Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2016

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

From early detection to rehabilitation in the community: reading beyond the blog testimonies of survivors’ quality of life and prostate cancer representation

Authors: Margareth Santos Zanchetta, Marguerite Cognet, Mary Rachel Lam-Kin-Teng, Marie Elisabeth Dumitriu, Lise Renaud, Jacques Rhéaume

Published in: Health and Quality of Life Outcomes | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Survivors’ testimonies can reveal much about men’s experiences of prostate cancer and impacts on their quality of life (QOL) during the clinical trajectory of the disease. These survivors’ shared thoughts and views were hypothesized to reflect salient features of their lived social representation of prostate cancer.

Context

We explored the content of testimonies posted by men to a public blog hosted by a French national prostate cancer patients’ association. The study question, “What do French bloggers’ testimonies reveal about their lived experiences with prostate cancer, especially regarding their quality of life in community settings, that underpin their social representation of prostate cancer?” guided the exploration and analysis of the textual data. The aims were to better understand men’s experiences and predominant thoughts and views, to elucidate patients’ behaviours, and to enlighten medical policy and practice.

Purpose

Explore issues of QOL as reported by French prostate cancer survivors in a public blog by: (a) identifying the salient aspects and issues of the experience of living with prostate cancer from the perspective of survivors; and (b) analyzing the content in the posted testimonies regarding perceived and lived impacts of prostate cancer on QOL.

Methods

A critical ethnographic study guided the selection of textual data from 196 male bloggers’ testimonies about prostate cancer posted in the period from 2008 to 2013. Media content analysis method was undertaken on blog testimonies, framed by a multidimensional conceptual framework of QOL.

Results

Testimonies focused mainly on medical care and rehabilitation, recovery, health education and self-care, as well as on a global vision of prostate cancer and its impacts on personal views of manhood and masculinity. The language used indicated that political, educative and compassionate discourses were intertwined to create a complex representation of the experience and effects of prostate cancer; this multi-faceted representation can inform the public and professional debate about men’s capacity to provide emotional support and problem-solve within a community of interest.

