Top

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine

Published in:

01-09-2012 | Trauma (MJ Gardner, Section Editor)

Fragility fractures of the pelvis

Authors: Gillian L. S. Soles, Tania A. Ferguson

Published in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | Issue 3/2012

Abstract

Fragility fractures of the pelvis are common and the incidence is increasing with the aging population. The primary risk factor is osteoporosis. Diagnosis is challenging and advanced imaging with computed tomography (CT), bone scintigraphy, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is helpful. These injuries result in significant morbidity, including prolonged hospitalization, immobility, and loss of autonomy in previously active patients. The mortality rate is high, similar to hip fracture patients. This problem is underappreciated and deserves attention. An opportunity exists to improve outcomes with medical and surgical management.

• Hill RM, Robinson CM, Keating JF. Fractures of the pubic rami. Epidemiology and five-year survival. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(8):1141–4. This study points out the high rate of mortality associated with osteoporotic pelvic fractures. In addition, at five years there was no difference in mortality between patients with pelvic fractures and patients with hip fractures. We feel this finding is important and should be emphasized.PubMedCrossRef

Taillandier J, Langue F, Alemanni M, et al. Mortality and functional outcomes of pelvic insufficiency fractures in older patients. Joint Bone Spine. 2003;70(4):287–9.PubMedCrossRef

Breuil V, Roux CH, Testa J, et al. Outcome of osteoporotic pelvic fractures: An underestimated severity. Survey of 60 cases. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;75(5):585–8.PubMedCrossRef

• Morris RO, Sonibare A, Green DJ, et al. Closed pelvic fractures: characteristics and outcomes in older patients admitted to medical and geriatric wards. Postgrad Med J. 2000;76(900):646–50. This study is important to our understanding of the poor patient outcomes following conservative management of sacral insufficiency fractures. The authors demonstrate a significant impact on patient mobility and dependence post injury..PubMedCrossRef

Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, et al. Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis-Related Fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;22(3):465–75.CrossRef

• Kannus PP, Palvanen MM, Niemi SS, et al. Epidemiology of osteoporotic pelvic fractures in elderly people in Finland: sharp increase in 1970–1997 and alarming projections for the new millennium. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(5):443–8. This epidemiologic study highlights the rapid increase in the incidence of osteoporotic pelvic fractures in the elderly patient population. The authors emphasize that this trend is expected to continue with the number of fractures tripling by 2030. This data points to an important public health problem which deserves our attention..PubMedCrossRef

Melton LJ, Sampson JM, Morrey BF, et al. Epidemiologic features of pelvic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;155:43–7.PubMed

Tsiridis E, Upadhyay N, Giannoudis PV. Sacral insufficiency fractures: current concepts of management. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(12):1716–25.PubMedCrossRef

Pogrund H, Rigal W, Makin M, et al. Determination of osteoporosis in patients with fractured femoral neck using the Singh index: a Jerusalem study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;156:189.PubMed

10.

Gotis-Graham I, McGuigan L, Diamond T, et al. Sacral insufficiency fractures in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76(6):882.PubMed

11.

Denis F, Davis S, Comfort T. Sacral fractures: an important problem. Retrospective analysis of 236 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;227:67–81.PubMed

12.

Dalal S, Burgess A, Siegel J, et al. Pelvic fracture in multiple trauma: classification by mechanism is key to pattern of organ injury, resuscitative requirements, and outcome. J Trauma. 1989;29(7):981–1000. discussion 1000–2.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Krappinger D, Kammerlander C, Hak DJ, et al. Low-energy osteoporotic pelvic fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130(9):1167–75.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Gagna G, et al. Transverse fracture of the upper sacrum. Suicidal jumper's fracture. Spine. 1985;10(9):838–45.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Sabiston C, Wing P. Sacral fractures: classification and neurologic implications. J Trauma. 1986;26(12):1113–5.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Linstrom NJ, Heiserman JE, Kortman KE, et al. Anatomical and Biomechanical Analyses of the Unique and Consistent Locations of Sacral Insufficiency Fractures. Spine. 2009;34(4):309–15.PubMedCrossRef

17.

De Smet AA, Neff JR. Pubic and sacral insufficiency fractures: clinical course and radiologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985;145(3):601–6.PubMed

18.

Grasland A, Pouchot J, Mathieu A, et al. Sacral insufficiency fractures: an easily overlooked cause of back pain in elderly women. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(6):668–74.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Peh WC, Khong PL, Yin Y, et al. Imaging of pelvic insufficiency fractures. Radiographics. 1996;16(2):335–48.PubMed

20.

