Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Psychiatry
Published in: BMC Psychiatry 1/2015

Open Access 01-12-2015 | Research article

Female adolescent sexual and nonsexual violent offenders: a comparison of the prevalence and impact of risk and protective factors for general recidivism

Author: Claudia E. van der Put

Published in: BMC Psychiatry | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

This study adds to the scarce literature on female adolescent sexual offenders by examining differences between female adolescent sexual and nonsexual violent offenders in the prevalence and impact of dynamic risk and protective factors for general recidivism.

Method

The sample consisted of female adolescents who were convicted for a sexual offense (FSOs; n =31) or nonsexual violent offense (FNSOs; n = 407), and for whom the Washington State Juvenile Court Assessment was completed.

Results

In FSOs, considerably more protective and fewer risk factors were present than in FNSOs in almost all domains (i.e., school, relationships, family, attitude and aggression). In addition, differences in the impact of risk/protective factors on general recidivism were found. In FSOs, risk/protective factors in the family and aggression domains were especially important, whereas in FNSOs, risk/protective factors in the attitude domain were especially important.

Conclusions

The results of this study indicate that treatment programs developed for mainstream female offenders may also be useful for female sexual offenders in reducing general recidivism. Furthermore, the results are of importance for determining the main focus of treatment for both mainstream and sexual female adolescent offenders.
Literature
1.
Becker JV. Treating adolescent sex offenders. Prof Psychol Res Pr. 1990;21:362–5.CrossRef
2.
Becker JV. What we know about the characteristics and treatment of adolescents who have committed sexual offenses. Child Maltreat. 1998;3:317–29.CrossRef
3.
Worling JR, Långström N. Risk of sexual recidivism in adolescents who offend sexually: Correlates and assessment. In: Barbaree HE, WL M s, editors. The Juvenile Sex Offender. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2006. p. 219–47.
4.
Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1990.
5.
France KG, Hudson SM. The conduct disorders and the juvenile sex offender. In: Barbaree HE, Marshall WL, Hudson SM, editors. The Juvenile Sex Offender. New York, N.Y.: Guilford Press; 1993. p. 225–34.
6.
Cortoni F, Hanson RK, Coache M. The recidivism rates of female sexual offenders are low: a meta-analysis. Sex Abuse-J Res Tr. 2010;22:387–401.
7.
McCann K, Lussier P. Antisociality, sexual deviance, and sexual reoffending in juvenile sex offenders. A meta-analytical investigation. Youth Violence Juv Justice. 2008;6:63–385.CrossRef
8.
Gannon TA, Cortoni F (Eds.): Female sexual offenders: Theory, assessment and treatment. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Com, 2010.
9.
Howell JC. Diffusing research into practice using the comprehensive strategy for serious, violent, and chronic juvenile offenders. Youth Violence Juv Justice. 2003;2003(1):219–45.CrossRef
10.
Loeber R, Farrington DP, Stouthamer-Loeber M, White HR. Violence and Serious Theft: Development and Prediction from Childhood to Adulthood. New York: Routledge; 2008.
11.
Stouthamer-Loeber M, Loeber R, Wei E, Farrington DP, Wikström P-OH. Risk and promotive effects in the explanation of persistent serious delinquency in boys. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70:11–23.CrossRef
12.
Andrews DA, Bonta J. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct. 5th ed. New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis; 2010.
13.
Loeber R, Slot W, Stouthamer-Loeber M. A cumulative developmental model of risk and promotive factors. In: Loeber R, Koot HM, Slot NW, Van der Laan PH, Hoeve M, editors. Tomorrow’s criminals: The development of child delinquency and effective interventions. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Ltd; 2008. p. 133–61.
14.
Andrews DA, Bonta J. Rehabilitating criminal justice policy and practice. Psychol Pub Pol'y L. 2010;16:39–55.CrossRef
