Top

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Published in:

20-03-2023 | Foreign Body Aspiration | Knee Revision Surgery

The optimal diagnostic cut-off of WBC and PMN counts for joint aspiration in periprosthetic joint infection is 2479/µL and 67%, respectively: ICM criteria thresholds are too high

Authors: Y. Gramlich, M. Schnetz, C. Ruckes, M. Kemmerer, M. Kremer, R. Hoffmann, A. Klug

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 8/2023

Abstract

Background

Various organizations have published definitions for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) with significant differences in the cut-offs of white blood cell (WBC) count and polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocyte cells. Herein, we aim to analyze optimal cut-offs in patients which are planned to undergo a prosthesis revision and compare them with the actual published thresholds of the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) and European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS).

Methods

A test kit was compiled in a monocentric prospective study, according to the ICM criteria (2018) and 2021 EBJIS criteria. The kit was implemented using: blood samples (including leukocyte count and C-reactive protein); samples for examining the synovial fluid (WBC count, PMN cell differentiation, microbiological culture for incubation over 14 days, alpha-defensin ELISA laboratory test, and leukocyte-esterase test). The cut-offs for WBC and PMN counts were investigated using ROC analyses and Youden index. The ICM 2018 criteria were applied, using alpha-defensin in all cases. Patients which have to undergo a prosthesis revision were included, a pre-operative joint aspiration had been performed, and the patients had been followed up prospectively.

Results

405 patients were examined with the compiled test kit; 100% had a complete dataset with respect to alpha-defensin; 383 patients, according to WBC count; and 256, according to PMN cell differentiation The cut-off of 2478.89 cells/µl in the WBC count (sensitivity: 87.70%; specificity: 88.10%) and the cut-off of 66.99% in PMN differentiation showed the best accuracy (sensitivity: 86.00%; specificity: 88.80%). Other published cut-offs for WBC were tested in this cohort and showed the following accuracy: 3000/µl (EBJIS/ICM; sensitivity: 82.10%; specificity: 91.00%), 2000/µl (sensitivity: 89.60%; specificity: 83.40%), and 1500/µl (sensitivity: 91.50%; specificity: 75.00%). The published cut-offs for PMN had the following accuracy in this cohort: 80% (ICM; sensitivity: 66.3%; specificity: 96.50%), 70% (sensitivity: 82.6%; specificity: 90%), and 65% (EBJIS, sensitivity: 86%; specificity: 88.8%).

Conclusions

This study aims to improve current cut-offs for PMN- and WB-Count, even though PJI diagnosis is based on the combination of all defined tests. The optimal diagnostic cut-off of WBC and PMN counts was found to be 2479/µL and 67%, respectively, whereas ICM cut-offs in this cohort seem too high, as they provide high specificity but very low sensitivity. On the other hand, a cut-off for WBC count of 1500/µl alone would be very low, leading to low specificity and very high suspicion of PJI. The current consensus guidelines could be actualized considering these results to significantly improve the diagnostic quality.

Level of evidence

II.

Natsuhara KM, Shelton TJ, Meehan JP, Lum ZC (2019) Mortality during total hip periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 34(7s):S337-s342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.12.024CrossRefPubMed

Premkumar A, Kolin DA, Farley KX, Wilson JM, McLawhorn AS, Cross MB, Sculco PK (2021) Projected economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee in the United States. J Arthroplasty 36(5):1484-1489.e1483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.005CrossRefPubMed

Lum ZC, Natsuhara KM, Shelton TJ, Giordani M, Pereira GC, Meehan JP (2018) Mortality during total knee periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 33(12):3783–3788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.021CrossRefPubMed

Rasouli MR, Harandi AA, Adeli B, Purtill JJ, Parvizi J (2012) Revision total knee arthroplasty: infection should be ruled out in all cases. J Arthroplasty 27(6):1239–1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.01.019. (e1231–1232)CrossRefPubMed

