Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 5/2009

01-05-2009

Functional luminal imaging probe geometric and histomorphologic analysis of abdominal wall wound induced by different trocars in pigs

Authors: Jingbo Zhao, Donghua Liao, Barry P. McMahon, Deidre O’Donovan, Rich Schiretz, Russell Heninrich, Hans Gregersen

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 5/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to investigate wound geometry and tissue damage caused by several different trocar types using a quantitative functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) geometric profile and histomorphologic analysis.

Methods

Four pigs were used in this study. After general anesthesia, six different trocars were randomly inserted at preselected locations in the porcine abdominal wall. The hydration status of the animals was monitored and maintained. A bag mounted on a FLIP was used to profile the geometry of the trocar holes during distension. After the FLIP study, the abdominal wall surrounding the trocar holes was harvested. The tissue was fixed in neutral 10% buffered formalin solution for more than 24 h. The samples contained control tissue (undamaged) and test tissue (damaged) through the entire rectangular tissue block. Approximately four to seven slides were cut parallel to the surface from each sample. Each slide was photographed, and the morphometry of the hole and damaged areas were measured and displayed three-dimensionally. The histologic sections were analyzed with regard to acute damage, bleeding, and acute inflammation of the skin, muscle, and fascia.

Results

The FLIP study demonstrated differences between the six trocars. These were mainly due to differences between the Versaport Plus V2 bladed trocar with the smooth cannula, the Applied Medical Separator nonbladed access system with threaded cannula, and the VersaStep Plus trocar. The morphometry data showed the smallest hole and damage areas for the Versaport Plus V2 bladed trocar with the smooth cannula. The damaged area divided by the trocar hole area was smallest for the VersaStep plus trocar and the Ethicon Endopath bladed trocar with a stability cannula (p < 0.05). The histologic analysis showed that the VersaStep Plus trocar and the Ethicon Endopath bladed trocar with a stability cannula gave the least bleeding and inflammation (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