15.
Andrews DA, Zinger I, Hoge RD, Bonta J, Gendreau P, Cullen FT. Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminol. 1990;1990(28):369–404.CrossRef
16.
Dowden C, Andrews DA. What works for female offenders: a meta-analytic review. Crime Delinq. 1999;45:438–52.CrossRef
17.
Dowden C, Andrews DA. Effective correctional treatment and violent reoffending: a meta-analysis. Can J Criminol. 2000;42:449–67.
18.
Gendreau P. The Principles of Effective Intervention with Offenders. In: Harland AT, editor. Choosing Correctional Interventions that Work: Defining the Demand and Evaluating the Supply. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1996. p. 117–30.
19.
Gendreau P, Smith P, French SA. The theory of effective correctional intervention: Empirical status and future directions. In: Cullen FT, Wright JP, Blevins KR, editors. Taking stock: The status of criminological theory: Vol. 15. Advances in criminological theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction; 2006. p. 419–46.
20.
Hanson RK, Bourgon G, Helmus J, Hodgson S. The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: A meta-analysis. Crim Justice Behav. 2009;36:865–91.CrossRef
21.
Wong TM, Slotboom AM, Bijleveld CC. Risk factors for delinquency in adolescent and young adult females: a European review. Eur J Criminol. 2010;7(4):266–84.CrossRef
22.
Hubbard DJ, Pratt TC. A meta-analysis of the predictors of delinquency among girls. J Offender Rehabil. 2002;34(3):1–13.CrossRef
23.
Lipsey MW. Juvenile Delinquency Treatment. A Meta-Analytic Inquiry into the Variability of Effects. In: Cook TD, editor. Meta-Analysis for Explanation. New York: Russell Sage; 1992. p. 83–127.
24.
Moffitt TE. Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychol Rev. 1993;100(4):674.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Simourd L, Andrews DA. Correlates of delinquency: a look at gender differences. Forum on Corrections Research. 1994;6:26–31.
26.
Hubbard DJ, Pratt TC. A meta-analysis of the predictors of delinquency among girls. J Offender Rehabil. 2002;34:1–14.CrossRef
27.
Salisbury EJ, Van Voorhis P, Spiropoulos GV. The predictive validity of a gender-responsive needs assessment: an exploratory study. Crime Delinq. 2009;55:550–85.CrossRef
28.
Van der Put CE, Deković M, Hoeve M, Stams GJJM, Van der Laan PH, Langewouters F. Risk assessment of girls: are there any sex differences in risk factors for re-offending and in risk profiles? Crime Delinq. 2014;60(7):1033–56.CrossRef
29.
Zahn M. The Delinquent Girl. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press; 2009.
30.
Dekovic M. Risk and protective factors in the development of problem behavior during adolescence. J Youth Adolesc. 1999;28:667–85.CrossRef
31.
32.
Fergusson DM, Lynskey MT. Adolescent resiliency to family adversity. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1996;37:281–92.CrossRefPubMed
33.
Pollard JA, Hawkins JD, Arthur MW. Risk and protection: are both necessary to understand diverse behavioral outcomes in adolescence? Soc Work Res. 1999;23:145–59.CrossRef
34.
Rutter M. Psychosocial resilience and protective mechanisms. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1987;57:316–31.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Rutter M. Crucial Paths from Risk Indicator to Causal Mechanism. In: Lahey BB, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, editors. Causes of Conduct Disorder and Juvenile Delinquency. New York: The Guilford; 2003. p. 3–26.
36.
Sameroff AJ, Bartko WT, Baldwin A, Baldwin C, Seifer R. Family and Social Influences on the Development of Child Competence. In: Lewis M, Feiring C, editors. Families, Risk, and Competence. Mahwah: Erlbaum; 1998. p. 161–86.
37.
Farrington DP, Loeber R, Jolliffe D, Pardini DA. Promotive and Risk Processes at Different Life Stages. In: Loeber R, Farrington DP, Stouthamer-Loeber M, Raskin White H, editors. Violence and Serious Theft. Development and Prediction from Childhood to Adulthood. New York: Routledge; 2008. p. 169–230.
38.
Van der Laan AM, Veenstra R, Bogaerts S, Verhulst FC, Ormel J. Serious, minor, and non-delinquents in early adolescence: the impact of cumulative risk and promotive factors. The TRAILS study. J Abnorm Child Psych. 2010;38:339–51.CrossRef
