned to work after 17 ± 12 days, to sports after 53 ± 22 days. The VAS-FA score at the final follow-up was 96 ± 4, SF-12 PCS score 57 ± 5 and MCS score 51 ± 8. No complications were reported, no patient required surgery. None of the assessed outcome parameters differed significantly between (1) the different fracture locations (L&B type I vs. II) or (2) the different fracture characteristics (displacement, intra-articular involvement, and number of fragments).

Conclusions

(1) Both, L&B I and II fractures featured excellent results with immediate full weightbearing. Consequently, L&B type I and II fractures should be summarized as epi-metaphyseal fractures. (2) Fracture displacement, articular involvement, and number of fragments did not influence the outcome. Therefore, functional treatment should be recommended for all epi-metaphyseal fractures.

Stewart IM. Jones's fracture: fracture of base of fifth metatarsal. Clin Orthop. 1960;16:190–8.PubMed

Torg JS, Balduini FC, Zelko RR, Pavlov H, Peff TC, Das M. Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal distal to the tuberosity. Classification and guidelines for non-surgical and surgical management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(2):209–14.CrossRefPubMed

Lawrence SJ, Botte MJ. Jones' fractures and related fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Foot & ankle. 1993;14(6):358–65.CrossRef

Dameron T. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal: selecting the best treatment option. The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. 1995;3(2):110–4.CrossRefPubMed

Polzer H, Polzer S, Mutschler W, Prall WC. Acute fractures to the proximal fifth metatarsal bone: development of classification and treatment recommendations based on the current evidence. Injury. 2012;43(10):1626–32.CrossRefPubMed

Richter M, Zech S, Geerling J, Frink M, Knobloch K, Krettek C. A new foot and ankle outcome score: questionnaire based, subjective, visual-analogue-scale, validated and computerized. Foot Ankle Surg. 2006;12(4):191–9.CrossRef

Stüber J, Zech S, Bay R, Qazzaz A, Richter M. Normative data of the visual analogue scale foot and ankle (VAS FA) for pathological conditions. Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;17:166–72.CrossRefPubMed

Zenios M, Kim WY, Sampath J, Muddu BN. Functional treatment of acute metatarsal fractures: a prospective randomised comparison of management in a cast versus elasticated support bandage. Injury. 2005;36(7):832–5.CrossRefPubMed

10.

Schmoz S, Voelcker AL, Burchhardt H, Tezval M, Schleikis A, Stürmer KM, Sehmisch S. Conservative therapy for metatarsal 5 basis fractures - retrospective and prospective analysis. Sportverletzung Sportschaden : Organ der Gesellschaft für Orthopädisch-Traumatologische Sportmedizin. 2014;28(4):211–7.

11.

Clapper MF, O'Brien TJ, Lyons PM. Fractures of the fifth metatarsal. Analysis of a fracture registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;315:238–41.

12.

Wiener BD, Linder JF, Giattini JF. Treatment of fractures of the fifth metatarsal: a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18(5):267–9.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Gray AC, Rooney BP, Ingram R. A prospective comparison of two treatment options for tuberosity fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Foot (Edinburgh, Scotland). 2008;18(3):156–8.

14.

Shahid MK, Punwar S, Boulind C, Bannister G. Aircast walking boot and below-knee walking cast for avulsion fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: a comparative cohort study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(1):75–9.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Akimau PI, Cawthron KL, Dakin WM, Chadwick C, Blundell CM, Davies MB. Symptomatic treatment or cast immobilisation for avulsion fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal: a prospective, randomised, single-blinded non-inferiority controlled trial. The bone & joint journal. 2016;98-B(6):806–11.CrossRef

16.

Egol K, Walsh M, Rosenblatt K, Capla E, Koval KJ. Avulsion fractures of the fifth metatarsal base: a prospective outcome study. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(5):581–3.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Tahririan MA, Momeni A, Moayednia A, Yousefi E. Designing a prognostic scoring system for predicting the outcomes of proximal fifth metatarsal fractures at 20 weeks. Iranian journal of medical sciences. 2015;40(2):104–9.PubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Van Aaken J, Berli MC, Noger M, Gambirasio R, Fritschy D. Symptomatic treatment of non-displaced avulsion and Jones fractures of the fifth metatarsal: a prospective study. Revue médicale suisse. 2007;3(120):1792–4.PubMed

19.

Bigsby E, Halliday R, Middleton RG, Case R, Harries W. Functional outcome of fifth metatarsal fractures. Injury. 2014;45(12):2009–12. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2014.06.010.

20.

Roche AJ, Calder JDF. Treatment and return to sport following a Jones fracture of the fifth metatarsal: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(6):1307–15.CrossRefPubMed

21.

O'Malley M, DeSandis B, Allen A, Levitsky M, O'Malley Q, Williams R. Operative treatment of fifth metatarsal Jones fractures (zones II and III) in the NBA. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37(5):488–500. doi:10.1177/1071100715625290.