Gramlich Y, Johnson T, Kemmerer M, Walter G, Hoffmann R, Klug A (2020) Salvage procedure for chronic periprosthetic knee infection: the application of DAIR results in better remission rates and infection-free survivorship when used with topical degradable calcium-based antibiotics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28(9):2823–2834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05627-8CrossRefPubMed

Middleton R, Khan T, Alvand A (2019) Update on the diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection in hip and knee arthroplasty. Bone and Joint 360 8(4):5–13. https://doi.org/10.1302/2048-0105.84.360701CrossRef

Parvizi J, Zmistowski B, Berbari EF, Bauer TW, Springer BD, Della Valle CJ, Garvin KL, Mont MA, Wongworawat MD, Zalavras CG (2011) New definition for periprosthetic joint infection: from the workgroup of the Musculoskeletal Infection Society. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(11):2992–2994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2102-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Parvizi J, Gehrke T (2014) Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 29(7):1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.009CrossRefPubMed

Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, Higuera C, Della Valle C, Chen AF, Shohat N (2018) The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: an evidence-based and validated criteria. J Arthroplasty 33(5):1309-1314.e1302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078CrossRefPubMed

10.

Shohat N, Bauer T, Buttaro M, Budhiparama N, Cashman J, Della Valle CJ, Drago L, Gehrke T, Marcelino Gomes LS, Goswami K, Hailer NP, Han SB, Higuera CA, Inaba Y, Jenny JY, Kjaersgaard-Andersen P, Lee M, Llinás A, Malizos K, Mont MA, Jones RM, Parvizi J, Peel T, Rivero-Boschert S, Segreti J, Soriano A, Sousa R, Spangehl M, Tan TL, Tikhilov R, Tuncay I, Winkler H, Witso E, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Young S, Zhang X, Zhou Y, Zimmerli W (2019) Hip and knee section, what is the definition of a periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) of the knee and the hip? Can the same criteria be used for both joints? Proceedings of International Consensus on Orthopedic Infections. J Arthroplasty 34(2s):S325-s327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.045CrossRefPubMed

11.

McNally M, Sousa R, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Chen AF, Soriano A, Vogely HC, Clauss M, Higuera CA, Trebše R (2021) The EBJIS definition of periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J 103-B(1):18–25. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.103b1.Bjj-2020-1381.R1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Della Valle CJ, Sporer SM, Jacobs JJ, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Paprosky WG (2007) Preoperative testing for sepsis before revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22(6 Suppl 2):90–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.013CrossRefPubMed

13.

Fernández-Sampedro M, Fariñas-Alvarez C, Garces-Zarzalejo C, Alonso-Aguirre MA, Salas-Venero C, Martínez-Martínez L, Fariñas MC (2017) Accuracy of different diagnostic tests for early, delayed and late prosthetic joint infection. BMC Infect Dis 17(1):592. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2693-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Lee YS, Koo KH, Kim HJ, Tian S, Kim TY, Maltenfort MG, Chen AF (2017) Synovial fluid biomarkers for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99(24):2077–2084. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.00123CrossRefPubMed

15.

Ottink KD, Strahm C, Muller-Kobold A, Sendi P, Wouthuyzen-Bakker M (2019) Factors to consider when assessing the diagnostic accuracy of synovial leukocyte count in periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Jt Infect 4(4):167–173. https://doi.org/10.7150/jbji.34854CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Gramlich Y, Kremer M, Bruning C, Breuer J, Hofmann L, Klug A, Hoffmann R (2021) Implementation of a standardized clinical test kit for diagnostics of periprosthetic infections in the clinical routine. Unfallchirurg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-021-01016-4CrossRefPubMed

17.

Gehrke T, Parvizi J (2014) Proceedings of the international consensus meeting on periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 29(2):4CrossRef

18.

Osmon DR, Berbari EF, Berendt AR, Lew D, Zimmerli W, Steckelberg JM, Rao N, Hanssen A, Wilson WR (2013) Diagnosis and management of prosthetic joint infection: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 56(1):e1–e25. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis803CrossRefPubMed

19.

Parvizi J, Gehrke T (2018) International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection

20.

Saleh A, George J, Sultan AA, Samuel LT, Mont MA, Higuera-Rueda CA (2019) The quality of diagnostic studies in periprosthetic joint infections: can we do better? J Arthroplasty 34(11):2737–2743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.06.044CrossRefPubMed

21.

Kheir MM, Tan TL, Shohat N, Foltz C, Parvizi J (2018) Routine diagnostic tests for periprosthetic joint infection demonstrate a high false-negative rate and are influenced by the infecting organism. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100(23):2057–2065. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.17.01429CrossRefPubMed

22.

Deirmengian CA, Citrano PA, Gulati S, Kazarian ER, Stave JW, Kardos KW (2016) The C-reactive protein may not detect infections caused by less-virulent organisms. J Arthroplasty 31(9 Suppl):152–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.060CrossRefPubMed

23.

Zahar A, Lausmann C, Cavalheiro C, Dhamangaonkar AC, Bonanzinga T, Gehrke T, Citak M (2018) How reliable is the cell count analysis in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection? J Arthroplasty 33(10):3257–3262CrossRefPubMed

24.

Abdelaziz H, Rademacher K, Suero EM, Gehrke T, Lausmann C, Salber J, Citak M (2020) The 2018 international consensus meeting minor criteria for chronic hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection: validation from a single center. J Arthroplasty 35(8):2200–2203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.014CrossRefPubMed

25.

De Fine M, Giavaresi G, Fini M, Illuminati A, Terrando S, Pignatti G (2018) The role of synovial fluid analysis in the detection of periprosthetic hip and knee infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Orthop 42(5):983–994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3865-3CrossRefPubMed

26.

Sendi P, Müller AM, Berbari E (2018) Are all joints equal? Synovial fluid analysis in periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Jt Infect 3(5):258–259. https://doi.org/10.7150/jbji.30491CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Zmistowski B, Restrepo C, Huang R, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J (2012) Periprosthetic joint infection diagnosis: a complete understanding of white blood cell count and differential. J Arthroplasty 27(9):1589–1593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.059CrossRefPubMed

28.

Lee SC, Jung KA, Yoon JY, Nam CH, Hwang SH, Park IS (2010) Analysis of synovial fluid in culture-negative samples of suspicious periprosthetic infections. Orthopedics 33(10):725. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20100826-13CrossRefPubMed

Title: The optimal diagnostic cut-off of WBC and PMN counts for joint aspiration in periprosthetic joint infection is 2479/µL and 67%, respectively: ICM criteria thresholds are too high
Authors: Y. Gramlich
M. Schnetz
C. Ruckes
M. Kemmerer
M. Kremer
R. Hoffmann
A. Klug
Publication date: 20-03-2023
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords: Foreign Body Aspiration
Foreign Body Aspiration
Aspiration
Joint Infection
Hip-TEP
Hip-TEP
Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 8/2023
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-023-04822-0

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

The optimal diagnostic cut-off of WBC and PMN counts for joint aspiration in periprosthetic joint infection is 2479/µL and 67%, respectively: ICM criteria thresholds are too high

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of evidence

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Level of evidence

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 8/2023

Latissimus dorsi and teres major tendon transfer for irreparable anterosuperior rotator cuff tear improves kinematics and internal rotation compared to latissimus dorsi tendon transfer

A propensity score-matched analysis on the impact of patient and surgical factors on early periprosthetic joint infection in minimally invasive anterolateral and transgluteal total hip arthroplasty

Femoral head and neck autograft in arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review of long-term outcomes

Clinical impact of microbiological results in two-stage revision arthroplasty with spacer exchange

Avascular necrosis of the femoral head: three-dimensional measurement of drilling precision reveals high accuracy and no difference between fluoroscopically controlled core decompression and cancellous bone grafting

Posterior subtotal meniscectomy revealed the worst scenario for the progression of osteocartilaginous damage in cases of juvenile discoid lateral meniscus with peripheral tear