Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine 3/2021

01-03-2021 | Foreign Body Aspiration | Original Article

Semi-quantitative assessment optimized the grading of pulmonary aspiration on salivagram in children

Authors: Fuqiang Shao, Xiaofei Zhao, Hiroshi Toyama, Takashi Ichihara, Hongming Zhuang, Ruifang Zhao, Boom Ting Kung, Kwok Sing Ng, Ziwei Zhang, Ha Wu

Published in: Annals of Nuclear Medicine | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Salivagram is one of the imaging modalities to detect pulmonary aspiration in children. This study aims to optimize the classification of pulmonary aspiration detected by salivagram with a semi-quantitative analytical method.

Methods

This is a retrospective study involving 737 patients (471 males, 266 females; aged 1 month to 8 years; mean age 5.3 months, median age 3.0 months old) with suspected pulmonary aspiration, who had salivagram done between January 2018 and June 2019. Positive cases were divided into 10 groups (Grade 1, R2, L2, R2L2, R3, L3, R3L2, R2L3, R3L3, and 4) according to the scintigraphic findings. Aspiration index was determined as the ratio of the count in the respiratory tract to the total count in the image field of view and compared among different groups using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

A total of 180 cases had positive scintigraphic findings of various grades of aspiration (24.4%, 180/737). There is a high consistency among the two independent nuclear medicine physicians involved in the study, in determining both the disease gradings (κ = 0.919;95% CI: 0.915–0.923) and aspiration index (ICC = 0.994;95% CI: 0.993–0.996). There is no significant difference (p > 0.05) in aspiration index among the gradings in “mild” group (grade 1, R2, L2, L2R2), and “moderate” group (grade R3, R3L2, R3L3). After dividing the different grades into “mild”, “moderate” and “severe” groups, the aspiration index of “mild” group is 4.40 ± 2.01, that of “moderate” group is 16.43 ± 8.20, and that of “severe” group is 46.94 ± 14.81. Difference in groups was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). In ROC curve analysis, AUC of “mild” and “moderate” groups is 0.970 and that of “moderate” and “severe” groups is 0.943; the cut-off value with highest diagnostic efficiency is 6.75 between “mild” and “moderate” groups and 38.00 between “moderate” and “severe” groups.

