Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Reproductive Health 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2016 | Research

Fertility awareness and attitudes towards parenthood among Danish university college students

Authors: Nina Olsén Sørensen, Signe Marcussen, Mette Grønbæk Backhausen, Mette Juhl, Lone Schmidt, Tanja Tydén, Hanne Kristine Hegaard

Published in: Reproductive Health | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Postponing parenthood has steadily increased during the past decades in Western countries. This trend has affected the size of families in the direction of fewer children born per couple. In addition, higher maternal age is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy-related complications such as prematurity and foetal death, while higher paternal age increases the risk of miscarriage and affects time-to-pregnancy. Hence, understanding the circumstances and reflections that influence the decision is greatly needed and little is known about potential gender difference influencing the choice. The aim was to investigate attitudes towards parenthood, intentions for childbirth and knowledge about fertility issues among men and women.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study based on a validated 49-item questionnaire among students, who attended selected mandatory lectures at a Danish university college in February to April 2016. The participation rate was 99%, and 517 completed the questionnaire.

Results

Though the majority of all participants wished to have children in the future (>86%), there was significant difference between the genders (p = 0.002). Women rated having children to be more important than men did (p < 0.001), while men rated higher the likelihood of abstaining from having children if faced with infertility (p = 0.003). Knowledge about fertility issues was similar between genders including poor knowledge about the age-related decline in female fertility. While women found it more important to have children before being ‘too old’ (p = 0.04), still more than 40% of all respondents intended to have their last child after the age of 35 years. For both genders the most important prerequisite for parenthood was having a partner to share responsibility with. Perceived or experienced life changes related to parenthood were generally positive such as personal development.

