Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Neurology 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Finger tapping impairments are highly sensitive for evaluating upper motor neuron lesions

Authors: Afsaneh Shirani, Braeden D. Newton, Darin T. Okuda

Published in: BMC Neurology | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Identifying highly sensitive and reliable neurological exam components are crucial in recognizing clinical deficiencies. This study aimed to investigate finger tapping performance differences between patients with CNS demyelinating lesions and healthy control subjects.

Methods

Twenty-three patients with multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome with infratentorial and/or cervical cord lesions on MRI, and 12 healthy controls were videotaped while tapping the tip of the index finger against the tip and distal crease of the thumb using both the dominant and non-dominant hand. Videos were assessed independently by 10 evaluators (three MS neurologists, four neurology residents, three advanced practice providers). Sensitivity and inter-evaluator reliability of finger tapping interpretations were calculated.

Results

A total of 1400 evaluations (four videos per each of the 35 subjects evaluated by 10 independent providers) were obtained. Impairments in finger tapping against the distal thumb crease of the non-dominant hand, identified by neurologists, had the greatest sensitivity (84%, p < 0.001) for detecting impairment. Finger tapping against the thumb crease was more sensitive than the thumb tip across all categories of providers. The best inter-evaluator reliability was associated with neurologists’ evaluations for the thumb crease of the non-dominant hand (kappa = 0.83, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Impaired finger tapping against the distal thumb crease of the non-dominant hand was a more sensitive technique for detecting impairments related to CNS demyelinating lesions. Our findings highlight the importance of precise examinations of the non-dominant side where impaired fine motor control secondary to an upper motor injury might be detectable earlier than the dominant side.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nicholl DJ, Appleton JP. Clinical neurology: why this still matters in the 21st century. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86:229–33.CrossRefPubMed Nicholl DJ, Appleton JP. Clinical neurology: why this still matters in the 21st century. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2015;86:229–33.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Johnston SC, Hauser SL. The beautiful and ethereal neurological exam: an appeal for research. Ann Neurol. 2011;70:A9–A10.CrossRefPubMed Johnston SC, Hauser SL. The beautiful and ethereal neurological exam: an appeal for research. Ann Neurol. 2011;70:A9–A10.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Campbell W. Motor strength and power. In: DeJong’s the neurologic examination. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. Campbell W. Motor strength and power. In: DeJong’s the neurologic examination. 7th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
4.
go back to reference Sundqvist M, Johnels JA, Lindh J, Laakso K, Hartelius L. Syllable repetition vs. finger tapping: aspects of motor timing in 100 healthy adults. Mot Control. 2016;20:233–54.CrossRef Sundqvist M, Johnels JA, Lindh J, Laakso K, Hartelius L. Syllable repetition vs. finger tapping: aspects of motor timing in 100 healthy adults. Mot Control. 2016;20:233–54.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Dean AC, Victor TL, Boone KB, Arnold G. The relationship of IQ to effort test performance. Clin Neuropsychol. 2008;22:705–22.CrossRefPubMed Dean AC, Victor TL, Boone KB, Arnold G. The relationship of IQ to effort test performance. Clin Neuropsychol. 2008;22:705–22.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Haaland KY, Temkin N, Randahl G, Dikmen S. Recovery of simple motor skills after head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994;16:448–56.CrossRefPubMed Haaland KY, Temkin N, Randahl G, Dikmen S. Recovery of simple motor skills after head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994;16:448–56.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference de Groot-Driessen D, van de Sande P, van Heugten C. Speed of finger tapping as a predictor of functional outcome after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:40–4.CrossRefPubMed de Groot-Driessen D, van de Sande P, van Heugten C. Speed of finger tapping as a predictor of functional outcome after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:40–4.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, et al. Movement disorder society - unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS). Mov Disord. 2008;23:2129–70.CrossRefPubMed Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, et al. Movement disorder society - unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS). Mov Disord. 2008;23:2129–70.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kraft GH, Amtmann D, Bennett SE, et al. Assessment of upper extremity function in multiple sclerosis: review and opinion. Postgrad Med. 2014;126:102–8.CrossRefPubMed Kraft GH, Amtmann D, Bennett SE, et al. Assessment of upper extremity function in multiple sclerosis: review and opinion. Postgrad Med. 2014;126:102–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Lamers I, Kelchtermans S, Baert I, et al. Upper limb assessment in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of outcome measures and their psychometric properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:1184–200.CrossRefPubMed Lamers I, Kelchtermans S, Baert I, et al. Upper limb assessment in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of outcome measures and their psychometric properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:1184–200.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Schenk T, Walther EU, Mai N. Closed- and open-loop handwriting performance in patients with multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2000;7:269–79.CrossRefPubMed Schenk T, Walther EU, Mai N. Closed- and open-loop handwriting performance in patients with multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol. 2000;7:269–79.CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Daams M, Steenwijk MD, Wattjes MP, et al. Unraveling the neuroimaging predictors for motor dysfunction in long-standing multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2015;85:248–55.CrossRefPubMed Daams M, Steenwijk MD, Wattjes MP, et al. Unraveling the neuroimaging predictors for motor dysfunction in long-standing multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2015;85:248–55.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011;69:292–302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011;69:292–302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Hubel KA, Reed B, Yund EW, Herron TJ, Woods DL. Computerized measures of finger tapping: effects of hand dominance, age, and sex. Percept Mot Skills. 2013;116:929–52.CrossRefPubMed Hubel KA, Reed B, Yund EW, Herron TJ, Woods DL. Computerized measures of finger tapping: effects of hand dominance, age, and sex. Percept Mot Skills. 2013;116:929–52.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Gwet KL. Handbook on interrator reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among multiple raters. 3rd ed. Gaithersburg: Advanced Analytics; 2012. Gwet KL. Handbook on interrator reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among multiple raters. 3rd ed. Gaithersburg: Advanced Analytics; 2012.
17.
go back to reference Kuo PL, Lee DL, Jindrich DL, Dennerlein JT. Finger joint coordination during tapping. J Biomech. 2006;39:2934–42.CrossRefPubMed Kuo PL, Lee DL, Jindrich DL, Dennerlein JT. Finger joint coordination during tapping. J Biomech. 2006;39:2934–42.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Arunachalam R, Weerasinghe VS, Mills KR. Motor control of rapid sequential finger tapping in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:2162–70.CrossRefPubMed Arunachalam R, Weerasinghe VS, Mills KR. Motor control of rapid sequential finger tapping in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2005;94:2162–70.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Stern Y. The concept of cognitive reserve: a catalyst for research. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003;25:589–93.CrossRefPubMed Stern Y. The concept of cognitive reserve: a catalyst for research. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003;25:589–93.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Stern Y. What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002;8:448–60.CrossRefPubMed Stern Y. What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002;8:448–60.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Katzman R. Education and the prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1993;43:13–20.CrossRefPubMed Katzman R. Education and the prevalence of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology. 1993;43:13–20.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Stern Y, Gurland B, Tatemichi TK, Tang MX, Wilder D, Mayeux R. Influence of education and occupation on the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. JAMA. 1994;271:1004–10.CrossRefPubMed Stern Y, Gurland B, Tatemichi TK, Tang MX, Wilder D, Mayeux R. Influence of education and occupation on the incidence of Alzheimer’s disease. JAMA. 1994;271:1004–10.