Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2006

01-11-2006 | Knee

Full arthroscopic inlay reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament

Authors: Pier Paolo Mariani, Fabrizio Margheritini

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 11/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

We report a full arthroscopic inlay reconstruction technique to avoid the morbidity of traditional open inlay procedure. With the transeptal approach a trough is created arthroscopically at the anatomical tibial insertion of the PCL, which must fit with the patellar bone block of a quadriceps tendon autograft. The bone plug is harvested with two nonabsorbable sutures, each end of which is passed through two holes from the cortical to the cancellous side. The graft is introduced into the knee joint from the posteromedial portal using two traction sutures passed previously through two transtibial tunnels exiting at the middle of the trough. Tibial graft fixation is achieved using the sutures knotted at the anterior aspect of the tibial cortex. Arthroscopic inlay procedure may be a rational surgical alternative because it reduces the crucial steps of an open inlay procedure, such as extensive exposure of the posterior capsule, the need of position change with risk of contamination, longer surgical time, and the risk of bone block fracture if an autograft is harvested. The arthroscopic procedure may also be performed also when hardware presence of previous surgery limits use of the open technique. We initially limited use of this technique to patients: (1) undergoing PCL revision surgery, (2) having hardware from previous tibial surgery, and (3) presenting a PCL lesion following posterior dislocation with previous vascular surgery. The results have been good, and we are now also using this technique for primary PCL reconstruction with favorable results.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ahn J-H, Ha CW (2000) Posterior portal for arthroscopic surgery of the knee joint. Arthroscopy 16:774–779PubMedCrossRef Ahn J-H, Ha CW (2000) Posterior portal for arthroscopic surgery of the knee joint. Arthroscopy 16:774–779PubMedCrossRef
2.
3.
go back to reference Bergfeld JA, `McAllister DR, Parker RD, Valdevit AD, Kambic HE (2001) A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Am J Sports Med 29:129–136PubMed Bergfeld JA, `McAllister DR, Parker RD, Valdevit AD, Kambic HE (2001) A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Am J Sports Med 29:129–136PubMed
4.
go back to reference Burks RT, Schaffer JJ (1990) A simplified approach to the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop 254:216–219PubMed Burks RT, Schaffer JJ (1990) A simplified approach to the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop 254:216–219PubMed
5.
go back to reference Cooper DE, Stewart D (2004) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 28:402–406 Cooper DE, Stewart D (2004) Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 28:402–406
6.
go back to reference Chuang T-Y, Ho W-P, Chen C-H, Liao Y-S, Chen W-J (2004) Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using inlay technique with quadriceps tendon–bone autograft. Arthroscopy 20:E-23–E-28CrossRef Chuang T-Y, Ho W-P, Chen C-H, Liao Y-S, Chen W-J (2004) Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using inlay technique with quadriceps tendon–bone autograft. Arthroscopy 20:E-23–E-28CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Margheritini F, Mauro CS, Rihn JA, Stabile KJ, Woo S, Harner CD (2004) Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Analysis of knee kinematics and graft in situ forces. Am J Sports Med 32:587–593PubMedCrossRef Margheritini F, Mauro CS, Rihn JA, Stabile KJ, Woo S, Harner CD (2004) Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Analysis of knee kinematics and graft in situ forces. Am J Sports Med 32:587–593PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference McAllister DR, Markolf KL, Oakes DA, Young CR, McWilliams J (2002) A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Am J Sports Med 30:312–317PubMed McAllister DR, Markolf KL, Oakes DA, Young CR, McWilliams J (2002) A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Am J Sports Med 30:312–317PubMed
9.
go back to reference Markolf KL, Zemanovic JR, McAllister DR (2002) Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:518–524PubMedCrossRef Markolf KL, Zemanovic JR, McAllister DR (2002) Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:518–524PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Noyes FR, Medvecky MJ, Bhargava M (2003) Arthroscopically assisted quadriceps double-bundle tibial inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an analysis of techniques and a safe operative approach to the popliteal fossa. Arthroscopy 19:894–905PubMedCrossRef Noyes FR, Medvecky MJ, Bhargava M (2003) Arthroscopically assisted quadriceps double-bundle tibial inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an analysis of techniques and a safe operative approach to the popliteal fossa. Arthroscopy 19:894–905PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Noyes FR, Barber-Westin S (2005) Posterior cruciate ligament replacement with a two strand quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft and a tibial inlay technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1241–1252PubMedCrossRef Noyes FR, Barber-Westin S (2005) Posterior cruciate ligament replacement with a two strand quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft and a tibial inlay technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1241–1252PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Oakes DA, Markolf KL, McWilliams J, Young CR, McAllister DR (2002) Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:938–944PubMed Oakes DA, Markolf KL, McWilliams J, Young CR, McAllister DR (2002) Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:938–944PubMed
13.
go back to reference Park SE, Stamos BD, DeFrate LE, Gill TJ, Li G (2004) The effect of posterior knee capsulotomy on posterior tibial translation during posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:1514–1519PubMedCrossRef Park SE, Stamos BD, DeFrate LE, Gill TJ, Li G (2004) The effect of posterior knee capsulotomy on posterior tibial translation during posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:1514–1519PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Stannard JP, Riley RS, Sheils TM, McGwin Jr G, Volgas DA (2003) Anatomic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament after multiligament knee injuries. A combination of the tibial-inlay and two-femoral tunnel techniques. Am J Sports Med 31:196–202PubMed Stannard JP, Riley RS, Sheils TM, McGwin Jr G, Volgas DA (2003) Anatomic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament after multiligament knee injuries. A combination of the tibial-inlay and two-femoral tunnel techniques. Am J Sports Med 31:196–202PubMed
15.
go back to reference Thomann YR, Gaechter A (1994) Dorsal approach for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Arch Orthop Traum Surg 113:142–148CrossRef Thomann YR, Gaechter A (1994) Dorsal approach for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Arch Orthop Traum Surg 113:142–148CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Jung Y-B, Tae S-K, Yung H-J, Lee K-H (2004) Replacement of the torn posterior cruciate ligament with a mid-third patellar tendon graft with use of a modified tibial inlay. J Bone Joint Surg Am 8:1878–1883 Jung Y-B, Tae S-K, Yung H-J, Lee K-H (2004) Replacement of the torn posterior cruciate ligament with a mid-third patellar tendon graft with use of a modified tibial inlay. J Bone Joint Surg Am 8:1878–1883
Metadata
Title
Full arthroscopic inlay reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament
Authors
Pier Paolo Mariani
Fabrizio Margheritini
Publication date
01-11-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 11/2006
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-006-0086-x

Other articles of this Issue 11/2006

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2006 Go to the issue