Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2021

01-02-2021 | Fertility | Original Article

Higher reproductive concerns associated with fertility consultation: a cross-sectional study of young adult male cancer survivors

Authors: Julia H. Drizin, Brian W. Whitcomb, Tung-Chin Hsieh, Jessica R. Gorman

Published in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Issue 2/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study examined associations between fertility consultation (FC) and multiple dimensions of reproductive concerns among young adult (YA) male cancer survivors.

Methods

One hundred and seventy YA male cancer survivors (age 18 to 35) across the USA completed an online survey between 2016 and 2018. Participants reported demographics, receipt of FC, and reproductive concerns. Reproductive concerns were measured multidimensionally using the Reproductive Concerns after Cancer-Male scale. We used log binomial regression to examine associations between FC and high reproductive concerns across multiple domains.

Results

In multivariate analyses adjusting for desire for children, FC was associated with higher likelihood of having at least one high reproductive concern (relative risk [RR] 1.4, 95% CI 1.2–1.7). Across subscales, FC was associated with greater likelihood of having high concerns about fertility potential (RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.0–3.0), achieving pregnancy (RR 3.5, 95% CI 1.3–9.5), their (potential) child’s health (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1–2.2), and disclosing infertility to a partner (RR 2.7, 95% CI 1.8–4.1). In contrast, associations were not observed between FC and likelihood of high concerns about personal health (RR 1.4, 95% CI 0.5–3.8) or acceptance of infertility (RR 1.8, 95% CI 0.8–3.9).