22.

Stewart IM. Jones's fracture: fracture of base of fifth metatarsal. Clin Orthop. 1960;16:190–8.PubMed

23.

Dameron TB. Fractures and anatomical variations of the proximal portion of the fifth metatarsal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57:788–92.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Lawrence SJ, Botte MJ. Jones' fractures and related fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. Foot & ankle. 1993;14:358–65.CrossRef

25.

Roche AJ, Calder JDF. Treatment and return to sport following a Jones fracture of the fifth metatarsal: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:1307–15.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Gösele A, Schulenburg J, Ochsner PE. Early functional treatment of a 5th metatarsal fracture using an orthopedic boot. Swiss surgery = Schweizer Chirurgie = Chirurgie suisse = Chirurgia svizzera. 1997;3(2):81–4.PubMed

27.

Stüber J, Zech S, Bay R, Qazzaz A, Richter M. Normative data of the visual analogue scale foot and ankle (VAS FA) for pathological conditions. Foot Ankle Surg. 2011;17(3):166–72.CrossRefPubMed

28.

Konkel KF, Menger AG, Retzlaff SA. Nonoperative treatment of fifth metatarsal fractures in an orthopaedic suburban private multispeciality practice. Foot & Ankle International. 2005;26:704–7.CrossRef

29.

Quill GE. Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal. The Orthopedic clinics of North America. 1995;26(2):353–61.PubMed

30.

Rettig AC, Shelbourne KD, Wilckens J. The surgical treatment of symptomatic nonunions of the proximal (metaphyseal) fifth metatarsal in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20(1):50–4.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Rammelt S, Heineck J, Zwipp H. Metatarsal fractures. Injury. 2004;35(Suppl 2):SB77–86.CrossRefPubMed

32.

Zwitser EW, Breederveld RS. Fractures of the fifth metatarsal; diagnosis and treatment. Injury. 2010;41(6):555–62.CrossRefPubMed

33.

Giordano AR, Fallat LM. Strength analysis of intraosseous wire fixation for avulsion fractures of the fifth metatarsal base. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43(4):225–30.CrossRefPubMed

34.

SooHoo NF, Shuler M, Fleming LL, Society AOFaA. Evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS clinical rating systems by correlation to the SF-36. Foot & Ankle International. 2003;24:50–5.CrossRef

35.

Zarzaur BL, Kozar RA, Fabian TC, Coimbra R. A survey of American Association for the Surgery of Trauma member practices in the management of blunt splenic injury. J Trauma. 2011;70:1026–31.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Baumbach SF, Domaszewski F, Wyen H, Kalcher K, Mutschler W, Kanz K-G. Evaluation of the current treatment concepts in Germany, Austria and Switzerland for acute traumatic lesions to the prepatellar and olecranon bursa. Injury. 2013;44:1423–7.CrossRefPubMed

37.

Mehlhorn AT, Zwingmann J, Hirschmüller A, Südkamp NP, Schmal H. Radiographic classification for fractures of the fifth metatarsal base. Skelet Radiol. 2014;43(4):467–74.CrossRef

38.

Lareau CR, Hsu AR, Anderson RB. Return to play in National Football League Players after Operative Jones Fracture Treatment. Foot & Ankle International. 2016;37:8–16.CrossRef

39.

Lee K-t, Park Y-u, Jegal H, Park JW, Choi JP, Kim J-s. Prognostic classification of fifth metatarsal stress fracture using plantar gap. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34:691–6.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Japjec M, Starešinić M, Starjački M, Žgaljardić I, Štivičić J, Šebečić B. Treatment of proximal fifth metatarsal bone fractures in athletes. Injury. 2015;46(Suppl 6):S134–6. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.052.

Title: Functional treatment for fractures to the base of the 5th metatarsal - influence of fracture location and fracture characteristics
Authors: Sebastian Felix Baumbach
Wolf Christian Prall
Michael Kramer
Mareen Braunstein
Wolfgang Böcker
Hans Polzer
Publication date: 01-12-2017
Publisher: BioMed Central
Published in: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2474
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1893-6

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Functional treatment for fractures to the base of the 5th metatarsal - influence of fracture location and fracture characteristics

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

At a glance: The STEP trials

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

Accuracy of injection and short-term pain relief following intra-articular corticosteroid injection in knee osteoarthritis – an observational study

Age related prevalence of hand osteoarthritis diagnosed by photography (HOASCORE)

Leflunomide is equally efficacious and safe compared to low dose rituximab in refractory rheumatoid arthritis given in combination with methotrexate: results from a randomized double blind controlled clinical trial

Discography aids definitive diagnosis of posterior epidural migration of lumbar disc fragments: case report and literature review

Chronic musculoskeletal ankle disorders in Sri Lanka

Taking ACTION to reduce pain: ACTION study rationale, design and protocol of a randomized trial of a proactive telephone-based coaching intervention for chronic musculoskeletal pain among African Americans