Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Anesthesia 3/2015

01-06-2015 | Short Communication

Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale: a first pilot study

Authors: Yusuke Naito, Yuu Tanaka, Noriyuki Sasaoka, Toshio Iwata, Yuko Fujimoto, Nozomi Okamoto, Satoki Inoue, Masahiko Kawaguchi

Published in: Journal of Anesthesia | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

The Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale (PQRS) is a multi-domain tracking scale to assess recovery after surgery. The PQRS is used in seven countries and five languages; however, the Japanese version of the PQRS (PQRSj) has not been established. We therefore translated the PQRS into Japanese, and examined the feasibility, reliability and validity of the PQRSj. The time taken to complete the test was measured to assess feasibility. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated to assess reliability. The Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Japanese version of the Quality of Recovery Scale 40 (QoR-40 J) were performed for comparison with the PQRSj (validity). Fifty-one patients were enrolled in the study. The mean completion time was 3.9 min for baseline (feasibility). Cronbach’s alpha was between 0.40 and 0.94 in each domain (reliability). A relationship was shown between cognitive domain and MMSE at baseline (r = 0.65, P < 0.01); however, no relationship was found between the other domains and the MMSE and QoR-40 J. Ceiling effects were observed in 78 % of the questions. These results indicate that the PQRSj can be used to assess recovery after surgery, although it may be better to revise some of the questions to improve the validity of the PQRSj.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Royse CF, Newman S, Chung F, Stygall J, McKay RE, Boldt J, Servin FS, Hurtado I, Hannallah R, Yu B, Wilkinson DJ. Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery: the post-operative quality recovery scale. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:892–905.PubMedCrossRef Royse CF, Newman S, Chung F, Stygall J, McKay RE, Boldt J, Servin FS, Hurtado I, Hannallah R, Yu B, Wilkinson DJ. Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery: the post-operative quality recovery scale. Anesthesiology. 2010;113:892–905.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tanaka Y, Wakita T, Fukuhara S, Nishiwada M, Inoue S, Kawaguchi M, Furuya H. Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40. J Anesth. 2011;4:509–15.CrossRef Tanaka Y, Wakita T, Fukuhara S, Nishiwada M, Inoue S, Kawaguchi M, Furuya H. Validation of the Japanese version of the quality of recovery score QoR-40. J Anesth. 2011;4:509–15.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Herrera FJ, Wong J, Chung F. A systematic review of postoperative recovery outcomes measurements after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:63–9.PubMedCrossRef Herrera FJ, Wong J, Chung F. A systematic review of postoperative recovery outcomes measurements after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:63–9.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.PubMedCrossRef Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Garratt AM, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. Br Med J. 2002;324:1417–9.CrossRef Garratt AM, Schmidt L, Mackintosh A, Fitzpatrick R. Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures. Br Med J. 2002;324:1417–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford JL. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:83–90.PubMed Myles PS, Hunt JO, Nightingale CE, Fletcher H, Beh T, Tanil D, Nagy A, Rubinstein A, Ponsford JL. Development and psychometric testing of a quality of recovery score after general anesthesia and surgery in adults. Anesth Analg. 1999;88:83–90.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Talamini MA, Stanfield CL, Chang DC, Wu AW. The Surgical Recovery Index. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:596–600.PubMedCrossRef Talamini MA, Stanfield CL, Chang DC, Wu AW. The Surgical Recovery Index. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:596–600.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hogue SL, Reese PR, Colopy M, Fleisher LA, Tuman KJ, Twersky RS, Warner DS, Jamerson B. Assessing a tool to measure patient functional ability after outpatient surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:97–106.PubMed Hogue SL, Reese PR, Colopy M, Fleisher LA, Tuman KJ, Twersky RS, Warner DS, Jamerson B. Assessing a tool to measure patient functional ability after outpatient surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:97–106.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Swan BA, Maislin G. Traber KB Symptom distress and functional status changes during the first seven days after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:739–45.PubMed Swan BA, Maislin G. Traber KB Symptom distress and functional status changes during the first seven days after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 1998;86:739–45.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Oakes CL, Ellington KJ, Oakes KJ, Olson RL, Neill KM, Vacchiano CA. Assessment of post anesthesia short-term quality of life: a pilot study. AANA J. 2002;70:267–73.PubMed Oakes CL, Ellington KJ, Oakes KJ, Olson RL, Neill KM, Vacchiano CA. Assessment of post anesthesia short-term quality of life: a pilot study. AANA J. 2002;70:267–73.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–91.PubMedCrossRef Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186–91.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4:293–307.PubMedCrossRef McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4:293–307.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale: a first pilot study
Authors
Yusuke Naito
Yuu Tanaka
Noriyuki Sasaoka
Toshio Iwata
Yuko Fujimoto
Nozomi Okamoto
Satoki Inoue
Masahiko Kawaguchi
Publication date
01-06-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Journal of Anesthesia / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0913-8668
Electronic ISSN: 1438-8359
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-014-1945-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Journal of Anesthesia 3/2015 Go to the issue