Conclusion

The majority of respondents wished to have children, but many desired to have these after the biological decline in female fertility. The moderate knowledge level among both genders uncovered in this study is of concern. Future research should address the potential link between fertility knowledge and planning of parenthood. We may benefit from intervention studies examining the effect of routine preconception care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schmidt L, Sobotka T, Bentzen JG, Nyboe Andersen A, ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(1):29–43.CrossRefPubMed Schmidt L, Sobotka T, Bentzen JG, Nyboe Andersen A, ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. Demographic and medical consequences of the postponement of parenthood. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18(1):29–43.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Sobotka T. Is Lowest-Low Fertility in Europe Explained by the Postponement of Childbearing? Popul Dev Rev. 2004;30(2):195–220.CrossRef Sobotka T. Is Lowest-Low Fertility in Europe Explained by the Postponement of Childbearing? Popul Dev Rev. 2004;30(2):195–220.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Balasch J, Gratacós E. Delayed childbearing: effects on fertility and the outcome of pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;24(3):187–93.CrossRefPubMed Balasch J, Gratacós E. Delayed childbearing: effects on fertility and the outcome of pregnancy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;24(3):187–93.CrossRefPubMed
7.
9.
go back to reference Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD iLibrary, editor. Doing better for families. Paris: OECD; 2011. p. 275. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD iLibrary, editor. Doing better for families. Paris: OECD; 2011. p. 275.
10.
go back to reference Delbaere I, Verstraelen H, Goetgeluk S, Martens G, De Backer G, Temmerman M. Pregnancy outcome in primiparae of advanced maternal age. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;135(1):41–6.CrossRefPubMed Delbaere I, Verstraelen H, Goetgeluk S, Martens G, De Backer G, Temmerman M. Pregnancy outcome in primiparae of advanced maternal age. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;135(1):41–6.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kenny LC, Lavender T, McNamee R, O’Neill SM, Mills T, Khashan AS. Advanced Maternal Age and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome: Evidence from a Large Contemporary Cohort. Shi Q, editor. PLoS ONE. 2013. 20;8(2):e56583. Kenny LC, Lavender T, McNamee R, O’Neill SM, Mills T, Khashan AS. Advanced Maternal Age and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome: Evidence from a Large Contemporary Cohort. Shi Q, editor. PLoS ONE. 2013. 20;8(2):e56583.
13.
go back to reference Leridon H. Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(7):1548–53.CrossRefPubMed Leridon H. Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(7):1548–53.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Schmidt L. Social and psychological consequences of infertility and assisted reproduction–what are the research priorities? Hum Fertil. 2009;12(1):14–20.CrossRef Schmidt L. Social and psychological consequences of infertility and assisted reproduction–what are the research priorities? Hum Fertil. 2009;12(1):14–20.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yli-Kuha A-N, Gissler M, Klemetti R, Luoto R, Koivisto E, Hemminki E. Psychiatric disorders leading to hospitalization before and after infertility treatments. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(8):2018–23.CrossRefPubMed Yli-Kuha A-N, Gissler M, Klemetti R, Luoto R, Koivisto E, Hemminki E. Psychiatric disorders leading to hospitalization before and after infertility treatments. Hum Reprod. 2010;25(8):2018–23.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Andersson G, Rønsen M, Knudsen LB, Lappegård T, Neyer G, Skrede K, et al. Cohort fertility patterns in the nordic countries. Demogr Res. 2009;20:313–52.CrossRef Andersson G, Rønsen M, Knudsen LB, Lappegård T, Neyer G, Skrede K, et al. Cohort fertility patterns in the nordic countries. Demogr Res. 2009;20:313–52.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Knudsen LB. Fertilitetsudviklingen [Fertility, in Danish]. In: Fertilitet og sundhed [Fertility and health, in Danish]. Copenhagen; 2012. p. 15–38. Knudsen LB. Fertilitetsudviklingen [Fertility, in Danish]. In: Fertilitet og sundhed [Fertility and health, in Danish]. Copenhagen; 2012. p. 15–38.
18.
go back to reference Danmarks Statistik. Befolkningens udvikling 2014 = Vital statistics 2014. Kbh.; 2016. Danmarks Statistik. Befolkningens udvikling 2014 = Vital statistics 2014. Kbh.; 2016.
19.
go back to reference Statistics Denmark. Kvinder & Mænd [Women & men, in Danish]. Copenhagen: Statistics Denmark; 2011. Statistics Denmark. Kvinder & Mænd [Women & men, in Danish]. Copenhagen: Statistics Denmark; 2011.
20.
go back to reference Statistics Denmark. Social transfer and childbirth [Dagpenge ved fødsel, in Danish]. News from Statistics Denmark number 148. 2015. Statistics Denmark. Social transfer and childbirth [Dagpenge ved fødsel, in Danish]. News from Statistics Denmark number 148. 2015.
21.
go back to reference Mills M, Rindfuss RR, McDonald P, te Velde E, on behalf of the ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(6):848–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mills M, Rindfuss RR, McDonald P, te Velde E, on behalf of the ESHRE Reproduction and Society Task Force. Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17(6):848–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Lampic C. Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics. Hum Reprod. 2005;21(2):558–64.CrossRefPubMed Lampic C. Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics. Hum Reprod. 2005;21(2):558–64.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Bunting L, Tsibulsky I, Boivin J. Fertility knowledge and beliefs about fertility treatment: findings from the International Fertility Decision-making Study. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(2):385–97.CrossRefPubMed Bunting L, Tsibulsky I, Boivin J. Fertility knowledge and beliefs about fertility treatment: findings from the International Fertility Decision-making Study. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(2):385–97.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Sundhedsstyrelsen, Miljø- og Fødevarestyrelsen. MaybeBaby - oplysningskampagne om fertilitet [Internet]. Available from: http://maybebaby.dk/. Accessed 14 June 2016. Sundhedsstyrelsen, Miljø- og Fødevarestyrelsen. MaybeBaby - oplysningskampagne om fertilitet [Internet]. Available from: http://​maybebaby.​dk/​. Accessed 14 June 2016.
