Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Fertility | Commentary

Queering reproductive access: reproductive justice in assisted reproductive technologies

Author: Michelle W. Tam

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Advancements in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and policy development have enabled more people to have biologically related children in Canada. However, as ART continues to focus on infertility and low fertility of heterosexual couples, ART access and research has been uneven towards meeting the reproductive needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, two-spirit, intersex, and asexual (LGBTQ2SIA +) people. Furthermore, experiences of reproduction are impacted by intersectional lived realities of race, gender, sexuality, and class. This commentary utilizes a reproductive justice (RJ) framework to consider reproductive access for LGBTQ2SIA + Black, Indigenous, and people of colour (BIPOC), while simultaneously engaging through a critical lens RJ has on ART. An RJ framework considers the constitutive elements of reproductive capacity and decision making that are not often at the forefront of reproductive health discussions. Additionally, this commentary discusses reproductive rights violations and reproductive violence such as coerced and forced sterilizations that have and are currently occurring in Canada. This article considers systems of access and structures of regulation that seek to control the reproductive capacities of marginalized communities, while empowering accessibility and upholding white supremacy and heteronormativity. In thinking through research and access in ART, who are ART users and whose reproduction is centered in research and access in Canada?

Conclusion

A reproductive justice framework is urgently needed to address inequities of sexual and reproductive health access in Canada.
Literature
3.
4.
go back to reference Mamo L, Alston-Stepnitz E. Queer intimacies and structural inequalities: new directions in stratified reproduction. J Fam Issues. 2015;36(4):519–40.CrossRef Mamo L, Alston-Stepnitz E. Queer intimacies and structural inequalities: new directions in stratified reproduction. J Fam Issues. 2015;36(4):519–40.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ross LE, Tarasoff LA, Anderson S, Epstein R, Marvel S, Steele LS. Sexual and gender minority peoples’ recommendations for assisted human reproduction services. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(2):146–53.PubMedCrossRef Ross LE, Tarasoff LA, Anderson S, Epstein R, Marvel S, Steele LS. Sexual and gender minority peoples’ recommendations for assisted human reproduction services. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(2):146–53.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Marvel S. Polymorphous reproductivity and the critique of futurity: toward a queer legal analytic for fertility law. Jindal Glob Law Rev. 2013;4(2):296–314. Marvel S. Polymorphous reproductivity and the critique of futurity: toward a queer legal analytic for fertility law. Jindal Glob Law Rev. 2013;4(2):296–314.
7.
go back to reference Combahee River Collective. A Black Feminist Statement. 1977. Combahee River Collective. A Black Feminist Statement. 1977.
8.
go back to reference Crenshaw K. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stan L Rev. 1990;43:1241.CrossRef Crenshaw K. Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stan L Rev. 1990;43:1241.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Racism DA, Control B, Rights R. In: Davis A, editor. Women, race and class. London: The Women’s Press; 1982. p. 202–71. Racism DA, Control B, Rights R. In: Davis A, editor. Women, race and class. London: The Women’s Press; 1982. p. 202–71.
10.
go back to reference Ross L, Solinger R. Reproductive justice: an introduction. California: Univ of California Press; 2017. Ross L, Solinger R. Reproductive justice: an introduction. California: Univ of California Press; 2017.
11.
go back to reference Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice. A new vision for advancing our movement for reproductive health, reproductive rights and reproductive justice. Oakland, CA; 2005. Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice. A new vision for advancing our movement for reproductive health, reproductive rights and reproductive justice. Oakland, CA; 2005.
12.
go back to reference Ross L. Understanding reproductive justice: transforming the pro-choice movement. Off Our Backs. 2006;36(4):14–9. Ross L. Understanding reproductive justice: transforming the pro-choice movement. Off Our Backs. 2006;36(4):14–9.
