Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Gynecological Surgery 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Techniques and Instrumentation

Feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for huge uteri without the use of uterine manipulator: description of emblematic cases

Authors: Antonio Macciò, Clelia Madeddu, Paraskevas Kotsonis, Giacomo Chiappe, Fabrizio Lavra, Ivan Collu, Roberto Demontis

Published in: Gynecological Surgery | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Uterine manipulator is a very useful tool in performing total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for large uteri; however, in some cases, it cannot be used due to unfavorable anatomical conditions. The feasibility and safety of TLH for very large uteri without the use of uterine manipulator has not yet been established.

Results

We describe two emblematic cases of TLH for huge fibromatous uteri: the first one for a uterus weighing 5700 g, which is the largest uterus laparoscopically removed to date reported in literature, and the second one for a uterus of 3670 g associated with a severe lymph node neoplastic disease.
In both cases, TLH was successfully and safely performed even without the use of uterine manipulator, thus allowing a rapid recovery, especially in the second case, which was essential for a fast start of the most appropriate oncological treatment, the best quality of life and undoubtedly cosmetic advantages.

Conclusions

Although we believe in the great usefulness of the uterine manipulator in performing TLH for huge uteri, in the present paper, we demonstrate the feasibility and safety of such complex surgery also when the use of this tool is not possible due to unfavorable anatomical condition.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Reich H, McGlynn F, Sekel L (1993) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Gynaecol Endosc 2:59–63 Reich H, McGlynn F, Sekel L (1993) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Gynaecol Endosc 2:59–63
2.
go back to reference Nassif J, Wattiez A (2010) Clermont Ferrand uterine manipulator. Surg Technol Int 20:225–231PubMed Nassif J, Wattiez A (2010) Clermont Ferrand uterine manipulator. Surg Technol Int 20:225–231PubMed
3.
go back to reference Van den Haak L, Alleblas C, Nieboer TE, Rhemrev JP, Jansen FW (2015) Efficacy and safety of uterine manipulators in laparoscopic surgery: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:1003–1011CrossRefPubMed Van den Haak L, Alleblas C, Nieboer TE, Rhemrev JP, Jansen FW (2015) Efficacy and safety of uterine manipulators in laparoscopic surgery: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:1003–1011CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Macciò A, Chiappe G, Kotsonis P, Nieddu R, Lavra F, Serra M, Onnis P, Sollai G, Zamboni F, Madeddu C (2016) Surgical outcome and complications of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very large myomatous uteri in relation to uterine weight: a prospective study in a continuous series of 461 procedures. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294:525–531CrossRefPubMed Macciò A, Chiappe G, Kotsonis P, Nieddu R, Lavra F, Serra M, Onnis P, Sollai G, Zamboni F, Madeddu C (2016) Surgical outcome and complications of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very large myomatous uteri in relation to uterine weight: a prospective study in a continuous series of 461 procedures. Arch Gynecol Obstet 294:525–531CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Macciò A, Kotsonis P, Lavra F, Chiappe G, Sanna D, Zamboni F, Madeddu C (2017) Laparoscopic removal of a very large uterus weighting 5320 g is feasible and safe: a case report. BMC Surg 17(1):50CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Macciò A, Kotsonis P, Lavra F, Chiappe G, Sanna D, Zamboni F, Madeddu C (2017) Laparoscopic removal of a very large uterus weighting 5320 g is feasible and safe: a case report. BMC Surg 17(1):50CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB (2015) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD003677 Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Tavender E, Garry R, Mol BW, Kluivers KB (2015) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8:CD003677
7.
go back to reference Sandberg EM, Twijnstra AR, Driessen SR, Jansen FW (2017) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24:206–217 e22CrossRefPubMed Sandberg EM, Twijnstra AR, Driessen SR, Jansen FW (2017) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24:206–217 e22CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Yavuzcan A, Caglar M, Ustun Y, Dilbaz S, Kumru S (2014) Evaluation of the outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy for normal and enlarged uterus (> 280 g). Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:831–837CrossRefPubMed Yavuzcan A, Caglar M, Ustun Y, Dilbaz S, Kumru S (2014) Evaluation of the outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomy for normal and enlarged uterus (> 280 g). Arch Gynecol Obstet 289:831–837CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Wu KY, Lertvikool S, Huang KG, Su H, Yen CF, Lee CL (2011) Laparoscopic hysterectomies for large uteri. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 50:411–414CrossRefPubMed Wu KY, Lertvikool S, Huang KG, Su H, Yen CF, Lee CL (2011) Laparoscopic hysterectomies for large uteri. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 50:411–414CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Mebes I, Diedrich K, Banz-Jansen C (2012) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy without uterine manipulator at big uterus weight (> 280 g). Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:131–134CrossRefPubMed Mebes I, Diedrich K, Banz-Jansen C (2012) Total laparoscopic hysterectomy without uterine manipulator at big uterus weight (> 280 g). Arch Gynecol Obstet 286:131–134CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for huge uteri without the use of uterine manipulator: description of emblematic cases
Authors
Antonio Macciò
Clelia Madeddu
Paraskevas Kotsonis
Giacomo Chiappe
Fabrizio Lavra
Ivan Collu
Roberto Demontis
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Gynecological Surgery / Issue 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1613-2076
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s10397-018-1037-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

Gynecological Surgery 1/2018 Go to the issue