Conclusions

YA male cancer survivors who received FC were more likely to have high reproductive concerns than those who did not receive FC. Men who seek out FC after cancer diagnosis may need additional support for their reproductive concerns. Research is needed to identify strategies to alleviate these concerns among this population.
Literature
1.
go back to reference American Cancer Society (2019) Cancer treatment & survivorship facts & figures 2019–2021. American Cancer Society, Atlanta American Cancer Society (2019) Cancer treatment & survivorship facts & figures 2019–2021. American Cancer Society, Atlanta
10.
go back to reference Gorman JR, Su HI, Hsieh M (2017) Measuring reproductive concerns among young adult male cancer survivors: preliminary results. Fertil Steril 108:e185–e186CrossRef Gorman JR, Su HI, Hsieh M (2017) Measuring reproductive concerns among young adult male cancer survivors: preliminary results. Fertil Steril 108:e185–e186CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Lockart BA (2019) The fertility preservation (FP) consult. In: Textbook of oncofertility research and practice: a multidisciplinary approach. Springer, Cham, pp 265–271CrossRef Lockart BA (2019) The fertility preservation (FP) consult. In: Textbook of oncofertility research and practice: a multidisciplinary approach. Springer, Cham, pp 265–271CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Green D, Galvin H, Horne B (2003) The psycho-social impact of infertility on young male cancer survivors: a qualitative study. Psychooncology 12:141–152CrossRef Green D, Galvin H, Horne B (2003) The psycho-social impact of infertility on young male cancer survivors: a qualitative study. Psychooncology 12:141–152CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Shnorhavorian M, Harlan LC, Smith AW, et al (2015) Fertility preservation knowledge, counseling, and actions among adolescent and young adult patients with cancer: a population-based study: fertility issues and AYA patients with Cancer. Cancer 121:3499–3506. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29328 Shnorhavorian M, Harlan LC, Smith AW, et al (2015) Fertility preservation knowledge, counseling, and actions among adolescent and young adult patients with cancer: a population-based study: fertility issues and AYA patients with Cancer. Cancer 121:3499–3506. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cncr.​29328
22.
go back to reference Quinn GP, Block RG, Clayman ML, Kelvin J, Arvey SR, Lee JH, Reinecke J, Sehovic I, Jacobsen PB, Reed D, Gonzalez L, Vadaparampil ST, Laronga C, Lee MC, Pow-Sang J, Eggly S, Franklin A, Shah B, Fulp WJ, Hayes-Lattin B (2015) If you did not document it, it did not happen: rates of documentation of discussion of infertility risk in adolescent and young adult oncology patients’ medical records. J Oncol Pract 11:137–144. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2014.000786CrossRefPubMed Quinn GP, Block RG, Clayman ML, Kelvin J, Arvey SR, Lee JH, Reinecke J, Sehovic I, Jacobsen PB, Reed D, Gonzalez L, Vadaparampil ST, Laronga C, Lee MC, Pow-Sang J, Eggly S, Franklin A, Shah B, Fulp WJ, Hayes-Lattin B (2015) If you did not document it, it did not happen: rates of documentation of discussion of infertility risk in adolescent and young adult oncology patients’ medical records. J Oncol Pract 11:137–144. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JOP.​2014.​000786CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Klosky JL, Wang F, Russell KM, Zhang H, Flynn JS, Huang L, Wasilewski-Masker K, Landier W, Leonard M, Albritton KH, Gupta AA, Casillas J, Colte P, Kutteh WH, Schover LR (2017) Prevalence and predictors of sperm banking in adolescents newly diagnosed with Cancer: examination of adolescent, parent, and provider factors influencing fertility preservation outcomes. J Clin Oncol 35:3830–3836. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.70.4767CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Klosky JL, Wang F, Russell KM, Zhang H, Flynn JS, Huang L, Wasilewski-Masker K, Landier W, Leonard M, Albritton KH, Gupta AA, Casillas J, Colte P, Kutteh WH, Schover LR (2017) Prevalence and predictors of sperm banking in adolescents newly diagnosed with Cancer: examination of adolescent, parent, and provider factors influencing fertility preservation outcomes. J Clin Oncol 35:3830–3836. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1200/​JCO.​2016.​70.​4767CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Deshpande NA, Braun IM, Meyer FL (2015) Impact of fertility preservation counseling and treatment on psychological outcomes among women with cancer: a systematic review: impact of FPC/FP on women with cancer. Cancer 121:3938–3947. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29637 Deshpande NA, Braun IM, Meyer FL (2015) Impact of fertility preservation counseling and treatment on psychological outcomes among women with cancer: a systematic review: impact of FPC/FP on women with cancer. Cancer 121:3938–3947. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cncr.​29637
33.
go back to reference Yee S, Fuller-Thomson E, Dwyer C, et al (2012) “Just what the doctor ordered”: factors associated with oncology patients’ decision to bank sperm. 6:5 Yee S, Fuller-Thomson E, Dwyer C, et al (2012) “Just what the doctor ordered”: factors associated with oncology patients’ decision to bank sperm. 6:5
36.
go back to reference Young K, Shliakhtsitsava K, Natarajan L, Myers E, Dietz AC, Gorman JR, Martínez ME, Whitcomb BW, Su HI (2019) Fertility counseling before cancer treatment and subsequent reproductive concerns among female adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Cancer 125:980–989. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31862CrossRefPubMed Young K, Shliakhtsitsava K, Natarajan L, Myers E, Dietz AC, Gorman JR, Martínez ME, Whitcomb BW, Su HI (2019) Fertility counseling before cancer treatment and subsequent reproductive concerns among female adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Cancer 125:980–989. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​cncr.​31862CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Szklo M, Nieto J (2019) Identifying noncausal associations: confounding. In: Epidemiology: beyond the basics, 4th edn. Jones and Bartlett, Burlington, MA, pp 175–204 Szklo M, Nieto J (2019) Identifying noncausal associations: confounding. In: Epidemiology: beyond the basics, 4th edn. Jones and Bartlett, Burlington, MA, pp 175–204
Metadata
Title
Higher reproductive concerns associated with fertility consultation: a cross-sectional study of young adult male cancer survivors
Authors
Julia H. Drizin
Brian W. Whitcomb
Tung-Chin Hsieh
Jessica R. Gorman
Publication date
01-02-2021
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Issue 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05527-5

Other articles of this Issue 2/2021

Supportive Care in Cancer 2/2021 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine