Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2013

01-06-2013

Feasibility of NOTES omental plug repair of perforated peptic ulcers: results from a clinical pilot trial

Authors: Juliane Bingener, Erica A. Loomis, Christopher J. Gostout, Martin D. Zielinski, Navtej S. Buttar, Louis M. Wong Kee Song, Todd H. Baron, Leili Shahgholi Ghahfarokhi, Elizabeth Rajan

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Ulcer perforation carries up to a 30 % 1-year mortality rate. Intervention-related adverse events are among statistically significant predictors of 1-year mortality. A natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgical (NOTES) approach may be less invasive and may decrease procedure-related adverse events by diminishing the so-called second hit, thus leading to decreased morbidity and mortality. We sought to assess the feasibility of an endoscopic transluminal omental plug technique in patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcers under laparoscopic guidance.

Methods

Patients with suspected acute gastroduodenal ulcer perforations were offered participation in this prospective pilot study. Closure of the perforation was attempted using the NOTES omental plug technique. Demographic, clinical, endoscopic, and radiographic data were abstracted, as were data for morbidity, mortality, and pilot data regarding quality of life (QOL).

Results

From February 2010 through February 2012, a total of 17 patients presented to a tertiary care center with clinically suspected perforated ulcer. Of seven patients (mean age 79 years, range 64–89 years) who consented to the study, three underwent the study procedure. All patients had multiple comorbidities. Two patients presented with 4–6 mm perforated peptic ulcers and underwent successful laparoscopic-assisted NOTES omental and falciform ligament patch closure, respectively. Postoperative radiographic contrast studies showed no leak, and patients were discharged home on postoperative days 3 and 4. The third patient had undergone enterocutaneous fistula repair with herniorrhaphy 6 weeks before. Although a transluminal endoscopic approach was feasible, the omentum was under too much tension to be secured. This procedure was converted to an open omental patch repair. For all but one patient who provided consent, obtaining QOL data was feasible.