13.
go back to reference Ross LJ. Reproductive justice as intersectional feminist activism. Souls. 2017;19(3):286–314.CrossRef Ross LJ. Reproductive justice as intersectional feminist activism. Souls. 2017;19(3):286–314.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rebouché R. Reproducing rights: the intersection of reproductive justice and human rights. UC Irvine L Rev. 2017;7:579. Rebouché R. Reproducing rights: the intersection of reproductive justice and human rights. UC Irvine L Rev. 2017;7:579.
15.
go back to reference Macleod CI, Beynon-Jones S, Toerien M. Articulating reproductive justice through reparative justice: case studies of abortion in Great Britain and South Africa. Cult Health Sex. 2017;19(5):601–15.PubMedCrossRef Macleod CI, Beynon-Jones S, Toerien M. Articulating reproductive justice through reparative justice: case studies of abortion in Great Britain and South Africa. Cult Health Sex. 2017;19(5):601–15.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Chiweshe M, Mavuso J, Macleod C. Reproductive justice in context: South African and Zimbabwean women’s narratives of their abortion decision. Fem Psychol. 2017;27(2):203–24.CrossRef Chiweshe M, Mavuso J, Macleod C. Reproductive justice in context: South African and Zimbabwean women’s narratives of their abortion decision. Fem Psychol. 2017;27(2):203–24.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Murphy M. Seizing the means of reproduction: entanglements of feminism, health, and technoscience. Durham: Duke University Press; 2012.CrossRef Murphy M. Seizing the means of reproduction: entanglements of feminism, health, and technoscience. Durham: Duke University Press; 2012.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Roberts DE. Killing the black body: race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York: Pantheon Books; 1997. Roberts DE. Killing the black body: race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York: Pantheon Books; 1997.
21.
go back to reference Roberts DE. Race, gender, and genetic technologies: a new reproductive dystopia? Signs J Women Cult Soc. 2009;34(4):783–804.CrossRef Roberts DE. Race, gender, and genetic technologies: a new reproductive dystopia? Signs J Women Cult Soc. 2009;34(4):783–804.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Weinbaum AE. The afterlife of reproductive slavery: biocapitalism and black feminism’s philosophy of history. Durham: Duke University Press; 2019.CrossRef Weinbaum AE. The afterlife of reproductive slavery: biocapitalism and black feminism’s philosophy of history. Durham: Duke University Press; 2019.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Vora K. Limits of “labor”: Accounting for affect and the biological in transnational surrogacy and service work. S Atl Q. 2012;111(4):681–700. Vora K. Limits of “labor”: Accounting for affect and the biological in transnational surrogacy and service work. S Atl Q. 2012;111(4):681–700.
24.
go back to reference Chandra A, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, Abma JC, Jones J. Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of US women; data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. 2005. Chandra A, Martinez GM, Mosher WD, Abma JC, Jones J. Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of US women; data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. 2005.
25.
go back to reference Chambers GM, Sullivan EA, Ishihara O, Chapman MG, Adamson GD. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(6):2281–94.PubMedCrossRef Chambers GM, Sullivan EA, Ishihara O, Chapman MG, Adamson GD. The economic impact of assisted reproductive technology: a review of selected developed countries. Fertil Steril. 2009;91(6):2281–94.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Fujimoto VY, Luke B, Brown MB, Jain T, Armstrong A, Grainger DA, Hornstein MD, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Writing Group. Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):382–90.PubMedCrossRef Fujimoto VY, Luke B, Brown MB, Jain T, Armstrong A, Grainger DA, Hornstein MD, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Writing Group. Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the United States. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(2):382–90.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Gumbs AP, China M, Williams M. Revolutionary mothering: love on the front lines. Oakland: PM Press; 2016. Gumbs AP, China M, Williams M. Revolutionary mothering: love on the front lines. Oakland: PM Press; 2016.
28.
go back to reference Somerville S. Scientific racism and the emergence of the homosexual body. J Hist Sex. 1994;5(2):243–66.PubMed Somerville S. Scientific racism and the emergence of the homosexual body. J Hist Sex. 1994;5(2):243–66.PubMed
29.
go back to reference Sanger M. The eugenic value of birth control propaganda. Birth Control Rev. 1921;5(10):5. Sanger M. The eugenic value of birth control propaganda. Birth Control Rev. 1921;5(10):5.
