Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 5/2013

01-05-2013 | Glaucoma

Five-year forecasts of the Visual Field Index (VFI) with binocular and monocular visual fields

Authors: Ryo Asaoka, Richard A. Russell, Rizwan Malik, David F. Garway-Heath, David P. Crabb

Published in: Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In clinical care, visual field (VF) damage is assessed using monocular VF testing, yet patients perceive the world binocularly. This study was conducted to compare 5-year forecasts for the Visual Field Index (VFI) generated from series of binocular and monocular VFs.

Methods

Series of ten consecutive VFs (Humphrey 24–2 Full-threshold) spanning on average 3.7 (SD: ±0.8) years from 60 eyes of 30 glaucomatous patients were retrospectively examined. The VFs of both eyes were merged to produce the integrated VF and its VFI score (Binocular VFI) was estimated. Forecasts of binocular and monocular VFIs were calculated for each patient by projecting the fitted linear regression 5 years ahead from the last VF following the method on the Humphrey Guided Progression Analysis (GPA) print-out. The precisions of the forecasts were calculated as the width of the 95 % prediction limit (PL).

Results

The mean 5 year forecast for binocular VFIs was 92 % (SD: 11 %), which was significantly higher than forecasts from right and left eyes (79 % [SD: 19 %] and 82 % [SD: 16 %] respectively; P < 0.05). The width of the 95 % PL for 5-year predictions with monocular VFIs (mean right eye: 29 % [SD: 19 %] and mean left eye: 27 % [SD: 16 %]) were significantly larger than that of the binocular VFI (mean: 12 % [SD: 7 %]; P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Five year forecasted VFI values using binocular measures return significantly better values, and can be made with greater confidence than those based on monocular measures. In turn, forecasts of a patient’s binocular VFI might be more relevant to estimating the patient’s future functional VF.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gutierrez P, Wilson MR, Johnson C, Gordon M, Cioffi GA, Ritch R, Sherwood M, Meng K, Mangione CM (1997) Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on health-related quality of life. Arch Ophthalmol 115:777–784PubMedCrossRef Gutierrez P, Wilson MR, Johnson C, Gordon M, Cioffi GA, Ritch R, Sherwood M, Meng K, Mangione CM (1997) Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on health-related quality of life. Arch Ophthalmol 115:777–784PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Janz NK, Wren PA, Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Guire KE (2001) Quality of life in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients: the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study. Ophthalmology 108:887–897, discussion 898PubMedCrossRef Janz NK, Wren PA, Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Guire KE (2001) Quality of life in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients: the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study. Ophthalmology 108:887–897, discussion 898PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Parrish RK 2nd, Gedde SJ, Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC, Mangione CM, Montenegro-Piniella A (1997) Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 115:1447–1455PubMedCrossRef Parrish RK 2nd, Gedde SJ, Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Schiffman JC, Mangione CM, Montenegro-Piniella A (1997) Visual function and quality of life among patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 115:1447–1455PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ringsdorf L, McGwin G Jr, Owsley C (2006) Visual field defects and vision-specific health-related quality of life in African-Americans and whites with glaucoma. J Glaucoma 15:414–418PubMedCrossRef Ringsdorf L, McGwin G Jr, Owsley C (2006) Visual field defects and vision-specific health-related quality of life in African-Americans and whites with glaucoma. J Glaucoma 15:414–418PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Spaeth G, Walt J, Keener J (2006) Evaluation of quality of life for patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 141:S3–S14PubMedCrossRef Spaeth G, Walt J, Keener J (2006) Evaluation of quality of life for patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 141:S3–S14PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Varma R, Wu J, Chong K, Azen SP, Hays RD (2006) Impact of severity and bilaterality of visual impairment on health-related quality of life. Ophthalmology 113:1846–1853PubMedCrossRef Varma R, Wu J, Chong K, Azen SP, Hays RD (2006) Impact of severity and bilaterality of visual impairment on health-related quality of life. Ophthalmology 113:1846–1853PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Wang JJ, Mitchell P, Smith W (2000) Vision and low self-rated health: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:49–54PubMed Wang JJ, Mitchell P, Smith W (2000) Vision and low self-rated health: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:49–54PubMed
8.
