Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Finite element analysis of stress in oral mucosa and titanium mesh interface

Authors: Chen-Xi Wang, Qi-Guo Rong, Ning Zhu, Ting Ma, Yu Zhang, Ye Lin

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The stiffness of titanium mesh is a double-blade sword to repair larger alveolar ridges defect with excellent space maintenance ability, while invade the surrounding soft tissue and lead to higher mesh exposure rates. Understanding the mechanical of oral mucosa/titanium mesh/bone interface is clinically meaningful. In this study, the above relationship was analyzed by finite elements and verified by setting different keratinized tissue width in oral mucosa.

Methods

Two three-dimensional finite element models were constructed with 5 mm keratinized tissue in labial mucosa (KM cases) and 0 mm keratinized tissue in labial mucosa (LM cases). Each model was composed of titanium mesh, titanium screws, graft materials, bone, teeth and oral mucosa. After that, a vertical (30 N) loadings were applied from both alveolar ridges direction and labial mucosa direction to stimulate the force from masticatory system. The displacements and von Mises stress of each element at the interfaces were analyzed.

Results

Little displacements were found for titanium mesh, titanium screws, graft materials, bone and teeth in both LM and KM cases under different loading conditions. The maximum von Mises stress was found around the lingual titanium screw insertion place for those elements in all cases. The keratinized tissue decreased the displacement of oral mucosa, decreased the maximum von Mises stress generated by an alveolar ridges direction load, while increased those stress from labial mucosa direction load. Only the von Mises stress of the KM cases was all lower than the tensile strength of the oral mucosa.

