Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Skeletal Radiology 10/2021

01-10-2021 | Foreign Body Aspiration | Scientific Article

Introducing image-guided synovial aspiration and biopsy in assessing peri-prosthetic joint infection: an early single-centre experience

Authors: Ramanan Rajakulasingam, Leanne Cleaver, Michael Khoo, Ian Pressney, Bhavin Upadhyay, Shara Palanivel, Rikin Hargunani

Published in: Skeletal Radiology | Issue 10/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Aim

Synovial sampling can be used in the diagnosis of peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of this study was to establish the role of simultaneous image-guided synovial aspiration and biopsy (SAB) during an initial 2-year experience at our institution.

Methods

Retrospective review of consecutive SABs performed during 2014–2016 at a tertiary referral musculoskeletal centre. Radiological SAB microbiology culture results were compared with intra-operative surgical samples or multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting outcome at 1-year follow-up if surgery was not undertaken. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of synovial aspiration (SA), synovial biopsy (SB) and simultaneous SAB were calculated.

Results

103 patients (46 male, 57 female) totalling 111 procedures were analysed with mean age 65 years (range 31–83). Image-guided synovial procedures were performed on 52 (46.9%) hip and 59 (53.1%) knee joint prostheses. The mean combined sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the entire cohort was 72.6%, 96.9% and 90%, respectively. When only SB was obtained, diagnostic accuracy (92.5%) was similar to SA alone (94.1%). In total, there were 21 (18.9%) true-positive, 80 (72.1%) true-negative, 2 (1.8%) false-positive and 8 (7.2%) false-negative cases (PPV 91.3% and NPV 90.9%). No post-procedural complications were recorded at 1-year follow-up.