25.
go back to reference Peterson BD, Pirritano M, Tucker L, Lampic C. Fertility awareness and parenting attitudes among American male and female undergraduate university students. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(5):1375–82.CrossRefPubMed Peterson BD, Pirritano M, Tucker L, Lampic C. Fertility awareness and parenting attitudes among American male and female undergraduate university students. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(5):1375–82.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C, Karlström P-O, Tydén T. Attitudes toward parenthood and awareness of fertility among postgraduate students in Sweden. Gend Med. 2006;3(3):187–95.CrossRefPubMed Skoog Svanberg A, Lampic C, Karlström P-O, Tydén T. Attitudes toward parenthood and awareness of fertility among postgraduate students in Sweden. Gend Med. 2006;3(3):187–95.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Tydén T, Svanberg AS, Karlström P-O, Lihoff L, Lampic C. Female university students’ attitudes to future motherhood and their understanding about fertility. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2006;11(3):181–9.CrossRefPubMed Tydén T, Svanberg AS, Karlström P-O, Lihoff L, Lampic C. Female university students’ attitudes to future motherhood and their understanding about fertility. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2006;11(3):181–9.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Mogilevkina I, Stern J, Melnik D, Getsko E, Tydén T. Ukrainian medical students’ attitudes to parenthood and knowledge of fertility. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;22:1–6. Mogilevkina I, Stern J, Melnik D, Getsko E, Tydén T. Ukrainian medical students’ attitudes to parenthood and knowledge of fertility. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;22:1–6.
31.
go back to reference Johnson K, Posner S, Biermann J, Cordero J, Atrash H, Parker C, et al. Recommendations to Improve Preconception Health and Health Care -United States. A report of the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care. CDC; 2006. p. 1–23. Report No.: 55. Johnson K, Posner S, Biermann J, Cordero J, Atrash H, Parker C, et al. Recommendations to Improve Preconception Health and Health Care -United States. A report of the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care. CDC; 2006. p. 1–23. Report No.: 55.
32.
go back to reference Stern J, Larsson M, Kristiansson P, Tyden T. Introducing reproductive life plan-based information in contraceptive counselling: an RCT. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(9):2450–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stern J, Larsson M, Kristiansson P, Tyden T. Introducing reproductive life plan-based information in contraceptive counselling: an RCT. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(9):2450–61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Daniluk JC, Koert E. Fertility awareness online: the efficacy of a fertility education website in increasing knowledge and changing fertility beliefs. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(2):353–63.CrossRefPubMed Daniluk JC, Koert E. Fertility awareness online: the efficacy of a fertility education website in increasing knowledge and changing fertility beliefs. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(2):353–63.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Vassard D, Lallemant C, Nyboe Andersen A, Macklon N, Schmidt L. A population-based survey on family intentions and fertility awareness in women and men in the United Kingdom and Denmark. Ups J Med Sci. 2016;27:1–8. Vassard D, Lallemant C, Nyboe Andersen A, Macklon N, Schmidt L. A population-based survey on family intentions and fertility awareness in women and men in the United Kingdom and Denmark. Ups J Med Sci. 2016;27:1–8.
35.
go back to reference The European IVF-monitoring programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2001. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(5):1158–76.CrossRef The European IVF-monitoring programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2001. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(5):1158–76.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Chan CHY, Chan THY, Peterson BD, Lampic C, Tam MYJ. Intentions and attitudes towards parenthood and fertility awareness among Chinese university students in Hong Kong: a comparison with Western samples. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(2):364–72.CrossRefPubMed Chan CHY, Chan THY, Peterson BD, Lampic C, Tam MYJ. Intentions and attitudes towards parenthood and fertility awareness among Chinese university students in Hong Kong: a comparison with Western samples. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(2):364–72.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Dunson DB. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(5):1399–403.CrossRefPubMed Dunson DB. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(5):1399–403.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Fertility awareness and attitudes towards parenthood among Danish university college students
Authors
Nina Olsén Sørensen
Signe Marcussen
Mette Grønbæk Backhausen
Mette Juhl
Lone Schmidt
Tanja Tydén
Hanne Kristine Hegaard
Publication date
01-12-2016
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Reproductive Health / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1742-4755
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0258-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Reproductive Health 1/2015 Go to the issue