Conclusion

Findings, while based on data limited to mostly one-time entries to a French blog, contribute to understanding a unique, collective expression of men’s lived experiences of prostate cancer. These anonymous survivors shared their varied reactions, ways of coping, and thoughts on needed change.
Literature
1.
2.
Frank AW. At the will of the body: reflections on illness. 1st ed. New York: Mariner Books; 2002.
3.
Klaeson K, Sandell K, Berterö C. Talking about sexuality: desire, virility, and intimacy in the context of prostate cancer associations. Am J Mens Health. 2013;7(1):42–53.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Rivera-Ramos Z, Buki LP. I will no longer be a man! Manliness and prostate cancer screenings among Latino men. Psychol Men Masc. 2011;12(1):13–25.CrossRef
5.
Maliski S, Rivera S, Connor S, Lopez G, Litwin M. Renegotiating masculine identity after prostate cancer treatment. Qual Health Res. 2008;18(12):1609–20.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Schumm K, Skea Z, McKee L, N’Dow J. ‘They’re doing surgery on two people’: a meta-ethnography of the influences on couples’ treatment decision making for prostate cancer. Health Expect. 2010;13(4):335–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Chung E, Brock G. Sexual rehabilitation and cancer survivorship: a state of art review of current literature and management strategies in male sexual dysfunction among prostate cancer survivors. J Sexual Medicine. 2013;10:102–11.CrossRef
8.
Zanchetta MS, Cognet M, Xenocostas S, Aoki D, Talbot Y. Prostate cancer among Canadian men: a transcultural representation. Int J Mens Health. 2007;6(3):224–58.CrossRef
9.
Jodelet D. Représentations sociales : Un domaine en expansion [Social representation: An expanding field]. In: Jodelet D, editor. Les représentations sociales [Social representations]. 6th ed. Paris: Presses universitaires de France; 1999. p. 47–8.
10.
Abric JC. Les représentations sociales: Aspects théoriques [Social representations: theoretical aspects]. In: Abric JC, editor. Pratiques sociales et représentations [Social practices and representations]. 2nd ed. Paris: Presses universitaires de France; 2001. p. 11–36.
11.
Rootman I. Health promotion and literacy: implications for nursing. Can J Nurs Res. 2004;36(1):13–21.PubMed
12.
13.
14.
15.
Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2013.
16.
Flament C. Aspects périphériques des représentations sociales [Peripheral aspects of social representation]. In: Guimelli C, editor. Structures et transformations des représentations [Structure and transformation of representations]. Lausanne: Delachaux & Niestlé; 1994. p. 139–41.
17.
Epstein RM, Street Jr RL. The values and value of patient-centered care. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9(2):101–3.CrossRef
18.
19.
Cockle-Hearne J, Faithful S. Self-management for men surviving prostate cancer: a review of behavioural and psychosocial interventions to understand what strategies can work, for whom and in what circumstances. Psychooncology. 2010;19(9):909–22.CrossRefPubMed
20.
Gualtieri L, Akhtar FY. Cancer patient blogs: how patients, clinicians, and researchers learn from rich narratives of illness. In: Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces (ITI); 2013 Jun 24–27; Cavtat, Croatia. p. 3–8.
21.
Heilferty CM. Toward a theory of online communication in illness: concept analysis of illness blogs. JAN. 2009;65(7):1539–47.CrossRef
22.
23.
Broom A. Virtually he@lthy: the impact of internet use on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(3):325–45.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Sillence E, Mo PKH. Communicating health decisions: an analysis of messages posted to online prostate cancer forums. Health Expect. 2014;17(2):244–53.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Galbraith ME, Fink R, Wilkins GG. Couples surviving prostate cancer: challenges in their lives and relationships. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2011;27(4):300–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Tanner T, Galbraith M, Hays L. From a woman’s perspective: life as a partner of a prostate cancer survivor. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2011;56(2):154–60.CrossRefPubMed
27.
McSorley O, McCaughan E, Prue G, Parahoo K, Bunting B, O’Sullivan J. A longitudinal study of coping strategies in men receiving radiotherapy and neo‐adjuvant androgen deprivation for prostate cancer: a quantitative and qualitative study. J Adv Nurs. 2014;70(3):625–38.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Iyigun E, Ayhan H, Tastan S. Perceptions and experiences after radical prostatectomy in Turkish men: a descriptive qualitative study. App Nurs Res. 2011;24(2):101–9.CrossRef
29.
Wall DP, Kristjanson LJ, Fisher C, Boldy D, Kendall GE. Responding to a diagnosis of localized prostate cancer: men’s experiences of normal distress during the first 3 postdiagnostic months. Cancer Nurs. 2013;36(6):E44–50.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Hsiao CP, Moore IMK, Insel KC, Merkle CJ. Symptom self‐management strategies in patients with non‐metastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(3–4):440–9.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Hartman ME, Irvine J, Currie KL, Ritvo P, Trachtenberg L, Louis A, Trachtenberg J, Jamnicky L, Matthew AG. Exploring gay couples’ experience with sexual dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: a qualitative study. J Sex Marital Ther. 2014;40(3):233–53.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Grajales III FJ, Sheps S, Ho K, Novak-Lauscher H, Eysenbach G. Social media: a review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care. J Med Int Res. 2014;16(2):e13.
33.
Chung DS, Kim S. Blogging activity among cancer patients and their companions: uses, gratifications, and predictors of outcomes. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2008;59(2):297–306.CrossRef
34.
35.
Adams SA. Blog-based applications and health information: two case studies that illustrate important questions for consumer health informatics (CHI) research. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(6):e89–96.CrossRefPubMed
36.
37.
Donelle L, Hoffman-Goetz L. Functional health literacy and cancer care conversations in online forums for retired persons. Inform Health Soc Care. 2009;34(1):59–72.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Himelboim I, Han JY. Cancer talk on twitter: community structure and information sources in breast and prostate cancer social networks. J Health Commun. 2014;19:210–25.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Moorhead SA, Hazlett DE, Harrison L, Carroll JK, Irwin A, Hoving C. A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e85.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Merolli M, Gray K, Martin-Sanchez F. Health outcomes and related effects of using social media in chronic disease management: a literature review and analysis of affordances. J Biomed Inform. 2013;46:957–69.CrossRefPubMed
41.
Ziebald S, Wyke S. Health and illness in a connected world: how might sharing experiences on the internet affect people’s health? Milbank Q. 2012;90(2):219–49.CrossRef
42.
Kim JN, Lee S. Communication and cybercoping: coping with chronic illness through communicative action in online support networks. J Health Commun. 2014;19(7):775–94.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Lober WB, Flowers JL. Consumer empowerment in health care amid the internet and social media. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2011;27(3):169–82.CrossRefPubMed
44.
45.
Koskan A, Klasko L, Davis SN, Gwede CK, Wells KJ, Kumar A, Lopez N, Meade CD. Use and taxonomy of social media in cancer-related research: a systematic review. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(7):e20–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Rains SA. The implications of stigma and anonymity for self-disclosure in health blogs. Health Commun. 2014;29(1):23–31.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Flanagin AJ, Hocevar KP, Samahito SN. Connecting with the user-generated Web: how group identification impacts online information sharing and evaluation. Inform Commun Soc. 2014;17(6):683–94.CrossRef
48.
Arrington MI. Uncertainty and stigma in the experiences of prostate cancer survivors : a thematic analysis of narrative elements. Illn Crisis Loss. 2015;23(3):242–60.CrossRef
49.
Khoo CS. Issues in information behaviour on social media. Libres. 2014;24(2):75–96.
50.
de Bronkart D. From patient centered to people powered: autonomy on the rise. BMJ. 2015;350:h148.CrossRef
51.
Nanton V, Dale J. New models of follow-up in prostate cancer: a role for information technology? BJU Int. 2012;110(9):1224–6.CrossRefPubMed
52.
Lee CJ, Ramírez AS, Lewis N, Gray SW, Hornik RC. Looking beyond the internet: examining socioeconomic inequalities in cancer information seeking among cancer patients. Health Commun. 2012;27:806–17.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
53.
Hardiker NR, Grant MJ. Factors that influence public engagement with eHealth: a literature review. Int J Med Inform. 2011;80:1–12.CrossRefPubMed
54.
Satterfield JM, Spring B, Brownson RC, Mullen EJ, Newhouse RP, Walker BB, Whitlock EP. Toward a transdisciplinary model of evidence-based practice. Milbank Q. 2009;87(2):368–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
55.
Wilson E, Kenny A, Dickson-Swift V. Using blogs as a qualitative health research tool: a scoping review. Int J Qual Methods. 2015;14(5):1–12.CrossRef
56.
Rains SA, Keating DM. Health blogging: an examination of the outcomes associated with making public, written disclosures about health. Communic Res. 2015;42(1):107–33.CrossRef
57.
Ahern DK, Woods SS, Lightowler MC, Finley SW, Houston TK. Promise of and potential for patient-facing technologies to enable meaningful use. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(5S2):S161–72.
58.
59.
Han J, Wiley J. Digital illness narratives: a new form of health communication. In: Lee H, editor. Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Information Technology Advancement. Kalamazoo: Western Michigan University, ScholarWorks; 2013. p. 46–52.
60.
Haberman MR, Bush NE. Quality of life: methodological and measurement issues. In: Kings CR, Hinds PS, editors. Quality of life: from nursing and patient perspectives. 3rd ed. Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2012. p. 165–9.
61.
