Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 4/2022

Open Access 19-02-2022 | Femoral Fracture | Review Article

Total hip arthroplasty compared to bipolar and unipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced hip fractures in the elderly: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Authors: Filippo Migliorini, Nicola Maffulli, Mira Trivellas, Jörg Eschweiler, Frank Hildebrand, Marcel Betsch

Published in: European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery | Issue 4/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Displaced femoral neck fractures (FNF) usually require surgical treatment with either a total hip arthroplasty (THA), unipolar hemiarthroplasty (U-HHA), or bipolar hemiarthroplasty (B-HHA). However, there is still controversy regarding the optimal implant. This network meta-analysis compared the outcomes and complication rates of THA versus B-HHA and versus U-HHA in elderly patients with FNF.

Material and methods

This study was conducted according to the PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews, and incorporated network meta-analyses of health care interventions. The literature search was performed in September 2020. All randomized clinical trials comparing two or more of the index surgical interventions for displaced FNF in the elderly were eligible for inclusion. For the Bayesian network meta-analysis, the standardized mean difference (SMD) and Log Odd Ratio (LOR) were used.

Results

Data from 24 RCTs (2808 procedures) were analysed. The mean follow-up was 33.8 months. The THA group had the longest surgical time (SMD 85.74) and the greatest Harris Hip Score (SMD − 17.31). THA scored similarly in terms of mortality (LOR 3.89), but had lower rates of revision surgeries (LOR 2.24), higher rates of dislocations (LOR 2.60), and lower rates of acetabular erosion (LOR − 0.02). Cementless implants required a shorter surgical duration (− 18.05 min; P = 0.03). Mortality was positively associated with acetabular erosion (P = 0.006), female gender (P = 0.007), revision (P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

THA led to the highest Harris Hip scores and lowest rate of revision surgery compared to B-HHA and U-HHA. However, B-HHA had the lowest dislocation rate when compared with U-HHA and THA. No significant differences in functional outcomes and complication rates were found between cemented and uncemented implants; however, a tendency for lower mortality, revision and dislocation rates in cemented implants was evidenced.

Level of evidence

I, Bayesian network meta-analysis of RCTs.
Literature
9.
go back to reference Butler M et al (2009) Treatment of common hip fractures. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep), 1–85, v Butler M et al (2009) Treatment of common hip fractures. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep), 1–85, v
31.
go back to reference Christie J, Robinson CM, Singer B, Ray DC. Medullary lavage reduces embolic phenomena and cardiopulmonary changes during cemented hemiarthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:456–9.CrossRef Christie J, Robinson CM, Singer B, Ray DC. Medullary lavage reduces embolic phenomena and cardiopulmonary changes during cemented hemiarthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77:456–9.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Brown RM, Wheelwright EF, Chalmers J. Removal of metal implants after fracture surgery–indications and complications. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1993;38:96–100.PubMed Brown RM, Wheelwright EF, Chalmers J. Removal of metal implants after fracture surgery–indications and complications. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1993;38:96–100.PubMed
45.
go back to reference Woon CYL, Moretti VM, Schwartz BE, Goldberg BA. Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty: US National Trends in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017;46:E474–8. Woon CYL, Moretti VM, Schwartz BE, Goldberg BA. Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty: US National Trends in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017;46:E474–8.
61.
go back to reference Calder SJ, Anderson GH, Jagger C, Harper WM, Gregg PJ. Unipolar or bipolar prosthesis for displaced intracapsular hip fracture in octogenarians: a randomised prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:391–4.CrossRef Calder SJ, Anderson GH, Jagger C, Harper WM, Gregg PJ. Unipolar or bipolar prosthesis for displaced intracapsular hip fracture in octogenarians: a randomised prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996;78:391–4.CrossRef
62.
go back to reference Cornell CN, Levine D, O’Doherty J, Lyden J. Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;348:67–71.CrossRef Cornell CN, Levine D, O’Doherty J, Lyden J. Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;348:67–71.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Davison JN, et al. Treatment for displaced intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur. A prospective, randomised trial in patients aged 65 to 79 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:206–12.CrossRef Davison JN, et al. Treatment for displaced intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur. A prospective, randomised trial in patients aged 65 to 79 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:206–12.CrossRef
67.
68.
go back to reference Malhotra R, Arya R, Bhan S. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1995;114:79–82.CrossRef Malhotra R, Arya R, Bhan S. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1995;114:79–82.CrossRef
69.
go back to reference Mishra AK, Chalise PK, Shah SB, Adhikari V, Singh RP. Comparative study in surgical outcome of intracapsular fracture neck of femur in active elderly patients treated with hemiarthroplasty with Austin Moore’s and bipolar prosthesis. Nepal Med Coll J. 2013;15:81–3.PubMed Mishra AK, Chalise PK, Shah SB, Adhikari V, Singh RP. Comparative study in surgical outcome of intracapsular fracture neck of femur in active elderly patients treated with hemiarthroplasty with Austin Moore’s and bipolar prosthesis. Nepal Med Coll J. 2013;15:81–3.PubMed
71.
go back to reference Naser MA, Pathak R, Ahmad A. Superiority of fixed stem bipolar prosthesis over Austin Moore prosthetic in fracture neck femur. Int J Res Orthop. 2018;4(4):577–81.CrossRef Naser MA, Pathak R, Ahmad A. Superiority of fixed stem bipolar prosthesis over Austin Moore prosthetic in fracture neck femur. Int J Res Orthop. 2018;4(4):577–81.CrossRef
72.
go back to reference Pr N, Hg KK, Pr C, Rn B. Prospective randomised control study of bipolar versus unipolar prosthesis in the management of fracture neck of femur in elderly patients. Int J Orth Sci. 2018;4(2):501–4.CrossRef Pr N, Hg KK, Pr C, Rn B. Prospective randomised control study of bipolar versus unipolar prosthesis in the management of fracture neck of femur in elderly patients. Int J Orth Sci. 2018;4(2):501–4.CrossRef
73.
go back to reference Ravikumar KJ, Marsh G. Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures of femur–13 year results of a prospective randomised study. Injury. 2000;31:793–7.CrossRef Ravikumar KJ, Marsh G. Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures of femur–13 year results of a prospective randomised study. Injury. 2000;31:793–7.CrossRef
76.
go back to reference Vishwanath C, Mummigatti SB. Comparative study between Austin Moore prosthesis and bipolar prosthesis in fracture neck of femur. Clin Orthop. 2017;1(2):53–61. Vishwanath C, Mummigatti SB. Comparative study between Austin Moore prosthesis and bipolar prosthesis in fracture neck of femur. Clin Orthop. 2017;1(2):53–61.
Metadata
Title
Total hip arthroplasty compared to bipolar and unipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced hip fractures in the elderly: a Bayesian network meta-analysis
Authors
Filippo Migliorini
Nicola Maffulli
Mira Trivellas
Jörg Eschweiler
Frank Hildebrand
Marcel Betsch
Publication date
19-02-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery / Issue 4/2022
Print ISSN: 1863-9933
Electronic ISSN: 1863-9941
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-022-01905-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2022

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 4/2022 Go to the issue