An agreement was found between the geometric data obtained by FLIP, the morphometric analysis, and the histology.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J, Laberge PY, The Society of Obstetricians, Gynaecologists of Canada (2007) Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 29:433–465PubMed Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J, Laberge PY, The Society of Obstetricians, Gynaecologists of Canada (2007) Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 29:433–465PubMed
2.
go back to reference Bhoyrul S, Vierra MA, Nezhat CR, Krummel TM, Way LW (2001) Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 192:677–683PubMedCrossRef Bhoyrul S, Vierra MA, Nezhat CR, Krummel TM, Way LW (2001) Trocar injuries in laparoscopic surgery. J Am Coll Surg 192:677–683PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Tarnay CM, Glass KB, Munro MG (1999) Incision characteristics associated with six laparoscopic trocar–cannula systems: a randomized, observer-blinded comparison. Obstet Gynecol 94:89–93PubMedCrossRef Tarnay CM, Glass KB, Munro MG (1999) Incision characteristics associated with six laparoscopic trocar–cannula systems: a randomized, observer-blinded comparison. Obstet Gynecol 94:89–93PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Munro MG, Tarnay CM (2004) The impact of trocar–cannula design and simulated operative manipulation on incisional characteristics: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 103:681–685PubMed Munro MG, Tarnay CM (2004) The impact of trocar–cannula design and simulated operative manipulation on incisional characteristics: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 103:681–685PubMed
5.
go back to reference Shafer DM, Khajanchee Y, Wong J, Swanstrom LL (2006) Comparison of five different abdominal access trocar systems: analysis of insertion force, removal force, and defect size. Surg Innov 13:183–189PubMedCrossRef Shafer DM, Khajanchee Y, Wong J, Swanstrom LL (2006) Comparison of five different abdominal access trocar systems: analysis of insertion force, removal force, and defect size. Surg Innov 13:183–189PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference (2001) Access-related complications: an analysis of 6023 consecutive laparoscopic hernia repairs. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 10:23–29 (2001) Access-related complications: an analysis of 6023 consecutive laparoscopic hernia repairs. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 10:23–29
7.
8.
go back to reference Bohm B, Knigge M, Kraft M, Grundel K, Boenick U (1998) Influence of different trocar tips on abdominal wall penetration during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 12:1434–1438PubMedCrossRef Bohm B, Knigge M, Kraft M, Grundel K, Boenick U (1998) Influence of different trocar tips on abdominal wall penetration during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 12:1434–1438PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Glass KB, Tarnay CM, Munro MG (2002) Intraabdominal pressure and incision parameters associated with a pyramidal laparoscopic trocar–cannula system and the EndoTIP cannula. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9:508–513PubMedCrossRef Glass KB, Tarnay CM, Munro MG (2002) Intraabdominal pressure and incision parameters associated with a pyramidal laparoscopic trocar–cannula system and the EndoTIP cannula. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 9:508–513PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Glass KB, Tarnay CM, Munro MG (2003) Randomized comparison of the effect of manipulation on incisional parameters associated with a pyramidal laparoscopic trocar–cannula system and the EndoTIP cannula. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10:412–414PubMedCrossRef Glass KB, Tarnay CM, Munro MG (2003) Randomized comparison of the effect of manipulation on incisional parameters associated with a pyramidal laparoscopic trocar–cannula system and the EndoTIP cannula. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 10:412–414PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference McMahon BP, Drewes AM, Gregersen H (2006) Functional oesophagogastric junction imaging. World J Gastroenterol 12:2818–2824PubMed McMahon BP, Drewes AM, Gregersen H (2006) Functional oesophagogastric junction imaging. World J Gastroenterol 12:2818–2824PubMed
12.
go back to reference McMahon BP, Frokjaer JB, Kunwald P, Liao D, Funch-Jensen P, Drewes AM, Gregersen H (2007) The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) for evaluation of the esophagogastric junction. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 292:G377–G384PubMedCrossRef McMahon BP, Frokjaer JB, Kunwald P, Liao D, Funch-Jensen P, Drewes AM, Gregersen H (2007) The functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) for evaluation of the esophagogastric junction. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 292:G377–G384PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference McMahon BP, Frøkjær JB, Liao D, Kunwald P, Drewes AM, Gregersen H (2005) A new technique for evaluating sphincter function in visceral organs: application of the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) for the evaluation of the oesophagogastric junction. Physiol Meas 26:823–836PubMedCrossRef McMahon BP, Frøkjær JB, Liao D, Kunwald P, Drewes AM, Gregersen H (2005) A new technique for evaluating sphincter function in visceral organs: application of the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) for the evaluation of the oesophagogastric junction. Physiol Meas 26:823–836PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Tarnay CM, Glass KB, Munro MG (1999) Entry force and intraabdominal pressure associated with six laparoscopic trocar–cannula systems: a randomized comparison. Obstet Gynecol 94:83–88PubMedCrossRef Tarnay CM, Glass KB, Munro MG (1999) Entry force and intraabdominal pressure associated with six laparoscopic trocar–cannula systems: a randomized comparison. Obstet Gynecol 94:83–88PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kolata RJ, Ransick M, Briggs L, Baum D (1999) Comparison of wounds created by nonbladed trocars and pyramidal tip trocars in the pig. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:455–461PubMedCrossRef Kolata RJ, Ransick M, Briggs L, Baum D (1999) Comparison of wounds created by nonbladed trocars and pyramidal tip trocars in the pig. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 9:455–461PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Geraci G, Sciume C, Pisello F, Li VF, Facella T, Modica G (2006) Trocar-related abdominal wall bleeding in 200 patients after laparoscopic cholecistectomy: personal experience. World J Gastroenterol 12:7165–7167PubMed Geraci G, Sciume C, Pisello F, Li VF, Facella T, Modica G (2006) Trocar-related abdominal wall bleeding in 200 patients after laparoscopic cholecistectomy: personal experience. World J Gastroenterol 12:7165–7167PubMed
17.
go back to reference Opitz I, Gantert W, Giger U, Kocher T, Krahenbuhl L (2005) Bleeding remains a major complication during laparoscopic surgery: analysis of the SALTS database. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:128–133PubMedCrossRef Opitz I, Gantert W, Giger U, Kocher T, Krahenbuhl L (2005) Bleeding remains a major complication during laparoscopic surgery: analysis of the SALTS database. Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:128–133PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hurd WW, Wang L, Schemmel MT (1995) A comparison of the relative risk of vessel injury with conical versus pyramidal laparoscopic trocars in a rabbit model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:1731–1733PubMedCrossRef Hurd WW, Wang L, Schemmel MT (1995) A comparison of the relative risk of vessel injury with conical versus pyramidal laparoscopic trocars in a rabbit model. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:1731–1733PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Functional luminal imaging probe geometric and histomorphologic analysis of abdominal wall wound induced by different trocars in pigs
Authors
Jingbo Zhao
Donghua Liao
Barry P. McMahon
Deidre O’Donovan
Rich Schiretz
Russell Heninrich
Hans Gregersen
Publication date
01-05-2009
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 5/2009
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0105-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2009

Surgical Endoscopy 5/2009 Go to the issue