Conclusion

The mucosa was vulnerable under the increasing stress generated by the force from masticatory system. The adequate buccal keratinized mucosa width are critical factors in reducing the stress beyond the titanium mesh, which might reduce the titanium exposure rate.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cooray U, et al. Importance of socioeconomic factors in predicting tooth loss among older adults in Japan: evidence from a machine learning analysis. Soc Sci Med (1982). 2021;291:114486.CrossRef Cooray U, et al. Importance of socioeconomic factors in predicting tooth loss among older adults in Japan: evidence from a machine learning analysis. Soc Sci Med (1982). 2021;291:114486.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Aprile P, Letourneur D, Simon-Yarza T. Membranes for guided bone regeneration: a road from bench to bedside. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020;9(19):e2000707.CrossRef Aprile P, Letourneur D, Simon-Yarza T. Membranes for guided bone regeneration: a road from bench to bedside. Adv Healthc Mater. 2020;9(19):e2000707.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Sasaki J, et al. Barrier membranes for tissue regeneration in dentistry. Biomater Investig Dent. 2021;8(1):54–63. Sasaki J, et al. Barrier membranes for tissue regeneration in dentistry. Biomater Investig Dent. 2021;8(1):54–63.
4.
go back to reference Sagheb K, et al. Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized CAD-CAM-produced titanium mesh. Int J Implant Dent. 2017;3(1):36.CrossRef Sagheb K, et al. Clinical outcome of alveolar ridge augmentation with individualized CAD-CAM-produced titanium mesh. Int J Implant Dent. 2017;3(1):36.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Zhang M, et al. Effect of different membranes on vertical bone regeneration: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BioMed Res Int. 2022;2022:7742687. Zhang M, et al. Effect of different membranes on vertical bone regeneration: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. BioMed Res Int. 2022;2022:7742687.
6.
go back to reference Her S, Kang T, Fien M. Titanium mesh as an alternative to a membrane for ridge augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(4):803–10.CrossRef Her S, Kang T, Fien M. Titanium mesh as an alternative to a membrane for ridge augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg Off J Am Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(4):803–10.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Ciocca L, et al. Prosthetically CAD-CAM-guided bone augmentation of atrophic jaws using customized titanium mesh: preliminary results of an open prospective study. J Oral Implantol. 2018;44(2):131–7.CrossRef Ciocca L, et al. Prosthetically CAD-CAM-guided bone augmentation of atrophic jaws using customized titanium mesh: preliminary results of an open prospective study. J Oral Implantol. 2018;44(2):131–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Xie Y, et al. Titanium mesh for bone augmentation in oral implantology: current application and progress. Int J Oral Sci. 2020;12(1):37.CrossRef Xie Y, et al. Titanium mesh for bone augmentation in oral implantology: current application and progress. Int J Oral Sci. 2020;12(1):37.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Hartmann A, Seiler M. Minimizing risk of customized titanium mesh exposures—a retrospective analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):36.CrossRef Hartmann A, Seiler M. Minimizing risk of customized titanium mesh exposures—a retrospective analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):36.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Zhou L, et al. Effect of exposure rates with customized versus conventional titanium mesh on guided bone regeneration: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2022;48(4):339–46.CrossRef Zhou L, et al. Effect of exposure rates with customized versus conventional titanium mesh on guided bone regeneration: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2022;48(4):339–46.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gu C, et al. Titanium mesh exposure in guided bone regeneration procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022;37(1):e29-40.CrossRef Gu C, et al. Titanium mesh exposure in guided bone regeneration procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022;37(1):e29-40.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Paeng K, et al. Effect of collagen membrane and of bone substitute on lateral bone augmentation with titanium mesh: an experimental in vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33(4):413–23.CrossRef Paeng K, et al. Effect of collagen membrane and of bone substitute on lateral bone augmentation with titanium mesh: an experimental in vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022;33(4):413–23.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Park S, Wang H. Clinical significance of incision location on guided bone regeneration: human study. J Periodontol. 2007;78(1):47–51.CrossRef Park S, Wang H. Clinical significance of incision location on guided bone regeneration: human study. J Periodontol. 2007;78(1):47–51.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lee H, Jo M, Noh G. Biomechanical effects of dental implant diameter, connection type, and bone density on microgap formation and fatigue failure: a finite element analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;200:105863.CrossRef Lee H, Jo M, Noh G. Biomechanical effects of dental implant diameter, connection type, and bone density on microgap formation and fatigue failure: a finite element analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;200:105863.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bai L, et al. Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed individualized Ti-mesh (membrane) for alveolar bone defects. J Healthc Eng. 2019;2019:4231872.CrossRef Bai L, et al. Mechanical characterization of 3D-printed individualized Ti-mesh (membrane) for alveolar bone defects. J Healthc Eng. 2019;2019:4231872.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Acharya P, et al. Comparative evaluation of peri-implant stress distribution in implant protected occlusion and cuspally loaded occlusion on a 3 unit implant supported fixed partial denture: a 3D finite element analysis study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2021;13(2):79–88.CrossRef Acharya P, et al. Comparative evaluation of peri-implant stress distribution in implant protected occlusion and cuspally loaded occlusion on a 3 unit implant supported fixed partial denture: a 3D finite element analysis study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2021;13(2):79–88.