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Ham JH, Lee JJ, Kim JS, Lee PH, Sohn YH. Is dominant-side onset associated with a better motor compensation in Parkinson’s disease? Mov Disord. 2015;30:1921–5.CrossRefPubMed Ham JH, Lee JJ, Kim JS, Lee PH, Sohn YH. Is dominant-side onset associated with a better motor compensation in Parkinson’s disease? Mov Disord. 2015;30:1921–5.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Harris JE, Eng JJ. Individuals with the dominant hand affected following stroke demonstrate less impairment than those with the nondominant hand affected. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;20:380–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Harris JE, Eng JJ. Individuals with the dominant hand affected following stroke demonstrate less impairment than those with the nondominant hand affected. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;20:380–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Schwarz HB, Fritz JV, Govindarajan R, et al. Neurology advanced practice providers: A position paper of the Ameircan Academy of Neurology. Neurol Clin Pract. 2015;5:333–7. Schwarz HB, Fritz JV, Govindarajan R, et al. Neurology advanced practice providers: A position paper of the Ameircan Academy of Neurology. Neurol Clin Pract. 2015;5:333–7.
27.
go back to reference Ringel SP, Vickrey BG, Keran CM, Bieber J, Bradley WG. Training the future neurology workforce. Neurology. 2000;54:480–4.CrossRefPubMed Ringel SP, Vickrey BG, Keran CM, Bieber J, Bradley WG. Training the future neurology workforce. Neurology. 2000;54:480–4.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Miller TM, Johnston SC. Should the Babinski sign be part of the routine neurologic examination? Neurology. 2005;65:1165–8.CrossRefPubMed Miller TM, Johnston SC. Should the Babinski sign be part of the routine neurologic examination? Neurology. 2005;65:1165–8.CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
go back to reference Araujo R, Firmino-Machado J, Correia P, et al. The plantar reflex. A study of observer agreement, sensitivity, and observer bias. Neurol Clin Pract. 2015;5:309–16. Araujo R, Firmino-Machado J, Correia P, et al. The plantar reflex. A study of observer agreement, sensitivity, and observer bias. Neurol Clin Pract. 2015;5:309–16.
31.
go back to reference Sullivan SJ, Hammond-Tooke GD, Schneiders AG, Gray AR, McCrory P. The diagnostic accuracy of selected neurological tests. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19:423–7.CrossRefPubMed Sullivan SJ, Hammond-Tooke GD, Schneiders AG, Gray AR, McCrory P. The diagnostic accuracy of selected neurological tests. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19:423–7.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Witt ST, Laird AR, Meyerand ME. Functional neuroimaging correlates of finger-tapping task variations: an ALE meta-analysis. NeuroImage. 2008;42:343–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Witt ST, Laird AR, Meyerand ME. Functional neuroimaging correlates of finger-tapping task variations: an ALE meta-analysis. NeuroImage. 2008;42:343–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Dhamala M, Pagnoni G, Wiesenfeld K, Zink CF, Martin M, Berns GS. Neural correlates of the complexity of rhythmic finger tapping. NeuroImage. 2003;20:918–26.CrossRefPubMed Dhamala M, Pagnoni G, Wiesenfeld K, Zink CF, Martin M, Berns GS. Neural correlates of the complexity of rhythmic finger tapping. NeuroImage. 2003;20:918–26.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Austin D, McNames J, Klein K, Jimison H, Pavel M. A statistical characterization of the finger tapping test: modeling, estimation, and applications. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2015;19:501–7.CrossRefPubMed Austin D, McNames J, Klein K, Jimison H, Pavel M. A statistical characterization of the finger tapping test: modeling, estimation, and applications. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2015;19:501–7.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Barut C, Kiziltan E, Gelir E, Kokturk F. Advanced analysis of finger-tapping performance: a preliminary study. Balkan Med J. 2013;30:167–71.PubMedPubMedCentral Barut C, Kiziltan E, Gelir E, Kokturk F. Advanced analysis of finger-tapping performance: a preliminary study. Balkan Med J. 2013;30:167–71.PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Finger tapping impairments are highly sensitive for evaluating upper motor neuron lesions
Authors
Afsaneh Shirani
Braeden D. Newton
Darin T. Okuda
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Neurology / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2377
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-017-0829-y

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Neurology 1/2017 Go to the issue