Conclusions

Initial results from a laparoscopic-assisted NOTES approach for closure of perforated peptic ulcers appear promising and enable swift recovery in selected patients. This is especially important in elderly and/or immunocompromised patients. Technical details and patient selection criteria continue to evolve.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Svanes C (2000) Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: incidence, etiology, treatment, and prognosis. World J Surg 24:277–283PubMedCrossRef Svanes C (2000) Trends in perforated peptic ulcer: incidence, etiology, treatment, and prognosis. World J Surg 24:277–283PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Thorsen K, Glomsaker TB, von Meer A, Soreide K, Soreide JA (2011) Trends in diagnosis and surgical management of patients with perforated peptic ulcer. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1329–1335PubMedCrossRef Thorsen K, Glomsaker TB, von Meer A, Soreide K, Soreide JA (2011) Trends in diagnosis and surgical management of patients with perforated peptic ulcer. J Gastrointest Surg 15:1329–1335PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Imhof M, Epstein S, Ohmann C, Roher HD (2008) Duration of survival after peptic ulcer perforation. World J Surg 32:408–412PubMedCrossRef Imhof M, Epstein S, Ohmann C, Roher HD (2008) Duration of survival after peptic ulcer perforation. World J Surg 32:408–412PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bonin EA, Moran E, Gostout CJ, McConico AL, Zielinski M, Bingener J (2012) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Surg Endosc 26:1534–1538PubMedCrossRef Bonin EA, Moran E, Gostout CJ, McConico AL, Zielinski M, Bingener J (2012) Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Surg Endosc 26:1534–1538PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Graham R (1937) The treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. Surg Gynecol Obstet 64:235–238 Graham R (1937) The treatment of perforated duodenal ulcers. Surg Gynecol Obstet 64:235–238
7.
go back to reference Turner WW Jr, Thompson WM Jr, Thal ER (1988) Perforated gastric ulcers. A plea for management by simple closures. Arch Surg 123:960–964PubMedCrossRef Turner WW Jr, Thompson WM Jr, Thal ER (1988) Perforated gastric ulcers. A plea for management by simple closures. Arch Surg 123:960–964PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lau WY, Leung KL, Kwong KH, Davey IC, Robertson C, Dawson JJ, Chung SC, Li AK (1996) A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique. Ann Surg 224:131–138PubMedCrossRef Lau WY, Leung KL, Kwong KH, Davey IC, Robertson C, Dawson JJ, Chung SC, Li AK (1996) A randomized study comparing laparoscopic versus open repair of perforated peptic ulcer using suture or sutureless technique. Ann Surg 224:131–138PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BKB, Chau CH, Li ACN, Fung KH, Tai YP, Li MKW (2002) Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 235:313–319PubMedCrossRef Siu WT, Leong HT, Law BKB, Chau CH, Li ACN, Fung KH, Tai YP, Li MKW (2002) Laparoscopic repair for perforated peptic ulcer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 235:313–319PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lam PWF, Lam MCS, Hui EKL, Sun YW, Mok FPT (2005) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: the “three-stitch” Graham patch technique. Surg Endosc 19:1627–1630PubMedCrossRef Lam PWF, Lam MCS, Hui EKL, Sun YW, Mok FPT (2005) Laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcers: the “three-stitch” Graham patch technique. Surg Endosc 19:1627–1630PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference So JB, Kum CK, Fernandes ML, Goh P (1996) Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc 10:1060–1063PubMedCrossRef So JB, Kum CK, Fernandes ML, Goh P (1996) Comparison between laparoscopic and conventional omental patch repair for perforated duodenal ulcer. Surg Endosc 10:1060–1063PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Moran EA, Gostout CJ, McConico AL, Bingener J (2010) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery used for perforated viscus repair is feasible using lower peritoneal pressures than laparoscopy in a porcine model. J Am Coll Surg 210:474–479PubMedCrossRef Moran EA, Gostout CJ, McConico AL, Bingener J (2010) Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery used for perforated viscus repair is feasible using lower peritoneal pressures than laparoscopy in a porcine model. J Am Coll Surg 210:474–479PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Hashiba K, Carvalho AM, Diniz G Jr, Barbosa de Aridrade N, Guedes CA, Siqueira Filho L, Lima CA, Coehlo HE, de Oliveira RA (2001) Experimental endoscopic repair of gastric perforations with an omental patch and clips. Gastrointest Endosc 54:500–504PubMedCrossRef Hashiba K, Carvalho AM, Diniz G Jr, Barbosa de Aridrade N, Guedes CA, Siqueira Filho L, Lima CA, Coehlo HE, de Oliveira RA (2001) Experimental endoscopic repair of gastric perforations with an omental patch and clips. Gastrointest Endosc 54:500–504PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinee S, Abbou CC, Eypasch E, Caballero MG, Lumsden MA, Millat B, Monson JR, Nilsson G, Pointner R, Schwenk W, Shamiyeh A, Szold A, Targarona E, Ure B, Neugebauer E (2004) Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 18:879–897PubMedCrossRef Korolija D, Sauerland S, Wood-Dauphinee S, Abbou CC, Eypasch E, Caballero MG, Lumsden MA, Millat B, Monson JR, Nilsson G, Pointner R, Schwenk W, Shamiyeh A, Szold A, Targarona E, Ure B, Neugebauer E (2004) Evaluation of quality of life after laparoscopic surgery: evidence-based guidelines of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery. Surg Endosc 18:879–897PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmulling C, Neugebauer E, Troidl H (1995) Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82:216–222PubMedCrossRef Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmulling C, Neugebauer E, Troidl H (1995) Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 82:216–222PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Urbach DR, Harnish JL, McIlroy JH, Streiner DL (2006) A measure of quality of life after abdominal surgery. Qual Life Res 15:1053–1061PubMedCrossRef Urbach DR, Harnish JL, McIlroy JH, Streiner DL (2006) A measure of quality of life after abdominal surgery. Qual Life Res 15:1053–1061PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Boey J, Choi SK, Poon A, Alagaratnam TT (1987) Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg 205:22–26PubMedCrossRef Boey J, Choi SK, Poon A, Alagaratnam TT (1987) Risk stratification in perforated duodenal ulcers. A prospective validation of predictive factors. Ann Surg 205:22–26PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381PubMedCrossRef Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lee KH, Chang HC, Lo CJ (2004) Endoscope-assisted laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. Am Surg 70:352–356PubMed Lee KH, Chang HC, Lo CJ (2004) Endoscope-assisted laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers. Am Surg 70:352–356PubMed
20.
go back to reference Pescatore P, Halkic N, Calmes JM, Blum A, Gillet M (1998) Combined laparoscopic–endoscopic method using an omental plug for therapy of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation. Gastrointest Endosc 48:411–414PubMedCrossRef Pescatore P, Halkic N, Calmes JM, Blum A, Gillet M (1998) Combined laparoscopic–endoscopic method using an omental plug for therapy of gastroduodenal ulcer perforation. Gastrointest Endosc 48:411–414PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Costalat G, Alquier Y (1995) Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer using the ligamentum teres hepatis (LTH). Surg Endosc 9:677–679PubMedCrossRef Costalat G, Alquier Y (1995) Combined laparoscopic and endoscopic treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer using the ligamentum teres hepatis (LTH). Surg Endosc 9:677–679PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Marks J, Ponsky J, Pearl J, McGee M (2007) PEG “rescue”: a practical NOTES technique. Surg Endosc 21:816–819PubMedCrossRef Marks J, Ponsky J, Pearl J, McGee M (2007) PEG “rescue”: a practical NOTES technique. Surg Endosc 21:816–819PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Feasibility of NOTES omental plug repair of perforated peptic ulcers: results from a clinical pilot trial
Authors
Juliane Bingener
Erica A. Loomis
Christopher J. Gostout
Martin D. Zielinski
Navtej S. Buttar
Louis M. Wong Kee Song
Todd H. Baron
Leili Shahgholi Ghahfarokhi
Elizabeth Rajan
Publication date
01-06-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2013
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2740-3

Other articles of this Issue 6/2013

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2013 Go to the issue