Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Orthopaedics 6/2010

01-08-2010 | Original Paper

Femoral bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty with uncemented taper-design stem: a five year follow-up study

Authors: Rocco P. Pitto, Annabel Hayward, Cameron Walker, Vickie B. Shim

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

We measured bone density (BD) changes to assess adaptive bone remodelling five years after uncemented total hip arthroplasty with taper-design femoral component using quantitative computed-tomography-assisted osteodensitometry (qCT). Nineteen consecutive patients (21 hips) with degenerative joint disease were enrolled in the study. A press-fit cup and a tapered uncemented stem ceramic−ceramic pairing were used in all patients. Serial clinical, radiological and qCT osteodensitometry assessments were performed after the index operation and at the one, two and five year follow-ups. At the latest follow-up, the clinical outcome was rated satisfactory in all hips. The radiological assessment showed signs of osteointegration with stable fixation of all cups and stems. Overall, there was evidence of a BD loss at year five (p = 0.004). We estimate that BD loss was between 2.2% and 12.1% in comparison with baseline postoperative values. Progressive loss of BD in the metaphyseal region was observed in all hips. We found unremarkable BD changes of diaphyseal cortical BD throughout the five year follow-up period. qCT osteodensitometry technology allows differentiation of cortical and cancellous BD changes over time. Periprosthetic BD changes at the five year follow-up are suggestive of stable stem osteointegration with proximal femoral diaphysis load transfer and metaphyseal stress shielding.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14:231–242CrossRefPubMed Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM, Gruen TA, Bognar B, Malluche HH (1993) Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone 14:231–242CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 69:45–55 Engh CA, Bobyn JD, Glassman AH (1987) Porous-coated hip replacement. The factors governing bone ingrowth, stress shielding, and clinical results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 69:45–55
4.
go back to reference Gibbons CE, Davies AJ, Amis AA, Olearnik H, Parker BC, Scott JE (2001) Periprosthetic bone mineral density changes with femoral components of differing design philosophy. Int Orthop 25:89–92CrossRefPubMed Gibbons CE, Davies AJ, Amis AA, Olearnik H, Parker BC, Scott JE (2001) Periprosthetic bone mineral density changes with femoral components of differing design philosophy. Int Orthop 25:89–92CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Huiskes R, Weinans H, Dalstra M (1989) Adaptive bone remodelling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 12:1255–1267PubMed Huiskes R, Weinans H, Dalstra M (1989) Adaptive bone remodelling and biomechanical design considerations for noncemented total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 12:1255–1267PubMed
6.
go back to reference Laine HJ, Puolakka TJ, Moilanen T, Pajamaki KJ, Wirta J, Lehto MU (2000) The effects of cementless femoral stem shape and proximal surface texture on ‘fit-and-fill’ characteristics and on bone remodeling. Int Orthop 24:184–190CrossRefPubMed Laine HJ, Puolakka TJ, Moilanen T, Pajamaki KJ, Wirta J, Lehto MU (2000) The effects of cementless femoral stem shape and proximal surface texture on ‘fit-and-fill’ characteristics and on bone remodeling. Int Orthop 24:184–190CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Leali A, Fetto JF (2004) Preservation of femoral bone mass after total hip replacements with a lateral flare stem. Int Orthop 28:151–154CrossRefPubMed Leali A, Fetto JF (2004) Preservation of femoral bone mass after total hip replacements with a lateral flare stem. Int Orthop 28:151–154CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Martini F, Sell S, Kremling E, Kusswetter W (1996) Determination of periprosthetic bone density with the DEXA method after implantation of custom-made uncemented femoral stems. Int Orthop 20:218–221CrossRefPubMed Martini F, Sell S, Kremling E, Kusswetter W (1996) Determination of periprosthetic bone density with the DEXA method after implantation of custom-made uncemented femoral stems. Int Orthop 20:218–221CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Niinimaki T, Junila J, Jalovaara P (2001) A proximal fixed anatomic femoral stem reduces stress shielding. Int Orthop 25:85–88CrossRefPubMed Niinimaki T, Junila J, Jalovaara P (2001) A proximal fixed anatomic femoral stem reduces stress shielding. Int Orthop 25:85–88CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pandit S, Graydon A, Bradley WC, Munro J, Pitto RP (2006) CT-osteodensitometry in modern uncemented taper-design stem with hydroxyapatite coating. Australia-NZ J of Surg 76:778–781CrossRef Pandit S, Graydon A, Bradley WC, Munro J, Pitto RP (2006) CT-osteodensitometry in modern uncemented taper-design stem with hydroxyapatite coating. Australia-NZ J of Surg 76:778–781CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pitto