30.
go back to reference Owens DC. Medical bondage: race, gender, and the origins of American gynecology. Athens: University of Georgia Press; 2017.CrossRef Owens DC. Medical bondage: race, gender, and the origins of American gynecology. Athens: University of Georgia Press; 2017.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Lowik A. Reproducing eugenics, reproducing while trans: the state sterilization of trans people. J GLBT Fam Stud. 2018;14(5):425–45.CrossRef Lowik A. Reproducing eugenics, reproducing while trans: the state sterilization of trans people. J GLBT Fam Stud. 2018;14(5):425–45.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kline W. Building a better race: gender, sexuality, and eugenics from the turn of the century to the baby boom. California: Univ of California Press; 2001. Kline W. Building a better race: gender, sexuality, and eugenics from the turn of the century to the baby boom. California: Univ of California Press; 2001.
33.
go back to reference Rich A. Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs. 1980;5(4):631–60.CrossRef Rich A. Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs. 1980;5(4):631–60.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Stote K. The coercive sterilization of aboriginal women in Canada. Am Indian Cult Res J. 2012;36(3):117–50.CrossRef Stote K. The coercive sterilization of aboriginal women in Canada. Am Indian Cult Res J. 2012;36(3):117–50.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Canada, Parliament, House of Commons, Standing Committee on Human Rights, Evidence of Proceedings, 42nd Parl, 1st Sess, No 42 (15 May 2019). Canada, Parliament, House of Commons, Standing Committee on Human Rights, Evidence of Proceedings, 42nd Parl, 1st Sess, No 42 (15 May 2019).
39.
go back to reference Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights. Forced and coerced sterilizations of persons in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Senate of Canada; 2021. Standing Senate Committee on Human Rights. Forced and coerced sterilizations of persons in Canada. Ottawa, ON: Senate of Canada; 2021.
40.
go back to reference Barnes L, Fledderjohann J. Reproductive justice for the invisible infertile: a critical examination of reproductive surveillance and stratification. Sociol Compass. 2020;14(2):12745. Barnes L, Fledderjohann J. Reproductive justice for the invisible infertile: a critical examination of reproductive surveillance and stratification. Sociol Compass. 2020;14(2):12745.
41.
go back to reference Ginsburg FD, Rapp R, Reiter RR, Rapp RR. Conceiving the new world order: the global politics of reproduction. California: Univ of California Press; 1995. Ginsburg FD, Rapp R, Reiter RR, Rapp RR. Conceiving the new world order: the global politics of reproduction. California: Univ of California Press; 1995.
42.
go back to reference Colen S. Stratified reproduction: the case of domestic workers in America. Wrightsville Beach, NC: American Ethnological Society Meetings; 1986. Colen S. Stratified reproduction: the case of domestic workers in America. Wrightsville Beach, NC: American Ethnological Society Meetings; 1986.
43.
go back to reference Pollitt AM, Reczek C, Umberson D. LGBTQ-parent families and health. In: LGBTQ-parent families. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 125–40. Pollitt AM, Reczek C, Umberson D. LGBTQ-parent families and health. In: LGBTQ-parent families. Cham: Springer; 2020. p. 125–40.
44.
45.
go back to reference Delgado R, Stefancic J. Critical race theory: an introduction. New York: New York University Press; 2017. Delgado R, Stefancic J. Critical race theory: an introduction. New York: New York University Press; 2017.
46.
go back to reference Omi M, Winant H. Racial formation in the United States. Milton Park: Routledge; 2018. Omi M, Winant H. Racial formation in the United States. Milton Park: Routledge; 2018.
47.