39.
Stouthamer-Loeber M, Loeber R, Farrington DP, Zhang Q, Van Kammen WB, Maguin E. The double edge of protective and risk factors for delinquency: interrelations and developmental patterns. Dev Psychopathol. 1993;1993(5):683–701.CrossRef
40.
Van der Put CE, Van Vug ES, Stams GJJM, Hendriks J. Psychosocial and developmental characteristics of female adolescents who have committed sexual offenses. Sex Abuse-J Res Tr. 2014;26(4):330–42.CrossRef
41.
42.
Barnoski R. Washington State Juvenile Court Assessment Manual, Version 2.1. Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy; 2004.
43.
Baird SC, Storrs GM, Connelly H. Classification of Juveniles in Corrections: A Model Systems Approach. Washington D.C: Arthur D. Little, Inc; 1984.
44.
Hoge RD, Andrews DA. The Youth Level of Service/Case Management, Inventory and Manual. Ottowa, Ontario: Department of Psychology, Carleton University; 1994.
45.
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological). 1995;57(1):289–300.
46.
Rice ME, Harris GT. Comparing effect sizes in follow-up studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r. Law Hum Behav. 2005;29(5):615.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Kubik EK, Hecker JE, Righthand S. Adolescent females who have sexually offended: comparisons with delinquent adolescent female offenders and adolescent males who sexually offend. J Child Sex Abus. 2003;11(3):63–83.CrossRef
48.
Seto MC, Lalumiere ML. What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations through meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2010;4:526–75.CrossRef
49.
Van der Put CE, Van Vugt ES, Stams GJJM, Deković M, Laan V d. Risk profiles of different types of juvenile sex offenders: Differences in the prevalence and impact of risk factors for general recidivism among different types of juvenile sex offenders and non-sex offenders. Sexual Abuse J Res Tr. 2013;25(1):41–68.CrossRef
50.
Alexander JF, Parson BV. Functional Family Therapy: Principles and Procedures. Brooks/Cole: Carmel, CA; 1982.CrossRef
51.
Sexton T, Alexander JF. Functional Family Therapy: Clinical Training Manual. WA: Seattle; 2004.
52.
Goldstein AP, Glick B, Gibbs JC. Aggression Replacement Training: A Comprehensive Intervention for Aggressive Youth. Champaign, IL: Research Press; 1998.
53.
Lipton DS, Pearson FS, Cleland CM, Yee D. The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral treatment: meta-analytic outcomes from the CDATE project. In: McGuire J, editor. Offender rehabilitation and treatment/effective programmes and policies to reduce re-offending. Chichester: Wiley; 2002. p. 79–112.
54.
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
Metadata
Title
Female adolescent sexual and nonsexual violent offenders: a comparison of the prevalence and impact of risk and protective factors for general recidivism
Author
Claudia E. van der Put
Publication date
01-12-2015
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Psychiatry / Issue 1/2015
Electronic ISSN: 1471-244X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-015-0615-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

BMC Psychiatry 1/2015 Go to the issue

Research article

Roles of attachment and self-esteem: impact of early life stress on depressive symptoms among Japanese institutionalized children

Study protocol

A randomized controlled trial of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) versus treatment-as-usual (TAU) for chronic, treatment-resistant depression: study protocol

Research article

Structured follow-up by general practitioners after deliberate self-poisoning: a randomised controlled trial

Research article

Psycho-education for substance use and antisocial personality disorder: a randomized trial

Research article

The development and psychometric properties of a measure of clinicians’ attitudes to depression: the revised Depression Attitude Questionnaire (R-DAQ)

Research article

Perceptions of treatment for tics among young people with Tourette syndrome and their parents: a mixed methods study