Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2008

01-08-2008 | Knee

Free bone cement fragments after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an underappreciated problem

Authors: S. M. Hauptmann, P. Weber, C. Glaser, C. Birkenmaier, V. Jansson, P. E. Müller

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 8/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The minimally invasive implantation of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) leads to excellent functional results, but due to the reduced intraoperative visibility the removal of excessive cement may be difficult. In a retrospective study we assessed radiologically the incidence of loose and excess bone cement in 120 UKAs and correlated it to the thickness of the tibial cement layer. In 25 cases loose or attached excess cement was seen. Two of these patients with loose cement bodies required revision surgery. An additional 2 patients not operated at our institution required revision because of pain and loss of motion. The average thickness of the tibial cement layer was 3.1 (1.7–5.0) mm in all the patients. But it was significantly higher in the group with excess cement bodies [3.3 (2.3–5.0) mm] compared to the group without excess cement [3.0 (1.7–4.1) mm] (P < 0.05). Symptomatic free cement bodies need to be removed immediately, if necessary arthroscopically, in order to avoid damage to the implants. To avoid this problem in minimally invasive UKA, intraoperative fluoroscopy, a dental mirror or a nerve hook seem to be useful tools to identify and remove loose or excess cement.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ackroyd CE, Whitehouse SL, Newman JH, Joslin CC (2002) A comparative study of the medial St Georg sled and kinematic total knee arthroplasties. Ten-year survivorship. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:667–672PubMedCrossRef Ackroyd CE, Whitehouse SL, Newman JH, Joslin CC (2002) A comparative study of the medial St Georg sled and kinematic total knee arthroplasties. Ten-year survivorship. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:667–672PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ahlback S (1968) Osteonecrosis of the knee-radiographic observations. Calcif Tissue Res Suppl–36b Ahlback S (1968) Osteonecrosis of the knee-radiographic observations. Calcif Tissue Res Suppl–36b
3.
go back to reference Ahlback S, Bauer GC, Bohne WH (1968) Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 11:705–733PubMedCrossRef Ahlback S, Bauer GC, Bohne WH (1968) Spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum 11:705–733PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Aldinger PR, Clarius M, Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, Breusch SJ (2004) Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the “Oxford Uni” meniscal bearing knee. Orthopade 33:1277–1283PubMedCrossRef Aldinger PR, Clarius M, Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, Breusch SJ (2004) Medial unicompartmental knee replacement using the “Oxford Uni” meniscal bearing knee. Orthopade 33:1277–1283PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Wright TM (1986) The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:1041–1051PubMed Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Wright TM (1986) The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:1041–1051PubMed
6.
go back to reference Becker R, John M, Neumann WH (2004) Clinical outcomes in the revision of unicondylar arthoplasties to bicondylar arthroplasties. A matched-pair study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:702–707PubMedCrossRef Becker R, John M, Neumann WH (2004) Clinical outcomes in the revision of unicondylar arthoplasties to bicondylar arthroplasties. A matched-pair study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:702–707PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, Sheinkop MM, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO (1999) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:50–60PubMedCrossRef Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, Sheinkop MM, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO (1999) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:50–60PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Bert JM, McShane M (1998) Is it necessary to cement the tibial stem in cemented total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:73–78PubMedCrossRef Bert JM, McShane M (1998) Is it necessary to cement the tibial stem in cemented total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:73–78PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Berth A, Urbach D, Becker R, Awiszus F (2002) Gait anlysis in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee before and after total knee replacement. Zentralbl Chir 127:868–872PubMedCrossRef Berth A, Urbach D, Becker R, Awiszus F (2002) Gait anlysis in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee before and after total knee replacement. Zentralbl Chir 127:868–872PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bocell JR, Thorpe CD, Tullos HS (1991) Arthroscopic treatment of symptomatic total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:125–134 Bocell JR, Thorpe CD, Tullos HS (1991) Arthroscopic treatment of symptomatic total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:125–134
11.