go back to reference Wilson MR, Coleman AL, Yu F, Bing EG, Sasaki IF, Berlin K, Winters J, Lai A (1998) Functional status and well-being in patients with glaucoma as measured by the medical outcomes study short form-36 questionnaire. Ophthalmology 105:2112–2116PubMedCrossRef Wilson MR, Coleman AL, Yu F, Bing EG, Sasaki IF, Berlin K, Winters J, Lai A (1998) Functional status and well-being in patients with glaucoma as measured by the medical outcomes study short form-36 questionnaire. Ophthalmology 105:2112–2116PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Glen FC, Crabb DP, Garway-Heath DF (2011) The direction of research into visual disability and quality of life in glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol 11:19PubMedCrossRef Glen FC, Crabb DP, Garway-Heath DF (2011) The direction of research into visual disability and quality of life in glaucoma. BMC Ophthalmol 11:19PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ramulu P (2009) Glaucoma and disability: which tasks are affected, and at what stage of disease? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 20:92–98PubMedCrossRef Ramulu P (2009) Glaucoma and disability: which tasks are affected, and at what stage of disease? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 20:92–98PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Jampel HD, Friedman DS, Quigley H, Miller R (2002) Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1059–1067PubMed Jampel HD, Friedman DS, Quigley H, Miller R (2002) Correlation of the binocular visual field with patient assessment of vision. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1059–1067PubMed
12.
go back to reference Jampel HD, Schwartz A, Pollack I, Abrams D, Weiss H, Miller R (2002) Glaucoma patients’ assessment of their visual function and quality of life. J Glaucoma 11:154–163PubMedCrossRef Jampel HD, Schwartz A, Pollack I, Abrams D, Weiss H, Miller R (2002) Glaucoma patients’ assessment of their visual function and quality of life. J Glaucoma 11:154–163PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Nelson P, Aspinall P, Papasouliotis O, Worton B, O’Brien C (2003) Quality of life in glaucoma and its relationship with visual function. J Glaucoma 12:139–150PubMedCrossRef Nelson P, Aspinall P, Papasouliotis O, Worton B, O’Brien C (2003) Quality of life in glaucoma and its relationship with visual function. J Glaucoma 12:139–150PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Noe G, Ferraro J, Lamoureux E, Rait J, Keeffe JE (2003) Associations between glaucomatous visual field loss and participation in activities of daily living. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 31:482–486CrossRef Noe G, Ferraro J, Lamoureux E, Rait J, Keeffe JE (2003) Associations between glaucomatous visual field loss and participation in activities of daily living. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 31:482–486CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Jacko JA (2002) Impact of graphical user interface screen features on computer task accuracy and speed in a cohort of patients with age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 134:857–862PubMedCrossRef Scott IU, Feuer WJ, Jacko JA (2002) Impact of graphical user interface screen features on computer task accuracy and speed in a cohort of patients with age-related macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 134:857–862PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Turano KA, Rubin GS, Quigley HA (1999) Mobility performance in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:2803–2809PubMed Turano KA, Rubin GS, Quigley HA (1999) Mobility performance in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40:2803–2809PubMed
17.
go back to reference Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosawmy D, Fontana L, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA (1999) Severity and stability of glaucoma: patient perception compared with objective measurement. Arch Ophthalmol 117:450–454PubMedCrossRef Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosawmy D, Fontana L, Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA (1999) Severity and stability of glaucoma: patient perception compared with objective measurement. Arch Ophthalmol 117:450–454PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Esterman B (1982) Functional scoring of the binocular field. Ophthalmology 89:1226–1234PubMed Esterman B (1982) Functional scoring of the binocular field. Ophthalmology 89:1226–1234PubMed
19.
go back to reference Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, Viswanathan AC (2004) A practical approach to measuring the visual field component of fitness to drive. Br J Ophthalmol 88:1191–1196PubMedCrossRef Crabb DP, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA, Viswanathan AC (2004) A practical approach to measuring the visual field component of fitness to drive. Br J Ophthalmol 88:1191–1196PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Crabb DP, Viswanathan AC (2005) Integrated visual fields: a new approach to measuring the binocular field of view and visual disability. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:210–216PubMedCrossRef Crabb DP, Viswanathan AC (2005) Integrated visual fields: a new approach to measuring the binocular field of view and visual disability. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 243:210–216PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Crabb DP, Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA (1998) Simulating binocular visual field status in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 82:1236–1241PubMedCrossRef Crabb DP, Viswanathan AC, McNaught AI, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA (1998) Simulating binocular visual field status in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 82:1236–1241PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Owen VM, Crabb DP, White ET, Viswanathan AC, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA (2008) Glaucoma and fitness to drive: using binocular visual fields to predict a milestone to blindness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:2449–2455PubMedCrossRef Owen VM, Crabb DP, White ET, Viswanathan AC, Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA (2008) Glaucoma and fitness to drive: using binocular visual fields to predict a milestone to blindness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:2449–2455PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Bengtsson B, Heijl A (2008) A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Am J Ophthalmol 145:343–353PubMedCrossRef Bengtsson B, Heijl A (2008) A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Am J Ophthalmol 145:343–353PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Asaoka R, Crabb DP, Yamashita T, Russell RA, Wang YX, Garway-Heath DF (2011) Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:7007–7011PubMedCrossRef Asaoka R, Crabb DP, Yamashita T, Russell RA, Wang YX, Garway-Heath DF (2011) Patients have two eyes!: binocular versus better eye visual field indices. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:7007–7011PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Bengtsson B, Heijl A (2000) False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:2201–2204PubMed Bengtsson B, Heijl A (2000) False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:2201–2204PubMed
26.
go back to reference Caprioli J, Park HJ, Ugurlu S, Hoffman D (1998) Slope of the peripapillary nerve fiber layer surface in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:2321–2328PubMed Caprioli J, Park HJ, Ugurlu S, Hoffman D (1998) Slope of the peripapillary nerve fiber layer surface in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 39:2321–2328PubMed
27.
go back to reference Levi DM, Klein SA, Aitsebaomo AP (1985) Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification. Vis Res 25:963–977PubMedCrossRef Levi DM, Klein SA, Aitsebaomo AP (1985) Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification. Vis Res 25:963–977PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Artes PH, O’Leary N, Hutchison DM, Heckler L, Sharpe GP, Nicolela MT, Chauhan BC (2011) Properties of the statpac visual field index. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:4030–4038PubMedCrossRef Artes PH, O’Leary N, Hutchison DM, Heckler L, Sharpe GP, Nicolela MT, Chauhan BC (2011) Properties of the statpac visual field index. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 52:4030–4038PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Bengtsson B, Patella VM, Heijl A (2009) Prediction of glaucomatous visual field loss by extrapolation of linear trends. Arch Ophthalmol 127:1610–1615PubMedCrossRef Bengtsson B, Patella VM, Heijl A (2009) Prediction of glaucomatous visual field loss by extrapolation of linear trends. Arch Ophthalmol 127:1610–1615PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Giraud JM, Fenolland JR, May F, Hammam O, Sadat AM, Boumezrag AB, Renard JP (2010) Analysis of a new visual field index, the VFI, in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. J Fr Ophtalmol 33:2–9PubMedCrossRef Giraud JM, Fenolland JR, May F, Hammam O, Sadat AM, Boumezrag AB, Renard JP (2010) Analysis of a new visual field index, the VFI, in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. J Fr Ophtalmol 33:2–9PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Rao HL, Kumar AU, Babu JG, Senthil S, Garudadri CS (2011) Relationship between severity of visual field loss at presentation and rate of visual field progression in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 118:249–253PubMedCrossRef Rao HL, Kumar AU, Babu JG, Senthil S, Garudadri CS (2011) Relationship between severity of visual field loss at presentation and rate of visual field progression in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 118:249–253PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kwon YH, Kim CS, Zimmerman MB, Alward WL, Hayreh SS (2001) Rate of visual field loss and long-term visual outcome in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 132:47–56PubMedCrossRef Kwon YH, Kim CS, Zimmerman MB, Alward WL, Hayreh SS (2001) Rate of visual field loss and long-term visual outcome in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 132:47–56PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Rasker MT, van den Enden A, Bakker D, Hoyng PF (2000) Rate of visual field loss in progressive glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 118:481–488PubMedCrossRef Rasker MT, van den Enden A, Bakker D, Hoyng PF (2000) Rate of visual field loss in progressive glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol 118:481–488PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Stewart WC, Kolker AE, Sharpe ED, Day DG, Holmes KT, Leech JN, Johnson M, Cantrell JB (2000) Factors associated with long-term progression or stability in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 130:274–279PubMedCrossRef Stewart WC, Kolker AE, Sharpe ED, Day DG, Holmes KT, Leech JN, Johnson M, Cantrell JB (2000) Factors associated with long-term progression or stability in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 130:274–279PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Drance S, Anderson DR, Schulzer M (2001) Risk factors for