Blake SP. Sacral insufficiency fracture. Br J Radiol. 2004;77(922):891–6.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Lyders EM, Whitlow CT, Baker MD, et al. Imaging and Treatment of Sacral Insufficiency Fractures. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(2):201–10.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Gertzbein SD, Chenoweth DR. Occult injuries of the pelvic ring. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977;128:202–7.PubMed

23.

Finiels H, Finiels P, Jacquot J, et al. Fractures of the sacrum caused by bone insufficiency. Meta-analysis of 508 cases. Presse Med. 1997;26(33):1568–73.PubMed

24.

Peh W, Khong P, Ho W, et al. Sacral insufficiency fractures. Spectrum of radiological features. Clin Imaging. 1995;19(2):92–101.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Cabarrus MC, Ambekar A, Lu Y, et al. MRI and CT of Insufficiency Fractures of the Pelvis and the Proximal Femur. Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(4):995–1001.CrossRef

26.

Cosker TDA, Ghandour A, Gupta SK, et al. Pelvic ramus fractures in the elderly. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(4):513–6.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Babayev M, Lachmann E, Nagler W. The controversy surrounding sacral insufficiency fractures: to ambulate or not to ambulate? Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;79(4):404–9.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, Schwartz MC, et al. Pubic rami fracture: A benign pelvic injury? J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(1):7.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Rodan GA, Fleisch HA. Bisphosphonates: mechanisms of action. J Clin Invest. 1996;97(12):2692.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Reginster J, Minne H, Sorensen O, et al. Randomized trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group. Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(1):83–91.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Liberman U, Weiss S, Broll J, et al. Effect of oral alendronate on bone mineral density and the incidence of fractures in postmenopausal osteoporosis. The Alendronate Phase III Osteoporosis Treatment Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(22):1437–43.PubMedCrossRef

32.

• Peichl P. Parathyroid Hormone 1–84 Accelerates Fracture-Healing in Pubic Bones of Elderly Osteoporotic Women. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93(17):1583. This randomized controlled trial evaluating the use of recombinant human PTH in insufficiency fractures has encouraging results. The data suggests that recombinant human PTH can increase bone mineral density, reduce fracture risk, and enhance fracture healing. Further research is needed to determine the precise role of recombinant human PTH in the medical management of insufficiency fractures..PubMedCrossRef

33.

Pommersheim W, Huang-Hellinger F, Baker M, et al. Sacroplasty: a treatment for sacral insufficiency fractures. Am J Neuroradiol. 2003;24(5):1003–7.PubMed

34.

Butler CL, Given CA, Michel SJ, et al. Percutaneous sacroplasty for the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(6):1956–9.PubMed

35.

Frey ME, DePalma MJ, Cifu DX, et al. Efficacy and safety of percutaneous sacroplasty for painful osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures: a prospective, multicenter trial. Spine. 2007;32(15):1635–40.PubMedCrossRef

36.

Richards AM, Mears SC, Knight TA, et al. Biomechanical Analysis of Sacroplasty: Does Volume or Location of Cement Matter? Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;30(2):315–7.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Beaulé PE, Antoniades J, Matta JM. Trans-sacral fixation for failed posterior fixation of the pelvic ring. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005;126(1):49–52.PubMedCrossRef

38.

• Gardner MJ, Routt MLC. Transiliac-transsacral screws for posterior pelvic stabilization. J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(6):378–84. In this case series including patients with osteoporosis and insufficiency fractures the surgical technique and clinical experience using transiliac-transsacral screws is reported. The important points to note are greater screw length assists in distributing the load and resisting vertical shear forces, the holding power is increased by the additional screw threads, and that anchoring the screw in iliac cortical bone aids in maintenance of reduction. This technique is the mainstay of our surgical management of these patients..PubMedCrossRef

39.

Moed BR, Whiting DR. Locked transsacral screw fixation of bilateral injuries of the posterior pelvic ring: initial clinical series. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(10):616.PubMedCrossRef

Title: Fragility fractures of the pelvis
Authors: Gillian L. S. Soles
Tania A. Ferguson
Publication date: 01-09-2012
Publisher: Current Science Inc.
Published in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine / Issue 3/2012
Electronic ISSN: 1935-9748
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-012-9128-9

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Fragility fractures of the pelvis

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Management of cartilage defects in the shoulder

Proximal humerus fractures

Operative treatment of chondral defects in the hip joint: a systematic review

Contemporary management of femoral neck fractures: the young and the old

Acute compartment syndrome: obtaining diagnosis, providing treatment, and minimizing medicolegal risk

Erratum to: Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma of the spine: a review of the literature