Conclusions

We introduced a semi-quantitative analytical method in pulmonary aspiration on salivagram, to optimize and supplement to the current classification of pulmonary aspiration.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Marik PE. Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(9):665–71.CrossRef Marik PE. Aspiration pneumonitis and aspiration pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(9):665–71.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yu KJ, Park D. Clinical characteristics of dysphagic stroke patients with salivary aspiration: a STROBE-compliant retrospective study. Medicine. 2019;98(12):e14977.CrossRef Yu KJ, Park D. Clinical characteristics of dysphagic stroke patients with salivary aspiration: a STROBE-compliant retrospective study. Medicine. 2019;98(12):e14977.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Yu KJ, Moon H, Park D. Different clinical predictors of aspiration pneumonia in dysphagic stroke patients related to stroke lesion: a STROBE-complaint retrospective study. Medicine. 2018;97(52):e13968.CrossRef Yu KJ, Moon H, Park D. Different clinical predictors of aspiration pneumonia in dysphagic stroke patients related to stroke lesion: a STROBE-complaint retrospective study. Medicine. 2018;97(52):e13968.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hunt EB, Sullivan A, Galvin J, MacSharry J, Murphy DM. Gastric aspiration and its role in airway inflammation. Open Respir Med J. 2018;12:1–10.CrossRef Hunt EB, Sullivan A, Galvin J, MacSharry J, Murphy DM. Gastric aspiration and its role in airway inflammation. Open Respir Med J. 2018;12:1–10.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Tutor JD, Gosa MM. Dysphagia and aspiration in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012;47(4):321–37.CrossRef Tutor JD, Gosa MM. Dysphagia and aspiration in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012;47(4):321–37.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lanspa MJ, Jones BE, Brown SM, Dean NC. Mortality, morbidity, and disease severity of patients with aspiration pneumonia. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(2):83–90.CrossRef Lanspa MJ, Jones BE, Brown SM, Dean NC. Mortality, morbidity, and disease severity of patients with aspiration pneumonia. J Hosp Med. 2013;8(2):83–90.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Rossi UG, Owens CM. The radiology of chronic lung disease in children. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(6):601–7.CrossRef Rossi UG, Owens CM. The radiology of chronic lung disease in children. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90(6):601–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Heyman S. The radionuclide salivagram for detecting the pulmonary aspiration of saliva in an infant. Pediatr Radiol. 1989;19(3):208–9.CrossRef Heyman S. The radionuclide salivagram for detecting the pulmonary aspiration of saliva in an infant. Pediatr Radiol. 1989;19(3):208–9.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Wu H, Zhao R. Image characteristics and classification of salivagram in the diagnosis of pulmonary aspiration in children. Nucl Med Commun. 2017;38(7):617–22.CrossRef Wu H, Zhao R. Image characteristics and classification of salivagram in the diagnosis of pulmonary aspiration in children. Nucl Med Commun. 2017;38(7):617–22.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Wu H, Zhao R, Zhao X. Use of static imaging as a substitute for conventional dynamic imaging for salivagrams in children. Clin Nucl Med. 2019;44(7):532–4.CrossRef Wu H, Zhao R, Zhao X. Use of static imaging as a substitute for conventional dynamic imaging for salivagrams in children. Clin Nucl Med. 2019;44(7):532–4.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Boesch RP, Daines C, Willging JP, Kaul A, Cohen AP, Wood RE, et al. Advances in the diagnosis and management of chronic pulmonary aspiration in children. Eur Respir J. 2006;28(4):847–61.CrossRef Boesch RP, Daines C, Willging JP, Kaul A, Cohen AP, Wood RE, et al. Advances in the diagnosis and management of chronic pulmonary aspiration in children. Eur Respir J. 2006;28(4):847–61.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Jang DH, Choi KH, Kim DH, Lim CM, Kim JS. Comparison between the radionuclide salivagram and videofluoroscopic swallowing study methods for evaluating patients with aspiration pneumonia. Ann Nucl Med. 2013;27(3):247–52.CrossRef Jang DH, Choi KH, Kim DH, Lim CM, Kim JS. Comparison between the radionuclide salivagram and videofluoroscopic swallowing study methods for evaluating patients with aspiration pneumonia. Ann Nucl Med. 2013;27(3):247–52.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yang J, Codreanu I, Servaes S, Zhuang H. Radionuclide salivagram and gastroesophageal reflux scintigraphy in pediatric patients: targeting different types of pulmonary aspiration. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40(7):559–63.CrossRef Yang J, Codreanu I, Servaes S, Zhuang H. Radionuclide salivagram and gastroesophageal reflux scintigraphy in pediatric patients: targeting different types of pulmonary aspiration. Clin Nucl Med. 2015;40(7):559–63.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bar-Sever Z, Connolly LP, Treves ST. The radionuclide salivagram in children with pulmonary disease and a high risk of aspiration. Pediatr Radiol. 1995;25(Suppl 1):S180–3.CrossRef Bar-Sever Z, Connolly LP, Treves ST. The radionuclide salivagram in children with pulmonary disease and a high risk of aspiration. Pediatr Radiol. 1995;25(Suppl 1):S180–3.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Drubach LA, Zurakowski D, Palmer EL 3rd, Tracy DA, Lee EY. Utility of salivagram in pulmonary aspiration in pediatric patients: comparison of salivagram and chest radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(2):437–41.CrossRef Drubach LA, Zurakowski D, Palmer EL 3rd, Tracy DA, Lee EY. Utility of salivagram in pulmonary aspiration in pediatric patients: comparison of salivagram and chest radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(2):437–41.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ciofetta G. Gastro-esophageal studies in relationship to respiratory problems. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;54(4):372–8.PubMed Ciofetta G. Gastro-esophageal studies in relationship to respiratory problems. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;54(4):372–8.PubMed
17.
go back to reference Somasundaram VH, Subramanyam P, Palaniswamy S. Salivagram revisited: justifying its routine use for the evaluation of persistent/recurrent lower respiratory tract infections in developmentally normal children. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26(7):578–85.CrossRef Somasundaram VH, Subramanyam P, Palaniswamy S. Salivagram revisited: justifying its routine use for the evaluation of persistent/recurrent lower respiratory tract infections in developmentally normal children. Ann Nucl Med. 2012;26(7):578–85.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cook SP, Lawless S, Mandell GA, Reilly JS. The use of the salivagram in the evaluation of severe and chronic aspiration. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1997;41(3):353–61.CrossRef Cook SP, Lawless S, Mandell GA, Reilly JS. The use of the salivagram in the evaluation of severe and chronic aspiration. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1997;41(3):353–61.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lee DH, Kim JM, Lee Z, Park D. The effect of radionuclide solution volume on the detection rate of salivary aspiration in the radionuclide salivagram: a STROBE-compliant retrospective study. Medicine. 2018;97(30):e11729.CrossRef Lee DH, Kim JM, Lee Z, Park D. The effect of radionuclide solution volume on the detection rate of salivary aspiration in the radionuclide salivagram: a STROBE-compliant retrospective study. Medicine. 2018;97(30):e11729.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Semi-quantitative assessment optimized the grading of pulmonary aspiration on salivagram in children
Authors
Fuqiang Shao
Xiaofei Zhao
Hiroshi Toyama
Takashi Ichihara
Hongming Zhuang
Ruifang Zhao
Boom Ting Kung
Kwok Sing Ng
Ziwei Zhang
Ha Wu
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Annals of Nuclear Medicine / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0914-7187
Electronic ISSN: 1864-6433
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-020-01564-6

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

Annals of Nuclear Medicine 3/2021 Go to the issue