Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Cancer Education 1/2018

01-02-2018

Feasibility Test of a Community-Relevant Intervention Designed to Promote African American Participation in Translational, Breast Cancer Disparities Research: Know About Health Options for Women (Know HOW)

Authors: Karen Hye-cheon Kim Yeary, Page Moore, Jerome Turner, Leah Dawson, Seongkum Heo, Paul Greene

Published in: Journal of Cancer Education | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

There are marked racial differences in breast cancer, the second leading cause of death among US women. Understanding the causes of these differences is essential to eliminate breast cancer inequities. More prevalent in African American than in Caucasian women, metabolic syndrome has been associated with breast cancer outcomes. Further research is needed to understand metabolic syndrome’s role in breast cancer disparities, thus novel strategies to increase minority participation in research are important. We embedded two approaches (comprehensive, focused) to increase African American participation in breast cancer research in a state-wide service program and pilot tested both approaches in rural African American women. We conducted three comprehensive and three focused outreach programs (n = 48) and assessed research participation through consent and actual provision of data for four types of data: survey, anthropometric, blood, and mammography records. The majority of participants provided written consent for all data collection procedures (96 % survey; 92 % anthropometric; 94 %, blood; 100 % mammography). There were no between group differences in consent rates. There was variation in the overall proportion of participants who provided data (96 % survey; 92 % anthropometric; 73 % blood; 40 % mammography). Women in the comprehensive approach were less likely to return for a scheduled mammogram than women in the focused approach (19 % vs 64 %, p = 0.0236). Both outreach programs promoted African American engagement in research. Differences in the provision of data by type may have been due to participant burden (i.e., time required to provide data). Study designs that embed research in service programs have promise to increase minority research participation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Society AC (2006) Cancer facts and figures 2006 Society AC (2006) Cancer facts and figures 2006
2.
go back to reference Lannin DR et al (2002) Impacting cultural attitudes in African-American women to decrease breast cancer mortality. Am J Surg 184(5):418–423CrossRefPubMed Lannin DR et al (2002) Impacting cultural attitudes in African-American women to decrease breast cancer mortality. Am J Surg 184(5):418–423CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Ward E et al (2004) Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin 54(2):78–93CrossRefPubMed Ward E et al (2004) Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin 54(2):78–93CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ford ES, Giles WH, Dietz WH (2002) Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA 287(3):356–359CrossRefPubMed Ford ES, Giles WH, Dietz WH (2002) Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among US adults: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA 287(3):356–359CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Caballero A (2003) Endothelial dysfunction in obesity and insulin resistance: a road to diabetes and heart disease. Obes Res 11(11):1278–1289CrossRefPubMed Caballero A (2003) Endothelial dysfunction in obesity and insulin resistance: a road to diabetes and heart disease. Obes Res 11(11):1278–1289CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Shavers VL, Brown ML (2002) Racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(5):334–357CrossRefPubMed Shavers VL, Brown ML (2002) Racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(5):334–357CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Xue F, Michels KB (2007) Diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and breast cancer: a review of the current evidence. Am J Clin Nutr 86(3):s823–s835PubMed Xue F, Michels KB (2007) Diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and breast cancer: a review of the current evidence. Am J Clin Nutr 86(3):s823–s835PubMed
8.
go back to reference Rose DP, Haffner SM, Baillargeon J (2007) Adiposity, the metabolic syndrome, and breast cancer in African-American and white American women. Endocr Rev 28(7):763–777CrossRefPubMed Rose DP, Haffner SM, Baillargeon J (2007) Adiposity, the metabolic syndrome, and breast cancer in African-American and white American women. Endocr Rev 28(7):763–777CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Kabat GC et al (2009) A longitudinal study of the metabolic syndrome and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 18(7):2046–2053CrossRef Kabat GC et al (2009) A longitudinal study of the metabolic syndrome and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 18(7):2046–2053CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Bjorge T et al (2010) Metabolic syndrome and breast cancer in the me-can (metabolic syndrome and cancer) project. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19(7):1737–1745CrossRef Bjorge T et al (2010) Metabolic syndrome and breast cancer in the me-can (metabolic syndrome and cancer) project. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 19(7):1737–1745CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ford JG et al (2008) Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review. Cancer 112(2):228–242CrossRefPubMed Ford JG et al (2008) Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review. Cancer 112(2):228–242CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Movsas B et al (2007) Who enrolls onto clinical oncology trials? A radiation Patterns Of Care Study analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68(4):1145–1150CrossRefPubMed Movsas B et al (2007) Who enrolls onto clinical oncology trials? A radiation Patterns Of Care Study analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68(4):1145–1150CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Ford BM et al (2006) Factors associated with enrollment in cancer genetics research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15(7):1355–1359CrossRef Ford BM et al (2006) Factors associated with enrollment in cancer genetics research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15(7):1355–1359CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Gotay CC, Wilson ME (1998) Social support and cancer screening in African American, Hispanic, and Native American women. Cancer Pract 6(1):31–37CrossRefPubMed Gotay CC, Wilson ME (1998) Social support and cancer screening in African American, Hispanic, and Native American women. Cancer Pract 6(1):31–37CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Viswanathan M et al (2004) Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment (Summary) (99):1–8 Viswanathan M et al (2004) Community-based participatory research: assessing the evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment (Summary) (99):1–8
16.
go back to reference Will JC et al (2002) Health promotion interventions for disadvantaged women: overview of the WISEWOMAN projects. J Women’s Health 2004. 13(5):484–502 Will JC et al (2002) Health promotion interventions for disadvantaged women: overview of the WISEWOMAN projects. J Women’s Health 2004. 13(5):484–502
17.
go back to reference Alexy BB, Elnitsky C (1998) Rural mobile health unit: outcomes. Public health nursing (Boston Mass) 15(1):3–11CrossRef Alexy BB, Elnitsky C (1998) Rural mobile health unit: outcomes. Public health nursing (Boston Mass) 15(1):3–11CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Harrison G ed (1997) Lower Mississippi Delta Nutrition Intervention Research Consortium. Nutrition and health Status in the Lower Mississippi Delta of Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi: A Review of Existing Data. Westat Inc: Rockville, MD Harrison G ed (1997) Lower Mississippi Delta Nutrition Intervention Research Consortium. Nutrition and health Status in the Lower Mississippi Delta of Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi: A Review of Existing Data. Westat Inc: Rockville, MD
19.
20.
go back to reference Resnicow K et al (1999) Cultural sensitivity in public health: defined and demystified. Ethn Dis 9(1):10–21PubMed Resnicow K et al (1999) Cultural sensitivity in public health: defined and demystified. Ethn Dis 9(1):10–21PubMed
21.
go back to reference Erwin DO et al (2003) Replication and dissemination of a cancer education model for African American women. Cancer Control 10(5 Suppl):13–21CrossRefPubMed Erwin DO et al (2003) Replication and dissemination of a cancer education model for African American women. Cancer Control 10(5 Suppl):13–21CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Nelson DE et al (2004) The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination. J Health Commun 9(5):443–460, discussion 81-4CrossRefPubMed Nelson DE et al (2004) The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS): development, design, and dissemination. J Health Commun 9(5):443–460, discussion 81-4CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Prevention C.f.D.C.a (2010) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010: Atlanta, Georgia Prevention C.f.D.C.a (2010) Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey Data. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2010: Atlanta, Georgia
Metadata
Title
Feasibility Test of a Community-Relevant Intervention Designed to Promote African American Participation in Translational, Breast Cancer Disparities Research: Know About Health Options for Women (Know HOW)
Authors
Karen Hye-cheon Kim Yeary
Page Moore
Jerome Turner
Leah Dawson
Seongkum Heo
Paul Greene
Publication date
01-02-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 0885-8195
Electronic ISSN: 1543-0154
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-016-1032-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Journal of Cancer Education 1/2018 Go to the issue

Editorial

New Horizons

Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine