Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Orthopaedic Surgery

Functional and radiological outcomes of semi-rigid dynamic lumbar stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion after 2 years

Authors: Lingjie Fu, Alexandra France, Youzhuan Xie, Kai Fang, Yaokai Gan, Pu Zhang

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To prospectively evaluate the functional and radiological outcomes of Isobar semi-rigid dynamic posterior stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion up to and including 24 months postoperatively.

Method

A prospective follow-up for 24 months of 36 patients who underwent posterior Isobar dynamic stabilization due to single-level degenerative lumbar discopathy and instability (DLDI) with mild adjacent level degeneration, with collection of functional [visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)] and radiological data (resting, functional X-rays and MRI).

Results

Functional outcomes at 24 months showed significant improvement in mean VAS score by 38.9 points (P < 0.01) and ODI by 22.4 points (P < 0.01). Compared with data preoperatively, disc height at the index and adjacent levels and intervertebral angle (IVA) at the index level showed a slight decreasing trend at each follow-up (P > 0.05), while IVA at the adjacent level showed a slight increasing trend (P > 0.05). Range of motion averaged 2.84° at the index level and remained unchanged at the adjacent level (P > 0.05). The mean Pfirrmann score changed from 2.86 preoperatively to 2.92 at 24 months postoperatively at the index level (P > 0.05), and from 1.92 preoperatively to 1.96 at 24 months postoperatively at the adjacent level (P > 0.05). No reoperation, loosening of screws or infection was recorded.