48.
go back to reference Somerville SB. The Cambridge companion to queer studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020.CrossRef Somerville SB. The Cambridge companion to queer studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2020.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Cohen CJ. Punks, bulldaggers, and welfare queens: the radical potential of queer politics? GLQ J Lesbian Gay Stud. 1997;3(4):437–65.CrossRef Cohen CJ. Punks, bulldaggers, and welfare queens: the radical potential of queer politics? GLQ J Lesbian Gay Stud. 1997;3(4):437–65.CrossRef
50.
go back to reference Snorton CR. Black on both sides: a racial history of trans identity. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press; 2017.CrossRef Snorton CR. Black on both sides: a racial history of trans identity. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press; 2017.CrossRef
51.
go back to reference Preciado B. Testo junkie: sex, drugs, and biopolitics in the pharmacopornographic era. New York: The Feminist Press at CUNY; 2013. Preciado B. Testo junkie: sex, drugs, and biopolitics in the pharmacopornographic era. New York: The Feminist Press at CUNY; 2013.
52.
go back to reference Serano J. Trans-misogyny primer. Whipping Girl. 2012;3. Serano J. Trans-misogyny primer. Whipping Girl. 2012;3.
53.
go back to reference Garwood E. Reproducing the homonormative family: neoliberalism, queer theory and same-sex reproductive law. J Int Women’s Stud. 2016;17(2):5–17. Garwood E. Reproducing the homonormative family: neoliberalism, queer theory and same-sex reproductive law. J Int Women’s Stud. 2016;17(2):5–17.
54.
go back to reference Nordqvist P. Feminist heterosexual imaginaries of reproduction: lesbian conception in feminist studies of reproductive technologies. Fem Theory. 2008;9(3):273–92.CrossRef Nordqvist P. Feminist heterosexual imaginaries of reproduction: lesbian conception in feminist studies of reproductive technologies. Fem Theory. 2008;9(3):273–92.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Franklin S. Embodied progress: a cultural account of assisted conception. Milton Park: Routledge; 2002.CrossRef Franklin S. Embodied progress: a cultural account of assisted conception. Milton Park: Routledge; 2002.CrossRef
56.
go back to reference Hayman B, Wilkes L, Halcomb E, Jackson D. Marginalised mothers: lesbian women negotiating heteronormative healthcare services. Contemp Nurse. 2013;44(1):120–7.PubMedCrossRef Hayman B, Wilkes L, Halcomb E, Jackson D. Marginalised mothers: lesbian women negotiating heteronormative healthcare services. Contemp Nurse. 2013;44(1):120–7.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Epstein R. Space invaders: queer and trans bodies in fertility clinics. Sexualities. 2018;21(7):1039–58.CrossRef Epstein R. Space invaders: queer and trans bodies in fertility clinics. Sexualities. 2018;21(7):1039–58.CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Green D, Tarasoff LA, Epstein R. Meeting the assisted human reproduction (AHR) needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer (LGBTQ) people in Canada: a fact sheet for AHR service providers. Toronto, ON: LGBTQ Parenting Network. 2012. Green D, Tarasoff LA, Epstein R. Meeting the assisted human reproduction (AHR) needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer (LGBTQ) people in Canada: a fact sheet for AHR service providers. Toronto, ON: LGBTQ Parenting Network. 2012.
59.
go back to reference Guichon J, Mitchell I, Doig C. Assisted human reproduction in common law Canada after the Supreme Court of Canada reference: moving beyond regulation by colleges of physicians and surgeons. Can J Women Law. 2013;25(2):315–39.CrossRef Guichon J, Mitchell I, Doig C. Assisted human reproduction in common law Canada after the Supreme Court of Canada reference: moving beyond regulation by colleges of physicians and surgeons. Can J Women Law. 2013;25(2):315–39.CrossRef
61.
go back to reference Assal A, Jones CA, Gotz T, Shah BR. The impact of the Ontario fertility program on duplicate fertility consultations. Healthc Policy. 2019;14(4):66.PubMedPubMedCentral Assal A, Jones CA, Gotz T, Shah BR. The impact of the Ontario fertility program on duplicate fertility consultations. Healthc Policy. 2019;14(4):66.PubMedPubMedCentral
62.
go back to reference Gotz T, Jones C. Prioritization of patients for publicly funded IVF in Ontario: a survey of fertility centres. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017;39(3):138–44.PubMedCrossRef Gotz T, Jones C. Prioritization of patients for publicly funded IVF in Ontario: a survey of fertility centres. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017;39(3):138–44.PubMedCrossRef
63.
go back to reference Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Registry (CARTR) Plus. Preliminary treatment cycle data for 2019. Ottawa, ON: Better Outcomes Registry & Network Ontario; 2021 February. Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Registry (CARTR) Plus. Preliminary treatment cycle data for 2019. Ottawa, ON: Better Outcomes Registry & Network Ontario; 2021 February.
