Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2010

01-02-2010 | Original Article

Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography

Authors: Georgios Galazios, Grigorios Tripsianis, Panagiotis Tsikouras, Nikoleta Koutlaki, Vasilios Liberis

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

In this study, we tried to establish cut-off values for more than one parameters of computerized cardiotocography (c CTG) in the prediction of fetal distress during labor, using a group of pregnant women with low-risk pregnancies.

Method

A retrospective study was performed. Data were collected from 167 patients for measurements of fetal heart rate (FHR) variables and perinatal outcome. Computerized CTG was performed with an Oxford Sonicaid monitor with connection to a 8000 system for CTG spontaneous analysis. The following c CTG variables were considered: FHR, number of accelerations, the presence and the number of episodes of high and low variation, the number of decelerations, short-term variation (STV), peaks of contractions (per hour) and fetal movements assessed by maternal perception (per hour). Computerized CTG recordings started not earlier than the beginning of week 38 of gestation. Immediately after delivery, blood sample was collected from umbilical artery for umbilical artery blood gas analysis (UBGA). The main UBGA parameter in cord umbilical artery that was considered for analysis was pH. pH values <7.25 were considered as suspicious for acidemia and pH values ≥7.25 as normal.

Results

Women suspicious for fetal distress during labor presented significantly lower fetal movements (P = 0.026), accelerations (P = 0.018), variability (P < 0.001), number of high episodes (P < 0.001), higher values of FHR baseline (P < 0.001) and low episodes (P < 0.001). Only the number of decelerations did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.545). The cut-off points of 5.00 for STV and 3.00 for high episodes were determined to classify women with fetal distress, which yielded high sensitivities (34 and 52%) and specificities (96.6 and 94.9%), with positive predictive values of 81.0 and 81.3% and negative predictive values of 77.4 and 82.2%, respectively.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we believe that not only STV but also other components of the cCTG, mainly the presence and the number of episodes of high variation, are related to pregnancy’s outcome as measured by an umbilical artery pH.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ferrario M, Signorini M, Magenes G et al (2006) Comparison of entropy-based regularity estimators: application to the Fetal Heart Rate Signal for the identification of fetal distress. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53:119–125. doi:10.1109/TBME.2005.859809 CrossRefPubMed Ferrario M, Signorini M, Magenes G et al (2006) Comparison of entropy-based regularity estimators: application to the Fetal Heart Rate Signal for the identification of fetal distress. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53:119–125. doi:10.​1109/​TBME.​2005.​859809 CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ayres de Campos D, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J et al (2005) Prediction of neonatal state computer analysis of fetal heart rate tracings: the antepartum arm of the SisPorto multicentre validation study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 118:52–60. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.04.013 CrossRefPubMed Ayres de Campos D, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J et al (2005) Prediction of neonatal state computer analysis of fetal heart rate tracings: the antepartum arm of the SisPorto multicentre validation study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 118:52–60. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejogrb.​2004.​04.​013 CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW (1996) Improvements in computerized fetal heart rate analysis antepartum. J Perinat Med 24:25–36CrossRefPubMed Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW (1996) Improvements in computerized fetal heart rate analysis antepartum. J Perinat Med 24:25–36CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Valensise H, Facchinetti F, Vasapollo B, Giannini F, Monte ID, Arduini D (2006) The computerized fetal heart rate analysis in post-term pregnancy identifies patients at risk for fetal distress in labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 125:185–192. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.034 CrossRefPubMed Valensise H, Facchinetti F, Vasapollo B, Giannini F, Monte ID, Arduini D (2006) The computerized fetal heart rate analysis in post-term pregnancy identifies patients at risk for fetal distress in labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 125:185–192. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejogrb.​2005.​06.​034 CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Buscicchio G, Giannubilo SR, Bezzeccheri V, Scagnoli C, Rinci A, Tranquilli AL (2006) Computerized analysis of the fetal heart rate in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 19:39–42. doi:10.1080/14767050500361505 CrossRefPubMed Buscicchio G, Giannubilo SR, Bezzeccheri V, Scagnoli C, Rinci A, Tranquilli AL (2006) Computerized analysis of the fetal heart rate in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 19:39–42. doi:10.​1080/​1476705050036150​5 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Boog G (2004) Intrapartum computerized fetal heart rate parameters and metabolic acidosis at birth. Obstet Gynecol 103:1002–1003PubMed Boog G (2004) Intrapartum computerized fetal heart rate parameters and metabolic acidosis at birth. Obstet Gynecol 103:1002–1003PubMed
10.
go back to reference Garcia GS, Mariani NC, Araujo JE, Garcia RL, Nardozza LM, Moron AF (2008) Fetal acidemia prediction through short-term variation assessed by antepartum computerized cardiotocography in pregnant women with hypertension syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 278:125–128. doi:10.1007/s00404-007-0537-8 CrossRefPubMed Garcia GS, Mariani NC, Araujo JE, Garcia RL, Nardozza LM, Moron AF (2008) Fetal acidemia prediction through short-term variation assessed by antepartum computerized cardiotocography in pregnant women with hypertension syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 278:125–128. doi:10.​1007/​s00404-007-0537-8 CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Valensise H, Arduini D, Giannini F, Conforti R, Giacomello F, Romanini C (1997) Role of antepartum computerized fetal heart rate analysis in the prediction of fetal distress during labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 73:129–134. doi:10.1016/S0301-2115(97)02740-1 CrossRefPubMed Valensise H, Arduini D, Giannini F, Conforti R, Giacomello F, Romanini C (1997) Role of antepartum computerized fetal heart rate analysis in the prediction of fetal distress during labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 73:129–134. doi:10.​1016/​S0301-2115(97)02740-1 CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Weiner Z, Farmakides G, Schulman H, Kellner L, Plancher S, Maulik D (1994) Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variation in postterm pregnancy: prediction of intrapartum fetal distress and fetal acidosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:1132–1138PubMed Weiner Z, Farmakides G, Schulman H, Kellner L, Plancher S, Maulik D (1994) Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variation in postterm pregnancy: prediction of intrapartum fetal distress and fetal acidosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:1132–1138PubMed
16.
go back to reference Guzman ER, Vintzileos AM, Martins M, Benito C, Houlihan C, Hanley M (1996) The efficacy of individual computer heart rate indices in detecting acidemia at birth in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 87:969–974. doi:10.1016/0029-7844(96)00020-8 CrossRefPubMed Guzman ER, Vintzileos AM, Martins M, Benito C, Houlihan C, Hanley M (1996) The efficacy of individual computer heart rate indices in detecting acidemia at birth in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 87:969–974. doi:10.​1016/​0029-7844(96)00020-8 CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography
Authors
Georgios Galazios
Grigorios Tripsianis
Panagiotis Tsikouras
Nikoleta Koutlaki
Vasilios Liberis
Publication date
01-02-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1119-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2/2010 Go to the issue