Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 10/2017

Open Access 01-10-2017 | Neuro

FLAIR* to visualize veins in white matter lesions: A new tool for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis?

Authors: T. Campion, R. J. P. Smith, D. R. Altmann, G. C. Brito, B. P. Turner, J. Evanson, I. C. George, P. Sati, D. S. Reich, M. E. Miquel, K. Schmierer

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 10/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To explore the potential of a post-processing technique combining FLAIR and T2* (FLAIR*) to distinguish between lesions caused by multiple sclerosis (MS) from cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) in a clinical setting.

Methods

FLAIR and T2* head datasets acquired at 3T of 25 people with relapsing MS (pwRMS) and ten with pwSVD were used. After post-processing, FLAIR* maps were used to determine the proportion of white matter lesions (WML) showing the ‘vein in lesion’ sign (VIL), a characteristic histopathological feature of MS plaques. Sensitivity and specificity of MS diagnosis were examined on the basis of >45% VIL+ and >60% VIL+ WML, and compared with current dissemination in space (DIS) MRI criteria.

Results

All pwRMS had >45% VIL+ WML (range 58–100%) whilst in pwSVD the proportion of VIL+ WML was significantly lower (0–64%; mean 32±20%). Sensitivity based on >45% VIL+ was 100% and specificity 80% whilst with >60% VIL+ as the criterion, sensitivity was 96% and specificity 90%. DIS criteria had 96% sensitivity and 40% specificity.

Conclusion

FLAIR* enables VIL+ WML detection in a clinical setting, facilitating differentiation of MS from SVD based on brain MRI.