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gao H, et al. Mechanobiologically optimization of a 3D titanium-mesh implant for mandibular large defect: a simulated study. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;104:109934.CrossRef Gao H, et al. Mechanobiologically optimization of a 3D titanium-mesh implant for mandibular large defect: a simulated study. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;104:109934.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Checa S, Prendergast P, Duda G. Inter-species investigation of the mechano-regulation of bone healing: comparison of secondary bone healing in sheep and rat. J Biomech. 2011;44(7):1237–45.CrossRef Checa S, Prendergast P, Duda G. Inter-species investigation of the mechano-regulation of bone healing: comparison of secondary bone healing in sheep and rat. J Biomech. 2011;44(7):1237–45.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Alom G, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of buccally cantilevered implant-supported prostheses in a severely resorbed mandible. J Adv Prosthodont. 2021;13(1):12.CrossRef Alom G, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of buccally cantilevered implant-supported prostheses in a severely resorbed mandible. J Adv Prosthodont. 2021;13(1):12.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chen J, et al. Biomechanics of oral mucosa. J R Soc Interface. 2015;12(109):20150325.CrossRef Chen J, et al. Biomechanics of oral mucosa. J R Soc Interface. 2015;12(109):20150325.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Choi J, et al. Mechanical properties of human oral mucosa tissues are site dependent: a combined biomechanical, histological and ultrastructural approach. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020;6(6):602–11.CrossRef Choi J, et al. Mechanical properties of human oral mucosa tissues are site dependent: a combined biomechanical, histological and ultrastructural approach. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2020;6(6):602–11.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Stetiu AA, et al. Dimensioning initial preparation for dental incisal reconstruction with biomaterials. Rom Biotechnol Lett. 2014;19(5):9792–800. Stetiu AA, et al. Dimensioning initial preparation for dental incisal reconstruction with biomaterials. Rom Biotechnol Lett. 2014;19(5):9792–800.
25.
go back to reference Uehara S, et al. Predictability of staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation using a micro titanium mesh. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;19(4):411–6.CrossRef Uehara S, et al. Predictability of staged localized alveolar ridge augmentation using a micro titanium mesh. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;19(4):411–6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Hartmann A, et al. Evaluation of risk parameters in bone regeneration using a customized titanium mesh: results of a clinical study. Implant Dent. 2019;28:543–50. Hartmann A, et al. Evaluation of risk parameters in bone regeneration using a customized titanium mesh: results of a clinical study. Implant Dent. 2019;28:543–50.
27.
go back to reference Maiorana C, et al. Evaluation of the use of iliac cancellous bone and anorganic bovine bone in the reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla with titanium mesh: a clinical and histologic investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16(3):427–32. Maiorana C, et al. Evaluation of the use of iliac cancellous bone and anorganic bovine bone in the reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla with titanium mesh: a clinical and histologic investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16(3):427–32.
28.
go back to reference dos Santos M, Consani R, Mesquita M. Influence of different soft liners on stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissue during healing period. A 3D finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2013;39(5):575–81.CrossRef dos Santos M, Consani R, Mesquita M. Influence of different soft liners on stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissue during healing period. A 3D finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol. 2013;39(5):575–81.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Haden CV, Collins PC, Harlow DG. Yield strength prediction of titanium alloys. JOM. 2015;67(6):1357–61.CrossRef Haden CV, Collins PC, Harlow DG. Yield strength prediction of titanium alloys. JOM. 2015;67(6):1357–61.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Li L, et al. Assessment of customized alveolar bone augmentation using titanium scaffolds vs polyetheretherketone (PEEK) scaffolds: a comparative study based on 3D printing technology. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022;8(5):2028–39.CrossRef Li L, et al. Assessment of customized alveolar bone augmentation using titanium scaffolds vs polyetheretherketone (PEEK) scaffolds: a comparative study based on 3D printing technology. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022;8(5):2028–39.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Aziz S. Hard and soft tissue surgical complications in dental implantology. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am. 2015;27(2):313–8.CrossRef Aziz S. Hard and soft tissue surgical complications in dental implantology. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am. 2015;27(2):313–8.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Herford A, et al. Evaluation of a porcine matrix with and without platelet-derived growth factor for bone graft coverage in pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(6):1351–8. Herford A, et al. Evaluation of a porcine matrix with and without platelet-derived growth factor for bone graft coverage in pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012;27(6):1351–8.
34.
go back to reference De Angelis N, et al. Platform switching versus conventional technique: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. 2014;34:S75–9. De Angelis N, et al. Platform switching versus conventional technique: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent. 2014;34:S75–9.
35.
go back to reference Tsaira A, et al. Theoretical considerations and a mathematical model for the analysis of the biomechanical response of human keratinized oral mucosa. Front Physiol. 2016;7:364.CrossRef Tsaira A, et al. Theoretical considerations and a mathematical model for the analysis of the biomechanical response of human keratinized oral mucosa. Front Physiol. 2016;7:364.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Finite element analysis of stress in oral mucosa and titanium mesh interface
Authors
Chen-Xi Wang
Qi-Guo Rong
Ning Zhu
Ting Ma
Yu Zhang
Ye Lin
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02703-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Oral Health 1/2023 Go to the issue