Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2005

01-08-2005

Filler Injection Enhances the Projection of the Reconstructed Nipple:An Original Easy Technique

Authors: P. Panettiere, L. Marchetti, D. Accorsi

Published in: Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | Issue 4/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Reduced nipple projection is the main reason for unsatisfactory nipple–areola complex reconstruction, and many techniques have been proposed to maintain projection of the reconstructed nipple.

Methods

For 70 patients, 90 nipples were reconstructed using either a small wedge from the labia minora (LMW) (n=70) or nipple sharing (NS) (n=20). Two months after reconstruction, each reconstructed nipple was injected with DermaLive. Second and third injections were performed 2 and 5 months later. The injected volume was tailored to the desired projection. Nipple projection was measured at the moment of implant, before and after each injection, and 6 and 12 months after the last injection.

Results

Nipple projection was satisfactory in all cases and comparable with that of the contralateral nipple. The average nipple projection at 6 months was 5.8 mm in the LMW group and 3.8 mm in the NS group (p < 0.01) and, respectively, 5.6 mm and 3.5 mm at 12 months (p < 0.01). No complications occurred, except for one positron emission tomography (PET) false-positive result.

Conclusions

The described method is simple and safe. It provides precise projection with no need for intraoperative forecasting of tissue reabsorption. The result was better for the LMW patients, perhaps because of their higher distensibility.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Banducci, DR, Le, TK, Hughes, KC 1999Long-term follow-up of a modified Anton–Hartrampf nipple reconstructionAnn Plast Surg43467469CrossRefPubMed Banducci, DR, Le, TK, Hughes, KC 1999Long-term follow-up of a modified Anton–Hartrampf nipple reconstructionAnn Plast Surg43467469CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bergeret-Galley, C, Latouche, X, Illouz, Y-G 2001The value of a new filler material in corrective and cosmetic surgery: DermaLive and DermaDeepAesth Plast Surg25249255CrossRef Bergeret-Galley, C, Latouche, X, Illouz, Y-G 2001The value of a new filler material in corrective and cosmetic surgery: DermaLive and DermaDeepAesth Plast Surg25249255CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bernard, RW, Beran, SJ 2003Autologous fat graft in nipple reconstructionPlast Reconstr Surg112964968CrossRefPubMed Bernard, RW, Beran, SJ 2003Autologous fat graft in nipple reconstructionPlast Reconstr Surg112964968CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cao, YL, Lach, E, Kim, TH, Rodriguez, A, Arevalo, CA, Vacanti, CA 1998Tissue-engineered nipple reconstructionPlast Reconstr Surg10222932298CrossRefPubMed Cao, YL, Lach, E, Kim, TH, Rodriguez, A, Arevalo, CA, Vacanti, CA 1998Tissue-engineered nipple reconstructionPlast Reconstr Surg10222932298CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Cheng, MH, Ho-Asjoe, M, Wei, FC, Chuang, DC 2003Nipple reconstruction in Asian females using banked cartilage graft and modified top hat flapBr J Plast Surg56692694CrossRefPubMed Cheng, MH, Ho-Asjoe, M, Wei, FC, Chuang, DC 2003Nipple reconstruction in Asian females using banked cartilage graft and modified top hat flapBr J Plast Surg56692694CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Few, JW, Marcus, JR, Casas, LA, Aitken, ME, Redding, J 1999Long-term predictable nipple projection following reconstructionPlast Reconstr Surg10413211324CrossRefPubMed Few, JW, Marcus, JR, Casas, LA, Aitken, ME, Redding, J 1999Long-term predictable nipple projection following reconstructionPlast Reconstr Surg10413211324CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Guerra, AB, Khoobehi, K, Metzinger, SE, Allen, RJ 2003New technique for nipple–areola reconstruction: Arrow flap and rib cartilage graft for long-lasting nipple projectionAnn Plast Surg503137CrossRefPubMed Guerra, AB, Khoobehi, K, Metzinger, SE, Allen, RJ 2003New technique for nipple–areola reconstruction: Arrow flap and rib