Key points

• FLAIR* in a clinical setting allows visualization of veins in white matter lesions.
• Significant proportions of MS lesions demonstrate a vein in lesion on MRI.
• Microangiopathic lesions demonstrate a lower proportion of intralesional veins than MS lesions.
• Intralesional vein-based criteria may complement current MRI criteria for MS diagnosis.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69:292–302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69:292–302CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Charil A, Yousry TA, Rovaris M et al (2006) MRI and the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: expanding the concept of “no better explanation”. Lancet Neurol 5:841–852CrossRefPubMed Charil A, Yousry TA, Rovaris M et al (2006) MRI and the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: expanding the concept of “no better explanation”. Lancet Neurol 5:841–852CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Kappos L, Freedman MS, Polman CH et al (2007) Effect of early versus delayed interferon beta-1b treatment on disability after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: a 3-year follow-up analysis of the BENEFIT study. Lancet 370:389–397CrossRefPubMed Kappos L, Freedman MS, Polman CH et al (2007) Effect of early versus delayed interferon beta-1b treatment on disability after a first clinical event suggestive of multiple sclerosis: a 3-year follow-up analysis of the BENEFIT study. Lancet 370:389–397CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Coles AJ, Cox A, Le Page E et al (2006) The window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis: evidence from monocolonal antibody therapy. J Neurol 253:98–108CrossRefPubMed Coles AJ, Cox A, Le Page E et al (2006) The window of therapeutic opportunity in multiple sclerosis: evidence from monocolonal antibody therapy. J Neurol 253:98–108CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Leist TP, Comi G, Cree BA et al (2014) Effect of oral cladribine on time to conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with a first demyelinating event (ORACLE MS): a phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 13:257–267CrossRefPubMed Leist TP, Comi G, Cree BA et al (2014) Effect of oral cladribine on time to conversion to clinically definite multiple sclerosis in patients with a first demyelinating event (ORACLE MS): a phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 13:257–267CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Geraldes R, Esiri MM, Deluca GC et al. (2016) Age-related small vessel disease: a potential contributor to neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathology Geraldes R, Esiri MM, Deluca GC et al. (2016) Age-related small vessel disease: a potential contributor to neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. Brain Pathology
7.
go back to reference Giovannoni G, Turner B, Gnanapavan S, Offiah C, Schmierer K, Marta M (2015) Is it time to target no evident disease activity (NEDA) in multiple sclerosis? Multiple Sclerosis Relat Disord 4:329–333CrossRef Giovannoni G, Turner B, Gnanapavan S, Offiah C, Schmierer K, Marta M (2015) Is it time to target no evident disease activity (NEDA) in multiple sclerosis? Multiple Sclerosis Relat Disord 4:329–333CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Lassmann H (2005) Multiple sclerosis pathology: evolution of pathogenetic concepts. Brain Pathol 15:217–222CrossRefPubMed Lassmann H (2005) Multiple sclerosis pathology: evolution of pathogenetic concepts. Brain Pathol 15:217–222CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Sati P, Jiwon O, Todd Constable R, et al. (2016) The central vein sign and its clinical evaluation for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a consensus statement from the North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Collective. Nat Rev Neurol Sati P, Jiwon O, Todd Constable R, et al. (2016) The central vein sign and its clinical evaluation for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: a consensus statement from the North American Imaging in Multiple Sclerosis Collective. Nat Rev Neurol
11.
go back to reference Tan IL, van Schijndel RA, Pouwels PJ et al (2000) MR venography of multiple sclerosis. AJNR 21:1039–1042PubMed Tan IL, van Schijndel RA, Pouwels PJ et al (2000) MR venography of multiple sclerosis. AJNR 21:1039–1042PubMed
12.
go back to reference Mistry N, Dixon J, Tallantyre E et al (2013) Central veins in brain lesions visualized with high-field magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA 70:623–628 Mistry N, Dixon J, Tallantyre E et al (2013) Central veins in brain lesions visualized with high-field magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA 70:623–628
13.
go back to reference Tallantyre EC, Dixon JE, Donaldson I et al (2011) Ultra-high-field imaging distinguishes MS lesions from asymptomatic white matter lesions. Neurology 76:534–539CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tallantyre EC, Dixon JE, Donaldson I et al (2011) Ultra-high-field imaging distinguishes MS lesions from asymptomatic white matter lesions. Neurology 76:534–539CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Tallantyre EC, Morgan PS, Dixon JE et al (2009) A comparison of 3T and 7T in the detection of small parenchymal veins within MS lesions. Invest Radiol 44:491–494CrossRefPubMed Tallantyre EC, Morgan PS, Dixon JE et al (2009) A comparison of 3T and 7T in the detection of small parenchymal veins within MS lesions. Invest Radiol 44:491–494CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Mistry N, Abdel-Fahim R, Samaraweera A et al (2015) Imaging central veins in brain lesions with 3-T T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging differentiates multiple sclerosis from microangiopathic brain lesions. Mult Scler. doi:10.1177/1352458515616700 PubMed Mistry N, Abdel-Fahim R, Samaraweera A et al (2015) Imaging central veins in brain lesions with 3-T T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging differentiates multiple sclerosis from microangiopathic brain lesions. Mult Scler. doi:10.​1177/​1352458515616700​ PubMed