Conclusion

Percutaneous image-guided SAB is a valuable technique in assessing suspected PJI, with most samples indicative of infective status and causative organisms when validated against intra-operative results and specialist MDT evaluation. Image-guided SB is a safe and useful additional procedure following failed SA with equivalent levels of diagnostic accuracy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Izakovicova P, Borens O, Trampuz A. Periprosthetic joint infection: current concepts and outlook. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4(7):482–94.CrossRef Izakovicova P, Borens O, Trampuz A. Periprosthetic joint infection: current concepts and outlook. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4(7):482–94.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Rangan A, Falworth M, Watts AC, et al. Investigation and management of periprosthetic joint infection in the shoulder and elbow: evidence and consensus based guidelines of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society [published correction appears in shoulder elbow. 2018 Oct;10(4):NP1]. Should Elb. 2018;10(1 Suppl):S5–S19.CrossRef Rangan A, Falworth M, Watts AC, et al. Investigation and management of periprosthetic joint infection in the shoulder and elbow: evidence and consensus based guidelines of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society [published correction appears in shoulder elbow. 2018 Oct;10(4):NP1]. Should Elb. 2018;10(1 Suppl):S5–S19.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Gbejuade HO, Lovering AM, Webb JC. The role of microbial biofilms in prosthetic joint infections. Acta Orthop. 2015;86(2):147–58.CrossRef Gbejuade HO, Lovering AM, Webb JC. The role of microbial biofilms in prosthetic joint infections. Acta Orthop. 2015;86(2):147–58.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Renz N, Mudrovcic S, Perka C, Trampuz A. Orthopedic implant-associated infections caused by Cutibacterium spp. – a remaining diagnostic challenge. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0202639.CrossRef Renz N, Mudrovcic S, Perka C, Trampuz A. Orthopedic implant-associated infections caused by Cutibacterium spp. – a remaining diagnostic challenge. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0202639.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Saleh A, George J, Faour M, et al. Serum biomarkers in periprosthetic joint infections. Bone Joint Res. 2018;7(1):85–93.CrossRef Saleh A, George J, Faour M, et al. Serum biomarkers in periprosthetic joint infections. Bone Joint Res. 2018;7(1):85–93.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Yee DK, Chiu KY, Yan CH, et al. Review article: joint aspiration for diagnosis of periprosthetic infection. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013 Aug;21(2):236–40.CrossRef Yee DK, Chiu KY, Yan CH, et al. Review article: joint aspiration for diagnosis of periprosthetic infection. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013 Aug;21(2):236–40.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Cross MC, Kransdorf MJ, Chivers FS, et al. Utility of percutaneous joint aspiration and synovial biopsy in identifying culture-positive infected hip arthroplasty. Skelet Radiol. 2014;43(2):165–8.CrossRef Cross MC, Kransdorf MJ, Chivers FS, et al. Utility of percutaneous joint aspiration and synovial biopsy in identifying culture-positive infected hip arthroplasty. Skelet Radiol. 2014;43(2):165–8.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ali F, Wilkinson JM, Cooper JR, et al. Accuracy of joint aspiration for the preoperative diagnosis of infection in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2006;21:221–6.CrossRef Ali F, Wilkinson JM, Cooper JR, et al. Accuracy of joint aspiration for the preoperative diagnosis of infection in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2006;21:221–6.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fink B, Gebhard A, Fuerst M, Berger I, et al. High diagnostic value of synovial biopsy in periprosthetic joint infection of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(3):956–64.CrossRef Fink B, Gebhard A, Fuerst M, Berger I, et al. High diagnostic value of synovial biopsy in periprosthetic joint infection of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(3):956–64.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Fink B, Makowiak C, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schäfer P, Frommelt L. The value of synovial biopsy, joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2008;90(7):874–8.CrossRef Fink B, Makowiak C, Fuerst M, Berger I, Schäfer P, Frommelt L. The value of synovial biopsy, joint aspiration and C-reactive protein in the diagnosis of late peri-prosthetic infection of total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2008;90(7):874–8.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Signore A, Sconfienza LM, Borens O, et al. Consensus document for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a joint paper by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement) [published correction appears in Eur J Nucl med Mol imaging. 2019 Feb 9]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(4):971–88.CrossRef Signore A, Sconfienza LM, Borens O, et al. Consensus document for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections: a joint paper by the EANM, EBJIS, and ESR (with ESCMID endorsement) [published correction appears in Eur J Nucl med Mol imaging. 2019 Feb 9]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(4):971–88.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fowler TJ, Sayers A, Whitehouse MR. Two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(Suppl 8):S261.CrossRef Fowler TJ, Sayers A, Whitehouse MR. Two-stage revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection following total hip arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(Suppl 8):S261.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Taha M, Abdelbary H, Ross FP, et al. New innovations in the treatment of PJI and biofilms-clinical and preclinical topics. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018;11(3):380–8.CrossRef Taha M, Abdelbary H, Ross FP, et al. New innovations in the treatment of PJI and biofilms-clinical and preclinical topics. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018;11(3):380–8.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF. Proceedings of the international consensus on periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(11):1450–2.CrossRef Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Chen AF. Proceedings of the international consensus on periprosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(11):1450–2.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tande AJ, Patel R. Prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(2):302–45.CrossRef Tande AJ, Patel R. Prosthetic joint infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(2):302–45.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Fey PD, Olson ME. Current concepts in biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Future Microbiol. 2010;5(6):917–33.CrossRef Fey PD, Olson ME. Current concepts in biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis. Future Microbiol. 2010;5(6):917–33.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lourtet-Hascoët J, Bicart-See A, Félicé MP, et al. Staphylococcus lugdunensis, a serious pathogen in periprosthetic joint infections: comparison to Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Int J Infect Dis. 2016;51:56–61.CrossRef Lourtet-Hascoët J, Bicart-See A, Félicé MP, et al. Staphylococcus lugdunensis, a serious pathogen in periprosthetic joint infections: comparison to Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Int J Infect Dis. 2016;51:56–61.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Shah NB, Osmon DR, Fadel H, et al. Laboratory and clinical characteristics of Staphylococcus lugdunensis prosthetic joint infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:1600–3.CrossRef Shah NB, Osmon DR, Fadel H, et al. Laboratory and clinical characteristics of Staphylococcus lugdunensis prosthetic joint infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:1600–3.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ottink KD, Strahm C, Muller-Kobold A, et al. Factors to consider when assessing the diagnostic accuracy of synovial leukocyte count in periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Jt Infect. 2019;4(4):167–73.CrossRef Ottink KD, Strahm C, Muller-Kobold A, et al. Factors to consider when assessing the diagnostic accuracy of synovial leukocyte count in periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Jt Infect. 2019;4(4):167–73.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Cazanave C, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Hanssen AD, et al. Corynebacterium prosthetic joint infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(5):1518–23.CrossRef Cazanave C, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Hanssen AD, et al. Corynebacterium prosthetic joint infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(5):1518–23.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Reisener M, Perka C. Do culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections have a worse outcome than culture-positive periprosthetic joint infections? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:6278012.PubMed Reisener M, Perka C. Do culture-negative periprosthetic joint infections have a worse outcome than culture-positive periprosthetic joint infections? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:6278012.PubMed
23.
go back to reference Parker S, Key T, Hughes H, et al. The myth of surgical sterility: bacterial contamination of knee arthroplasty drapes. 2018;98-B,(SUPP_23,). Parker S, Key T, Hughes H, et al. The myth of surgical sterility: bacterial contamination of knee arthroplasty drapes. 2018;98-B,(SUPP_23,).
24.
go back to reference Xu C, Tan TL, Li WT, et al. Reporting outcomes of treatment for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee and hip together with a minimum 1-year follow-up is reliable. J Arthroplast. 2020;35(7):1906–1911.e5.CrossRef Xu C, Tan TL, Li WT, et al. Reporting outcomes of treatment for periprosthetic joint infection of the knee and hip together with a minimum 1-year follow-up is reliable. J Arthroplast. 2020;35(7):1906–1911.e5.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Ntalos D, Berger-Groch J, Rohde H, et al. Implementation of a multidisciplinary infections conference affects the treatment plan in prosthetic joint infections of the hip: a retrospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(4):467–73.CrossRef Ntalos D, Berger-Groch J, Rohde H, et al. Implementation of a multidisciplinary infections conference affects the treatment plan in prosthetic joint infections of the hip: a retrospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(4):467–73.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Introducing image-guided synovial aspiration and biopsy in assessing peri-prosthetic joint infection: an early single-centre experience
Authors
Ramanan Rajakulasingam
Leanne Cleaver
Michael Khoo
Ian Pressney
Bhavin Upadhyay
Shara Palanivel
Rikin Hargunani
Publication date
01-10-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Skeletal Radiology / Issue 10/2021
Print ISSN: 0364-2348
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2161
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-021-03774-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2021

Skeletal Radiology 10/2021 Go to the issue