Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2015

01-04-2015 | Pancreatic Tumors

FOLFIRINOX: Desert, Oasis, or Mirage?

Author: Cristina R. Ferrone, MD

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 4/2015

Login to get access

Excerpt

Unfortunately, most patients with PDAC present with advanced disease. In addition to the large number who present with distant metastases, approximately 40 % of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma present with locally advanced or borderline resectable disease (LAPDC).1 Furthermore, systemic disease is identified in 30 % of patients with LAPDAC during early cycles of treatment.2 The cynics believe that a much larger percentage, if not all, of these patients have micrometastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. The understanding that locally advanced and borderline resectable lesions are more advanced and that an R1 resection decreases overall survival has prompted aggressive neoadjuvant approaches.3,4 Based on the ACCORD-11 trial different institutions have utilized FOLFRINOX in patients with locally advanced and borderline resectable PDAC.58 Similar to Blazer et al.’s results, this has resulted in increased resectability rates. Until recently, only 30 % of patients were converted from unresectable to resectable candidates with chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation therapy.9 In the series by Blazer et al., 51 % of patients became resectable after 4 months of modified FOLFIRINOX ± chemoradiation, and progression was seen in only 15 % of patients. …
Literature
3.
go back to reference Konstantinidis IT, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: is there a survival difference for R1 resections versus locally advanced unresectable tumors? What is a “true” R0 resection? Ann Surg. 2013;257(4):731–6.CrossRefPubMed Konstantinidis IT, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: is there a survival difference for R1 resections versus locally advanced unresectable tumors? What is a “true” R0 resection? Ann Surg. 2013;257(4):731–6.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Evans DB, et al. Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(21):3496–502.CrossRefPubMed Evans DB, et al. Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(21):3496–502.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ferrone CR, Marchegiani G, Hong TS, et al. Radiological and surgical implications of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2015. Ferrone CR, Marchegiani G, Hong TS, et al. Radiological and surgical implications of neoadjuvant treatment with FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg. 2015.
6.
go back to reference Conroy T, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1817–25.CrossRefPubMed Conroy T, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(19):1817–25.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Christians KK, et al. Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable pancreas cancer: a new treatment paradigm? Oncologist. 2014;19(3):266–74.CrossRefPubMed Christians KK, et al. Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable pancreas cancer: a new treatment paradigm? Oncologist. 2014;19(3):266–74.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ferrone CR. Lymphadenectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: is that the relevant debate? Ann Surg. 2014;259(2):213–4.CrossRefPubMed Ferrone CR. Lymphadenectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: is that the relevant debate? Ann Surg. 2014;259(2):213–4.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gillen S, et al. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med. 2010;7(4):e1000267.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Gillen S, et al. Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med. 2010;7(4):e1000267.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
10.
go back to reference Faris JE, et al. FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center experience. Oncologist. 2013;18(5):543–8.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Faris JE, et al. FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: the Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center experience. Oncologist. 2013;18(5):543–8.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
11.
go back to reference Hosein PJ, et al. A retrospective study of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in unresectable or borderline-resectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:199.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Hosein PJ, et al. A retrospective study of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in unresectable or borderline-resectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:199.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
12.
go back to reference Fong ZV, et al. Understanding hospital readmissions after pancreaticoduodenectomy: can we prevent them? A 10-year contemporary experience with 1,173 patients at the Massachusetts General Hospital. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(1):137–44; discussion 144–5.CrossRefPubMed Fong ZV, et al. Understanding hospital readmissions after pancreaticoduodenectomy: can we prevent them? A 10-year contemporary experience with 1,173 patients at the Massachusetts General Hospital. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(1):137–44; discussion 144–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ahmad SA, et al. Factors influencing readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multi-institutional study of 1,302 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256(3):529–37.CrossRefPubMed Ahmad SA, et al. Factors influencing readmission after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a multi-institutional study of 1,302 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256(3):529–37.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
FOLFIRINOX: Desert, Oasis, or Mirage?
Author
Cristina R. Ferrone, MD
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 4/2015
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4260-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2015

Annals of Surgical Oncology 4/2015 Go to the issue