16.
go back to reference Sati P, George IC, Shea CD, Gaitan MI, Reich DS (2012) FLAIR*: a combined MR contrast technique for visualizing white matter lesions and parenchymal veins. Radiology 265:926–932CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sati P, George IC, Shea CD, Gaitan MI, Reich DS (2012) FLAIR*: a combined MR contrast technique for visualizing white matter lesions and parenchymal veins. Radiology 265:926–932CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Staals J, Makin SDJ, Doubal FN et al (2014) Stroke subtype, vascular risk factors, and total MRI brain small-vessel disease burden. Neurology 83:1228–1234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Staals J, Makin SDJ, Doubal FN et al (2014) Stroke subtype, vascular risk factors, and total MRI brain small-vessel disease burden. Neurology 83:1228–1234CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Sati P, Thomasson DM, Lin N et al (2014) Rapid, high-resolution, whole-brain, susceptibility-based MRI of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 11:1464–1470CrossRef Sati P, Thomasson DM, Lin N et al (2014) Rapid, high-resolution, whole-brain, susceptibility-based MRI of multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 11:1464–1470CrossRef
19.
go back to reference McHugh ML (2012) Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 22:276–282CrossRef McHugh ML (2012) Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 22:276–282CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Hawkes CH, Giovannoni G (2010) The McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis: time for clarification. Mult Scler 16:566–575CrossRefPubMed Hawkes CH, Giovannoni G (2010) The McDonald criteria for multiple sclerosis: time for clarification. Mult Scler 16:566–575CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Schmierer K, Turner BP (2012) The second revision of ‘McDonald’ criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. ACNR 12:3–4 Schmierer K, Turner BP (2012) The second revision of ‘McDonald’ criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. ACNR 12:3–4
22.
23.
go back to reference Charcot J-M (1868) Histologie de la sclérose en plaques. La Lancette Française, Gazette des Hôpitaux Civils et Militaires 41:554–555 Charcot J-M (1868) Histologie de la sclérose en plaques. La Lancette Française, Gazette des Hôpitaux Civils et Militaires 41:554–555
24.
go back to reference Swanton JK, Rovira A, Tintore M et al (2007) MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes: a multicentre retrospective study. Lancet Neurol 6:677–686CrossRefPubMed Swanton JK, Rovira A, Tintore M et al (2007) MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes: a multicentre retrospective study. Lancet Neurol 6:677–686CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Lummel N, Boeckh-Behrens T, Schoepf V, Burke M, Bruckmann H, Lin J (2011) Presence of a central vein within white matter lesions on susceptibility weighted imaging: a specific finding for multiple sclerosis? Neuroradiology 53:311–317CrossRefPubMed Lummel N, Boeckh-Behrens T, Schoepf V, Burke M, Bruckmann H, Lin J (2011) Presence of a central vein within white matter lesions on susceptibility weighted imaging: a specific finding for multiple sclerosis? Neuroradiology 53:311–317CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Lane JI, Bolster B, Campeau NG, Welker KM, Gilbertson JR (2015) Characterization of multiple sclerosis plaques using susceptibility-weighted imaging at 1.5T: can perivenular localization improve specificity of imaging criteria? J Comput Assist Tomogr 39:317–320PubMed Lane JI, Bolster B, Campeau NG, Welker KM, Gilbertson JR (2015) Characterization of multiple sclerosis plaques using susceptibility-weighted imaging at 1.5T: can perivenular localization improve specificity of imaging criteria? J Comput Assist Tomogr 39:317–320PubMed
27.
go back to reference Kilsdonk ID, Wattjes MP, Lopez-Soriano A et al (2014) Improved differentiation between MS and vascular brain lesions using FLAIR* at 7 Tesla. Eur Radiol 24:841–849CrossRefPubMed Kilsdonk ID, Wattjes MP, Lopez-Soriano A et al (2014) Improved differentiation between MS and vascular brain lesions using FLAIR* at 7 Tesla. Eur Radiol 24:841–849CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference George IC, Sati P, Absinta M et al (2016) Clinial 3-tesla FLAIR* MRI improves diagnostic accuracy in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 22:1578–1586CrossRefPubMed George IC, Sati P, Absinta M et al (2016) Clinial 3-tesla FLAIR* MRI improves diagnostic accuracy in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 22:1578–1586CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Solomon AJ, Schindler MK, Howard DB et al (2015) “Central vessel sign” on 3T FLAIR* MRI for the differentiation of multiple sclerosis from migraine. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 3:82–87CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Solomon AJ, Schindler MK, Howard DB et al (2015) “Central vessel sign” on 3T FLAIR* MRI for the differentiation of multiple sclerosis from migraine. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 3:82–87CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
FLAIR* to visualize veins in white matter lesions: A new tool for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis?
Authors
T. Campion
R. J. P. Smith
D. R. Altmann
G. C. Brito
B. P. Turner
J. Evanson
I. C. George
P. Sati
D. S. Reich
M. E. Miquel
K. Schmierer
Publication date
01-10-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 10/2017
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4822-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2017

European Radiology 10/2017 Go to the issue