Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2009

01-09-2009

Functional Capacity Evaluation in Subjects with Early Osteoarthritis of Hip and/or Knee; is Two-Day Testing Needed?

Authors: M. W. van Ittersum, H. J. Bieleman, M. F. Reneman, F. G. J. Oosterveld, J. W. Groothoff, C. P. van der Schans

Published in: Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | Issue 3/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction The Work Well Functional Capacity Evaluation (WW FCE) is a two-day performance based test consisting of several work-related activities. Three lifting and carrying test items may be performed on both days. The objective of this study was to assess the need for repeated testing of these items in subjects with early osteoarthritis of the hip and/or the knee and to analyze sources of variation between the 2 days of measurement. Methods A standardized WW FCE protocol was applied, including repeated testing of lifting low, lifting overhead and carrying. Differences and associations between the 2 days were calculated using paired samples t-tests, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and limits of agreement (LoA). Possible sources of individual variation between the 2 days were identified by Wilcoxon signed ranks tests. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for differences in performances between days and differences in possible sources of variation between days. Results Seventy-nine subjects participated in this study, their mean (SD) age was 56.6 (4.8) years, median (min–max) WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) index scores for pain, stiffness and physical function were 5 (0–17), 3 (0–7) and 14 (0–49), respectively. Median (min–max) SF36 physical function was 75 (5–95), and SF36 pain score was 67 (12–76). Mean performance differences ranged from −0.2 to −0.8 kg (P > 0.05). ICC’s ranged from 0.75 (lifting overhead) to 0.88 (lifting low). LoA were: lifting low 8.0 kg; lifting overhead 6.5 kg; carrying 9.0 kg. Pearson’s correlations were low and non-significant. Conclusions All three tests show acceptable two-day consistency. WW FCE testing on two consecutive days is not necessary for groups of subjects with early osteoarthritis. Individual sources of variation could not be identified.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Arden N, Nevitt MC. Osteoarthritis: epidemiology. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006;20(1):3–25.PubMedCrossRef Arden N, Nevitt MC. Osteoarthritis: epidemiology. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006;20(1):3–25.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Corti MC, Rigon C. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: prevalence, risk factors and functional impact. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2003;15(5):359–63.PubMed Corti MC, Rigon C. Epidemiology of osteoarthritis: prevalence, risk factors and functional impact. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2003;15(5):359–63.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum. 1991;34(5):505–14.PubMedCrossRef Altman R, Alarcon G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, et al. The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum. 1991;34(5):505–14.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pincus T, Mitchell JM, Burkhauser RV. Substantial work disability and earnings losses in individuals less than 65 with osteoarthritis: comparisons with rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:449–57.PubMedCrossRef Pincus T, Mitchell JM, Burkhauser RV. Substantial work disability and earnings losses in individuals less than 65 with osteoarthritis: comparisons with rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989;42:449–57.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hopman-Rock M, Kraaimaat FW, Bijlsma JWJ. Quality of life in elderly subjects with pain in hip or knee. Qual Life Res. 1997;6:67–76.PubMedCrossRef Hopman-Rock M, Kraaimaat FW, Bijlsma JWJ. Quality of life in elderly subjects with pain in hip or knee. Qual Life Res. 1997;6:67–76.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Salaffi F, Carotti M, Stancati A, Grassi W. Health-related quality of life in older adults with symptomatic hip and knee osteoarthritis: a comparison with matched healthy controls. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005;17(4):255–63.PubMed Salaffi F, Carotti M, Stancati A, Grassi W. Health-related quality of life in older adults with symptomatic hip and knee osteoarthritis: a comparison with matched healthy controls. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005;17(4):255–63.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Bellamy N. Osteoarthritis clinical trials: candidate variables and clinimetric properties. J Rheumatol. 1997;24:768–78.PubMed Bellamy N. Osteoarthritis clinical trials: candidate variables and clinimetric properties. J Rheumatol. 1997;24:768–78.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Bellamy N, Kirwan J, Boers M, Brooks P, Strand V, Tugwell P, et al. Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. J Rheumatol. 1997;24:799–802.PubMed Bellamy N, Kirwan J, Boers M, Brooks P, Strand V, Tugwell P, et al. Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. J Rheumatol. 1997;24:799–802.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Steultjens MP, Roorda LD, Dekker J, Bijlsma JW. Responsiveness of observational and self-report methods for assessing disability in mobility in patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;45:56–61.PubMedCrossRef Steultjens MP, Roorda LD, Dekker J, Bijlsma JW. Responsiveness of observational and self-report methods for assessing disability in mobility in patients with osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;45:56–61.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Schellekens JMH, Göeken LNH. Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance based disability measurements in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12:119–29.PubMedCrossRef Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Schellekens JMH, Göeken LNH. Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance based disability measurements in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12:119–29.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Stratford PW, Kennedy DM. Performance measures were necessary to obtain a complete picture of osteoarthritic patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(2):160–7.PubMedCrossRef Stratford PW, Kennedy DM. Performance measures were necessary to obtain a complete picture of osteoarthritic patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59(2):160–7.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Stratford PW, Kennedy DM, Woodhouse LJ. Performance measures provide assessments of pain and function in people with advanced osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Phys Ther. 2006;86(11):1489–96.PubMedCrossRef Stratford PW, Kennedy DM, Woodhouse LJ. Performance measures provide assessments of pain and function in people with advanced osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Phys Ther. 2006;86(11):1489–96.