cartilage graft for long-lasting nipple projectionAnn Plast Surg503137CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Jabor, MA, Shayani, P, Collins, DR, Karas, T, Cohen, BE 2002Nipple–areola reconstruction: Satisfaction and clinical determinantsPlast Reconstr Surg110457463CrossRefPubMed Jabor, MA, Shayani, P, Collins, DR, Karas, T, Cohen, BE 2002Nipple–areola reconstruction: Satisfaction and clinical determinantsPlast Reconstr Surg110457463CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kargul, G, Deutinger, M 2001Die Rekonstruktion des Mamillen-Areola-Komplexes: Ergebnisse unterschiedlicher Techniken im VergleichHandchir Mikrochir Plast Chir33133137CrossRefPubMed Kargul, G, Deutinger, M 2001Die Rekonstruktion des Mamillen-Areola-Komplexes: Ergebnisse unterschiedlicher Techniken im VergleichHandchir Mikrochir Plast Chir33133137CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kroll, SS, Hamilton, S 1989Nipple reconstruction with the double-opposing-tab flapPlast Reconstr Surg84520525CrossRefPubMed Kroll, SS, Hamilton, S 1989Nipple reconstruction with the double-opposing-tab flapPlast Reconstr Surg84520525CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kroll, SS, Reece, GP, Miller, MJ, Evans, GR, Robb, GL, Baldwin, BJ, Wang, BG, Schusterman, MA 1997Comparison of nipple projection with the modified double-opposing tab and star flapsPlast Reconstr Surg9916021605CrossRefPubMed Kroll, SS, Reece, GP, Miller, MJ, Evans, GR, Robb, GL, Baldwin, BJ, Wang, BG, Schusterman, MA 1997Comparison of nipple projection with the modified double-opposing tab and star flapsPlast Reconstr Surg9916021605CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lemperle, G, Morhenn, VB, Pestonjamasp, V, Gallo, RL 2004Migration studies and histology of injectable microspheres of different sizes in micePlast Reconstr Surg11313801390CrossRefPubMed Lemperle, G, Morhenn, VB, Pestonjamasp, V, Gallo, RL 2004Migration studies and histology of injectable microspheres of different sizes in micePlast Reconstr Surg11313801390CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Losken, A, Mackay, GJ, Bostwick, J,III 2001Nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique: A long-term evaluationPlast Reconstr Surg108361369CrossRefPubMed Losken, A, Mackay, GJ, Bostwick, J,III 2001Nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique: A long-term evaluationPlast Reconstr Surg108361369CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Lossing, C, Brongo, S, Holmstrom, H 1998Nipple reconstruction with a modified S-flap techniqueScand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg32275912CrossRefPubMed Lossing, C, Brongo, S, Holmstrom, H 1998Nipple reconstruction with a modified S-flap techniqueScand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg32275912CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Shestak, KC, Gabriel, A, Landecker, A, Peters, S, Shestak, A, Kim, J 2002Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniquesPlast Reconstr Surg110780786CrossRefPubMed Shestak, KC, Gabriel, A, Landecker, A, Peters, S, Shestak, A, Kim, J 2002Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniquesPlast Reconstr Surg110780786CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Yanaga, H 2003Nipple–areola reconstruction with a dermal-fat flap: Technical improvement from rolled auricular cartilage to artificial bonePlast Reconstr Surg11218631869CrossRefPubMed Yanaga, H 2003Nipple–areola reconstruction with a dermal-fat flap: Technical improvement from rolled auricular cartilage to artificial bonePlast Reconstr Surg11218631869CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Filler Injection Enhances the Projection of the Reconstructed Nipple:An Original Easy Technique
Authors
P. Panettiere
L. Marchetti
D. Accorsi
Publication date
01-08-2005
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery / Issue 4/2005
Print ISSN: 0364-216X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5241
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-004-0145-y

Other articles of this Issue 4/2005

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery 4/2005 Go to the issue