Conclusions

Patients with single-level DLDI and mild adjacent level degeneration treated with Isobar stabilization show a clinical improvement after 2 years. However, disc degeneration at the index and adjacent levels seems to continue despite using semi-rigid dynamic stabilization.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sangiorgio SN, Sheikh H, Borkowski SL et al (2011) Comparison of three posterior dynamic stabilization devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E1251–E1258CrossRef Sangiorgio SN, Sheikh H, Borkowski SL et al (2011) Comparison of three posterior dynamic stabilization devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36:E1251–E1258CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ekman P, Moller H, Shalabi A (2009) A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 18:1175–1186PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Ekman P, Moller H, Shalabi A (2009) A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration. Eur Spine J 18:1175–1186PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sapkas GS, Themistocleous GS, Mavrogenis AF (2007) Stabilization of the lumbar spine using the dynamic neutralization system. Orthopedics 30:859–865PubMed Sapkas GS, Themistocleous GS, Mavrogenis AF (2007) Stabilization of the lumbar spine using the dynamic neutralization system. Orthopedics 30:859–865PubMed
4.
go back to reference Huang RC, Girardi FP, Lim MR (2005) Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 36:263–269PubMedCrossRef Huang RC, Girardi FP, Lim MR (2005) Advantages and disadvantages of nonfusion technology in spine surgery. Orthop Clin North Am 36:263–269PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tamburrelli FC, Proietti L, Logroscino CA (2011) Critical analysis of lumbar interspinous devices failures: a retrospective study. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 1):S27–S35PubMedCrossRef Tamburrelli FC, Proietti L, Logroscino CA (2011) Critical analysis of lumbar interspinous devices failures: a retrospective study. Eur Spine J 20(Suppl 1):S27–S35PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Yu AK, Siegfried CM, Chew B et al (2012) Biomechanics of posterior dynamic fusion systems in the lumbar spine: implications for stabilization with improved arthrodesis. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31827588b1 Yu AK, Siegfried CM, Chew B et al (2012) Biomechanics of posterior dynamic fusion systems in the lumbar spine: implications for stabilization with improved arthrodesis. J Spinal Disord Tech. doi:10.​1097/​BSD.​0b013e31827588b1​
8.
go back to reference Dabbs VM, Dabbs LG (1990) Correlation between disc height narrowing and low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15:1366–1369CrossRef Dabbs VM, Dabbs LG (1990) Correlation between disc height narrowing and low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15:1366–1369CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M et al (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1873–1878CrossRef Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M et al (2001) Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1873–1878CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hilibrand AS, Robbins M (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4:190S–194SPubMedCrossRef Hilibrand AS, Robbins M (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J 4:190S–194SPubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC (2004) Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:1938–1944CrossRef Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC (2004) Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29:1938–1944CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:1497–1503PubMed Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:1497–1503PubMed
13.
go back to reference Koeller W, Meier W, Hartmann F (1984) Biomechanical properties of human intervertebral discs subjected to axial dynamic compression. A comparison of lumbar and thoracic discs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9:725–733CrossRef Koeller W, Meier W, Hartmann F (1984) Biomechanical properties of human intervertebral discs subjected to axial dynamic compression. A comparison of lumbar and thoracic discs. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9:725–733CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Koeller W, Muehlhaus S, Meier W (1986) Biomechanical properties of human intervertebral discs subjected to axial dynamic compression––influence of age and degeneration. J Biomech 19:807–816PubMedCrossRef Koeller W, Muehlhaus S, Meier W (1986) Biomechanical properties of human intervertebral discs subjected to axial dynamic compression––influence of age and degeneration. J Biomech 19:807–816PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P (1996) ‘Stress’ distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:965–972PubMedCrossRef Adams MA, McNally DS, Dolan P (1996) ‘Stress’ distributions inside intervertebral discs. The effects of age and degeneration. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:965–972PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Heo DH, Cho YJ, Cho SM et al (2012) Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar dynamic stabilization using pedicle screws and a nitinol spring rod system with 2-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:409–414PubMedCrossRef Heo DH, Cho YJ, Cho SM et al (2012) Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar dynamic stabilization using pedicle screws and a nitinol spring rod system with 2-year minimum follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 25:409–414PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kumar A, Beastall J, Hughes J et al (2008) Disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic stabilization system after two years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2909–2914CrossRef Kumar A, Beastall J, Hughes J et al (2008) Disc changes in the bridged and adjacent segments after Dynesys dynamic stabilization system after two years. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:2909–2914CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Vaga S, Brayda-Bruno M, Perona F et al (2009) Molecular MR imaging for the evaluation of the effect of dynamic stabilization on lumbar intervertebral discs. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 1):40–48PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Vaga S, Brayda-Bruno M, Perona F et al (2009) Molecular MR imaging for the evaluation of the effect of dynamic stabilization on lumbar intervertebral discs. Eur Spine J 18(Suppl 1):40–48PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fay LY, Wu JC, Tsai TY et al (2013) Intervertebral disc rehydration after lumbar dynamic stabilization: magnetic resonance image evaluation with a mean followup of four years. Adv Orthop 2013:437570PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Fay LY, Wu JC, Tsai TY et al (2013) Intervertebral disc rehydration after lumbar dynamic stabilization: magnetic resonance image evaluation with a mean followup of four years. Adv Orthop 2013:437570PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wang JC, Arnold PM, Hermsmeyer JT et al (2012) Do lumbar motion preserving devices reduce the risk of adjacent segment pathology compared with fusion surgery? A systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:S133–S143CrossRef Wang JC, Arnold PM, Hermsmeyer JT et al (2012) Do lumbar motion preserving devices reduce the risk of adjacent segment pathology compared with fusion surgery? A systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37:S133–S143CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Anandjiwala J, Seo JY, Ha KY et al (2011) Adjacent segment degeneration after instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion: a prospective cohort study with a minimum five-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 20:1951–1960PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Anandjiwala J, Seo JY, Ha KY et al (2011) Adjacent segment degeneration after instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion: a prospective cohort study with a minimum five-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 20:1951–1960PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chen BL, Wei FX, Ueyama K et al (2011) Adjacent segment degeneration after single-segment PLIF: the risk factor for degeneration and its impact on clinical outcomes. Eur Spine J 20:1946–1950PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Chen BL, Wei FX, Ueyama K et al (2011) Adjacent segment degeneration after single-segment PLIF: the risk factor for degeneration and its impact on clinical outcomes. Eur Spine J 20:1946–1950PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bono CM, Kadaba M, Vaccaro AR (2009) Posterior pedicle fixation-based dynamic stabilization devices for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:376–383PubMedCrossRef Bono CM, Kadaba M, Vaccaro AR (2009) Posterior pedicle fixation-based dynamic stabilization devices for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:376–383PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kaner T, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T (2010) Dynamic stabilization of the spine: a new classification system. Turk Neurosurg 20:205–215PubMed Kaner T, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T (2010) Dynamic stabilization of the spine: a new classification system. Turk Neurosurg 20:205–215PubMed
25.
go back to reference Korovessis P, Repantis T, Zacharatos S (2009) Does wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion? Eur Spine J 18:830–840PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Korovessis P, Repantis T, Zacharatos S (2009) Does wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion? Eur Spine J 18:830–840PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Richter A, Schutz C, Hauck M (2010) Does an interspinous device (Coflex) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients. Eur Spine J 19:283–289PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Richter A, Schutz C, Hauck M (2010) Does an interspinous device (Coflex) improve the outcome of decompressive surgery in lumbar spinal stenosis? One-year follow up of a prospective case control study of 60 patients. Eur Spine J 19:283–289PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Schaeren S, Broger I, Jeanneret B (2008) Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E636–E642CrossRef Schaeren S, Broger I, Jeanneret B (2008) Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E636–E642CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Functional and radiological outcomes of semi-rigid dynamic lumbar stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion after 2 years
Authors
Lingjie Fu
Alexandra France
Youzhuan Xie
Kai Fang
Yaokai Gan
Pu Zhang
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1961-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 5/2014 Go to the issue