go back to reference Broughton NS, Newman JH, Baily RA (1986) Unicompartmental replacement and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. A comparative study after 5–10 years’ follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:447–452PubMed Broughton NS, Newman JH, Baily RA (1986) Unicompartmental replacement and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee. A comparative study after 5–10 years’ follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:447–452PubMed
12.
go back to reference Deshmukh RV, Scott RD (2001) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:272–278PubMedCrossRef Deshmukh RV, Scott RD (2001) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:272–278PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Deshmukh RV, Scott RD (2002) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for younger patients: an alternative view. Clin Orthop Rel Res 404:108–112CrossRef Deshmukh RV, Scott RD (2002) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for younger patients: an alternative view. Clin Orthop Rel Res 404:108–112CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ewald FC (1989) The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12PubMed Ewald FC (1989) The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12PubMed
15.
go back to reference Ferris BD (1990) A quantitative study of the tissue reaction and its relationship to debris production from a joint implant. J Exp Pathol (Oxford) 71:367–373 Ferris BD (1990) A quantitative study of the tissue reaction and its relationship to debris production from a joint implant. J Exp Pathol (Oxford) 71:367–373
16.
go back to reference Goodman SB, Fornasier VL, Kei J (1988) The effects of bulk versus particulate ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene on bone. J Arthroplasty 3(Suppl):S41–S46PubMedCrossRef Goodman SB, Fornasier VL, Kei J (1988) The effects of bulk versus particulate ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene on bone. J Arthroplasty 3(Suppl):S41–S46PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Howe DJ, Taunton OD Jr, Engh GA (2004) Retained cement after unicondylar knee arthroplasty. A report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:2283–2286PubMed Howe DJ, Taunton OD Jr, Engh GA (2004) Retained cement after unicondylar knee arthroplasty. A report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:2283–2286PubMed
18.
go back to reference Keene GC, Jeer PJ (2005) Cement retrieval in minimally invasive knee surgery: the 90 degrees ball probe. J Arthroplasty 20:798–799PubMedCrossRef Keene GC, Jeer PJ (2005) Cement retrieval in minimally invasive knee surgery: the 90 degrees ball probe. J Arthroplasty 20:798–799PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Khanna G, Levy BA (2007) Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: literature review. Orthopedics 30:11–14PubMed Khanna G, Levy BA (2007) Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: literature review. Orthopedics 30:11–14PubMed
20.
go back to reference Kim KT, Lee S, Park HS, Cho KH, Kim KS (2007) A prospective analysis of Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 30:15–18PubMed Kim KT, Lee S, Park HS, Cho KH, Kim KS (2007) A prospective analysis of Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 30:15–18PubMed
21.
go back to reference Kim WY, Shafi M, Kim YY, Kim JY, Cho YK, Han CW (2006) Posteromedial compartment cement extrusion after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty treated by arthroscopy: a case report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:46–49PubMedCrossRef Kim WY, Shafi M, Kim YY, Kim JY, Cho YK, Han CW (2006) Posteromedial compartment cement extrusion after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty treated by arthroscopy: a case report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:46–49PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Krause WR, Krug W, Miller J (1982) Strength of the cement–bone interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res 163:290–299PubMed Krause WR, Krug W, Miller J (1982) Strength of the cement–bone interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res 163:290–299PubMed
23.
go back to reference Lisowski LA, Verheijen PM, Lisowski AE (2004) Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA): Clinical and radiological results of minimum follow-up of 2 years. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 6:773–776PubMed Lisowski LA, Verheijen PM, Lisowski AE (2004) Oxford Phase 3 Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty (UKA): Clinical and radiological results of minimum follow-up of 2 years. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 6:773–776PubMed
24.
go back to reference Muller PE, Pellengahr C, Witt M, Kircher J, Refior HJ, Jansson V (2004) Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:296–301PubMedCrossRef Muller PE, Pellengahr C, Witt M, Kircher J, Refior HJ, Jansson V (2004) Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:296–301PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:983–989PubMedCrossRef Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:983–989PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA (1998) Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:862–865PubMedCrossRef Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA (1998) Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:862–865PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ninol G (1979) Spontaneous Ahlback’s knee joint osteonecrosis. Rontgenblatter 32:442–446PubMed Ninol G (1979) Spontaneous Ahlback’s knee joint osteonecrosis. Rontgenblatter 32:442–446PubMed