RP, Bhargava A, Pandit S, Walker C, Munro JT (2008) Quantitative CT-assisted osteodensitometry of femoral adaptive bone remodelling after uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32:589–595CrossRefPubMed Pitto RP, Bhargava A, Pandit S, Walker C, Munro JT (2008) Quantitative CT-assisted osteodensitometry of femoral adaptive bone remodelling after uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 32:589–595CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Pitto RP, Mueller L, Reilly K, Schmidt R, Munro J (2007) Quantitative computer assisted osteodensitometry in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 31:431–438CrossRefPubMed Pitto RP, Mueller L, Reilly K, Schmidt R, Munro J (2007) Quantitative computer assisted osteodensitometry in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 31:431–438CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rosenthall L, Bobyn JD, Tanzer M (1999) Bone densitometry: influence of prosthetic design and hydroxyapatite coating on regional adaptive bone remodelling. Int Orthop 23:325–329CrossRefPubMed Rosenthall L, Bobyn JD, Tanzer M (1999) Bone densitometry: influence of prosthetic design and hydroxyapatite coating on regional adaptive bone remodelling. Int Orthop 23:325–329CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Sanchez-Sotelo J, Lewallen DG, Harmsen WS, Harrington J, Cabanela ME (2004) Comparison of wear and osteolysis in hip replacement using two different coatings of the femoral stem. Int Orthop 28:206–210CrossRefPubMed Sanchez-Sotelo J, Lewallen DG, Harmsen WS, Harrington J, Cabanela ME (2004) Comparison of wear and osteolysis in hip replacement using two different coatings of the femoral stem. Int Orthop 28:206–210CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Schmidt R, Nowak TE, Mueller L, Pitto RP (2004) Osteodensitometry after total hip replacement with uncemented taper-design stem. Int Orthop 28:74–77CrossRefPubMed Schmidt R, Nowak TE, Mueller L, Pitto RP (2004) Osteodensitometry after total hip replacement with uncemented taper-design stem. Int Orthop 28:74–77CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Schmidt R, Pitto RP, Kress A, Ehremann C, Nowak TE, Reulbach U, Forst R, Muller L (2005) Inter- and Intraobserver assessment of periacetabular osteodensitometry after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography. Arch Ortho Trauma Surg 125:291–297CrossRef Schmidt R, Pitto RP, Kress A, Ehremann C, Nowak TE, Reulbach U, Forst R, Muller L (2005) Inter- and Intraobserver assessment of periacetabular osteodensitometry after cemented and uncemented total hip arthroplasty using computed tomography. Arch Ortho Trauma Surg 125:291–297CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Scott DF, Jaffe WL (1996) Host-bone response to porous-coated cobalt-chrome and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium femoral components in hip arthroplasty. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of paired bilateral cases at 5 to 7 years. J Arthroplasty 11:429–437CrossRefPubMed Scott DF, Jaffe WL (1996) Host-bone response to porous-coated cobalt-chrome and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium femoral components in hip arthroplasty. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry analysis of paired bilateral cases at 5 to 7 years. J Arthroplasty 11:429–437CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Shim V, Pitto RP, Streicher RM, Hunter PJ, Anderson IA (2007) The use of sparse CT datasets for auto-generating FE models of the femur and pelvis. J of Biomechanics 40:26–35CrossRef Shim V, Pitto RP, Streicher RM, Hunter PJ, Anderson IA (2007) The use of sparse CT datasets for auto-generating FE models of the femur and pelvis. J of Biomechanics 40:26–35CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Weber D, Pomeroy DL, Brown R, Schaper LA, Badenhausen WE Jr, Smith W, Curry JI, Suthers KE (2000) Proximally porous coated femoral stem in total hip replacement−5- to 13-year follow-up report. Int Orthop 24:97–100CrossRefPubMed Weber D, Pomeroy DL, Brown R, Schaper LA, Badenhausen WE Jr, Smith W, Curry JI, Suthers KE (2000) Proximally porous coated femoral stem in total hip replacement−5- to 13-year follow-up report. Int Orthop 24:97–100CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Zerahn B, Lausten GS, Kanstrup IL (2004) Prospective comparison of differences in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems. Int Orthop 28:146–150CrossRefPubMed Zerahn B, Lausten GS, Kanstrup IL (2004) Prospective comparison of differences in bone mineral density adjacent to two biomechanically different types of cementless femoral stems. Int Orthop 28:146–150CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Femoral bone density changes after total hip arthroplasty with uncemented taper-design stem: a five year follow-up study
Authors
Rocco P. Pitto
Annabel Hayward
Cameron Walker
Vickie B. Shim
Publication date
01-08-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0884-0

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

International Orthopaedics 6/2010 Go to the issue