progression of visual field abnormalities in normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 131:699–708PubMedCrossRef Drance S, Anderson DR, Schulzer M (2001) Risk factors for progression of visual field abnormalities in normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 131:699–708PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Fogagnolo P, Sangermani C, Oddone F, Frezzotti P, Iester M, Figus M, Ferreras A, Romano S, Gandolfi S, Centofanti M, Rossetti L, Orzalesi N (2011) Long-term perimetric fluctuation in patients with different stages of glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 95:189–193PubMedCrossRef Fogagnolo P, Sangermani C, Oddone F, Frezzotti P, Iester M, Figus M, Ferreras A, Romano S, Gandolfi S, Centofanti M, Rossetti L, Orzalesi N (2011) Long-term perimetric fluctuation in patients with different stages of glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 95:189–193PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Tattersall CL, Vernon SA, Menon GJ (2007) Mean deviation fluctuation in eyes with stable Humphrey 24–2 visual fields. Eye (Lond) 21:362–366CrossRef Tattersall CL, Vernon SA, Menon GJ (2007) Mean deviation fluctuation in eyes with stable Humphrey 24–2 visual fields. Eye (Lond) 21:362–366CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC (2002) Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, SITA standard, and SITA fast strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2654–2659PubMed Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC (2002) Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from full threshold, SITA standard, and SITA fast strategies. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2654–2659PubMed
39.
go back to reference Wall M, Woodward KR, Doyle CK, Artes PH (2009) Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:974–979PubMedCrossRef Wall M, Woodward KR, Doyle CK, Artes PH (2009) Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 50:974–979PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G (1989) Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 108:130–135PubMed Heijl A, Lindgren A, Lindgren G (1989) Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 108:130–135PubMed
41.
go back to reference Blumenthal EZ, Sample PA, Zangwill L, Lee AC, Kono Y, Weinreb RN (2000) Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol 129:309–313PubMedCrossRef Blumenthal EZ, Sample PA, Zangwill L, Lee AC, Kono Y, Weinreb RN (2000) Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol 129:309–313PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Kwon YH, Park HJ, Jap A, Ugurlu S, Caprioli J (1998) Test-retest variability of blue-on-yellow perimetry is greater than white-on-white perimetry in normal subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 126:29–36PubMedCrossRef Kwon YH, Park HJ, Jap A, Ugurlu S, Caprioli J (1998) Test-retest variability of blue-on-yellow perimetry is greater than white-on-white perimetry in normal subjects. Am J Ophthalmol 126:29–36PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Piltz JR, Starita RJ (1990) Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 109:109–111PubMed Piltz JR, Starita RJ (1990) Test-retest variability in glaucomatous visual fields. Am J Ophthalmol 109:109–111PubMed
44.
go back to reference Chauhan BC, Garway-Heath DF, Goni FJ, Rossetti L, Bengtsson B, Viswanathan AC, Heijl A (2008) Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 92:569–573PubMedCrossRef Chauhan BC, Garway-Heath DF, Goni FJ, Rossetti L, Bengtsson B, Viswanathan AC, Heijl A (2008) Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 92:569–573PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Crabb DP, Garway-Heath DF (2012) Intervals between visual field tests when monitoring the glaucomatous patient: wait-and-See approach. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:2770–2776PubMedCrossRef Crabb DP, Garway-Heath DF (2012) Intervals between visual field tests when monitoring the glaucomatous patient: wait-and-See approach. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53:2770–2776PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Jansonius NM (2010) On the accuracy of measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 94:1404–1405PubMedCrossRef Jansonius NM (2010) On the accuracy of measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 94:1404–1405PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Wesselink C, Stoutenbeek R, Jansonius NM (2011) Incorporating life expectancy in glaucoma care. Eye (Lond) 25:1575–1580CrossRef Wesselink C, Stoutenbeek R, Jansonius NM (2011) Incorporating life expectancy in glaucoma care. Eye (Lond) 25:1575–1580CrossRef
48.
go back to reference Nelson-Quigg JM, Cello K, Johnson CA (2000) Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:2212–2221PubMed Nelson-Quigg JM, Cello K, Johnson CA (2000) Predicting binocular visual field sensitivity from monocular visual field results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:2212–2221PubMed
Metadata
Title
Five-year forecasts of the Visual Field Index (VFI) with binocular and monocular visual fields
Authors
Ryo Asaoka
Richard A. Russell
Rizwan Malik
David F. Garway-Heath
David P. Crabb
Publication date
01-05-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0721-832X
Electronic ISSN: 1435-702X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-012-2214-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 5/2013 Go to the issue