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Abdel-moty E, Fishbain DA, Khalil TM, Sadek S, Cutler R, Rosomoff RS, et al. Functional capacity and residual functional capacity and their utility in measuring work capacity. Clin J Pain. 1993;9:2003–13.CrossRef Abdel-moty E, Fishbain DA, Khalil TM, Sadek S, Cutler R, Rosomoff RS, et al. Functional capacity and residual functional capacity and their utility in measuring work capacity. Clin J Pain. 1993;9:2003–13.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference King PM, Tuckwell N, Barrett TE. A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Phys Ther. 1998;78:852–66.PubMed King PM, Tuckwell N, Barrett TE. A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Phys Ther. 1998;78:852–66.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Gross DP, Battie MC. Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker’s compensation environment. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(4):287–95.PubMedCrossRef Gross DP, Battie MC. Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker’s compensation environment. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(4):287–95.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Dijkstra SJ, Dijkstra PU. Relationship between kinesiophobia and performance in a functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(4):277–85.PubMedCrossRef Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Dijkstra SJ, Dijkstra PU. Relationship between kinesiophobia and performance in a functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(4):277–85.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Stewart RE, Goeken LN, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH. Comparing self-report, clinical examination and functional testing in the assessment of work-related limitations in patients with chronic low back pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(17):999–1005.PubMedCrossRef Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Stewart RE, Goeken LN, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH. Comparing self-report, clinical examination and functional testing in the assessment of work-related limitations in patients with chronic low back pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(17):999–1005.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, Göeken LNH. Test–retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12:269–75.PubMedCrossRef Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M, Göeken LNH. Test–retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12:269–75.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Groothoff JW, Schellekens JM, Goeken LN. Test–retest reliability of the Isernhagen work systems functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(4):207–18.PubMedCrossRef Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Groothoff JW, Schellekens JM, Goeken LN. Test–retest reliability of the Isernhagen work systems functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(4):207–18.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Reneman MF, Brouwer S, Meinema A, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Groothoff JW. Test–retest reliability of the Isernhagen work systems functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults. J Occup Rehabil. 2004;14(4):295–305.PubMedCrossRef Reneman MF, Brouwer S, Meinema A, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Groothoff JW. Test–retest reliability of the Isernhagen work systems functional capacity evaluation in healthy adults. J Occup Rehabil. 2004;14(4):295–305.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Wesseling J, Dekker J, Van den Berg WB, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Boers M, Cats HA, et al. CHECK: Cohort Hip & Cohort Knee; similarities and differences with the OA initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 4. doi:10.1136/ard.2008.096164. Wesseling J, Dekker J, Van den Berg WB, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Boers M, Cats HA, et al. CHECK: Cohort Hip & Cohort Knee; similarities and differences with the OA initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2008; 4. doi:10.​1136/​ard.​2008.​096164.
22.
go back to reference McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(1):30–46.CrossRef McGraw KO, Wong SP. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods. 1996;1(1):30–46.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Lee J, Koh D, Ong CN. Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring quantitative variable. Comput Biol Med. 1989;19:61–70.PubMedCrossRef Lee J, Koh D, Ong CN. Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring quantitative variable. Comput Biol Med. 1989;19:61–70.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;8:307–10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;8:307–10.
25.
go back to reference Functional Capacity Evaluation Manual. Duluth, Minn: Isernhagen Work Systems; 1997. Functional Capacity Evaluation Manual. Duluth, Minn: Isernhagen Work Systems; 1997.
26.
go back to reference US Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. Dictionary of occupational titles. 4th ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor; 1991. US Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. Dictionary of occupational titles. 4th ed. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor; 1991.
27.
go back to reference Leardini G, Salaffi F, Caporali R, Canesi B, Rovati L, Montanelli R, et al. Direct and indirect costs of osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2004;22(6):699–706.PubMed Leardini G, Salaffi F, Caporali R, Canesi B, Rovati L, Montanelli R, et al. Direct and indirect costs of osteoarthritis of the knee. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2004;22(6):699–706.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Rabenda V, Manette C, Lemmens R, Mariani AM, Struvay N, Reginster JY. Direct and indirect costs attributable to osteoarthritis in active subjects. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(6):1152–8.PubMed Rabenda V, Manette C, Lemmens R, Mariani AM, Struvay N, Reginster JY. Direct and indirect costs attributable to osteoarthritis in active subjects. J Rheumatol. 2006;33(6):1152–8.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Functional Capacity Evaluation in Subjects with Early Osteoarthritis of Hip and/or Knee; is Two-Day Testing Needed?
Authors
M. W. van Ittersum
H. J. Bieleman
M. F. Reneman
F. G. J. Oosterveld
J. W. Groothoff
C. P. van der Schans
Publication date
01-09-2009
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation / Issue 3/2009
Print ISSN: 1053-0487
Electronic ISSN: 1573-3688
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9179-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2009

Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 3/2009 Go to the issue