Monzó LD. Learning to follow: An ethnographer’s tale of engagement. In: Berryman M, SooHoo S, Nevin A, editors. Culturally responsive methodologies. UK: Emerald; 2013. p. 371–87.
62.
Tan L. Psychotherapy 2.0: MySpace blogging as self-therapy. Am J Psychother. 2008;62(2):143–63.PubMed
63.
Maupoux A. Cancers et cultures: les représentations du cancer à travers les cultures. TranSfaire & Cultures, Revue d’Anthropologie, Médicale Clinique. 2009;1:38–51.
64.
Leray C. L’analyse de contenu [ressource électronique]: de la théorie à la pratique: la méthode Morin-Chartier. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec; 2008.
65.
Renaud L, editor. Les médias et le façonnement des normes en matière de santé. Québec: Presses Universitaires du Québec; 2007.
66.
Erlandson DA, Harris EL, Skipper BL, Allen SD. Doing naturalistic inquiry: a guide to methods. Newbury: Sage; 1993.
67.
Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.
68.
Karch AM. Lippincott Nursing Drug Guide. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015.
69.
Lilley LL, Harrington S, Snyder JS. In: Swart B, editor. Pharmacology for Canadian Health Care Practice. Toronto: Elsevier Canada; 2011.
70.
Hartzler A, Pratt W. Managing the personal side of health: how patient expertise differs from the expertise of clinicians. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(3):e62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
71.
Broom A. The eMale: prostate cancer, masculinity and online support as a challenge to medical expertise. J Sociology. 2005;41(1):87–104.CrossRef
72.
Zanchetta MS, Perreault M, Kaszap M, Viens C. Patterns in information strategies used by older men to understand and deal with prostate-cancer-related information: an application of the modélisation qualitative research design. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;44:961–72.CrossRef
73.
Huber J, Ihrig A, Peters T, Huber CG, Kessler A, Hadaschik B, Pahernik S, Hohenfellner M. Decision‐making in localized prostate cancer: lessons learned from an online support group. BJU Int. 2011;107(10):1570–5.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Lieberman MA. Gender and online cancer support groups: issues facing male cancer patients. J Cancer Educ. 2008;23(3):167–71.PubMed
75.
Levant R, Wimer D. Masculinity constructs as protective buffers and risk factors for men’s health. Am J Mens Health. 2014;8:110–20.CrossRefPubMed
76.
Clarke LH, Bennett E. ‘You learn to live with all the things that are wrong with you’: gender and the experience of multiple chronic conditions in later life. Ageing Soc. 2013;33:342–60.CrossRefPubMed
77.
78.
Zanchetta MS, Monteiro MS, Gorospe FF, Pilon RS, Peña A. Ideas of masculinities in Latin America and their influences on immigrant men’s attitudes toward health: prostate cancer prevention, an analysis of the literature. J Mens Health. 2010;7(3):259–69.CrossRef
79.
Williams I. Organizational readiness for innovation in health care: some lessons from the recent literature. Health Serv Manage Res. 2011;24(4):213–8.CrossRefPubMed
80.
Catallo C. Should nurses be knowledge brokers? Competencies and organizational resources to support the role. Nurs Leadersh. 2015;28(1):24–37.CrossRef
81.
Zanchetta M, Maheu C, Baku L, Nembhard-Wedderburn P, Lemonde M. Prospective roles for Canadian oncology nurses in breast cancer rapid diagnostic clinics. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2015;25(2):144–9. (English); 150–6 (French).CrossRefPubMed
82.
Morse JM. Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogue. Rockville: Aspen Publishers, Inc.; 1989.
83.
Leininger M. Evaluation criteria and critique of qualitative research studies. In: Morse JM, editor. Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994. p. 95–115.
Metadata
Title
From early detection to rehabilitation in the community: reading beyond the blog testimonies of survivors’ quality of life and prostate cancer representation
Authors
Margareth Santos Zanchetta
Marguerite Cognet
Mary Rachel Lam-Kin-Teng
Marie Elisabeth Dumitriu
Lise Renaud
Jacques Rhéaume
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes / Issue 1/2016
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7525
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-016-0568-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 1/2016 Go to the issue

Research

Explaining parent-child (dis)agreement in generic and short stature-specific health-related quality of life reports: do family and social relationships matter?

Research

Quality of life among elderly patients undergoing transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement– a model-based longitudinal data analysis

Research

Mediation analysis of relationships between chronic inflammation and quality of life in older adults

Research

Estimation of minimal clinically important change of the Japanese version of EQ-5D in patients with chronic noncancer pain: a retrospective research using real-world data

Research

Factors influencing changes in health related quality of life of caregivers of persons with multiple chronic conditions

Review

Systematic review reveals lack of quality in reporting health-related quality of life in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours