Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017

Open Access 01-12-2017 | Research article

Fetal heart rate abnormalities during and after external cephalic version: Which fetuses are at risk and how are they delivered?

Authors: Simone M. Kuppens, Ida Smailbegovic, Saskia Houterman, Ingrid de Leeuw, Tom H. Hasaart

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Fetal heart rate abnormalities (FHR) during and after external cephalic version (ECV) are relatively frequent. They may raise concern about fetal wellbeing. Only occasionally they may lead to an emergency cesarean section.

Methods

Prospective cohort study in 980 women (> 34 weeks gestation) with a singleton fetus in breech presentation. During and after external cephalic version (ECV) FHR abnormalities were recorded. Obstetric variables and delivery outcome were evaluated. Primary outcome was to identify which fetuses are at risk for FHR abnormalities. Secondary outcome was to identify a possible relationship between FHR abnormalities during and after ECV and mode of delivery and fetal distress during subsequent labor.

Results

The overall success rate of ECV was 60% and in 9% of the attempts there was an abnormal FHR pattern. In two cases FHR abnormalities after ECV led to an emergency CS. Estimated fetal weight per 100 g (OR 0.90, CI: 0.87–0.94) and longer duration of the ECV-procedure (OR 1.13, CI: 1.05–1.21) were factors significantly associated with the occurrence of FHR abnormalities. FHR abnormalities were not associated with the mode of delivery or the occurrence of fetal distress during subsequent labor.

Conclusions

FHR abnormalities during and after ECV are more frequent with lower estimated fetal weight and longer duration of the procedure. FHR abnormalities during and after ECV have no consequences for subsequent mode of delivery. They do not predict whether fetal distress will occur during labor.

Trial registration

The Eindhoven Breech Intervention Study, NCT00516555. Date of registration: August 13, 2007.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R, West HM. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;4:CD000083. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R, West HM. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;4:CD000083.
2.
go back to reference Hutton EK, Hofmeyr GJ, Dowswell T. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD000084. Hutton EK, Hofmeyr GJ, Dowswell T. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;7:CD000084.
3.
go back to reference Murray-Davis B, Marion A, Malott A, Reitsma A, Hutton EK. Women's experiences of participating in the early external cephalic version 2 trial. Birth. 2012;39(1):30–8.CrossRefPubMed Murray-Davis B, Marion A, Malott A, Reitsma A, Hutton EK. Women's experiences of participating in the early external cephalic version 2 trial. Birth. 2012;39(1):30–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Rijnders M, Offerhaus P, van Dommelen P, Wiegers T, Buitendijk S. Prevalence, outcome, and women's experiences of external cephalic version in a low-risk population. Birth. 2010;37(2):124–33.CrossRefPubMed Rijnders M, Offerhaus P, van Dommelen P, Wiegers T, Buitendijk S. Prevalence, outcome, and women's experiences of external cephalic version in a low-risk population. Birth. 2010;37(2):124–33.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Ciliacus E, van der Zalm M, Truijens SE, Hasaart TH, Pop VJ, Kuppens SM. Fear for external cephalic version and depression: predictors of successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ciliacus E, van der Zalm M, Truijens SE, Hasaart TH, Pop VJ, Kuppens SM. Fear for external cephalic version and depression: predictors of successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, Mol BW, van der Post JA. External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(5):1143–51.CrossRefPubMed Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, Mol BW, van der Post JA. External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112(5):1143–51.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Collaris RJ, Oei SG. External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83(6):511–8.CrossRefPubMed Collaris RJ, Oei SG. External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83(6):511–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hofmeyr GJ, Sonnendecker EW. Cardiotocographic changes after external cephalic version. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983;90(10):914–8.CrossRefPubMed Hofmeyr GJ, Sonnendecker EW. Cardiotocographic changes after external cephalic version. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1983;90(10):914–8.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Weiner Z, Farmakides G, Hsieh H, Maulik D. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate changes after antepartum external cephalic version. J Reprod Med. 1996;41(9):680–4.PubMed Weiner Z, Farmakides G, Hsieh H, Maulik D. Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate changes after antepartum external cephalic version. J Reprod Med. 1996;41(9):680–4.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Kurup A, Arulkumaran S, Montan S, Ratnam SS. Need for fetal assessment prior to and during external cephalic version. Occurrence of transient cardiac asystole. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993;72(1):60–2.CrossRefPubMed Kurup A, Arulkumaran S, Montan S, Ratnam SS. Need for fetal assessment prior to and during external cephalic version. Occurrence of transient cardiac asystole. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993;72(1):60–2.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Vyas S, Campbell S, Bower S, Nicolaides KH. Maternal abdominal pressure alters fetal cerebral blood flow. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97(8):740–2.CrossRefPubMed Vyas S, Campbell S, Bower S, Nicolaides KH. Maternal abdominal pressure alters fetal cerebral blood flow. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97(8):740–2.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Leung TY, Sahota DS, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK. External cephalic version induced fetal cerebral and umbilical blood flow changes are related to the amount of pressure exerted. BJOG. 2004;111(5):430–5.CrossRefPubMed Leung TY, Sahota DS, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK. External cephalic version induced fetal cerebral and umbilical blood flow changes are related to the amount of pressure exerted. BJOG. 2004;111(5):430–5.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Lau TK, Lo KW, Chan LY, Leung TY, Lo YM. Cell-free fetal deoxyribonucleic acid in maternal circulation as a marker of fetal-maternal hemorrhage in patients undergoing external cephalic version near term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(3):712–6.CrossRefPubMed Lau TK, Lo KW, Chan LY, Leung TY, Lo YM. Cell-free fetal deoxyribonucleic acid in maternal circulation as a marker of fetal-maternal hemorrhage in patients undergoing external cephalic version near term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183(3):712–6.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Lau TK, Lo KW, Leung TY, Fok WY, Rogers MS. Outcome of labour after successful external cephalic version at term complicated by isolated transient fetal bradycardia. BJOG. 2000;107(3):401–5.CrossRefPubMed Lau TK, Lo KW, Leung TY, Fok WY, Rogers MS. Outcome of labour after successful external cephalic version at term complicated by isolated transient fetal bradycardia. BJOG. 2000;107(3):401–5.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kuppens SM, Kooistra L, Hasaart TH, van der Donk RW, Vader HL, Oei GS, et al. Maternal thyroid function and the outcome of external cephalic version: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kuppens SM, Kooistra L, Hasaart TH, van der Donk RW, Vader HL, Oei GS, et al. Maternal thyroid function and the outcome of external cephalic version: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:10.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Leung TY, Fok WY, Chan LW, Law W, Lau TK. Prediction of intrapartum cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal status after a successful external cephalic version by a low pre-version pulsatility index of the fetal middle cerebral artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:416–9.CrossRefPubMed Leung TY, Fok WY, Chan LW, Law W, Lau TK. Prediction of intrapartum cesarean delivery for non-reassuring fetal status after a successful external cephalic version by a low pre-version pulsatility index of the fetal middle cerebral artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:416–9.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Leung TY, Sahota DS, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK. Quantification of contact surface pressure exerted during external cephalic version. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(11):1017–22.CrossRefPubMed Leung TY, Sahota DS, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK. Quantification of contact surface pressure exerted during external cephalic version. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;82(11):1017–22.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Fetal heart rate abnormalities during and after external cephalic version: Which fetuses are at risk and how are they delivered?
Authors
Simone M. Kuppens
Ida Smailbegovic
Saskia Houterman
Ingrid de Leeuw
Tom H. Hasaart
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2017
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-017-1547-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2017

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2017 Go to the issue