Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 9/2011

01-09-2011 | Clinical Research

Functional and Anatomic Orientation of the Femoral Head

Authors: David Wright, BSc, Cari Whyne, PhD, Michael Hardisty, MSc, Hans J. Kreder, MD, MPH, FRCS, Omri Lubovsky, MD

Published in: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® | Issue 9/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Femoral neck geometry directly affects load transmission through the hip. Orientations may be described anatomically or using functional definitions that consider load transmission.

Questions/purposes

This study introduces and applies a new method for characterizing functional femoral orientation based on the distribution of subchondral bone density in the femoral head and compares it with orientation measures generated via established anatomic landmark-based methods. Both orientation methods then are used to characterize side-to-side symmetry of orientation and differences between men and women within the population.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective review of CT imaging data from 28 patients was performed. Anatomic orientation was determined using established two-dimensional and three-dimensional landmarking methods. Subchondral bone density maps were generated and used to define a density-weighted surface normal vector. Orientation angles generated by the three methods were compared, with side-to-side symmetry and differences between genders also investigated.

Results

The three methods measured substantially different angles for anteversion and neck-shaft angle. Weak correlations were found between anatomic and functional orientation measures for neck-shaft angle only.

Conclusions

Neck-shaft angles calculated using the functional orientation method corresponded well with previous in vivo loading data. An absence of strong correlation between functional and anatomic measures reinforces the concept that bone geometry is not solely responsible for determining loading of the femoral head.

Level of Evidence

Level II, Diagnostic Studies—Investigating a Diagnostic Test. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001;34:859–871.PubMedCrossRef Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G, Heller M, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Strauss J, Duda GN. Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. J Biomech. 2001;34:859–871.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cheng XG, Lowet G, Boonen S, Nicholson PH, Brys P, Nijs J, Dequeker J. Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry. Bone. 1997;20:213–218.PubMedCrossRef Cheng XG, Lowet G, Boonen S, Nicholson PH, Brys P, Nijs J, Dequeker J. Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry. Bone. 1997;20:213–218.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Dewire P, Simkin PA. Subchondral plate thickness reflects tensile stress in the primate acetabulum. J Orthop Res. 1996;14:838–841.PubMedCrossRef Dewire P, Simkin PA. Subchondral plate thickness reflects tensile stress in the primate acetabulum. J Orthop Res. 1996;14:838–841.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Gray H, Pick TP, Howden R. Anatomy: Descriptive and Surgical. Philadelphia, PA: Running Press; 1974. Gray H, Pick TP, Howden R. Anatomy: Descriptive and Surgical. Philadelphia, PA: Running Press; 1974.
6.
go back to reference Grynpas MD, Alpert B, Katz I, Lieberman I, Pritzker KP. Subchondral bone in osteoarthritis. Calcif Tissue Int. 1991;49:20–26.PubMedCrossRef Grynpas MD, Alpert B, Katz I, Lieberman I, Pritzker KP. Subchondral bone in osteoarthritis. Calcif Tissue Int. 1991;49:20–26.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hoaglund FT, Low WD. Anatomy of the femoral neck and head, with comparative data from Caucasians and Hong Kong Chinese. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;152:10–16.PubMed Hoaglund FT, Low WD. Anatomy of the femoral neck and head, with comparative data from Caucasians and Hong Kong Chinese. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;152:10–16.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Ito M, Wakao N, Hida T, Matsui Y, Abe Y, Aoyagi K, Uetani M, Harada A. Analysis of hip geometry by clinical CT for the assessment of hip fracture risk in elderly Japanese women. Bone. 2010;46:453–457.PubMedCrossRef Ito M, Wakao N, Hida T, Matsui Y, Abe Y, Aoyagi K, Uetani M, Harada A. Analysis of hip geometry by clinical CT for the assessment of hip fracture risk in elderly Japanese women. Bone. 2010;46:453–457.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Johnston JD, Masri BA, Wilson DR. Computed tomography topographic mapping of subchondral density (CT-TOMASD) in osteoarthritic and normal knees: methodological development and preliminary findings. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17:1319–1326.PubMedCrossRef Johnston JD, Masri BA, Wilson DR. Computed tomography topographic mapping of subchondral density (CT-TOMASD) in osteoarthritic and normal knees: methodological development and preliminary findings. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17:1319–1326.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Kim JS, Park TS, Park SB, Kim JS, Kim IY, Kim SI. Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D imaging method. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2000;38:603–609.PubMedCrossRef Kim JS, Park TS, Park SB, Kim JS, Kim IY, Kim SI. Measurement of femoral neck anteversion in 3D. Part 1: 3D imaging method. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2000;38:603–609.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lee YS, Oh SH, Seon JK, Song EK, Yoon TR. 3D femoral neck anteversion measurements based on the posterior femoral plane in ORTHODOC system. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006;44:895–906.PubMedCrossRef Lee YS, Oh SH, Seon JK, Song EK, Yoon TR. 3D femoral neck anteversion measurements based on the posterior femoral plane in ORTHODOC system. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006;44:895–906.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Maruyama M, Feinberg JR, Capello WN, D’Antonio JA. The Frank Stinchfield Award. Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur: anteversion angle and implant positioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:52–65.PubMedCrossRef Maruyama M, Feinberg JR, Capello WN, D’Antonio JA. The Frank Stinchfield Award. Morphologic features of the acetabulum and femur: anteversion angle and implant positioning. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:52–65.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Muller-Gerbl M, Putz R, Hodapp N, Schulte E, Wimmer B. Computed tomography-osteoabsorptiometry for assessing the density distribution of subchondral bone as a measure of long-term mechanical adaptation in individual joints. Skeletal Radiol. 1989;18:507–512.PubMedCrossRef Muller-Gerbl M, Putz R, Hodapp N, Schulte E, Wimmer B. Computed tomography-osteoabsorptiometry for assessing the density distribution of subchondral bone as a measure of long-term mechanical adaptation in individual joints. Skeletal Radiol. 1989;18:507–512.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E. A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22:610–614.PubMedCrossRef Sugano N, Noble PC, Kamaric E. A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22:610–614.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tonnis D, Heinecke A. Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1747–1770.PubMed Tonnis D, Heinecke A. Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1747–1770.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Toogood PA, Skalak A, Cooperman DR. Proximal femoral anatomy in the normal human population. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:876–885.PubMedCrossRef Toogood PA, Skalak A, Cooperman DR. Proximal femoral anatomy in the normal human population. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:876–885.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Wedge JH, Munkacsi I, Loback D. Anteversion of the femur and idiopathic osteoarthrosis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:1040–1043.PubMed Wedge JH, Munkacsi I, Loback D. Anteversion of the femur and idiopathic osteoarthrosis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71:1040–1043.PubMed
Metadata
Title
Functional and Anatomic Orientation of the Femoral Head
Authors
David Wright, BSc
Cari Whyne, PhD
Michael Hardisty, MSc
Hans J. Kreder, MD, MPH, FRCS
Omri Lubovsky, MD
Publication date
01-09-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® / Issue 9/2011
Print ISSN: 0009-921X
Electronic ISSN: 1528-1132
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1754-1

Other articles of this Issue 9/2011

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® 9/2011 Go to the issue

Symposium: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Two-stage Reimplantation for Treating Prosthetic Shoulder Infections

Symposium: Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

The Classic: Delta Shoulder Prosthesis for Rotator Cuff Rupture