64.
go back to reference Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Registry (CARTR) Plus. Final treatment cycle and pregnancy outcome data for 2018. Ottawa, ON: Better Outcomes Registry & Network Ontario; 2021 February. Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Registry (CARTR) Plus. Final treatment cycle and pregnancy outcome data for 2018. Ottawa, ON: Better Outcomes Registry & Network Ontario; 2021 February.
65.
go back to reference Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Zhang Y, Jewett A, Boulet SL, Warner L, Kroelinger CD, Barfield WD. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance—United States, 2017. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2020;69(9):1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Zhang Y, Jewett A, Boulet SL, Warner L, Kroelinger CD, Barfield WD. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance—United States, 2017. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2020;69(9):1.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Quinn M, Fujimoto V. Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology access and outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(5):1119–23.PubMedCrossRef Quinn M, Fujimoto V. Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology access and outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2016;105(5):1119–23.PubMedCrossRef
67.
go back to reference Wellons MF, Fujimoto VY, Baker VL, Barrington DS, Broomfield D, Catherino WH, Richard-Davis G, Ryan M, Thornton K, Armstrong AY. Race matters: a systematic review of racial/ethnic disparity in Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology reported outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(2):406–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Wellons MF, Fujimoto VY, Baker VL, Barrington DS, Broomfield D, Catherino WH, Richard-Davis G, Ryan M, Thornton K, Armstrong AY. Race matters: a systematic review of racial/ethnic disparity in Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology reported outcomes. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(2):406–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Chandra A, Copen CE, Stephen EH. Infertility service use in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982–2010: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014. Chandra A, Copen CE, Stephen EH. Infertility service use in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982–2010: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2014.
69.
go back to reference Marvel S, Tarasoff LA, Epstein R, Green D, Steele LS, Ross LE. Listening to LGBTQ people on assisted human reproduction: access to reproductive material, services, and facilities. In: Milne C, Lee IB, Lemmens TF, Martin A, editors. Regulating creation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2017. p. 325–58. Marvel S, Tarasoff LA, Epstein R, Green D, Steele LS, Ross LE. Listening to LGBTQ people on assisted human reproduction: access to reproductive material, services, and facilities. In: Milne C, Lee IB, Lemmens TF, Martin A, editors. Regulating creation. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 2017. p. 325–58.
70.
go back to reference Mamo L. Queering reproduction: achieving pregnancy in the age of technoscience. Durham: Duke University Press; 2007.CrossRef Mamo L. Queering reproduction: achieving pregnancy in the age of technoscience. Durham: Duke University Press; 2007.CrossRef
71.
go back to reference Karpman HE, Ruppel EH, Torres M. “It wasn’t feasible for us”: queer women of color navigating family formation. Fam Relat. 2018;67(1):118–31.CrossRef Karpman HE, Ruppel EH, Torres M. “It wasn’t feasible for us”: queer women of color navigating family formation. Fam Relat. 2018;67(1):118–31.CrossRef
72.
73.
go back to reference El-Mowafi IM, Yalahow A, Idriss-Wheeler D, Yaya S. The politest form of racism: sexual and reproductive health and rights paradigm in Canada. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):1–5.CrossRef El-Mowafi IM, Yalahow A, Idriss-Wheeler D, Yaya S. The politest form of racism: sexual and reproductive health and rights paradigm in Canada. Reprod Health. 2021;18(1):1–5.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Queering reproductive access: reproductive justice in assisted reproductive technologies
Author
Michelle W. Tam
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Fertility
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01214-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

Reproductive Health 1/2021 Go to the issue