28.
go back to reference Norton MR, Eyres KS (2000) Irrigation and suction technique to ensure reliable cement penetration for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15:468–474PubMedCrossRef Norton MR, Eyres KS (2000) Irrigation and suction technique to ensure reliable cement penetration for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15:468–474PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Pandit H, Aslam N, Pirpiris M, Jinnah H (2006) Total knee arthroplasty: the future. J Surg Orthop Adv 15:79–85PubMed Pandit H, Aslam N, Pirpiris M, Jinnah H (2006) Total knee arthroplasty: the future. J Surg Orthop Adv 15:79–85PubMed
30.
go back to reference Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, Dodd CA, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW (2001) Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 16:970–976PubMedCrossRef Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, Dodd CA, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW (2001) Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 16:970–976PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Quale JL, Murphey MD, Huntrakoon M, Reckling FW, Neff JR (1992) Titanium-induced arthropathy associated with polyethylene-metal separation after total joint replacement. Radiology 182:855–858PubMed Quale JL, Murphey MD, Huntrakoon M, Reckling FW, Neff JR (1992) Titanium-induced arthropathy associated with polyethylene-metal separation after total joint replacement. Radiology 182:855–858PubMed
32.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM (1994) Radiolucency at the bone-cement interface in total knee replacement. The effects of bone-surface preparation and cement technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:60–65PubMed Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM (1994) Radiolucency at the bone-cement interface in total knee replacement. The effects of bone-surface preparation and cement technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:60–65PubMed
33.
go back to reference Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L (2001) The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:45–49PubMedCrossRef Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L (2001) The routine of surgical management reduces failure after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:45–49PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Rougraff BT, Heck DA, Gibson AE (1991) A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:157–164PubMed Rougraff BT, Heck DA, Gibson AE (1991) A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:157–164PubMed
35.
go back to reference Scott RD, Santore RF (1981) Unicondylar unicompartmental replacement for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:536–544PubMed Scott RD, Santore RF (1981) Unicondylar unicompartmental replacement for osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:536–544PubMed
36.
go back to reference Smith S, Naima VS, Freeman MA (1999) The natural history of tibial radiolucent lines in a proximally cemented stemmed total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:3–8PubMedCrossRef Smith S, Naima VS, Freeman MA (1999) The natural history of tibial radiolucent lines in a proximally cemented stemmed total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:3–8PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Stern SH, Becker MW, Insall JN (1993) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An evaluation of selection criteria. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:143–148PubMed Stern SH, Becker MW, Insall JN (1993) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An evaluation of selection criteria. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:143–148PubMed
38.
go back to reference Svard UC, Price AJ (2001) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:191–194PubMedCrossRef Svard UC, Price AJ (2001) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:191–194PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Walker PS, Soudry M, Ewald FC, McVickar H (1984) Control of cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 185:155–164PubMed Walker PS, Soudry M, Ewald FC, McVickar H (1984) Control of cement penetration in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 185:155–164PubMed
40.
go back to reference Weale AE, Murray DW, Crawford R, Psychoyios V, Bonomo A, Howell G, O’Connor J, Goodfellow JW (1999) Does arthritis progress in the retained compartments after ‘Oxford’ medial unicompartmental arthroplasty? A clinical and radiological study with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:783–789PubMedCrossRef Weale AE, Murray DW, Crawford R, Psychoyios V, Bonomo A, Howell G, O’Connor J, Goodfellow JW (1999) Does arthritis progress in the retained compartments after ‘Oxford’ medial unicompartmental arthroplasty? A clinical and radiological study with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:783–789PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Free bone cement fragments after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an underappreciated problem
Authors
S. M. Hauptmann
P. Weber
C. Glaser
C. Birkenmaier
V. Jansson
P. E. Müller
Publication date
01-08-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 8/2008
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0563-5

Other articles of this Issue 8/2008

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 8/2008 Go to the issue