Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 3/2017

01-03-2017 | Otology

Feasibility of an implanted microphone for cochlear implant listening

Authors: Jean-Marc Gérard, Laurent Demanez, Caroline Salmon, Filiep Vanpoucke, Joris Walraevens, Anke Plasmans, Daniele De Siati, Philippe Lefèbvre

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the feasibility of an implanted microphone for cochlear implants (CI) by comparison of hearing outcomes, sound quality and patient satisfaction of a subcutaneous microphone to a standard external microphone of a behind-the-ear sound processor. In this prospective feasibility study with a within-subject repeated measures design comparing the microphone modalities, ten experienced adult unilateral CI users received an implantable contralateral subcutaneous microphone attached to a percutaneous plug. The signal was pre-processed and fed into their CI sound processor. Subjects compared listening modes at home for a period of up to 4 months. At the end of the study the microphone was explanted. Aided audiometric thresholds, speech understanding in quiet, and sound quality questionnaires were assessed. On average thresholds (250, 500, 750, 1k, 2k, 3k, 4k and 6 kHz) with the subcutaneous microphone were 44.9 dB, compared to 36.4 dB for the external mode. Speech understanding on sentences in quiet was high, within approximately 90% of performance levels compared to hearing with an external microphone. Body sounds were audible but not annoying to almost all subjects. This feasibility study with a research device shows significantly better results than previous studies with implanted microphones. This is attributed to technology enhancements and careful fitting. Listening effort was somewhat increased with an implanted microphone. Under good sound conditions, speech performance is nearly similar to that of external microphones demonstrating that an implanted microphone is feasible in a range of normal listening conditions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pulcherio JO, Bittencourt AG, Burke PR et al (2014) Carina and Esteem: a systematic review of fully implantable hearing devices. PLoS ONE 9(10):e110636CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pulcherio JO, Bittencourt AG, Burke PR et al (2014) Carina and Esteem: a systematic review of fully implantable hearing devices. PLoS ONE 9(10):e110636CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Briggs RJS, Eder HC, Seligman PM et al (2008) Initial clinical experience with a totally implantable cochlear implant research device. Otol Neurotol 29(2):114–119CrossRefPubMed Briggs RJS, Eder HC, Seligman PM et al (2008) Initial clinical experience with a totally implantable cochlear implant research device. Otol Neurotol 29(2):114–119CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Briggs RJS, Eder HC, Seligman PM et al (2012) Six years of experience with a totally implantable cochlear implant. In: CI conference, Baltimore Briggs RJS, Eder HC, Seligman PM et al (2012) Six years of experience with a totally implantable cochlear implant. In: CI conference, Baltimore
4.
go back to reference Jenkins HA, Uhler K (2012) Speech perception comparisons of the otologics implanted Carina™ and the Freedom™ microphones in cochlear implant patients. Otol Neurotol 33(1):13–19CrossRefPubMed Jenkins HA, Uhler K (2012) Speech perception comparisons of the otologics implanted Carina™ and the Freedom™ microphones in cochlear implant patients. Otol Neurotol 33(1):13–19CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference van den Honert C, Kelsall DC (2007) Focused intracochlear electric stimulation with phased array channels. J Acoust Soc Am 121(6):3703–3716CrossRefPubMed van den Honert C, Kelsall DC (2007) Focused intracochlear electric stimulation with phased array channels. J Acoust Soc Am 121(6):3703–3716CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Cox RM (1997) Administration and application of the APHAB. Hear J 50(4):32–48CrossRef Cox RM (1997) Administration and application of the APHAB. Hear J 50(4):32–48CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Sang J, Hu H, Zheng C et al (2015) Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners. Hear Res 327:175–185CrossRefPubMed Sang J, Hu H, Zheng C et al (2015) Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners. Hear Res 327:175–185CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Mauger SJ, Arora K, Dawson PW (2012) Cochlear implant optimized noise reduction. J Neural Eng 9(6):e065007CrossRef Mauger SJ, Arora K, Dawson PW (2012) Cochlear implant optimized noise reduction. J Neural Eng 9(6):e065007CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Perrault M (2011) Matrix test: Une harmonisation européenne des procédures de mesures audiologiques chez les implantés cochléaires. Mémoire II Université de Montpellier, pp 9–20 Perrault M (2011) Matrix test: Une harmonisation européenne des procédures de mesures audiologiques chez les implantés cochléaires. Mémoire II Université de Montpellier, pp 9–20
10.
go back to reference Vaerenberg B, De Ceulaer G, Szlávik Z et al (2014) Setting and reaching targets with computer-assisted cochlear implant fitting. Sci World J 16:64659 Vaerenberg B, De Ceulaer G, Szlávik Z et al (2014) Setting and reaching targets with computer-assisted cochlear implant fitting. Sci World J 16:64659
11.
go back to reference Martin C, Deveze A, Richard C et al (2009) European results with totally implantable Carina placed on the round window: 2-year follow-up. Otol Neurotol 30(8):1196–1203CrossRefPubMed Martin C, Deveze A, Richard C et al (2009) European results with totally implantable Carina placed on the round window: 2-year follow-up. Otol Neurotol 30(8):1196–1203CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Jenkins HA, Uhler K (2014) Otologics active middle ear implants. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 47(6):967–978CrossRefPubMed Jenkins HA, Uhler K (2014) Otologics active middle ear implants. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 47(6):967–978CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Feasibility of an implanted microphone for cochlear implant listening
Authors
Jean-Marc Gérard
Laurent Demanez
Caroline Salmon
Filiep Vanpoucke
Joris Walraevens
Anke Plasmans
Daniele De Siati
Philippe Lefèbvre
Publication date
01-03-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4410-x

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 3/2017 Go to the issue