Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Virchows Archiv 2/2008

01-02-2008 | Original Article

Feasibility of percutaneous organ biopsy as part of a minimally invasive perinatal autopsy

Authors: A. C. G. Breeze, F. A. Jessop, A. L. Whitehead, P. A. K. Set, L. Berman, G. A. Hackett, C. C. Lees, for the Cambridge post mortem MRI Study Group

Published in: Virchows Archiv | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

To determine the feasibility of percutaneous fetal organ biopsies in the context of a ‘minimally invasive’ perinatal autopsy after stillbirth and termination for abnormality is the aim of this study. We assessed successful biopsy rate and the proportion adequate for histological examination in 30 fetuses undergoing organ sampling before autopsy. The relationship between gestational age, body weight, death–biopsy interval, operator experience and successful biopsy rate was investigated. Significant findings from conventional block histology were compared with corresponding percutaneous biopsies. Of 210 organ biopsies attempted from seven target organs, 107 were obtained, of which 94 were adequate for pathological comment. The median delivery–autopsy interval was 4 (range 2–11) days. Adequate samples were obtained from the lung in 86% cases (95% CI 68, 96%), liver 76% (95% CI 56, 90%) and less frequently for the myocardium, kidney, adrenal, thymus and spleen. There was no relationship between biopsy success and time to biopsy, gestational age, body weight and user experience. No histological abnormalities found at autopsy were diagnosed from needle biopsies. Although targeted percutaneous biopsies appear feasible for some organs, fewer than 50% of all biopsies are adequate for histological examination. This technique cannot be considered to provide useful clinical information as part of a ‘minimally invasive’ perinatal autopsy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alderliesten ME, Peringa J, van der Hulst VP, Blaauwgeers HL, van Lith JM (2003) Perinatal mortality: clinical value of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging compared with autopsy in routine obstetric practice. BJOG 110:378–382PubMedCrossRef Alderliesten ME, Peringa J, van der Hulst VP, Blaauwgeers HL, van Lith JM (2003) Perinatal mortality: clinical value of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging compared with autopsy in routine obstetric practice. BJOG 110:378–382PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Boyd PA, Tondi F, Hicks NR, Chamberlain PF (2004) Autopsy after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 328:137PubMedCrossRef Boyd PA, Tondi F, Hicks NR, Chamberlain PF (2004) Autopsy after termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly: retrospective cohort study. BMJ 328:137PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Breeze AC, Cross JJ, Hackett GA, Jessop FA, Joubert I, Lomas DJ, Set PA, Whitehead AL, Lees CC (2006) Use of a confidence scale in reporting postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:918–924PubMedCrossRef Breeze AC, Cross JJ, Hackett GA, Jessop FA, Joubert I, Lomas DJ, Set PA, Whitehead AL, Lees CC (2006) Use of a confidence scale in reporting postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28:918–924PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Brookes JA, Hall-Craggs MA, Sams VR, Lees WR (1996) Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 348:1139–1141PubMedCrossRef Brookes JA, Hall-Craggs MA, Sams VR, Lees WR (1996) Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet 348:1139–1141PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Farina J, Millana C, Fdez-Acenero MJ, Furio V, Aragoncillo P, Martin VG, Buencuerpo J (2002) Ultrasonographic autopsy (echopsy): a new autopsy technique. Virchows Arch 440:635–639PubMedCrossRef Farina J, Millana C, Fdez-Acenero MJ, Furio V, Aragoncillo P, Martin VG, Buencuerpo J (2002) Ultrasonographic autopsy (echopsy): a new autopsy technique. Virchows Arch 440:635–639PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Foroudi F, Cheung K, Duflou J (1995) A comparison of the needle biopsy post mortem with the conventional autopsy. Pathology 27:79–82PubMedCrossRef Foroudi F, Cheung K, Duflou J (1995) A comparison of the needle biopsy post mortem with the conventional autopsy. Pathology 27:79–82PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Griffiths PD, Paley MN, Whitby EH (2005) Post-mortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal autopsy. Lancet 365:1271–1273PubMedCrossRef Griffiths PD, Paley MN, Whitby EH (2005) Post-mortem MRI as an adjunct to fetal or neonatal autopsy. Lancet 365:1271–1273PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Griffiths PD, Variend D, Evans M, Jones A, Wilkinson ID, Paley MN, Whitby E (2003) Postmortem MR imaging of the fetal and stillborn central nervous system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:22–27PubMed Griffiths PD, Variend D, Evans M, Jones A, Wilkinson ID, Paley MN, Whitby E (2003) Postmortem MR imaging of the fetal and stillborn central nervous system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:22–27PubMed
10.
go back to reference Huisman TA, Wisser J, Stallmach T, Krestin GP, Huch R, Kubik-Huch RA (2002) MR autopsy in fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther 17:58–64PubMedCrossRef Huisman TA, Wisser J, Stallmach T, Krestin GP, Huch R, Kubik-Huch RA (2002) MR autopsy in fetuses. Fetal Diagn Ther 17:58–64PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Khong TY, Tanner AR (2006) Foetal and neonatal autopsy rates and use of tissue for research: The influence of ‘organ retention’ controversy and new consent process. J Paediatr Child Health 42:366–369PubMedCrossRef Khong TY, Tanner AR (2006) Foetal and neonatal autopsy rates and use of tissue for research: The influence of ‘organ retention’ controversy and new consent process. J Paediatr Child Health 42:366–369PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Nicholl RM, Balasubramaniam VP, Urquhart DS, Sellathurai N, Rutherford MA (2007) Postmortem brain MRI with selective tissue biopsy as an adjunct to autopsy following neonatal encephalopathy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 11:167–174PubMedCrossRef Nicholl RM, Balasubramaniam VP, Urquhart DS, Sellathurai N, Rutherford MA (2007) Postmortem brain MRI with selective tissue biopsy as an adjunct to autopsy following neonatal encephalopathy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 11:167–174PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Pathologists. Fetal and perinatal pathology: report of a joint working party. London: RCOG Press, 2001 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Pathologists. Fetal and perinatal pathology: report of a joint working party. London: RCOG Press, 2001
14.
go back to reference Rushton DI (1998) Perinatal pathology: centralise or perish. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:5–7PubMed Rushton DI (1998) Perinatal pathology: centralise or perish. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 105:5–7PubMed
15.
16.
17.
go back to reference Wellman KF (1969) The needle autopsy. A retrospective evaluation of 294 consecutive cases. Am J Clin Pathol 52:441–444 Wellman KF (1969) The needle autopsy. A retrospective evaluation of 294 consecutive cases. Am J Clin Pathol 52:441–444
18.
go back to reference Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Harris DP, Jackson GM, Klatt EC, Alexander AL, Kennedy A (1997) Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:41–46PubMed Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Harris DP, Jackson GM, Klatt EC, Alexander AL, Kennedy A (1997) Postmortem fetal MR imaging: comparison with findings at autopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:41–46PubMed
Metadata
Title
Feasibility of percutaneous organ biopsy as part of a minimally invasive perinatal autopsy
Authors
A. C. G. Breeze
F. A. Jessop
A. L. Whitehead
P. A. K. Set
L. Berman
G. A. Hackett
C. C. Lees
for the Cambridge post mortem MRI Study Group
Publication date
01-02-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Virchows Archiv / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 0945-6317
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2307
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-007-0548-7

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

Virchows Archiv 2/2008 Go to the issue